On 07/12/2018 04:08 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
@Robbie thanks for fixing it.. just came into it and realized you
already did it.. thanks

Documentation link for 2.6.1 on this page is still broken for me:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html



On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Robbie Gemmell
<[email protected]> wrote:
The 2.6.1 docs link at
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html is broken. The
link itself seems fine this time and the other 2.6.1 links work, there
just dont seem to be any 2.6.1 docs.

The 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 releases aren't mentioned on
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/previous-docs.html

Robbie

On 20 June 2018 at 13:20, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
As I said some links just weren't updated to reflect the newer
checksum distribution policy, but most were broken from pointing at
the wrong download area/server and using the query arguments that
aren't used there. That suggested the content was copied unchanged
from download.html into past-releases.html, which it generally
shouldnt be.

This commit 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5e07407b600aaae38a7ed757a0008bc70cca7a712868812202189f28@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
shows a couple of issues:
- All of the links for 2.5.0 and 2.6.0 were broken except for the
release notes and commit report links. The main links pointed to the
wrong download server/area, with the tar/zip links also having query
args left from the mirror system. The doc links pointed to the central
docs page rather than the actual docs for the release.
- The 1.5.6 release entry had links pointing to .sha1 files that dont
exist. Those were presumably just missed in updating the links from
1.5.5, which did have .sha1 checksums. I updated those to link to the
.sha512 files from the current distribution policy.

The typo you mention below was trivial so I didnt call it out in the
mail but adjusted that in this commit:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3d6c90c59e30d65013a0f5bc7243434edb8eb817ffd2272b3be341de@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E

A final change is mostly just reducing indent, as I removed the
wrapper divs (presumably also copied from download.html) for the
latest entries since the earlier ones dont have those and they all
live within an outer wrapper div already:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/641671780a10b81419711805519e7a8643688be53705c844ab7520de@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E

On 19 June 2018 at 15:59, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
I will be more careful... although.. beyond a typo on the
description.. of 2.6.0 in one of the downloads.. I had something like
<a href = "....2.6.0..."> 2.5.0 </a> what was the actual mistake.


I'm a bit rusty in svn.. and even though I could find the diff.. I did
not understand what was my actual mistake.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Robbie Gemmell
<[email protected]> wrote:
I tried downloading some Artemis bits using links from the website
earlier and found various links not working. Some just weren't updated
to reflect the newer checksum distribution policy, but most were
broken from pointing at the wrong download area/server and using the
query arguments that no longer apply. I've fixed the ones I saw now,
but as I had also done the same for earlier releases previously I
think its now worth noting the issue here to hopefully avoid future
breakages occurring.

It looks like the content is being copied unchanged from the main
download page to the past releases page. This wont work because the
main page links to the download mirrors and that content is removed
for historic releases as newer ones occur, so any links for past
releases must reference the archive. The mirrored download links also
use query arguments that don't apply for the archive area.

Instead, I think the simplest thing to do is to copy the prior release
entry on the past releases page and update the version numbers with
basic find/replace. I went to update the RELEASING.md file to suggest
this but found it already says that, so thought I'd send a mail to
highlight the issue instead.

Robbie


--
Clebert Suconic



--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to