What would the general consensus be here of using FindBugs
(http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/)? I just used the 1.1.1 version to
analyze Cayenne 3.0 and it is reporting 1720 (potential) bugs (at
least on my current source tree). I haven't used this tool much yet,
but it seems like it could be
OK, here it is:
http://people.apache.org/~mgentry/modeler-report.html
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 2/1/07, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly, SSH is blocked. I can do it tonight when I get home ...
/dev/mrg
On 2/1/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
BTW, you can
but BLOBs), but I was thinking
something that worked more locally in the tab you were on so you'd not
have to bounce around when making minor tweaks.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 2/6/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I just used Cayenne
I could see having it as part of the modeler or even a separate
module, if you think that flexibility would be worthwhile.
/dev/mrg
On 2/15/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The discussion on CAY-752 made me thinking - do we need a wocompat
package in runtime? Neither runtime nor
is required for just the Apache product (don't have to
also include OpenSSL in the notification).
-jean
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html#faq
Michael Gentry wrote:
Here are my thoughts ...
Cayenne 3.0 Modeler doesn't support encryption out-of-the-box. It
only provides hooks which an end
Doing mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install (after a previous mvn
clean), I get:
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 3 minutes 12
Well, for Cayenne Modeler to run standalone using Derby (embedded,
just like we use HSQL), we would need to include the Derby jar.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 2/27/07, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Gentry wrote:
To re-hash -- but not ROT-13 :-) -- this subject again, did someone
11. Hire contractors to ride the dead horse.
That one hits way too close to home at the moment ...
As for Maven ... I'm not an expert on it, but I never had trouble
building in the pre-Maven days ...
/dev/mrg
On 3/13/07, Ahmed Mohombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something changed in the
if using a built-in encoder, don't
log the salt (not used), etc, but that might just be more complicated
than it is worth.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 4/8/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question for Michael Gentry ...
I am nitpicking here, but with the new password encoder feature
I haven't had time to explore that potential bug yet and wouldn't want to
hold up a bug-fix release on that account.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 5/2/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, we had a report from Michael about a potential bug, an issue Tore
is working on that goes on trunk,
I just skimmed over my e-mails and that appears to be the highlights.
/dev/mrg
On 6/3/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just posted the first draft of the board report:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2007
Admittedly it's been a slow quarter for
remember which version
dumped it). So now we can reuse the name for the user-friendly
utility class (if we decide to go this way).
Andrus
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Hasn't QueryUtils gone poof in 3.0?
/dev/mrg
On 6/5/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So
I was thinking that, too ... seemed to stick in the back of my brain from
when I added the enumeration stuff. Made things harder. Static methods are
really functions, but are being marketed as methods. :-)
/dev/mrg
On 6/22/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately there's
For some reason, I thought CayenneDataObject had a
writeNestedProperty() method, but it doesn't seem to. It looks like
PropertyUtils has the ability to do this, though (although I might
need to patch it). Would it make since to make writing nested paths
available in CayenneDataObject, too?
Hey, look at that! I was rambling about the same things a year ago,
too. I'll open up two JIRA issues and assign them to me.
Thanks!
/dev/mrg
On 6/28/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
For some reason, I thought
I've been busy trying to get some stuff done before a trip out of
town. I'll try to take a look at it today. I'm in favor of a
release, but would like to try it out just a bit first.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 7/18/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been quiet on the list for the
Sorry, I didn't get to it today. It'll be next week before I can
look. If you decide before then, I guess I'm a +0. I'm in favor of a
release, but just haven't tried it. :-)
Thanks!
/dev/mrg
On 7/19/07, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been busy trying to get some stuff done
OK, I finally was able to try to migrate my old 1.2.x project to 3.0.
After some missing jar (log4j, common collections, etc) issues and
renaming all of my packages from objectstyle to apache, I was able to
launch the application but it doesn't work. A good portion of my
application depends on
Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 27, 2007, at 2:25 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Option 2 would be to remove it from the actual
code and documentation since it looks like it is still supported.
That would be my preference too - let's remove it M2.
Andrus
This doesn't really cover the JDBC driver, but tells a little more
about the serial type:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/datatype.html#DATATYPE-SERIAL
It looks like declaring something to be serial sets up a sequence,
too? I'm always wary of the word equivalent in tech docs, though.
