[REPORT] Aries July 2018

# July 2018 Board report ## Description: - Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - No issues to report. ## Activity: - As a community we made 13 releases in the last reporting period. This is up

[REPORT] Aries April 2018

Here is the board report for Aries for the period to April 2018: # April 2018 Board report ## Description: - Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - No issues to report. ## Activity: - As a community

signing key expired for cumminsh

I was going through the reporter.apache.org tool and it's showing 195 release files in /dist/ as being signed with what is now an expired key. They're listed here: https://checker.apache.org/projs/aries.html Instructions for fixing are here: https://checker.apache.org/doc/README.html#EXPKEYSIG

Fwd: ASF Board Report for Aries - Initial Reminder for April 2018

I'm going to submit this week. Anything particular we should highlight? Thanks, Jeremy -- Forwarded message -- From: Phil Steitz <pste...@apache.org> Date: 28 March 2018 at 22:37 Subject: ASF Board Report for Aries - Initial Reminder for April 2018 To: Jeremy Hughes

[REPORT] Aries January 2018

Here is our report for January 2018.. Thanks. # January 2018 Board report - Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - None to report this quarter. ## Activity: - As a community we made 10 releases this

Re: Board report

ng to its own git repository right now. > I’m not sure whether that’s something that we track? > > Best Regards, > > Tim > > > On 10 Jan 2018, at 10:50, Jeremy Hughes <hugh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'll be submitting the Januar

Board report

Hi all, I'll be submitting the January board report today. Please reply with anything particular that you feel needs to be included. Thanks, Jeremy

[REPORT] Apache Aries October 2017

Dear Board, Here is the report for October 2017: - Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - None to report this quarter. ## Activity & Health report: - As a community we made 10 releases this quarter. -

October board report

I'll be putting together the board report and submitting later today. Please reply with anything you'd particularly like mentioned. Thank you, Jeremy

[REPORT] Aries board report July 2017

## Description: - Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - None to report this quarter. ## Activity: - As a community we made 9 releases this quarter. - We have added a new project: Aries Containers for

Re: July Board report

ere is a new Aries subcomponent: Aries Containers > http://aries.apache.org/modules/containers.html > > Cheers, > > David > > On 12 July 2017 at 10:35, Jeremy Hughes <hugh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I'm going to be putting together the board report later today (today is >

July Board report

I'm going to be putting together the board report later today (today is the deadline). Please reply with anything you'd like in the report. Thanks, Jeremy

[REPORT] Aries report May 2017

- Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. - The PMC apologises for missing the April 2017 board report deadline and offers this report to cover the period between the April board meeting and now in addition to the months

Re: Aries Board Report Jan/Feb/Mar 2017

Oh and the JIRA and mailing figures - I updated them based on what reporter.apache.org said. On 10 May 2017 at 17:20, Jeremy Hughes <jpjhug...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I made the changes. Please take a look. > Christian, technically Dominik isn't in the PMC until the board > a

Re: Aries Board Report Jan/Feb/Mar 2017

corrections from the board. But if you don't agree with what I've said, please say. Deadline is 10:30 PDT https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=2017-05-10T10:30:00=ASF%20Board%20Report%20Deadline=137 Thanks Jeremy On 10 May 2017 at 16:58, Jeremy Hughes <jpjhug...@gmail.com>

Re: Aries Board Report Jan/Feb/Mar 2017

elect the >> aries unix group - apparently these are not integrated. >> >> @Christian would you like to try editing again? >> >> Cheers, >> >> David >> >> On 10 May 2017 at 09:44, Jeremy Hughes <jpjhug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is there a way of

[REPORT] Apache Aries board report Jan 2017

Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time. ## Activity: - As a community we made 3 releases this quarter and 3 further releases currently

[REPORT] Aries October 2016

Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time. ## Activity: - As a community we made 3 releases this quarter and 3 further releases currently

[REPORT] Apache Aries July 2016 report

Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Activity: - As a community we made 8 releases this quarter: one was the initial release of Aries Transaction Control, the were 4 function releases and 3 fix releases. -

