Glad to see there is support for this! I think ACCP would be a good choice
since there seems to be a lot of experience deploying it. I’ve opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18624. I should have some
time to work on the patch soon and I will try to provide some graphs that
show
We run ACCP in production on 1000s of nodes across Cassandra 3.11 and 4 with
great results.
Would love to see it baked into Cassandra.
Jackson
From: David Capwell
Date: Friday, 23 June 2023 at 9:22 am
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Using ACCP or tc-native by default
NetApp Security WARNING:
+1 to ACCP
> On Jun 22, 2023, at 3:05 PM, C. Scott Andreas wrote:
>
> +1 for ACCP and can attest to its results. ACCP also optimizes for a range of
> hash functions and other cryptographic primitives beyond TLS acceleration for
> Netty.
>
>> On Jun 22, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>>
I like having the latest patch release always brought in for testing and CI for the JDK versions explicitly supported. So for this release, 11/17.On Jun 22, 2023, at 5:42 PM, Jeremiah Jordan wrote:
Yes. -1 on forcing the patch release version, and possibly minor version, for anything that
Yes. -1 on forcing the patch release version, and possibly minor version,
for anything that is not absolutely necessary to do so. Especially for
things like Java or Python version, I would hope we just install the latest
Java 8, Java 11, or Java 17 JDK for the platform the image is built from
+1 for ACCP and can attest to its results. ACCP also optimizes for a range of hash
functions and other cryptographic primitives beyond TLS acceleration for Netty.On Jun 22,
2023, at 2:07 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:Either would be better than
today. On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:57 PM Jordan West
Wouldn’t we recommend people to use the test images the project CI use?
Thus using in testing the versions we use? I would assume the repeatable CI
will still expect test images the way we have now?
(I hope I did not misunderstand the question)
I also share similar worries with Brandon
On Thu,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 4:23 PM Josh McKenzie wrote:
>
> 2. Anyone concerned about us being specific about versions in
> requirements.txt in the dtest repo?
My concern with this is atrophy; we'll set the version once and when
finally forced to update, find that a lot of other things must also
Been working with Mick on CI and it dawned on me that we don't specify a
specific required JDK version (major.minor.patch) for CI nor do we actually
specify required python lib versions for many of the requirements in our dtests
Either would be better than today.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:57 PM Jordan West wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m wondering if there is appetite to change the default SSL provider for
> Cassandra going forward to either ACCP [1] or tc-native in Netty? Our
> deployment as well as others I’m aware of make this
Hi,
I’m wondering if there is appetite to change the default SSL provider for
Cassandra going forward to either ACCP [1] or tc-native in Netty? Our
deployment as well as others I’m aware of make this change in their fork
and it can lead to significant performance improvement. When recently
Hi Team,
If no one has comments/questions regarding this feature, I would like to start
voting thread on Monday.
Thanks,
Shailaja
> On Jun 15, 2023, at 4:49 PM, Shailaja Koppu wrote:
>
> Adding [DISCUSS] to the subject. I request everyone here to please share your
> thoughts/comments on
12 matches
Mail list logo
