Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Clerezza project to Attic

Dear Hasan, all, Unfortunately I don't have more resources to put into Clerezza. So with a pinch of sadness: +1 I hope we will be seeing each other and doing stuff together on other occasions. I'm currently mostly active around decentralized social media with Scuttlebutt and writing

Re: Tutorial 2

fine with any group-id. Cheers, Reto On 06.06.21 10:54, Hasan wrote: Dear all, Hi @Reto Gmür <mailto:r...@apache.org> There is a bug in rdf.jena.parser version 2.0.1 The file src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.serializedform.ParsingProvider should be r

Re: Tutorial 2

On 03.06.2021 18:47, Hasan wrote: Hi Yusuf I'll ask Reto why the fix for jena.parser is not available in the maven central repo yet. It's there now: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/wymiwyg/clerezza/rdf.jena.parser/2.0.1/ Reto Hasan On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Yusuf Karadağ

Re: Congrats Yusuf for Being Accepted to GSoC 2021 for Apache Clerezza

Welcome Yusuf! On 17.05.21 20:45, Furkan KAMACI wrote: Hi Yusuf, Congratulations on your acceptance of Google Summer of Code 2021 for Apache Clerezza. May 17, 2021 - June 7, 2021, is the community bonding period. You can try to familiarize yourself with Apache Clerezza during this period.

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Release "Apache Clerezza JAX-RS MessageBodyProviders for RDF" version 2.0.0

I've simplified my name years ago! Reto Gmür is enough  -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020 08:17 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Release "Apache Clerezza JAX-RS MessageBodyProviders for RDF" version 2.0.0 Dear all

RE: [VOTE] Release "Apache Clerezza JAX-RS MessageBodyProviders for RDF" version 2.0.0

+1 Thanks, Hasan! -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020 10:51 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release "Apache Clerezza JAX-RS MessageBodyProviders for RDF" version 2.0.0 Dear all You are invited to test and vote for the release candidate of Apache

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza API Utils version 2.0.0

+1 Thanks, Hasan! -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Sonntag, 28. Juni 2020 15:22 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza API Utils version 2.0.0 Dear all You are invited to test and vote for the release candidate of Apache Clerezza api.utils version

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza Data Set version 2.0.0

Compiles, verifies +1 Thanks, Hasan -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Sonntag, 3. Mai 2020 12:27 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Cc: Furkan KAMACI ; Reto Gmür Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza Data Set version 2.0.0 +1 Hasan On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Hasan wrote

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza Representation, SPARQL, and Test Utils version 2.0.0

+1 Reto -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Freitag, 21. Februar 2020 22:32 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza Representation, SPARQL, and Test Utils version 2.0.0 +1 Hasan On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:30 PM Hasan wrote: > Dear all > > You are

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza API Implementation and Ontologies version 2.0.0

+1 Thanks! -Original Message- From: Furkan KAMACI Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2020 08:34 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza API Implementation and Ontologies version 2.0.0 Hi, +1 Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:16 AM Hasan

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza API version 2.0.0

+1 Thanks, Hasan! Reto -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2020 17:32 To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza API version 2.0.0 +1 Hasan On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:00 AM Hasan wrote: > Dear all > > You are invited to test and

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza parent version 8

Looks good, signature verified. +1 Thanks, Hasan! -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 11:54 AM To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Clerezza parent version 8 Dear all You are invited to test and vote for the release candidate of

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

Hi Hasan, all, I'm having a bit too much going on right now and I would be glad if someone else could create the rlease candidate. Cheers, Reto -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 8:00 PM To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Cc: Reto Gmür Subject: Re: [DISCUSS

RE: Update version of org.apache.apache in parent/pom.xml

Cc: Reto Gmür ; dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: Update version of org.apache.apache in parent/pom.xml Many thanks Furkan for the information. But I am not sure whether this is the way to go. The goal as it is defined now is surely not correct anymore according to the error message

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

if it turns out to be inconvenient. As you suggested I merged reunited down to master and I think it would be great to have a release. Cheers, Reto -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 1:13 AM To: Reto Gmür Cc: Reto Gmür ; dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

Dear Hasan Again a late reply, I’m trying to improve. See the outlook style inline responses. Cheers, Reto From: Hasan Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:49 PM To: Reto Gmür ; Reto Gmür Cc: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