July board report

I just updated the board report for July. Please let me know ASAP if there's something you'd like to add. http://aries.apache.org/community/boardreports/july-2016.html I'll send to board@ in an hour or two. Which will be slightly late, but very nearly a week before the board meeting. Thanks,

[REPORT] Apache Aries board report April 2016

# Description Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - New module: Aries Remote Service Admin seeded from Apache CXF DOSGi

Board report

Hi all, I posted the draft of our April board report here: http://aries.apache.org/community/boardreports/april-2016.html Please modify as you see fit. I need to submit it before 10:30 PDT tomorrow - 13th April. Thanks, Jeremy

[REPORT] Apache Aries board report January 2016

## Description Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Issues: - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - 12 releases since the last report in November. - Aries added to

January Board Report

Hi everyone, our board report is due today. Does anyone have anything particular they want included. Thanks, Jeremy

Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries Subsystems Release Candidate 2.0.8

+1 from me On 26 November 2015 at 14:26, ROMAN, ALEXANDRE wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Looks good to me! > > +1 (non-binding) > > Alexandre Roman > > -Original Message- > From: John Ross [mailto:jwross.apa...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 3:16 PM >

Re: [DISCUSS] Subsystems 2.0.8 Release

Hi John, is this v2.0.8 or v2.0.6? Thanks. On 23 November 2015 at 12:52, John Ross wrote: > I will be preparing the 2.0.8 release of Subsystems today. See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1458. It will include the > following: > > subsystem-core > previous

Re: [DISCUSS] Subsystems 2.0.8 Release

; On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Jeremy Hughes <jpjhug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi John, is this v2.0.8 or v2.0.6? Thanks. >> >> On 23 November 2015 at 12:52, John Ross <jwross.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I will be preparing the 2.0.8 release of Su

Re: CMS edit of Aries website gives me an error

FYI: I've been having this problem - getting 404. So I did the 'force' and got in. But the working copy I have (on the cms host) didn't have the latest. 'Update resource' link at the top fixed this. On 19 August 2015 at 16:58, David Bosschaert wrote: > Hi all, > >

[REPORT] Apache Aries board report November 2015

Hi, here is the Apache Aries board report for the period from July to November 2015. Four months since we missed the October report. Our next report will be in January 2016 Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model.

latest release process

I was wondering if there's page describing this? Which modules are using it? Also - I'm interested in the structure of a top-level module and submodules when they're under the new release process. Is there a naming convention for artifactId of the top level module vs the parent vs the 'uber

Re: October board report

-2015.html >> >> If everyone agrees with it I can send it to the board. >> >> Christian >> >> On 14.10.2015 18:52, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>> >>> I'm really sorry but I've been frustrated by hotel wifi all week. If >>> anyone >>> has the t

Re: October board report

e referenced by the "Fix >>>> Version/s" field? Both? Something else? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Christian Schneider >>>> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I did put the JPA and Transaction releases i

Re: October board report

stian > - > > Report from the Apache Aries committee [Jeremy Hughes] > > ## Description: >OSGi Enterprise Programming Model > > ## Issues: > - TODO - list any issues that require board attention, > or say "there are no issues requiring board attention at th

Re: October board report

True. Probably indicates we're not putting all our releases in jira. On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:02 David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like the releases section is not accurate... > > David > > On 13 October 2015 at 11:57, Jeremy Hughes <jp

October board report

Hi everyone, we're due to report to the board this month, so I'm collecting information. Please email back with anything you'd like included. Thanks, Jeremy

Re: Versioning Policy

Sometimes no exported package changes but you still have new functionality. So a increasing the minor version instead of the bugfix version makes sense. I agree, but this has always been the case. The version reflects the semantics of the package or bundle, not the API. So if new function is

Re: Versioning Policy

On 20 August 2015 at 11:30, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net wrote: On 20.08.2015 11:36, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Sometimes no exported package changes but you still have new functionality. So a increasing the minor version instead of the bugfix version makes sense. I agree

Re: Fw: Versioning Policy

Hi John, I went through the same feelings of trepidation at making this change, but the reason for doing this in the first place is to make the release process easier and provide a set of bundles that users can know work together. So it's certainly a compromise from that point of view. What is

