delay to Maven
> central. We should adjust HOWTO accordingly.
>
> One last nitpick. Rui sent a result email with subject ‘Re: [VOTE]’. The
> subject should have been ‘[RESULT] [VOTE]’.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Dec 25, 2021, at 10:10 PM, Rui Wang wrote:
> >
> &g
Hi Community,
I am happy to announce that 1.29.0 is released and the Calcite main branch
is unlocked now.
-Rui
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rui Wang
Date: Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 9:15 PM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Calcite 1.29.0 released
To:
The Apache Calcite team is pleased
Thanks Francis!
-Rui
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 9:27 PM Francis Chuang
wrote:
> Hey Rui,
>
> I just registered 1.29.0 as released on 2021-12-26.
>
> Francis
>
> On 26/12/2021 4:23 pm, Rui Wang wrote:
> > Hi community,
> >
> > Can a PMC member help upd
Hi community,
Can a PMC member help update the 1.29.0 release version and date at
https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?calcite? For the release date
please use 12-26-2021 UTC time.
-Rui
> > > - Verified GPG signature - OK
> > > - Verified SHA512 - OK
> > > - Checked release notes - OK
> > > - Ran gradle tests - OK
> > >
> > > Environment:
> > > macOS Big Sur, Java 17+35-LTS-2724
> > > Gradle 7.3
> > &
contains contributions from 23 authors, and resolves 47 issues’ . I
> would definitely mention the upgrade to log4j2. Others at your discretion.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 2021, at 5:27 PM, Rui Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a bui
Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.29.0, release
candidate 0.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.29.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
The commit to be voted upon:
Rui Wang created CALCITE-4955:
-
Summary: Release Calcite 1.29.0
Key: CALCITE-4955
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4955
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Task
Reporter
After I switched from Mac to Ubuntu, the dependency check starts to work
:)
-Rui
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM Rui Wang wrote:
> I am Generate a report of vulnerabilities that occur among dependencies
> when running `./gradlew :dependencyCheckUpdate`, I consistently hit
>
nyone seen it in the past?
-Rui
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Rui Wang wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09
>
>
> -Rui
>
&
> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then t
<
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > >>>>> have
> > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Vladimir Oz
Thanks Julian!
Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
lock the main branch and start the release process.
-Rui
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>
> > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui
ed CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> since this Monday. I will do another pass
tps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> >
> > What’s the status on those?
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > http
eed an
> Avatica release afterall...
>
> Let's see how that discussion resolves.
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:47 PM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > Ack thanks!
> >
> > If there is no objection until the end of this week I will just go for
> the
> > 1.29.0 release process.
&g
onfigurable
> SPNEGO Jetty implementation (6 weeks ago)
> > * 95c1eb06e - [CALCITE-4828] Standard exception console output (7 weeks
> ago)
> > * e462b09d4 - [CALCITE-4837] FLOOR/CEIL for DECADE, CENTURY, MILLENIUM
> return wrong results (8 weeks ago)
> > * ef277ff34 -
Thank you!
-Rui
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:36 AM Stamatis Zampetakis
wrote:
> Done ;)
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 9:10 PM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > Can a PMC member help to add my public key[[1] to the Calcite KEYs
> file[2]
> > ?
> >
> >
> > [1]: https
Hi community,
Do you think we need an Avatica release before Calcite 1.29.0?
-Rui
ocs/howto.html#making-a-release-candidate <
> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/howto.html#making-a-release-candidate>
>
> > On Dec 6, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Rui Wang wrote:
> >
> > I am planning to spend some time this week to learn about the Calcite
> > release pr
Rui Wang wrote:
> Thanks Julian. That sounds good. I will revisit the release process at the
> beginning of Dec to check what preparation work I need to do.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:34 AM Julian Hyde
> wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, the more often
ter contributors, who are the next
> generation of committers and PMC members.
>
> Julian
>
> > On Nov 22, 2021, at 6:26 PM, Rui Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hi community,
> >
> > 1.28.0 was released on around 10/15. I volunteered to release
> > Calcite 1.29.0. I am
Hi community,
1.28.0 was released on around 10/15. I volunteered to release
Calcite 1.29.0. I am wondering what is the expected date/week to work
toward to 1.29.0? Should we expect to cut in this December or wait until
early next year?
I will need to reserve my time, probably a week, once we
I will take a look within this week.
-Rui
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:55 PM xiong duan wrote:
> Hi Follower, Please review this PR, So that I can make some improvements.
> Thank you.
>
In another related thread I volunteered for releasing 1.29.0. I think I can
still do it.