, 2019 at 5:36 PM Reto Gmür mailto:r...@factsmission.com>> wrote: Hi Hasan, all, I've just created a branch of the jena.* modules on https://github.com/clerezza and of https://github.com/linked-solutions/slds. The refactoring brings some good improvements so I'd like to see this released a

RE: [GitHub] [clerezza] tandhika opened a new pull request #13: Reunited

Thanks Hasan, I’m sorry I missed the context From: Hasan Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2019 8:21 PM To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Reto Gmür Cc: Reto Gmür Subject: Re: [GitHub] [clerezza] tandhika opened a new pull request #13: Reunited Hi Reto On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 5:49 PM Reto Gmür mailto:r

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

. Cheers, Reto From: Hasan Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:39 AM To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Reto Gmür Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8 I think we have to stick to the OSGI spec and use unsetXXX and not using resetXXX. (112.8.1 Component Annotations

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

day, March 18, 2019 6:24 AM To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8 Hi Reto, all, On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:22 PM Reto Gmür wrote: > Hi Hasan > > Yes, the renaming you propose makes sense to me. Are both names > s

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

should be replaced with resetSerializer which would be more suitable in this case, because we are going to reset it to a default serializer rather than set it to null. Cheers Hasan On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Reto Gmür wrote: > Hi Hasan > > Regarding GraphWriter: I created

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

@clerezza.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8 Hi Reto Thx for the input. Comments inline On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 5:36 PM Reto Gmür wrote: > Hi Hasan, all, > > I've just created a branch of the jena.* modules on > https://github.

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

ore I needed to make a subclass to access the protected methods. However it seems that graphWriter could access the default serializer using .getInstance itself, if none is set. Cheers, Reto -Original Message- From: Reto Gmür Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 2:36 PM To: dev@clerezza.ap

RE: [DISCUSS] Release the reunited branch as the master branch version 8

Hi Hasan Thanks a lot for the overview. While I think it shouldn't be a general requirement to release everything together, in this case it looks like it would make things easier to use version 2.0.0 in all modules. WDYT? Cheers, Reto -Original Message- From: Hasan Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Clerezza refactoring

: > Hi Reto > > Thanks for the information. > I'll take a look this weekend. > > Hasan > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür wrote: > >> Hi Hasan >> >> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the >> parent was most

RE: Clerezza refactoring

take a look at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to make clerezza better. Cheers Hasan On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür wrote: > Hi Hasan > > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list. > > Cheers, > Reto &

RE: [VOTE] Move Apache Clerezza project to Attic

Hi all, Sure. Sorry I missed the thread. I gladly conform my -1. Cheers, Reto From: Hasan Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 2:26 AM To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Cc: Tommaso Teofili ; Rupert Westenthaler ; Reto Gmür ; Reto Gmür Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Clerezza project to Attic Hi Reto

RE: Clerezza refactoring

Hasan [mailto:xushan.c...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring > > Hi Reto > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Hasan > > >

RE: Clerezza refactoring

t: Re: Clerezza refactoring > > Hi Reto > > Yes, that would be nice. > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ? > > hasan > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili > <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >

Clerezza refactoring

Hi Hasan, Thanks for the good conversation today. I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for code like this to work: Graph g = new SimpleGraph(); g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new

Re: [DISCUSS] Release rdf-core 0.3

On 2017-12-08 07:56, Hasan wrote: > Indeed, it is a bit confusing. > So, what is your suggestion for the new structure? I've created a new branch "reunited" in the clerezza repository that includes the rdf-core sources (with their histories). The next step I think would be

RE: building from source?

Hi, The missing modules in the parent (CLEREZZA-1024) is indeed embaracing, it's fixed now. Certainly the activity level of clerezza is low but I think we're moving forward at a low pace and the modules have some usage. Rather than moving to attic we should create a project site that reflects

RE: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?

