+1 (binding)
Verified wordcount with various configuration parameters and they all
worked. Particularly confirming that all the containers are chosen
correctly.
Kenn
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Heejong Lee wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:06 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>
>> I have
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 5 approving votes:
Binding:
* Chamikara Jayalath
* Ahmet Altay
* Robert Bradshaw
* Kenneth Knowles
Non-binding:
* Tomo Suzuki
There are no disapproving votes. I will finalize the release.
Thanks everyone!
On Tue,
Hi community!
I've noticed that there is no possibility in Beam JDBC to use partitioning for
reading a very large table with millions of rows in parallel (for example when
migrating legacy database data to BigQuery).
I have some ideas which are decribed here in more detailes:
During the last branch cleanup, it appears I accidentally deleted the
release-2.26.0 branch.
Lukasz Cwik pointed this out to me, and fortunately I was able to recover
and push it back to the repo. However, Brian Hulette then pointed out
github lets us set up rules to avoid accidental deletion of
Just to finish this thread I double checked and the SNAPSHOTs are published
correctly now.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:31 PM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying Brian. So we shall wait for Infra then
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021, 5:15 PM Brian Hulette wrote:
>
>> You may have already made this
ERROR: File 'src/.test-infra/jenkins/metrics_report/beam-metrics_report.html' does not exist
High Priority Dependency Updates Of Beam Python SDK:
Dependency Name
Current Version
Latest Version
Release Date Of the Current Used Version
Release Date Of The Latest Release
JIRA Issue
chromedriver-binary
88.0.4324.96.0
This is your daily summary of Beam's current P1 issues, not including flaky
tests
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20statusCategory%20!%3D%20Done%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20P1%20AND%20(labels%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20labels%20!%3D%20flake).
See
The INFRA ticket indicates this should be resolved now, and things do seem
to be working (e.g. Java PreCommit has started on
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14949).
Brian
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 7:51 AM Reuven Lax wrote:
> Sigh. Hopefully infra addresses this soon.
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021
This is your daily summary of Beam's current flaky tests
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20statusCategory%20!%3D%20Done%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20flake)
These are P1 issues because they have a major negative impact on the community
and make it hard to
I have some configurations that did not work properly in 2.29.0 that I'd
like to verify against this RC. Sorry I haven't got a chance to verify yet,
but can you please wait for that? I am doing the verification right now.
Kenn
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:28 PM Heejong Lee wrote:
> FYI, we now
Thanks, I left a few comments in the doc.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:26 PM Daria Malkova
wrote:
> Hi community!
>
> I've noticed that there is no possibility in Beam JDBC to use partitioning
> for reading a very large table with millions of rows in parallel (for
> example when migrating legacy
To give a quick update here: I did look into what it could look like to
swap out dill -> cloudpickle internally in Beam.
In principle, making the switch would be easy: literally just swap out
"dill" in favor of "cloudpickle". Both use the same loads/dumps API.
The hard part is figuring out how
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:06 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> I have some configurations that did not work properly in 2.29.0 that I'd
> like to verify against this RC. Sorry I haven't got a chance to verify yet,
> but can you please wait for that? I am doing the verification right now.
>
Sure.
Hi all,
The June report is due tomorrow. Through this link anyone should be able to
comment and make suggestions. Please help me out by adding highlights. I
already grabbed some from CHANGES.md.
https://s.apache.org/beam-draft-report-2021-06
You can read past reports at
ihji merged pull request #613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/613
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please
While trying to check on the new 2.32.0-SNAPSHOTs this morning I noticed
that the daily SNAPSHOTs have not been updating since last friday:
https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_Release_NightlySnapshot/
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-core/
Can
Sigh. Hopefully infra addresses this soon.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:34 PM Boyuan Zhang wrote:
> There is an infra issue ongoing:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21976, which affects all beam
> tests.
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:21 PM Reuven Lax wrote:
>
>>
You may have already made this connection, but this is likely the same
issue discussed in [1][2].
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r658cdfa643c44a3fa18c226238e537ad221c8f65337f0eab3ad6dad9%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21976
On Tue, Jun 8,
Thanks for clarifying Brian. So we shall wait for Infra then
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021, 5:15 PM Brian Hulette wrote:
> You may have already made this connection, but this is likely the same
> issue discussed in [1][2].
>
> [1]
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
