+1 for Artemis
Regards
JB
On 04/08/2015 10:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
So I'm about to start a vote thread to pick from the name option
posted on this thread. I'm only going to include options posted on
this thread that have received a +1 from someone else to help reduce
the options a bit. If you like an option that was posted, but have
not seen anyone else +1 it,
+1
Bruce
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com
wrote:
I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
christian.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at
What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)?
Regards
Krzysztof
On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote:
I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
1. RS stands for Research.
2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
4.
I liked ng at first. But reactive made a very cool name.
-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
On Apr 11, 2015, at 06:03, Krzysztof Sobkowiak krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com
wrote:
What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)?
Regards
Krzysztof
On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christian Posta christian.po...@gmail.com javascript:;
To: dev@activemq.apache.org javascript:;
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
I like jstrachan's definition: based on a different, reactive/netty broker
kernel
On Fri, Apr 10
/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4694738i=3 javascript:;
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
I like jstrachan's definition: based on a different, reactive/netty
broker
kernel
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram [hidden email]
http:///user
It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
christian.po...@gmail.com javascript:;
Nope.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:18:28AM -0400, James Carman wrote:
It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names?
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
On Wed, Apr 8,
I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
christian.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
give it?
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchir...@redhat.com |
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
give it?
+1 Hermes
Daniel Kulp mailto:dk...@apache.org
8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirinohi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion.
Good point
+1 Artemis
On 8 Apr 2015, at 21:52, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Rob Davies rajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Hermes
Daniel Kulp 8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM,
http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Rob Davies rajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Hermes
Daniel Kulp javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dk...@apache.org');
8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com
I believe nest is trademarked already. Is it cold in here? ;)
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com
wrote:
*If* we have to rename anything, I liked the name Nest as the
ActiveMQ Nest broker
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com
Ämne: Re: Naming Suggestions?
+1 Hermes
[cid:part1.05010901.07050308@gmail.com]
Daniel Kulpmailto:dk...@apache.org
8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino
hi...@hiramchirino.commailto:hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant
Hermes is already taken by Hermes JMS.. I wouldn't want to clash with that
name: http://www.hermesjms.com/confluence/display/HJMS/Home
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Rob Davies rajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Hermes
Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
...
That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always
be referred to as Apache
-Original Message-
From: Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM
To: ActiveMQ-Developers dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Naming Suggestions?
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code
Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com
wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think
*If* we have to rename anything, I liked the name Nest as the
ActiveMQ Nest broker
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots
Apache name incubating has a very nice ring to it
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any
-Developers dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Naming Suggestions?
Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
give it?
--
Hiram Chirino
I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
1. RS stands for Research.
2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
(ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
On Apr 8,
i'm still fine with amq-6 :)
but if it has to be changed, my vote is of course hades :P
what ever name - lets get going!
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Rob Davies rajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Hermes
Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
8 April 2015 21:41
On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram
26 matches
Mail list logo