Hi, Check out https://github.com/linked-solutions/tlds for a clerezza based linked data server applying client-side type-based rendering. It would be possible to have a very similar implementation that implements e.g. scala-server pages. Cheers, Reto > -Original Message- > From:

Simple Linked Data Server based on Clerezza

Hi all, As a Clerezza demo application I've programmed a Simple Linked Data Server exposing data from a SPARQL server as Linked Data, optionally rewriting the URIs so that data can be exposed under different host names. It's less than 300 lines of code. It's not using OSGi but designed to be

[RESULT][VOTE] 201604 partial clerezza release

The following votes have been cast: - 3 binding +1 - 1 non-binding 0 The vote has passed with 3 binding +1. Thanks for voting! Reto On Tue, 10 May 2016, at 13:19, Reto Gmür wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 4 May 2016, at 09:27, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > +1, checked signatures, successf

Re: [VOTE] 201604 partial clerezza release

gt; > > > I'll change my vote to a 0 assuming the md5 and/or sha1 files makes it > > > to dist. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 25 April 2016 at 07:52, Reto Gmür <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Stian > >

Re: [VOTE] 201604 partial clerezza release

> > Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; > 2015-11-10T16:41:47+00:00) > Maven home: /home/stain/software/maven > Java version: 1.8.0_72-internal, vendor: Oracle Corporation > Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre > Default locale: en_GB, platfo

[VOTE] 201604 partial clerezza release

Hi all, This is bug-fix release that fixes the wrong handling of literals with language in stable-serializer as well as in jena bindings, it also updates the rdf-commons dependency in rdf.core (to reduce potential maven dependency conflicts). It contains the following artifacts that shall be

Re: Radical Clerezza Spring Cleaning

On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, at 15:22, Reto Gmür wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, at 17:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > +1 to strip down a bit to simplify releasing/reviewing and maintenance. > > > > However I agree with Tommaso that the non-core stuff shouldn't just be > >

Re: Radical Clerezza Spring Cleaning

10:23, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > hi Reto, > > > > > > Il giorno gio 7 apr 2016 alle ore 20:52 Reto Gmür <r...@apache.org> ha > > scritto: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> It's spring cleaning time i

Radical Clerezza Spring Cleaning

Hi all, It's spring cleaning time in the northern hemisphere! I propose a radical cleaning of Clerezza. I think the project source has a size that poses the following problems: - It's hard to manage - It's too much for potential new contributors to easily get into the project - Votes are hard

Re: Request for Input for Feb 2016 Report

Dear Hasan What comes to mind is: - A partial release - Using the OSGi bundles provided by the Jena project for the Jena backend - Created integrations tests based on new launchers - Fighting with a sling-launchpad plugin update that made previous releases uncompilable There's probably more,

[RESULT][VOTE] RC2 for 201508 partial Release

The vote passed with 4 binding +1 and no other vote. Thanks for voting! Reto On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > tag build succeeded, signatures & co. look ok. > > Tommaso > > 2015-11-22 21:49 GMT+0

Re: [VOTE] RC2 for 201508 partial Release

+1 (and BUMP...) On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Reto Gmür <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > As the first release candidate of the partial clerezza release 2015 > couldn't be accepted here's a second release candidate > > The release brings the following improvem

[VOTE] RC2 for 201508 partial Release

Hi all, As the first release candidate of the partial clerezza release 2015 couldn't be accepted here's a second release candidate The release brings the following improvements: - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose their OSGi-DS services - Updated to latest

Using Jena OSGi bundle

Hi all, I've tried again to use the OSGi bundle provided by jena instead of our own bundles. It seems that the problems encountered with the SNAPSHOT version have been fixed. The only downside I can see is that the launchers gets around 4MB (~ 8%) bigger and that those who don't need TDB (but

[RESULT][VOTE] Release clerezza rdf-core 0.2

The vote has passed with 4+1 and no other vote. Thanks for voting. Reto On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Reto Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote: > >> checked signature, compilation, source co

Fwd: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules

of 23 Clerezza modules To: d...@jena.apache.org Reto - have you tried the released Jena OSGi bundle? Andy On 10/09/15 16:49, Reto Gmür wrote: > On 9 Sep 2015 13:50, "Rob Vesse" <rve...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote: > >> >> This seems a little od

Re: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules

Hi Tommaso, On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > 2015-09-07 18:36 GMT+02:00 Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>: > > > On 07/09/15 14:32, Reto Gmür wrote: > > > >> >The binaries have had t

Re: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > On 05/09/15 16:36, Reto Gmür wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the following >> improvements: >> >> - Fixed issues prev

[VOTE] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules

Hi all, This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the following improvements: - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose their OSGi-DS services - Updated to latest version of Jersey - Updated Jena Version - Contains integration tests It contains the

Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Aug 2015

Hi Hasan, I think the most important thing I did, is an integration test testing the new launchers, to reduces chances to have bugs like the ones that slipped into the last release. Furthermore I fixed bugs in jena.sparql and rdfrdfjson. Tailoring a new release is near the top of my todo list.

