Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

gt;>> karaf-maven-plugin to > >>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>> so). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think ActiveMQ (at least classic) should ju

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

I think ActiveMQ (at least classic) should just provide a >>>>>>>>>>>> Dockerfile (or a set) and push "official" docker images. But >>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> letting >>>

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

ee what the next steps will be to move forward on > having a > >> standard docker image for ActiveMQ > >> > >> Thanks for your feedback on this issue > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Arthur Naseef > >> Sent

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

r plans? >> >> Was looking to see what the next steps will be to move forward on having a >> standard docker image for ActiveMQ >> >> Thanks for your feedback on this issue >> >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: Arthur Naseef

Re: Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

ps will be to move forward on having a > standard docker image for ActiveMQ > > Thanks for your feedback on this issue > > > -Original Message- > From: Arthur Naseef > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:39 PM > To: dev@activemq.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL]

RE: Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Message- From: Arthur Naseef Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:39 PM To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or

Re: Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

h active branch > >> would > >>> be > >>>>>>> the source of truth for a functioning Dockerfile (can build and run > >>>>> tests > >>>>>>> on the version), and no incremental versions would have

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

gt;>>>> * The ActiveMQ community does not need to maintain any > >>> additional > >>>>>>> infrastructure, release process, repositories, dependencies. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile can and should be independent

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

evelop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#env >>>>>> >>>>>>> whenever possible, but even if not, this way each active branch >> would >>> be >>>>>>> the source of truth for a functioning Dockerfile (can build and run >>>>> te

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

;>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>> Étienne > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> P.S. should I add the

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

t;>>>>>>> Étienne > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> P.S. should I add the questions on the JIRA ticket as well? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>&g

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

t;>>>>>> email: ehoss...@amazon.com <mailto:ehoss...@amazon.com> >>>>>>>>>> phone: +1-778-945-8287 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

;mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. > >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

ments unless you can confirm the sender >> and know the content is safe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It would be nice to do the same with Artemis... we already have >> sc

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

t;> > > > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < > > > >>>>> jenki...@nationwide.com <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hello All, > > > &

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

onwide.com>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hello All, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with Chu

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

t;>>>>> > >>>>>> Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with Chuck. I am > >>>>>> stepping in > >>>>>> while he is out. I am the coworker who does the TomEE images. > >>>>>> > >>

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

t;> images are not the same SHA >>>>>> and not the same size. Is there a reason for that? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW, the Dockerfile is mostly complete, >>>>>> https://github.com/s

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

>>>> > >>>> <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile>. > >>>> I think the only thing left was getting the maven download to work as the > >>>> fallback to the other repos. I

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

re proposing. I am going to start on the other options >>> later today. We would be happy for any feedback. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rod. >>> >>> >>&

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

gt; > > Thanks, > > Rod. > > > > > > *From: *"Shank, Charles R" > *Date: *Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM > *To: *Jean-Baptiste Onofre , Matt Pavlovich < > mattr...@gmail.com>, "dev@activemq.apa

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

I can still make that work, but I thought it >>>> was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the files. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the other options >>>> later today.

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

at work, but I thought it >>> was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the files. >>> >>> >>> >>> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the other options >>> later today. We would be happy for any feedback.

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 15:36, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < jenki...@nationwide.com> wrote: > > > I have a question on the tarballs on https://archive.apache.org and > https://repo1.maven.org. I noticed that the images are not the same SHA > and not the same size. Is there a reason for that? > > >

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

;>> >>> >>> >>> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the other options >>> later today. We would be happy for any feedback. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rod. >>> >

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

activemq.apache.org>> *Cc: *"Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> *Subject: *Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ Jean, I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the discussion to the ActiveMQ community Currently, we are working on the follo

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Matt > Pavlovich mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>>, > "dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>" > mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>> > Cc: "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> > Subject: Official Docker I

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

ck. > > > > Thanks, > > Rod. > > > > > > *From: *"Shank, Charles R" > *Date: *Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM > *To: *Jean-Baptiste Onofre , Matt Pavlovich < > mattr...@gmail.com>, "dev@activemq.apache.org" > *Cc: *"Je

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

ebruary 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM To: Jean-Baptiste Onofre , Matt Pavlovich , "dev@activemq.apache.org" Cc: "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" Subject: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ Jean, I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the discussion to the ActiveMQ community

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Hey Clebert- I chatted with a member of INFRA team and it sounds like they have a process now. He indicated that access can be used for jenkins and deployment pipelines. I’ve got an INFRA ticket open and asked for info on best practices / approved procedures for release. Watch the AMQ-8149 ti

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

the issue I had before when I tried this was that Apache is about the "source is the release" When I looked with Apache Infra for tools on making official images, everything was about the TAG on the source, not allowing us much "build" for the image. Did anything change on Apache Infra Structure

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Hello Chuck- I created JIRA here to manage discussion for an ActiveMQ 5.x image: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8149 Thanks! -Matt > On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:49 AM, Shank, Charles R wrote: > > Jean, > > I agree we should make this

Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Jean, I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the discussion to the ActiveMQ community Currently, we are working on the following repository to provide generic images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can follow our progress here: https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-act