(eg: MM?). I don't think the above will work, at least it won't in
the original way we were using it.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Casanova will have many weapons
the settings in hints by forcing CFLAGS, LIBS, etc... on the
command line. I still think we need that somehow.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Casanova will have many weapons
|
--
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you
directly...
With this patch it now builds again and can be seen in action running on
BeOS R5 at
Then I vote we keep it with the patch folded in then. Looks like
it works on all required systems.
--
===
Jim Jagielski
not it at all.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will
have to have more than forks and flatulence.
close to the platforms that
1.3 was running on, and porting it to them would have been
nigh impossible.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Casanova will have many weapons
a few other people.
Just a FYI.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will
have to have more than forks
...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
like this :)
PS: I see some weird things where we set things to 'yes' or 'no'
which we may be able to standardize
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot
I've got a real cool idea about how to make everyone happy...
Heading out right now, but will commit something later
today :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell
Next will be to migrate to APR_FLAGS_FUNCS... will do a bit
later.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
. I see what the trouble is... Coming up.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
between some commits...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
...)
done
instead of:
AC_CHECK_HEADERS($stuff)
But it was a lng day ;)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
and the FreeBSDs
are using, well, their own :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
:
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
)
from what I can see.
Note I've just reset configure.in.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Do a ./buildconf so that autoheader is called. You'll see that
apr_private.h.in isn't being correctly built.
Now this is weird... it builds fine under Linux, but not under
FreeBSD.
--
===
Jim
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
Using GNUm4 under FreeBSD makes everything work...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Using GNUm4 under FreeBSD makes everything work...
That is not a restriction we want to add if at all possible.
Well, at least now I can build... I'll restore configure.in
to use APR_FLAG_HEADERS to see if we can
])
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
What's patsubst ? I don't see it in any m4 docs?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
of autoconf doesn't imply that everything will automatically
be portable :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
Would it make sense to migrate over to APR_FLAG_FUNCS?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
has a _yes_ or something definative, please speak up.
Bill
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.
this particular check
isn't a bad idea then.
SVID states that malloc(0) must return NULL. ANSI doesn't... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Hell is hot, that's never
that?
I would think that '/ntmount/foo/' should, as far as the code is concerned,
think the filename is foo and that it's a directory. If it's not
a directory, it should error out.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
It's *good* to be the King.
? Would this mean
that the Apache code would need to try multiple kinds of locks before it
necessarily found one that worked?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
At 3:16 PM +0100 6/22/01, Paul Hooper wrote:
Fellow Apache Gurus
Is mod_ssl shipped as standard with Apache_1.3.12 If not do you know where
I can get a copy??
check out www.modssl.org and www.openssl.org
--
===
Jim
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
It's *good* to be the King.
:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
It's *good* to be the King.
than I have...
--Cliff
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
It's *good* to be the King.
Linux)
Pier
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve
Ian Holsman wrote:
do you think we should TAG .30 before you introduce this?
+1 !
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
This is kind of a convenience patch. It allows you
to specify the type of pools debugging you want at
configure time.
+1
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
??
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither
At 4:27 PM -0500 1/14/02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
o (more controversial) removing the setting of the user and group ID
of the shared mem segment. There was discussion about this but
this was never done. I may actually wrap this in a preprocessor
container.
Hold on a tic... seems
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
Yep... Looks like it's no problem with 2.52.
Anyone have hearburn if I adjust buildcheck.sh to make 2.52 the
new requirement?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'll adjust PATH and see if that's the dependency... It's not libtool
dependent AFAIK (I tried 1.4.2 and 1.3.5).
Justin Erenkrantz wrote
).
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
is what's causing the problem.
I'll see how we pass the location around.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
! - Life of Brian |
--
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
I'm following up...
Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +1000, Brian Havard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:41:12 -0500 (EST), Jim Jagielski wrote:
Weird... I'm guessing you don't have problems with the other
usages of ${}... $3 should be special enough not to require
Are people happy with the priority order of the accept mutex?
Right now it's flock - sysvsem - fcntl - pthread.
I think it should be pthread - sysvsem - fcntl - flock, which
is what 1.3 has...