Integration test

Hi all, As you might be aware our integration tests have not been working correctly for a long time, I've remove the old project and created a test against the content launcher in provisioning/launchers/tests/content-launcher-tests. We obviously should have has this long before, the issues we

Re: [VOTE] release rdfjson 1.0.0

best Rupert On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The support for rdf/json was not part of first release of the clerezza commons rdf compliant modules. As it turns out that the module seems to be used and needed I've update the module

[VOTE] release rdfjson 1.0.0

Hi all, The support for rdf/json was not part of first release of the clerezza commons rdf compliant modules. As it turns out that the module seems to be used and needed I've update the module and prepared a release candidate. The source release is here:

Re: [VOTE] 201505 Release of 77 Clerezza modules

+1 On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Tommaso 2015-05-20 18:03 GMT+02:00 Reto Gmür r...@apache.org: Hi All, After the release of clerezza rdf-core 0.1 last month this is the first update of clerezza to use the new rdf-core libraries

[RESULT][VOTE] 201505 Release of 77 Clerezza modules

The vote has been passed with 3 binding +1s and no other vote. Thanks for voting. Reto On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: +1 On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Tommaso 2015-05-20 18:03 GMT+02:00 Reto

[VOTE] 201505 Release of 77 Clerezza modules

Hi All, After the release of clerezza rdf-core 0.1 last month this is the first update of clerezza to use the new rdf-core libraries (CLEREZZA-960). It contains the following 77 module directories: - jaxrs.rdf.providers - rdf/web/rdf.web.core - rdf/web - rdf/web/rdf.web.ontologies -

Re: Request for iNPUT for MAY 2015 REPORT

, May 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Reto Gmür r...@wymiwyg.com wrote: Hi Hasan I think the most important thing I contributed to were: - Extracted and released Clerezza Commons RDF API, modelling the RDF 1.1 data model and aligning the terms with the incubating commons RDF proposal

Re: Request for iNPUT for MAY 2015 REPORT

, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Reto Gmür r...@wymiwyg.com wrote: Hi Hasan I will create a launcher that includes everything needed to create the site. The editor I created based on etch is a bit of a hack with the RDF being present both as RDFa (for the editor) as well as Turtle (to tell the server what has

Re: Request for iNPUT for MAY 2015 REPORT

Hi Hasan I think the most important thing I contributed to were: - Extracted and released Clerezza Commons RDF API, modelling the RDF 1.1 data model and aligning the terms with the incubating commons RDF proposal in the incubator - Simple in memory implementation of the API, a SPARQL backed

Re: [VOTE] Release clerezza rdf-core 0.1 (RC2)

+1 On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, RC2 fixes the issue found with the bundle export-package directives in the previous release candidate. This is a vote to release clerezza-rdf-core, the release of rdf-core will allow to merge the rdf-commons

Re: clerezza-rdf-core git commit: CLEREZZA-951: language tag n1tormalized to lowercase (as the javadoc said it would)

/95dc8375 Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: 95dc837594df58bcf9d063e04a9b18b799723773 Parents: d1dc9e8 Author: Reto Gmür r...@apache.org Authored: Sun Apr 5 11:02:39 2015 + Committer: Reto Gmür r...@apache.org Committed: Sun Apr 5 11:02:39 2015 +

[RESULT][VOTE](lazy consensus) Release Clerezza Parent 6

The vote passed with no objection and 3 binding +1 (Enrico, Rupert, Reto). I will proceed with the release. Reto On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: On 23/03/15 09:58, Reto Gmür wrote: Hi Stian, On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes st

Re: [VOTE](lazy consensus) Release Clerezza Parent 6

be fixed locally instead). On 21 March 2015 at 11:41, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Clerezza Parent has been updated to use Java 8. Dependency versions have been updated and the scr plugin causing problems in non-OSGi projects has been removed This is a VOTE to release Clerezza

[VOTE](lazy consensus) Release Clerezza Parent 6

The Apache Clerezza Parent has been updated to use Java 8. Dependency versions have been updated and the scr plugin causing problems in non-OSGi projects has been removed This is a VOTE to release Clerezza Parent 6. This VOTE by LAZY-CONSENSUS is open for at least 72 hours until March 24 12:00

Clerezze RDF commons moved back to clerezza with a SPARQL Backend

Hello, With the new repository the clerezza rdf commons previously in the commons sandbox are now at: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/clerezza-rdf-core.git I will compare that code with the current status of the code in the incubating rdf-commons project in a later mail. Now I would

Re: Clerezze RDF commons moved back to clerezza with a SPARQL Backend

) adding a second triple with that BlankNode will result in something like a NoSuchBlankNodeInBackendException. Cheers, Reto On 16 March 2015 at 12:02, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hello, With the new repository the clerezza rdf commons previously in the commons sandbox are now

Re: Incomplete releases in dist ?