Re: unnecessary entry in aries/tags

On 13.07.2015 19:56, Christian Schneider wrote: Yes the first one looks broken. Christian Am 13.07.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Jeremy Hughes: Hi Christian, I think https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa-2.0.0/ was a mistake when you released jpa-2.0 ... the real

Releasing at the top level only (was: Re: [VOTE] blueprint-parser-1.3.1, blueprint-noosgi-1.1.1, blueprint-web-1.1.1 releases)

Hi, We had a discussion at the end of May about changing out release process to release at the top level module only. I've just realised this release vote was for sub-modules and that really we should have done a full Blueprint release. Christian, that was the intent wasn't it? I guess next

Re: Releasing at the top level only (was: Re: [VOTE] blueprint-parser-1.3.1, blueprint-noosgi-1.1.1, blueprint-web-1.1.1 releases)

. It was a good time to do it. Dan On Jul 13, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Jeremy Hughes jpjhug...@gmail.com wrote: It would also seem, that we are going to have top level modules doing either one of the release processes for some time. I think it would be best, if we can get to a single release process

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries Asynchronous OSGi Services 1.0.0

Hi David, it seems the async release that was cancelled has ended up in the aries/tags dir. Is this by mistake? I don't think it's an issue for now, but when you do the 1.0.0 release I think you'll need to remove that tag. I guess the 'cancelling a release' didn't undo the tag. On 7 July 2015 at

Re: Releasing at the top level only (was: Re: [VOTE] blueprint-parser-1.3.1, blueprint-noosgi-1.1.1, blueprint-web-1.1.1 releases)

the conversion the next time a release is needed. I'll leave this thread going for a while for more discussion before opening a vote thread. Thanks, Jeremy On 13 July 2015 at 14:05, Jeremy Hughes jpjhug...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, that sounds fair. Subsystem is another one. Would you have a chance

[REPORT] Apache Aries July 2015 board report

After some discussion at the end of May, we resolved to alter our release process. The new process means we'll be compromising slightly on OSGi semantic versioning at the bundle level in favour of making the release process simpler and easier to do often. The following releases have been created

Re: Releasing at the top level only (was: Re: [VOTE] blueprint-parser-1.3.1, blueprint-noosgi-1.1.1, blueprint-web-1.1.1 releases)

is not converted I propose we continue doing releases in the per bundle style. So we have a smooth transition and do not hold off releases. Christian On 13.07.2015 14:37, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Hi, We had a discussion at the end of May about changing out release process to release at the top level

unnecessary entry in aries/tags

Hi Christian, I think https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa-2.0.0/ was a mistake when you released jpa-2.0 ... the real tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa-2.0.0 Can we delete the first? Thanks, Jeremy

Re: Source formatting rules for Aries?

provide the rules as eclipse formatters and do not enforce them. We could then reformat source files when there are bigger changes. For smaller changes we should try to keep the original formatting of files to avoid bigger diffs. WDYT? Christian On 07.07.2015 14:38, Jeremy Hughes wrote

Items for the July board report

Hi, the board report is due tomorrow. Please let me know what items you'd like to add. I will of course include all the releases from the past 3 months. Thanks, Jeremy

Re: Source formatting rules for Aries?

I actually thought we had some, but can't find them right now. Without wanting to start the usual war of personal preference ... I'm happy as long as tabs are disallowed and the rules roughly match the majority of code we have - avoiding a full-blown code reformatting exercise. On 7 July 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JPA 2.0.0

Hi Sebastian, I guess I wasn't watching when the discussion happened in April - sorry about that. We had a discussion before then about the quiesce scenario with JPA. I see that the quiesce modules are no longer used by JPA. Can you describe how quiesce is now achieved in the new implementation.

