: Re: Migrate from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues
I agree with Stefan.
GitHub has its own set of pleasant features but I don't think moving Ant's
issue tracker to GitHub is necessary. I haven't been around in the Ant
community since the beginning but for the past few years that I've been around,
I
I agree with Stefan.
GitHub has its own set of pleasant features but I don't think moving
Ant's issue tracker to GitHub is necessary. I haven't been around in the
Ant community since the beginning but for the past few years that I've
been around, I don't think reporting issues in Bugzilla has
On 18/08/2022 13.32, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Personally I'd prefer to have less github in ASF projects rather than
more, but that may just be me. This has more to do with the ASF being in
control of its own fate than with technical reasons.
Couldn't agree more. Github mirrors are a good idea if
Hi Vladimir
I guess we have to agree that we disagree - and this is fine. Our
perception of how development of Ant happens are quite different. The
issue you are trying to solve is a non-issue for me. And the reasons I
do not want to move to github issues are likely irrelevant to you. No
need to
> I really don't believe we want to migrate more than 20 years
For reference, the first bug in JMeter was filed on 2003, and we look
forward
to migrating all the ~5K bugs to GitHub issues.
LLVM moved from Bugzilla to GitHub a year ago (50K bugs since 2003)
>When working on Ant I barely ever
On 2022-08-08, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> Have you considered migrating from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues?
I don't think we ever talked about that, no.
> I think co-locating issues and PRs at GitHub would make it easier to
> navigate between issues and PRs.
PRs are not the only way of
Hi,
Have you considered migrating from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues?
I think co-locating issues and PRs at GitHub would make it easier to
navigate between issues and PRs.
GitHub allows richer comment formatting (e.g. code highlight).
Moving issues to GitHub would simplify cross-references.
For
