@Robbie thanks for fixing it.. just came into it and realized you already did it.. thanks
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > The 2.6.1 docs link at > http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html is broken. The > link itself seems fine this time and the other 2.6.1 links work, there > just dont seem to be any 2.6.1 docs. > > The 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 releases aren't mentioned on > http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/previous-docs.html > > Robbie > > On 20 June 2018 at 13:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As I said some links just weren't updated to reflect the newer >> checksum distribution policy, but most were broken from pointing at >> the wrong download area/server and using the query arguments that >> aren't used there. That suggested the content was copied unchanged >> from download.html into past-releases.html, which it generally >> shouldnt be. >> >> This commit >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5e07407b600aaae38a7ed757a0008bc70cca7a712868812202189f28@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E >> shows a couple of issues: >> - All of the links for 2.5.0 and 2.6.0 were broken except for the >> release notes and commit report links. The main links pointed to the >> wrong download server/area, with the tar/zip links also having query >> args left from the mirror system. The doc links pointed to the central >> docs page rather than the actual docs for the release. >> - The 1.5.6 release entry had links pointing to .sha1 files that dont >> exist. Those were presumably just missed in updating the links from >> 1.5.5, which did have .sha1 checksums. I updated those to link to the >> .sha512 files from the current distribution policy. >> >> The typo you mention below was trivial so I didnt call it out in the >> mail but adjusted that in this commit: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3d6c90c59e30d65013a0f5bc7243434edb8eb817ffd2272b3be341de@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E >> >> A final change is mostly just reducing indent, as I removed the >> wrapper divs (presumably also copied from download.html) for the >> latest entries since the earlier ones dont have those and they all >> live within an outer wrapper div already: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/641671780a10b81419711805519e7a8643688be53705c844ab7520de@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E >> >> On 19 June 2018 at 15:59, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I will be more careful... although.. beyond a typo on the >>> description.. of 2.6.0 in one of the downloads.. I had something like >>> <a href = "....2.6.0..."> 2.5.0 </a> what was the actual mistake. >>> >>> >>> I'm a bit rusty in svn.. and even though I could find the diff.. I did >>> not understand what was my actual mistake. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Robbie Gemmell >>> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I tried downloading some Artemis bits using links from the website >>>> earlier and found various links not working. Some just weren't updated >>>> to reflect the newer checksum distribution policy, but most were >>>> broken from pointing at the wrong download area/server and using the >>>> query arguments that no longer apply. I've fixed the ones I saw now, >>>> but as I had also done the same for earlier releases previously I >>>> think its now worth noting the issue here to hopefully avoid future >>>> breakages occurring. >>>> >>>> It looks like the content is being copied unchanged from the main >>>> download page to the past releases page. This wont work because the >>>> main page links to the download mirrors and that content is removed >>>> for historic releases as newer ones occur, so any links for past >>>> releases must reference the archive. The mirrored download links also >>>> use query arguments that don't apply for the archive area. >>>> >>>> Instead, I think the simplest thing to do is to copy the prior release >>>> entry on the past releases page and update the version numbers with >>>> basic find/replace. I went to update the RELEASING.md file to suggest >>>> this but found it already says that, so thought I'd send a mail to >>>> highlight the issue instead. >>>> >>>> Robbie >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