I'm still using Java 1.4 with a customized Cayenne 1.2 (had added the
password encoding to it). At the time I did that, the vast majority
of our WebLogic servers were locked into Java 1.4, but that is slowly
changing. I guess for my personal take, I'd be OK with 3.0 moving to
Java 1.5 since we
.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On 8/7/07, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Atlassian claims Hibernate is the best open source persistence
framework (http://opensource.atlassian.com/), so talking about
Cayenne at their offices could be interesting. :-)
/dev/mrg
On 8/7/07, Aristedes
Another advantage of deciding on 1.5 is we can have native enumeration
support. I would definitely like to see this in the modeler and could
try to add it (my Swing skills aren't so hot, but I can be stubborn).
I'd like to be able to define the enumerated values in the modeler and
be able to
at the moment).
If this is the case, then it wouldn't make a lot of sense to add it to
the modeler.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 8/9/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Yes, that is currently how I've done it -- although with Java 1.4 and
my own
] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
PS. I also tried it without the toString() method in the enum.
On 8/9/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Cayenne handles Java 5 enums automatically? You don't have to have,
in your custom type
Well, when mapping to legacy DBs, we can't always control the mapping.
I'd much rather have usable/readable names in the Java code even if
the backend is more obscure. Using the enumerated name or index isn't
always desirable or even possible, either. To use a real-world
example from my code:
Uhm ... that's why I wanted it in the modeler and supported by Cayenne
natively. (Or easier to support, even if not in the modeler.)
:-)
I'm positive this feature would be useful to others. My current
approach is complicated to set up and easy to miss registering one of
your types (although
Another thing I was just thinking about. The current implementation
is somewhat fragile. When persisting the enumerated value, for an int
column it calls value.ordinal(), which returns the zero-based index of
the value of the enum, as it is declared in the class.
Given:
public enum Color {
Will moving to JDK 5 be a change in label only, or will we actually
go in and implement generics throughout all the classes, possibly
requiring some API changes along the way to do it right?
I'm thinking it'll be a label-change only (well, except the JPA stuff
does indeed require Java 5), but
OK, since I'm guilty of not having read the JPA specs (What can I say?
I like Classic Cayenne.), how would something like a Set or Map work?
I'm not talking about the underlying implementation details, but from
a user-perspective. Would a Map interface allow you to do something
like
I think that sums it up unless we want to add the vote about moving to
Java 5 ... which they probably wouldn't care about.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 9/6/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's that time of the year again. We need to submit the report until
the September 19th Board
I have a nested DataContext:
DataContext childContext = parentContext.createChildDataContext();
I have a Master and 3 Details (1-to-many) in the parent DC (in a
committed state), and pull the Master into the nested DC using
localObject(). If I then do the following:
Master childMaster =
On Oct 4, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I have a nested DataContext:
DataContext childContext = parentContext.createChildDataContext();
I have a Master and 3 Details (1-to-many) in the parent DC (in a
committed state), and pull the Master into the nested DC using
localObject
committed a fix. Per my Jira comment there is a correct way to go
about it that requires a bit of object lifecycle redesign, but my
fairly straightforward workaround should work for this particular case.
Andrus
On Oct 4, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I'm not sure if it matters
I just spent several days setting up a new computer and transferring
applications/files, so I was kind of busy ... a chore I never like.
I'll try to look at the artifacts.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 10/8/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll go ahead and prepare the artifacts.
OK, I'm not a lawyer, but ... :-)
LGPL (but not GPL) code can be included (or linked at compile time) in
commercial code and it doesn't open-source the commercial code. To
quote from the GNU itself:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
The GNU Project has two principal licenses to use
dependencies with Apache Cayenne.
Andrus
On Oct 30, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
OK, I'm not a lawyer, but ... :-)
LGPL (but not GPL) code can be included (or linked at compile time) in
commercial code and it doesn't open-source the commercial code. To
quote from the GNU itself
it as a non-ASF project. I'm personally not
a fan of it, but if doing so would significantly improve the quality of
the modeler, I'd warm up to it. I've just not been adequately convinced
that that'll be the case.
--
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Michael Gentry [mailto:[EMAIL
to build the assemblies over
the weekends.