-Rui
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:09 PM Fan Liya wrote:
> Hi Haisheng,
>
> I am interested in volunteering.
>
> Best,
> Liya Fan
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 6:50 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am release
Please tag me on PRs that you need my help. I will check those soon.
-Rui
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:06 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
> We still need 5 committers to review 5 PRs each. Please reply to this
> email to volunteer.
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:41 PM Stamatis Zampetakis
> wrote:
> >
> >
Also occasionally, I found that some of the issues might go away if I have
the project compiled by command line.
-Rui
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:39 AM Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I had to "build.gradle.kts Right Click->Import as Gradle Project"
>
> Just
It should be the main example
> we use in conference talks, blog posts, etc. When people understand that
> case, we can explain how we generalize from K=2 to arbitrary K.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On May 13, 2021, at 9:51 AM, Rui Wang wrote:
> >
> > I apologize that I
time to clean up
> our
> >> > code
> >> > > > > base
> >> > > > > >>>> and
> >> > > > > >>>> > publicly release it (which will be out soon) for a quick
> >> peek.
> >> > > &g
Hi Malte,
Thanks for your PR. I will take a look soon (<1d).
-Rui
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 2:21 AM Malte Bellmann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated a PR I started in August last year. It got buried by now, can
> someone have a look?
>
> The PR is https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2118 <
>
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 5:46 AM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > My understanding at this moment is that, if there is an interesting idea,
> > make sure creating a JIRA and label that by "mentor" and "gs
ite/rel/logical/LogicalTableFunctionScan.html
> Can i model a mapPartitions T -> U as ^ ?
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > I feel like the mapPartitions can be implemented as a SELECT + GROUP BY,
> > where GROUP BY is to partition the data, then per partition
ns and flatMapGroupsWithState, and it looks
> as
> > >> if you are talking about Apache Spark operations. Can you give some
> > >> examples of typical queries that would use these operations?
> > >>
> > >> It’s possible that these operations accomplish t
Well I think the expected approach is to translate other operations to
relational operators by yourself ;-)
I think Calcite won't be the place to have extensions for such translation.
The main concern is that those non relational operations are "non-standard".
-Rui
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:12
tps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f0ea9594f151e7f6ad9b7f305fc2c87d99f64acac2cc76e179a1a1f7%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> >
> > I would definitely love to see this happen. It would be a great
> > opportunity for students to learn something new and interesting and a
> &g
Hi community,
Does Calcite ever participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) [1]. What do
you think of creating smaller projects and allowing students to pick them
up?
I used to host two GSoC students for Apache Beam and I found the
collaboration was smooth and students could add valuable
Congratulations Liya!
-Rui
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:39 AM Michael Mior wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome Liya!
> --
> Michael Mior
> mm...@apache.org
>
> Le mer. 10 févr. 2021 à 05:23, Francis Chuang
> a écrit :
> >
> > Congrats Liya and well deserved!
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On
I can also help on releasing (haven't done one for Calcite).
-Rui
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:32 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> I haven't been RM for a while. I'll do 1.27, then Stamatis can do 1.28.
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:57 AM Stamatis Zampetakis
> wrote:
> >
> > Depending on the timing I
For me to participate in the discussion for the above questions, I will
need to read a lot more to know relevant context and likely ask lots of
questions :-). A editable doc is probably good for questions and back and
forward discussion.
-Rui
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:50 AM Rui Wang wrote
I am also happy to help push this work into Calcite (review code and doc,
etc.).
While you can share your code so people can have more idea how it is
implemented, I think it would be also nice to have a doc to discuss open
questions above. Some points that I copy those to here:
1. Can this
I think your ANY operator's signature is ANY(column_name, )? In this
case you might use Descriptor operator as an example to see how does a
operator that accepts column name work:
Could you clarify your goal a bit more? Are you trying to add a function
named "INFIX_CAST" starting from the parser?
-Rui
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:38 PM laughing.sh...@qq.com
wrote:
> Hi,community:
> 1. when I add binaryOpratorsTokens in default_config.fmpp, like
> binaryOperatorsTokens:
This draft looks good overall! Thanks Haisheng for your work!
-Rui
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:48 PM Haisheng Yuan wrote:
> Stamatis,
> Thanks a lot for the numbers you collected, I will add them into the
> report.
>
> Julian,
> Thanks for the remind, I will add the mention of new chair and our
Congratulations on your work! And thanks for considering contributing it to
Calcite!
I tried to have a pass on your paper, and have a question:
It seems like for concrete implementations for merge operator and delta
query for joins/aggregation, the paper adopts some algorithms and ideas
that
).
