Hi Hasan

I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent was 
mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built, but it 
becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all modules 
depend on the latests released version of the parent.

Cheers,
Reto

-----Original Message-----
From: Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
To: [email protected]; Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring

Dear all

I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan Kamaci.
@Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]>: could you please take a look at the 
reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to make clerezza 
better.

Cheers
Hasan


On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Hasan
>
> I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hasan <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >
> > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
> >
> > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
> > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
> > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
> >
> > Hasan
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hasan
> > >
> > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using 
> > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing it.
> > >
> > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the 
> > > rdf-commons repo)?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > >
> > > > Hi Reto
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hasan
> > > > >
> > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the 
> > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ah yes, of course.
> > > >
> > > > thx
> > > > hasan
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Reto
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Reto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hasan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili 
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tommaso
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <[email protected]>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of 
> > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would 
> > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
> > > > > to work:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >         Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > > > >         g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for 
> > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > > > >         BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> > > http://example.org/g2";);
> > > > > > > >         DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > > > >         ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Reto
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to