If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb
to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
--
Kevin
On 11/2/07 9:57 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some
You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of
us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-)
/dev/mrg
On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results:
-1: 0
0: 0
+1: 4 (all binding)
My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne
(no JPA) worked fine.
+1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to
,
/dev/mrg
On Nov 5, 2007 8:59 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne
(no JPA) worked fine.
+1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard [EMAIL
I just recently got a replacement system, but it came with Tiger.
I've gotten the upgrade DVD now, but was going to wait until 10.5.1
was out. What kind or problems are you running into? Is it with Java
1.4 or 1.5?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Nov 7, 2007 1:36 PM, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help.
/dev/mrg
On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the
release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but
I hope to
I don't know this for a fact, and I'm sure Andrus will correct me, but
I would never have expected the DataContext to be thread-safe.
Perhaps that is my EOF background. I believe that doing commits (or
queries) from two different DataContexts is thread-safe, though.
/dev/mrg
On Nov 9, 2007
belonging to the same user
to access the context (and its DataObjects) simultaneously, you'll
have to synchronize manually.
Andrus
On Nov 9, 2007 9:50 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know this for a fact, and I'm sure Andrus will correct me, but
I would never have expected
, it sped things up for everyone as there was
a shared database view and DB access was pretty expensive.
On 11/9/07, Aristedes Maniatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/2007, at 2:14 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
DataContext is not thread-safe, as it is intended for access by a
single user.
Ah
At one point, Andrus had e-mailed it to me and I used it to make the
OS X application icon (I had to rotate it a bit from the original).
I'll try to look for it later, but Andrus may have it handier.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 11/12/07, Thomas Bernhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All Frames and
). Let me know if you would like the PSD.
The ICNS file is in Subversion at:
modeler/cayenne-modeler-mac/src/japplication/resources/CayenneModeler.icns
/dev/mrg
On 11/12/07, Aristedes Maniatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/11/2007, at 10:01 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
At one point, Andrus had
To whomever (I suspect Andrus) added the search field to Cayenne
Modeler -- SWEETNESS.
/dev/mrg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool :-)
(btw it was developed on my request as a trial project by one of the
ObjectStyle prospective employees).
Andrus
On Nov 27, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
To whomever (I suspect Andrus) added the search field to Cayenne
Modeler -- SWEETNESS
I was working on one thing and got distracted and changed the query
logging code a little bit. I wanted to get thoughts before checking
it in, especially since I had to change QueryLogger.logQuery() -- I
added an extra parameter for the database column attributes. The log
now includes the
I played with the formatting, too. It is pretty easy to adjust and
I'm not very religious about it. In my little example, it isn't a big
deal, but if you have 50 binds or so (like in a real database table),
it could be useful information. That's kind of where I was heading
(even though it is
Changes are checked in. Please let me know if you have problems, etc.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
for me.
Andrus
On Dec 5, 2007, at 10:13 PM, Michael Gentry (JIRA) wrote:
Cancel doesn't cancel when quitting CM with a modified model
Key: CAY-932
URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne
Looks good to me, but how about changing:
Switched Cayenne development to Java 1.5 from a mixed Java 1.4/1.5 setup.
to:
Switched Cayenne 3.0 development to Java 1.5 from a mixed Java 1.4/1.5
setup after a poll on the user list revealed overwhelming community
acceptance of requiring Java 1.5 for
with the JAR.
How would your proposal work for that sort of situation?
--
Kevin
On 12/19/07 9:31 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I've brought this up before, but I don't believe we really
decided on anything (or did anything), so here goes again ...
What do you think about
my
disagreement is that we should make folder-based setup a default (even
if an optional default).
Thanks,
Andrus
On Dec 26, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I don't mind having the mapping (DataMap) in a single file, although
perhaps it might make merging harder if two people
, Michael Gentry wrote:
Changes are checked in. Please let me know if you have problems, etc.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
Fortunately (?), Apple hasn't put Java 6 on my computer yet. :-)
On Dec 28, 2007 1:59 PM, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. . . is likely going to be a pipedream.
It appears Sun went out of their way to make the interface changes
incompatible between Java 5 Java 6. Not only do the
the list... so doing that by
sending this message.
Andrus
On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:36 PM, Michael Gentry (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Gentry reassigned CAY-884
processes
on Windows, considering this change... Or just let users do it if they
want to?