--
===
Jim Jagielski
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are people happy with the priority order of the accept mutex?
Right now it's flock - sysvsem - fcntl - pthread.
I think it should be pthread - sysvsem - fcntl - flock, which
is what 1.3 has...
I realize everybody has
= apr_proc_mutex_unix_sysv_methods;
If that were #if apr_HAVE_flock_serialize instead of
apr_USE_flock_serialize then I'd believe you.
By gum, you're right.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
... are available at /www/httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
(sorry if you've already rec'd this notice)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
.
++1
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
occur :(
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
(IME, pthread-based locks tend to be the fastest, but not many platforms
support that.)
IME - In My Experience ??? :) how about semaphores against file locks?
Sems are faster there too
APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE0
./srclib/apr/include/apr.h:#define APR_HAS_RWLOCK_SERIALIZE 0
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
serialization by default (thanks, Jeff!) and
clean up the STATUS file.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
implement it correctly,
then that's what the hell APR_DECISION_OVERRIDE and hints is for.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
dyld is fun reading as well).
Also, if one is interested, check out sample (or Sample.app if so
included) and sc_usage as well, for fun Darwin tools.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
.
Any idea why we worry about this (finding echo's that don't interpret
backslashes) in APR and nowhere else... APR is the only one that sincludes
the libtool.m4 file...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
;
return oact.sa_handler;
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just my 2cents; you'll do want you want.
That did *not* come out right... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society
:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
, #function; \
x: MCOUNT(x)
and the #function...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both
with regards to warnings.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither
).
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
) where we do a strspn to see
if we are dealing with dotted-quad notation?
Makes sense...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
Except that, at least to me, it looks like apr_atomic_sparc.s itself
isn't totally portable among all Sparcs. Isn't 'cas' an 8+ opcode?
So to use apr_atomic_sparc.s, at a minimum we need that.
--
===
Jim Jagielski
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
to old cpp, it
correctly handles the file.
The file itself is weird, but that's a different point :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
smart-mode at configure time, however... it's also the
default in gcc3 for Darwin as well.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
I'll be traveling the next several days, and although not completely
offline, might as well be...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
= NSLinkModule(image, path, FALSE);
+handle = NSLinkModule(image, path, FALSE);
#endif
NSDestroyObjectFileImage(image);
}
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
experience. Assuming that
the actual packages themselves work individually, I've not seen any
dependencies other than the 1.4.2 one for libtool.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
the nastyness of 64bit mult/division when we (always) need second
resolution is another. Sure would be nice if it was an exact power of 2 :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
Ben Laurie wrote:
I still say it should be runtime configurable.
++1
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
configure time?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
, with;
typedef union ap_intptr_t {
int i;
int *p;
} ap_intptr_t;
and take ap_intptr_t or sizeof(ap_intptr_t) when we need an object
that safely maps either and both.
Bill
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
()??
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
, the string was too short and some of the
printed characters were discarded.
So if truncated, what is returned *must* be = the length passed in.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
for a bug in
apr_psprintf...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither
with a quick glance that 1048576 is really 2^20.
It is :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose
in ap_snprintf(). I'm guessing Sander will do APR and
I'll backport to 1.3
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I hope this is a balanced and fair summary of the discussion to date.
Lovely.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society
Brian Pane wrote:
apr_dsec_t mytime = apr_time_now();
What's an apr_dsec_t?
I would assume a 'decimal' sec rather than binary sec
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
is a valid remedy for that problem.
Yes it is, but it isn't the ONLY valid remedy. Since that change is
causing a lot of grief, I am asking us to consider other remedies.
Ryan
--
===
Jim
:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Would my unequivocal veto of any change to apr_time_t help?
I think the key point, IMO, is that we need to speed it up. If that
requires changes, so be it.
--
===
Jim Jagielski
just 'return errno' works
everywhere.
I am almost positive that errno, in use, is always treated as
an integral value. No matter what the underlying implementation is,
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
a function call.)
Agreed. Checking errno is a cornerstone of defensive programming.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little
1 - 100 of 649 matches
Mail list logo