Duration: 20~30 mins
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Slim Bouguerra wrote:
> this is a great idea thanks @Statmatis looking forward to learning more
> about Calcite especially the Streaming work.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the la
t; >
> > > > +1 for the online meeting, nice idea ~
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Danny Chan
> > > > 在 2020年10月22日 +0800 PM5:58，JiaTao Tao ，写道：
> > > > > I think it's a nice idea, hope to hear Julian's topic about
> > l
I think Michael has said points that I can say. Just try to understand your
problem after reads existing threads:
Sounds like, you need to do two things:
1. Reuse Calcite adaptors and combine that with your parser to parse
queries.
2. Convert results from 1. to RelNode and let Calcite optimize,
Alternatively, for the trait push down optimization effort, there are some
well defined tasks: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4052. If
you are interested, you can pick up some tasks from there :) I am happy to
help you get familiar with those tasks and review your code.
-Rui
On
Thanks Stamatis for serving as the PMC chair for Calcite in 2020!
One of the highlights I want to give for the PR reviewing/merging area was
the practice we started to adopt in recent releases: we started to check
each JIRA marked with the right release version and see whether there is a
PR in a
+1 on potential performance gain.
If I have some time, I will try to research and understand how fast the
space preallocation can offer.
-Rui
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 12:34 AM Fan Liya wrote:
> IMO, the major advantage of Iterable over List is that we do not need to
> know all the elements
's not use TUMBLE (or HOP, or SESSION) as the main example. It is
> > > somewhat built-in (i.e. has special treatment in the code). Let's work
> > > in terms of, say, the RAMP user-defined function. It is used in
> > > several tests [1].
> > >
>
>People who write to dev@ list and attach the stacktrace as an image don't
>really know if the list accepts images or not.
>Making images forbidden does not help to teach people to
>attach stacktraces as text.
I guess the way will be when we see those cases, we reply to ask to replace
the image
In terms of SQL grammar to support omitting TABLE, there are actually two
changes for
SELECT *
FROM TABLE(TUMBLE(TABLE Bid, DESCRIPTOR(bidtime), INTERVAL '10' MINUTES));
You can support omitting the TABLE after the FROM, which makes the query
become:
SELECT *
FROM TUMBLE(TABLE Bid,
If you include "ProjectJoinTransposeRule" as a default rule, what impact
will it have? Will some unit tests need to be updated?
-Rui
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 2:14 AM Fan Liya wrote:
> I also think the ProjectJoinTransposeRule should be included in the main
> optimizer process.
>
> Best,
> Liya
nsavaSE2JeE4
>
>
> Danny Chan 于2020年10月22日周四 下午7:40写道：
>
> > Rui Wang, can you help to consult with the author of the window TVF
> syntax
> > ? We want to hear more suggestions.
> >
> > cc @Rui Wang
> >
> > Rui Wang 于2020年10月22日周四 下午1
>
>
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:03 PM Rui Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi community,
> >
> > Where to find the current JavaCC used in Calcite? What I can tell is
> > Calcite core is using a JavaCC plugin [1], but after that I have lost the
&
Hi community,
Where to find the current JavaCC used in Calcite? What I can tell is
Calcite core is using a JavaCC plugin [1], but after that I have lost the
track to locate the version number?
[1]:
You can refer to function to understand Calcite planner API at higher
level:
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/extensions/sql/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/sql/impl/CalciteQueryPlanner.java#L155
-Rui
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:58 PM Shubh Sharma wrote:
>
I can give a small talk (10 to 20 mins) about changes of Calcite to support
streaming.
-Rui
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 7:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stamatis,
> that's a very nice idea, I am definitely interested in attending a meetup
> and hearing
Welcome!
BTW, If you share your JIRA username then people here can give you
permission then you will be able to assign Jira to yourseulf.
-Rui
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:23 AM guangyuan wang
wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
> My name is Guangyuan Wang. I'm a java software engineer and also an Apache
;
> > > The problem is with the semantics of these particular table functions
> > > - HOP, TUMBLE, SESSION - and what semantics are desirable depends on
> > > how people will typically use them. Is it common to follow TUMBLE with
> > > TUMBLE? What would a user
quickly back it out with a force push to
> > master.
> >
> > Maybe I'm a git dinosaur, but I always use the command line to merge
> > my own and others' changes. I don't trust the github UI to do exactly
> > what I want.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:
Thanks Ruben for kicking off 1.26.0 release!
Can I ask a question here: how can I squash commits to merge
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2160? I am worried that if I click
the "rebase and merge", it will push two commits into the Calcite main
branch.