Andrus
On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
It appears that Cayenne Modeler doesn't allow you to have two models
open at the same time? Anyone have thoughts on the difficulty
If you use the FindBugs plugin (Eclipse -- can run manually, too),
it'll flag all of those new Integer() calls, too. It is a
worthwhile plugin/tool.
/dev/mrg
On Dec 29, 2007 5:30 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see a reply to this one.
On Dec 20, 2007, at 1:47 AM,
are off by one position.
Andrus
On Dec 28, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
That's what I was hoping. Thanks for the update!
/dev/mrg
On Dec 28, 2007 9:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I deployed this in production some time back. I am really happy
I was going to try to get the logging glitch with auto-incrementing
PKs fixed this weekend. Not a show-stopper, though.
/dev/mrg
On Jan 11, 2008 1:29 PM, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the changelog, we've done a lot since M2, including the Java 5
transition.
What is the
column name is C2:
INSERT INTO mytable (C1, C3, C4) VALUES (?, ?, ?)
[bind: 1-C1:V1, 2-C2:V3, 3-C3:V4]
At position #2, the PK label that is not used in the statement SQL is
shown, and from there, all the values are off by one position.
Andrus
On Dec 28, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Michael Gentry
not).
Andrus
On Jan 13, 2008, at 5:13 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
What database are you using? I'm guessing MySQL? I was trying to set
up HSQLDB, but the modeler doesn't generate the SQL to use identity
columns so I'm not certain if Cayenne supports identity columns with
it? I suppose I can
, the generated values were not passed
back via the java.sql.Statement.getGeneratedKeys() - the method we
rely upon to init ObjectId's on commit. Maybe worth checkin again...
Andrus
On Jan 13, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
HSQLDB 1.8 has an identity column. To quote the documentation
Just curious if Siarhei is the one who added the search feature to CM?
On Jan 15, 2008 7:47 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I wanted to introduce a new Cayenne volunteer - Siarhei Kaneuski. He
got his first taste of Cayenne development when working on the H2
adapter. Now
Andrus, I had to modify the QueryLogger API just a tad to pass down if
the query was an INSERT query (which are the ones you want to skip
showing the PK value). My test cases worked. Please let me know if
you encounter other issues.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Jan 13, 2008 10:47 AM, Michael Gentry
We can change this, but see my previous message to Kevin. Perhaps I
should work on more advances enumeration support?
/dev/mrg
On Jan 16, 2008 11:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik (JIRA) dev@cayenne.apache.org wrote:
Enum logging in SQL logs
Key: CAY-964
to discuss any ideas that
do not require replacing a core java enum concept with a custom enum
implementation.
Andrus
On Jan 16, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
We can change this, but see my previous message to Kevin. Perhaps I
should work on more advances enumeration support
I like how the documentation took the longest amount of time ...
On Jan 25, 2008 1:02 AM, Aristedes Maniatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The path to continuous integration testing has been a rocky one, but
we have some progress.
1. Over the last weeks I've had Bamboo perform four hourly testing
Are you asking if you can specify/assign your own PKs? If so, the
answer is yes. You should expose the PK attribute in the ObjEntity in
CayenneModeler (this isn't done by default). Then when you generate
the code, it'll include a getter/setter for the PK. If you assign the
PK manually for a
I did some work on extended enumerations (where the DB value can be
defined) this weekend, but wanted to do more testing and get a little
feedback before checking it in. I apologize in advance for the length
of the e-mail, but hopefully it won't be too bad.
First off, there is a new interface to
I can play around with the first suggestion later this week. I'm not
adamant either way. I just want what is best for the end-user, even
if the underlying Cayenne code is a bit more complex.
Changing the method name to getDatabaseValue() is fine.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at
.
Ari
On 28/02/2008, at 3:01 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Ari, I took a glance at the code you sent me and on first look, it
appears to be similar to what I did for my Cayenne 1.2/2.0 enum
support (using Java 1.4 only, though) and the current stuff I'm
adding. I'll get to work
Comments inline.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
I have a few suggestions/comments/nitpicks.