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JPA 2.0.0

room for problems. If we would implement Quiesce then we probably would have to introduce such proxies again with all the problems they bring. Christian On 18.06.2015 15:19, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Hi Sebastian, I guess I wasn't watching when the discussion happened in April - sorry about

[jira] [Commented] (ARIES-1325) Redesign of jpa component

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14591539#comment-14591539 ] Jeremy Hughes commented on ARIES-1325: -- Hi Christian, I get an HTTP 503 when I try

Re: [Discuss] Release whole sub projects instead of individual bundles

should be minimal). Christian On 22.05.2015 18:25, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Some consequences: every release we do we'll bump the bundle version numbers so they're all the same. The bundles will individually be uploaded to maven central so a minor version change caused by a single bundle will cause

Re: [Discuss] Release whole sub projects instead of individual bundles

Hi, Simplifying the release process would definitely be good. I'd like to know the detail of what you're suggesting. I think you're saying that a release of (say) Aries JPA would contain all the artifacts the child modules release today... plus tests plus samples. The release would be a src and a

Re: versions of aries to aries module dependencies

Hi, I've just bumped the jmx-core-whiteboard dependency on jmx-core from 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT. It seems that's been the pattern recently. But I think this is against our 'depend on the minimum version' policy. jmx-core-whiteboard should only be depending on jmx-core @ 1.1.0 as that is

Re: svn commit: r1667047 - in /aries/trunk: ./ esa-ant-task/ esa-ant-task/src/ esa-ant-task/src/main/ esa-ant-task/src/main/java/ esa-ant-task/src/main/java/org/ esa-ant-task/src/main/java/org/apache/

Hi guys, is there any reason to tie this down to Java 7. I've built with Java 6 and all looks good. On 16 March 2015 at 15:49, dav...@apache.org wrote: ... + build + plugins + plugin +

Re: svn commit: r1667047 - in /aries/trunk: ./ esa-ant-task/ esa-ant-task/src/ esa-ant-task/src/main/ esa-ant-task/src/main/java/ esa-ant-task/src/main/java/org/ esa-ant-task/src/main/java/org/apache/

Cool. Done. Thanks. On 1 April 2015 at 14:19, David Bosschaert david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote: I've committed this on behalf of Kamesh Sampath the other day. I guess if it works fine with Java 6 then there is no reason to force Java 7. Cheers, David On 1 April 2015 at 14:17, Jeremy

[jira] [Assigned] (ARIES-1303) Return type for public API getRespository() is not exported

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-1303: Assignee: Jeremy Hughes Return type for public API getRespository() is not exported

Fwd: Apache Aries board report Feb 2015

I've just sent the board report for February. Next report is due 8th April. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org Date: 13 February 2015 at 14:30 Subject: Apache Aries board report Feb 2015 To: ASF Board bo...@apache.org Here is our report: # February

Re: Do we really need Quiesce support?

I've been digging around in my memory. The Quiesce capability is a like a soft-stop. It's a generic capability that is enforced differently depending on the context. It's more normal for an extender to implement the QuiesceParticipant rather than an individual bundle. In the case of the Blueprint

board report

I'm sorry I've missed organising the board report this month. We'll have to report next month then back on schedule the month after. I'll set up a page for Feb board report - please add any content you'd like reported. Cheers, Jeremy

Re: We should remove http://aries.apache.org/downloads/*

I agree, something should be done. Apache Felix seem to have an up to date downloads page. Is that automated in some sense? They have a large number of subprojects like us, so it would be good to do something similar. On 13 January 2015 at 10:20, David Bosschaert david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:

Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Oct 2014

Hi everyone, the board report deadline is 8th October. Please respond with anything you particularly want to get included. Thanks, Jeremy This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The

Re: [VOTE] Release a few bug fix bundles

Guillaume, since putting the fix for ARIES-1068 I found an issue that isn't showing up in the tests. I need to figure out a testcase for it, but for now I think it's best to pull the fix and respin the jndi-core bundle release. ARIES-1068 is a performance fix when security is enabled. Jeremy On

[jira] [Reopened] (ARIES-1068) JNDI lookup performance bad when security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reopened ARIES-1068: -- Found some problems with this, but haven't pinned down a testcase yet. Backing out so the release

Re: [VOTE] Release a few bug fix bundles

-core from the staging repo and respin a release and vote for that bundle when you tell me it's ready. 2014-09-17 12:03 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Hughes jpjhug...@gmail.com: Guillaume, since putting the fix for ARIES-1068 I found an issue that isn't showing up in the tests. I need to figure out

Re: Release bug fixes ?