Hi Stian Thanks a lot for this code archeology and for your preparation! I'm uploading the dists as you prepared them, the md5sums much what we have vote upon. Again, many thanks! Reto On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote: Thus the two source releases

Re: New repo for clerezza rdf core

or a major change? What makes this different from a branch besides the release needs? Cheers Hasan On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Reto Gmür r...@wymiwyg.com wrote: There would be releases as to allow the other clerezza modules to evolve. Cheers, Reto On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:08 PM

New repo for clerezza rdf core

Hi all, To facilitate migration to a future RDF Commons in Clerezza I would like to suggest to start a new Git repository for the clerezza core rdf projects. The idea is to have code that gradually evolves to being closer to what will be RDF Commons as to allow a smooth and iterative evolution of

Re: Testing of jena-osgi bundle

antrun:run and acces e.g. localhost:8080/admin/graphs Cheers, Reto On 14 January 2015 at 13:18, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hi Stian Do you happen to have this deployed to a snapshot repository (I don't see it here: https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache

Re: Updated Commons-RDF

as they can (i.e. as soon as originally added instance becomes eligible for garbage collection). Cheers, Reto On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I've just committed a new version to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/rdf/trunk/ The most

Re: Testing of jena-osgi bundle

Hi Stian Do you happen to have this deployed to a snapshot repository (I don't see it here: https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/jena/) This would make it a bit easier to try to create a launcher using it. Cheers, Reto On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Stian

Updated Commons-RDF

Hi all, I've just committed a new version to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/rdf/trunk/ The most obvious change if that instead of having TripleCollection, MGraph and Graph there is now Graph and ImmutableGraph. With this change the usage of the term graph is a bit closer to the

Coomns-RDF Proposal draft

Hi all, I've extracted what could become the RDF commons API from rdf.core to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/rdf/trunk/ [*]. In the clerezza git repo I made a branch rdf-commons which shall base on the new rdf-commons. So far I've adapted rdf.core to use rdf-commons, there are

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

:10 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: The system you referenced is now at: https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons-rdf and I hope you'll consider it for Clerezza. Andy On 17/12/14 15:23, Reto Gmür wrote: Hi, This sounds like a great occasion to publish a revised version

Re: IMPORTANT: Request for input for board report November 2014

From my side there were discussion around the release process, the preferred version would have been a self service GIT solution for many small repos, The working solution was an update to the maven release plugin so that we can easily release single modules. We also released the

Re: [] [] release provisioning/typehandlerspace 0.2

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: I don't see any source in http://apache.org/dist/clerezza/ except partial-release-20130710 two releases missing. Added TODO. (I was hoping to understand your workflow as to how you deal with maven and source-release

Re: MessageBodyWriter for GraphNode and text/html missing

Hi Daniel Somehow your mail landed on the wrong pile... Are you still having the issue? Which laucnher are you using? Cheers, Reto On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Guerrero dnl.guerr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I’m trying to evaluate Clerezza. After compiling in Mac OS X, with JVM 1.6,

[VOTE] [RESULT] release provisioning/typehandlerspace 0.2

Sorry for keeping the vote open for so long, here's the result: 3 +1: Hasan, Reto, Minto No other vote was casted. The vote passes by having a majority of +1 and 3 +1 votes. Thanks for voting. Reto On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Minto van der Sluis mi...@xup.nl wrote: +1 Reto Gmür

Re: [VOTE] release provisioning/typehandlerspace 0.2

+1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Hasan ha...@apache.org wrote: +1 cheers hasan On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hi, As you know the typehandlerspace feature from the last release is unusable because of CLEREZZA-942. This issue has now been