-Rui
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:38
> > > You can also use
> > >
> > > SELECT L.f0, R.f2, L.window_start, L.window_end
> > > FROM
> > > Tumble(table T1, descriptor(T1.ts), INTERVAL ‘5’ MINUTE) L
> > > JOIN
> > > Tumble(table T2, descriptor(T2.ts), INTERVAL ‘5’ M
Regarding to **L.window_start = R.window_start AND L.window_end =
R.window_end**:
In general, the current table function windowing model is to append window
metadata to table directly, thus window metadata becomes a part of table
(or call it data). So as a part of table, these two columns should
Hi Danny,
seems like the "Red" syntax is missing? I am guessing you were talking
about "L.window_start = R.window_start AND L.window_end = R.window_end"?
Can you use ** to indicate the red part.
Two additional questions:
> The Join action is triggered by the watermark of the stream
So sounds
Rui Wang created CALCITE-4269:
-
Summary: Improvement on enumerable implementation for HOP and
SESSION
Key: CALCITE-4269
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4269
Project: Calcite
; > Feng
> >
> > Stamatis Zampetakis 于2020年9月10日周四 上午5:51写道：
> >
> > > Apache Calcite's Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Rui
> Wang
> > to
> > > become a committer, and we are pleased to announce that he has
> accepted.
> > >
> &g
Rui Wang created CALCITE-4176:
-
Summary: Key descriptor can be optional in SESSION table function
Key: CALCITE-4176
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4176
Project: Calcite
Issue
+1
if well used/tested svn commands for releasing are documented, committers
without experience on release or svn can still use those properly.
-Rui
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stamatis Zampetakis
wrote:
> +1
>
> I always thought that committers had access to the dist repo and I was
>
Congrats, Ruben! Well deserved!
-Rui
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:24 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Congrats Ruben!
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 12 Ago 2020, 18:05 Michael Mior ha scritto:
>
> > Congrats Reuben!
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mior
> > mm...@apache.org
> >
> > Le mer. 12 août 2020 à 09:32, Ruben
t; OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.2+12-46)
> > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.2+12-46, mixed mode, sharing)
> >
> > My vote is: +1 (binding)
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 10/08/2020 4:10 am, Rui Wang wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
>
+1 (non-binding)
platform: ubuntu16 + java8
run tests locally on: ok
verify the commit hash in git tag: ok
check sha512: ok
verify signature by gpg: ok
one thing can be fixed after vote: CALCITE-4114 does not belong to
"breaking changes" in the release note. That change happened in core/test
Is the highlight section a right place for [1] as it has bigger impact?
[1]
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/19edf52c76c6a1507721f5bd37f2a33497aa0c4c
-Rui
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:48 PM Andrei Sereda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody want to mention any highlights for 1.25 besides
Rui Wang created CALCITE-4164:
-
Summary: Create a Spec doc for EMIT syntax
Key: CALCITE-4164
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4164
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Sub-task
[name_last] DESC
>
> So, just wanted to make sure that this is the right approach.
>
> Regards,
> Hrudaya
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rui Wang
> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 10:08 PM
> To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Implementation of DISTI
I did a test locally and I found your example syntax is correct.
I used "select distinct deptno, empno from emp order by empno desc"
and Calcite generates this plan:
LogicalSort(sort0=[$1], dir0=[DESC])
LogicalAggregate(group=[{0, 1}])
LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$7], EMPNO=[$0])
Rui Wang created CALCITE-4153:
-
Summary: Implement EMIT AFTER WATERMARK
Key: CALCITE-4153
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4153
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Sub-task
I tried to dig into the Calcite codebase and found there is likely no way
to enable JDBC codepath:
1. There is no planner config in CalciteConnectionProperty [1].
2. In CalcitePrepareImpl, there is only one createPlannerFactory with one
createPlanner, in which VolcanoPlanner is used [2].
If my
Rui Wang created CALCITE-4146:
-
Summary: Implement EMIT AFTER WATERMARK
Key: CALCITE-4146
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4146
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Thanks Chunwei for leading this release!
-Rui
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 1:48 AM Forward Xu wrote:
> Thanks! Chunwei! Good job.
>
> The link address of the Presto dialect implementation in
> https://calcite.apache.org/news/2020/07/24/release-1.24.0/ seems to be
> wrong.
>
> Best,
> Forward
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
- downloaded the artifacts, checked hash, verified signature, built and ran
tests. All are OK
- use `diff -r` to compare the artifact and the git tag. Like what Julian
has pointed out, I can find a difference about license but it can be
addressed after this vote.