Hi. I committed those patches. Thanks On 12 Sep 2014 11:28, Jeremy Hughes jpjhug...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guillaume, this would be great. I've been applying a few patches over the last couple of days. I'd like to take a look at these ones: 1201 1204 1242 1243 and if good, I'll get them

Re: Release bug fixes ?

Hi Guillaume, this would be great. I've been applying a few patches over the last couple of days. I'd like to take a look at these ones: 1201 1204 1242 1243 and if good, I'll get them in today. Thanks, Jeremy On 12 September 2014 10:49, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: We have a few

[jira] [Assigned] (ARIES-1117) JNDI Environment Augmentation can cause problems with JNDI providers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-1117: Assignee: Jeremy Hughes JNDI Environment Augmentation can cause problems with JNDI

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1117) JNDI Environment Augmentation can cause problems with JNDI providers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1117. -- Resolution: Fixed Resolved by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1624286 JNDI

[jira] [Assigned] (ARIES-1201) Blueprint start can hang when using reference-listeners

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-1201: Assignee: Jeremy Hughes Blueprint start can hang when using reference-listeners

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1242) Poor JNDI performance using Oracle DSML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1242. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Paul. Applied in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision

[jira] [Assigned] (ARIES-1242) Poor JNDI performance using Oracle DSML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-1242: Assignee: Jeremy Hughes Poor JNDI performance using Oracle DSML

[jira] [Assigned] (ARIES-1204) StringIndexOutOfBounds for blueprint apps that have constructors with multiple exceptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-1204: Assignee: Jeremy Hughes StringIndexOutOfBounds for blueprint apps that have constructors

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1204) StringIndexOutOfBounds for blueprint apps that have constructors with multiple exceptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1204. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Simon. Applied patch in revision: svn.apache.org/viewvc?view

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1243) NPE in ObjectFactoryHelper.getObjectInstanceViaContextDotObjectFactories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1243. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Paul, Applied fix in revision: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view

[jira] [Assigned] (ARIES-1068) JNDI lookup performance bad when security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-1068: Assignee: Jeremy Hughes JNDI lookup performance bad when security enabled

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1068) JNDI lookup performance bad when security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1068. -- Resolution: Fixed Resolved in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1623965

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1063) Aries Blueprint 1.0 service does not work with ServiceFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1063. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1624034 Aries

[jira] [Resolved] (ARIES-1065) Blueprint - ServiceFactory can't be specified as the bean class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-1065. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1624034

[jira] [Commented] (ARIES-1068) JNDI lookup performance bad when security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14127151#comment-14127151 ] Jeremy Hughes commented on ARIES-1068: -- Simon, do you have an updated patch file

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JPA 1.0.1

+1 On 17 July 2014 18:40, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: +1 Dan On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi all, I submit the following release to your vote: Aries JPA API 1.0.1 --- ChangeLog: [ARIES-1047]

[REPORT] Apache Aries July 2014

Please find the Apache Aries board report for July 2014 below. Apologies for being a few days late. # July 2014 Board report Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Releases There was a significant amount of release

Re: State of blueprint itests

Generally speaking, module dependencies on other Aries modules should be at the minimum required level for them to function correctly. Then using the -Pdev profile should bring those dependency versions up to the latest snapshot levels. blueprint-itests should be the same - when you run the tests

Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2014

that :) David On 26 June 2014 07:38, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: FYI our Board report is coming up. Please let me know anything particularly exciting you'd like included. I'll also go through the mailing lists. Thanks, Jeremy -- Forwarded message -- From: ASF

Re: Status of the build

Hi Christian, so what is the error with Java 6? Does it only appear when moving to pax exam 3? Do you think there might be an issue with pax exam 3 and Java 6? We could override the pax exam level to one that works with Java 6 and 7 (if that exists :-) On 16 June 2014 05:20, Christian Schneider

Re: Status of the build

Hi, it's true that Oracle's Java 6 is EOL. There are other vendors, such as IBM who haven't EOL'd Java 6 yet: According to https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/lifecycle/index.html they will service it until Sep 2017. I'd like to make sure we can continue to run / test on Java 6 until

Re: Version plugin and parent pom releases....