Re: Many small git-repos

breakdown is mostly driven by how Erlang-the-language mandates a flat namespace coupled with Erlang-the-ecosystem which has developed tooling that expects individual repositories. Paul On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:33 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Reto Gmür

Tests Failing on Jenkins

I'm quite puzzled by these: https://builds.apache.org/job/clerezza-trunk-1.6/1043/org.apache.clerezza$rdf.core/ Locally they seem to pass for me. Cheers, Reto

Re: Releasing module

Good news: with version 2.5.1 of the release plugin it works! So prepare for voting ;) Reto On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: After adding the scm tags to the subproject (identical to the ones in parent) I was able to run mvn release:prepare mvn

[VOTE] release provisioning/typehandlerspace 0.2

Hi, As you know the typehandlerspace feature from the last release is unusable because of CLEREZZA-942. This issue has now been fixed. So I propose a release for this module. The launchers using the new feature will be released later, I will prepare a release for them with some inetgration tests

Re: Many small git-repos

queries about the Cordova approach happy to help. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:22 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Dear Infra-Team On the Clerezza dev-list we have been discussing our release process and we would

Re: Versions in release branch and release process.

to store the code outside of ASF infrastructure? github, gitlab, or ? Any legal and financial consequences? Cheers Hasan On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Ok, so my proposal: We should have a git repository per maven project and version each project

Many small git-repos

Dear Infra-Team On the Clerezza dev-list we have been discussing our release process and we would now like to discus in how far it is possible to adapt the infrastructure we use to the envisaged process. Clerezza consist of currently around 200 individual maven artifacts (modules). They are all

Re: Configuring SPARQL (Query Update)

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Danny Ayers danny.ay...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 August 2014 09:41, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Danny Ayers danny.ay...@gmail.com wrote: http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/tutorial/html

Re: Versions in release branch and release process.

Gmür schreef op 24-8-2014 18:05: Hi Minto, Hasan, all, How do we want to proceed on this. We have two incompatible proposals and an inpractical status quo. Do we want to have a vote? Cheers, Reto On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: On Sun

Re: Configuring SPARQL (Query Update)

2014 19:24, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Hi Danny Could you tell more about what error you get when you run the query against http://localhost:8080/sparql. What does the log say? Taking the query : SELECT * WHERE {?s ?p ?o} converted to URL becomes : http://localhost:8080/sparql

Re: Releasing module

really should urgently release this module so that we can then release working launchers again. So help for the release process would be very much appreciated. Cheers, Reto On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Reto Gmür m...@farewellutopia.com wrote: So I was trying to prepare a release

Re: Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Aug 2014

Hi Hasan, I sorry that I didn't reply earlier. The main effort from my side was on the release as well as the new sling based launchers. The next big thing is to streamline our release process to make sure releases are no longer so painful an that we can release much more often. Cheers, Reto

Re: Versions in release branch and release process.

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Minto van der Sluis mi...@xup.nl wrote: Reto Gmür schreef op 8-8-2014 14:02: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Minto van der Sluis mi...@multimach.com wrote: Hi, Independently of this question I think we should re-discus the release process. I

Re: Versions in release branch and release process.

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Minto van der Sluis mi...@xup.nl wrote: In my daily work I prefer Continous Delivery. For this I configured my build server to no longer build snapshots. Only developers do build snapshots locally. So everything the build server builds is ready to be released.

Re: Versions in release branch and release process.

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Minto van der Sluis mi...@multimach.com wrote: Hi, Independently of this question I think we should re-discus the release process. I consider the release process as it is now as problematic for the following reasons: 1.When releasing a module we can

Re: Broken released typehandlerspace bundlelist

removing the scopeprovided/scope fixed the problem. Strange that it used to work On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: Just made the shocking discovery that the released typehandlerspace bundlelist is empty: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/clerezza

Re: How to fix jenkins build

I was puzzled myself. I deleted the workspace on jenkins hoping that this would help but it didn't :( Cheers, Reto On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Minto van der Sluis mi...@xup.nl wrote: Hi, What can we (or I) do to fix the jenkins build? Locally it builds just fine. Unfortunately I have

Re: How to fix jenkins build

It sesm jekinns is onvoking maven with a -pl argument and a modle that's no longer in the reactor. I try disabling the incremental build option. Cheers, Reto On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Reto Gmür r...@apache.org wrote: I was puzzled myself. I deleted the workspace on jenkins hoping

  1   2   >