-Rui
On Tue,
Hi Haisheng,
Do you know what is the impact on Enumerable implementation? Will
RexListCmp still be converted AND/OR something else in that layer or there
will be new logic introduced to generate code for RexListCmp?
-Rui
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:13 PM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il Lun 20 Lug
is sometimes used intentionally to limit the API surface area.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/6bb7e2d0b65ec3c7a0d82c92ca0564f8caec4af5
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:33 AM Rui Wang wrote:
> > >
> >
+1 to make getRelTypeName overridable.
Not a java language expert, to me when there are cases that a public API
with final cannot solve, it's a good sign to remove that final to allow
customization to solve those specific use cases.
-Rui
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 8:58 AM Haisheng Yuan wrote:
>
Regarding CALCITE-4000, the PR should be ready to merge now. Thanks for all
the help from Feng, Danny and Chuwei!
-Rui
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:11 PM Chunwei Lei wrote:
> Thank you for all your effort.
>
> Now there're only two issues(CALCITE-4000[1] and CALCITE-4118[2]) to
> be fixed in
Hi Talat,
I am guessing when you say logical type, you mean something like this in
Beam [1].
My question is why do you need Calcite to support ENUM? If you use logical
type, you can define a ENUM by yourself and the underlying type can be a
Map. Map is supported by Calcite. So ENUM will be
Here Andrei,
Here is an example of a failed PR check that was failed due to
elasticsearch:test:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/calcite/builds/33662741
See that failed Jdk11 check log.
-Rui
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 4:31 PM Andrei Sereda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can
Thanks Chunwei,
I am actively working on getting CALCITE-4000 and CALCITE-4015 reviewed and
merged by next week.
Question: are you planning to follow the practice of the last release (i.e.
lock master branch and clean up JIRA with fix version 1.24.0 marked before
re-open master branch?)
-Rui
BTW, if use 'externalize', what is the opposite side of it?
Is it `internalize` (which doesn't sound right)? Or call it
"de-externalize"?
-Rui
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rui Wang wrote:
> O got it :-)
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:55 PM Julian H
O got it :-)
-Rui
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:55 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> Please call it 'externalize'. 'Serialize' gives some folks PTSD. :)
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 2:26 PM Rui Wang wrote:
> >
> > Thanks everyone for your inputs. Now it sounds like RexNode serializati
9c3/core/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/plan/RelWriterTest.java#L88
> > >
> > > --
> > > Roman Kondakov
> > >
> > > On 07.07.2020 22:13, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> > > > Rui
> > > >
> > > > Il Mar 7 Lug 2020, 20:30 Rui Wa
Since this discussion is moved to email thread, I just copy something
I found and replied in that JIRA for the reference:
SqlToRelConverter ends with creating a RexSubQuery for that subquery,
and leaves it to JOIN condition. The string representation of
RexSubQuery seems just $7. If you check
Hi Community,
In Apache Beam we are facing a use case where we need to keep RexNode in
our distributed primitives. Because of the nature of distributed computing,
Beam requires the usage of those primitives be serializable (thus those
primitives can be sent over the network to backend/workers for
Hi,
I created a maven project and used 1.22.0 Calcite artifacts to make your
code work: https://github.com/amaliujia/CalciteParser. Does this work for
you?
-Rui
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:44 PM Subin Lee
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I hope this email finds you well. My name is Subin and I am an
There was a relevant thread about PostgresQL dialect, you might check it as
a reference:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r906f15c3f7a276ae5e2c68f79a11dc111c5862579848ab8f379b9925%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
-Rui
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:26 PM Tang, Mingjun
wrote:
> Hi dear calcite
I think it is because there is no clear mapping for how to convert a month
(and then same to year) in interval to seconds/milliseconds. Does a month
have 30 days, 31 days, 28 days or 29 days? (Probably can find an answer in
SQL standard).
-Rui
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 4:00 PM Rommel
If it goes back to make struct flattening configurable (thus can be turned
off), you could check this thread for some context:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6bc9fd2e4c8d09e71740b0544df0982acf0d64321b9d5dc68db6acf1%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
-Rui
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:21 AM Danny
>Also I am thinking about turning off the flatten stage but not sure this is
>going to happen (seems like a pandora box kind of flag where you do not
>know what to expect)
It is not happening to make flattener optional by setting a flag (see
[1]). If there is anything that is not properly
2) you might work it around
in your own fork.
Additional question: why do you want to migrate back to Maven?
-Rui
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:07 AM Rui Wang wrote:
> This email thread contains some discussions:
> https://lists.apache.org
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