+1. Does this mean those circular dependency errors go away? On 10 Jun 2014 16:12, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: With the updates to the versioning stuff to support the newer ASM version and the updates to the plugin to allow it to be fully defined in the parent, do we think we’re

Welcome Tom Watson - our newest Aries committer

The Aries PMC has voted in Tom Watson as committer, who you may know as Eclipse Equinox Project co-lead. Congratulations Tom, thanks for your contributions and welcome! Jeremy

Re: current aries build issues

On 5 June 2014 19:06, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: Everything should now compile with Java6 and Maven 3.2.1. Tests are another story…….. I think some of this has to do with using Equinox 3.5.0 in tests. Now that we default to OSGi 4.3.1 our bundles are doing Import-Packge:

Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2014

Hi everyone, I'm currently on vacation. Would anyone of the committers volunteer to put together a board report and submit it before Wednesday? Previous ones are here http://aries.apache.org/overview/boardreports.html I'd really appreciate it. Massive thanks. Jeremy This email was sent by an

Re: Proxy iTests failing as PAX runner unable to download junit

Would moving to the latest pax-exam help (v3.4) Wondering whether the two bumps in major version number mean a lot of API breaking changes. Cheers, Jeremy On 28 March 2014 10:44, David Bosschaert david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote: I ran into the same issue recently with the Blueprint itests. I

Re: Accepting pull requests for Aries from Github

There's a long discussion on the members@ list. https://mail-search.apache.org/members/private-arch/members/201311.mbox/%3c9cc82400-9a4b-4de3-a502-c18a7c6a3...@gmail.com%3E (sorry that's a private list). This summarises it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-156 Cheers, Jeremy On 28

Re: Proxy iTests failing as PAX runner unable to download junit

...@googlemail.com wrote: It definitely would help ;) Though yes there are some API breaking changes and you'll need to rework your POM a bit. Still I think this switch is really worth it. Regards, Achim 2014-03-28 11:49 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Hughes jpjhug...@gmail.com: Would moving

Re: Problem to compile Aries Jpa sources

Hi, we have a problem building with Maven 3.1.x and some modules have a problem with Java 7. Could you try with Maven 3.0.5 and Java 6? Thanks, Jeremy On 22 January 2014 14:32, Giuseppe Gerla giuseppe.ge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all I need to use eclipselink 2.5.1 in Karaf container. I try to

[REPORT] Apache Aries January 2014

Please find the Apache Aries board report for January 2014 below. Apologies for the lateness of the report. No one particular reason, mostly catching up after the new year. Thanks. Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model.

Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jan 2014

Just seen that we have a board report to do for ahem today. Please let me know if there's anything specific you'd like to add and I'll submit tomorrow. Thanks, Jeremy On 1 Jan 2014 14:17, ASF Board bo...@apache.org wrote: This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board.

Re: Broken link

Sorry for the delay. It's working for me right now. On 11 December 2013 22:28, brad.john...@mediadriver.com wrote: http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprintweb.html

Re: [VOTE] blueprint.cm 1.0.2

+1 (ran the verify_staged_release.sh) btw: had problems building with mvn 3.1.0 ... ok with 3.0.3 On 10 October 2013 12:57, John W Ross jwr...@us.ibm.com wrote: +1 [VOTE] blueprint.cm 1.0.2 This vote is to release blueprint-cm 1.0.2. The only change is to update the manifest to allow

Apache Aries October 2013 board report

Apache Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. ## Releases * Apache Aries Blueprint Parser 1.1.0 Reusable component for parsing Blueprint xmls. * Apache Aries Blueprint Core 1.2.0 Core of the implementation of the OSGi

  1   2   3   4   5   >