* Placing ExtendedEnumeration class in
org.apache.cayenne.access.types will make it inaccessible on the ROP
client
Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
I think adding support for JavaDoc comments in Cayenne Modeler would
be a perfect-sized task for SoC.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Ahmed Mohombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If somebody has a
project idea
IMHO the JIRA is full with requests (project ideas):
- support for CM plug-ins
-
, at 4:32 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I moved the enumeration documentation to here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAYDOC/Modeling+Object
+Layer
And deleted it off the Extended Types page. Let me know if that's
what you were thinking.
I also checked in the other
I moved the enumeration documentation to here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAYDOC/Modeling+Object+Layer
And deleted it off the Extended Types page. Let me know if that's
what you were thinking.
I also checked in the other changes to the code, so I think this can
close out
14, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
That just tells me you live in a more orderly world than I do. :-)
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think it is logical to start with Standard and then move to
Extended, but otherwise
How about being able to drill through relationships in the view on the
left, just like EOModeler?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a page with the list of tasks for the SoC project called
cayenne-modeler-improvements:
clickable elements on the right-hand side editor forms.
Andrus
On Mar 16, 2008, at 3:11 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
How about being able to drill through relationships in the view on the
left, just like EOModeler?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm not convinced this is a bug, but I suppose I can see an argument
being made where the table PKs are States, Countries, etc that you
want to map to an enum. I'm just not a fan of meaningful PKs, I
suppose, but that doesn't mean my opinion is necessarily the correct
one for everyone. Would you
One of the guys here downloaded Cayenne (versions 3 and 2) and tried
running Cayenne Modeler, but it kept crashing. I looked at it for him
and there was an exception in Apache Commons (I don't have the exact
exception, but that isn't the real issue). I eventually went to his
Andrus, I'm going to send you a test I just did via e-mail since the
list doesn't support attachments. Enums as PKs worked for me. What
issue were you seeing?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
Hmm, I used the ExtendedEnumerations which aren't in M3. When I
changed my State class to look like:
public enum State
{
AL, AK, AR, AZ, DC, MD, TN, VA;
}
It still worked with M3.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, already sent the attachment
.
So it was probably an issue similar to this:
https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1034
I guess we can close CAY-1014 and see if we can improve relationship
validation...
Andrus
On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Hmm, I used the ExtendedEnumerations which
/A
Reporter: Michael Gentry
Priority: Minor
Add the Cayenne release notes (RELEASE-NOTES.txt) to the downloads page at:
http://cayenne.apache.org/download.html
A user shouldn't have to download the entire distribution to see what has
changed.
--
This message
. That would be a bug of course.
Andrus
On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I didn't try doing a relationship using the enum in the join. Did
you? I can try that, too, but I believe all of the translation code
goes through the same routines, so it should work there, too
and what not, feel free to join
the group. It's pretty low volume:
http://code.google.com/p/tapestry5-cayenne/
--
Kevin
On 4/27/08 11:50 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I'm just curious since I haven't been following Tapestry much lately
(I'm
FWIW, I've seen Oracle automatically/silently convert numbers to
varchars before, too (999 = '999'). This works great until your
numbers start having letters in them. :-)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Kevin Menard
Welcome Andrey! I hope you enjoy working on Cayenne over the summer.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Andrey Razumovsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all Cayenne Developers!
My name is Andrey Razumovsky, i'm from St.-Petersburg, Russia.
I am glad to announce that i will be participate
Did anyone else have thoughts/comments on this issue?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm OK with either way, I just figured having one would simplify maintenance.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Andrus Adamchik
[EMAIL
Welcome back, Kevin! Hope you had a wonderful time!
I just updated and built the new CM and the right-click support is
nice. Haven't tried out anything else, but it is indeed a nice
surprise. We had a code-freeze last night, so maybe I'll poke around
some of the other stuff, too.
On Thu, May
I believe that creating CayenneModeler.app (for OS X) is fine on any
platform, but creating the disk image (.dmg) for OS X needs to be done
on OS X. Under the assembly directory is a build-mac.sh which does it
(using the hdiutil command).
Can the Windows CayenneModeler.exe be produced on
I never got to test the actual artifacts, but others did without major
issues. I've mainly been using the trunk successfully. Given those
two items, I'm also +1 for the M4 release and agree it is time to
close the vote.
/dev/mrg
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL
I still think we should have the release notes on the download page:
http://cayenne.apache.org/download.html
and probably even a link in the News section on the home page. This,
at a minimum, could be a link to:
1 - 100 of 744 matches
Mail list logo
