I don't know if you guys already know this, but the mounting of sec storage on
the management server to pass the systemvm.iso is also done when using hyper-v
as well. So for hyper-v, samba support is required on the management server.
Regards
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M:
thanks, will find some time to add those.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
I looked at the code in acl-item-cidrs. Persisting cidrs in separate table
looks good.
Pending items:
1. All references to NetworkACLItemVO.getSourceCidrList()
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17995/
---
(Updated Feb. 26, 2014, 8:34 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
Cool! Thanks :)
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
Boeingavenue 271
1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
schubergphilis.com
+31 207506672
+31651428188
_
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2014 23:51
To:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2357/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/303/
--
[...truncated 17678 lines...]
Running com.cloud.gate.testcase.BaseTestCase
Configure log4j with default properties
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec
Thank Rajani!
I’ve put the information on using FindBugs here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+FindBugs
Cheers,
Hugo
On 26 feb. 2014, at 07:31, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
intellij findbugs plugin can be downloaded @
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/
---
(Updated Feb. 26, 2014, 9:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
Hi,
I am trying to create template on vmware with CS 4.0.2, its giving
2014-02-26 14:21:44,578 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Seq 39-1804402824: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 345051457089, via: 39, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
Hi,
This seems similar to the bug @
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3604 . It is root caused to
permissions set on the folder.
Can you please check the permissions set on the secondary storage folder .
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Tejas Gadaria
punith shared an issue with you
Implement a CloudByte storage plugin.
-
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6173
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6173
Project:
At a desk in 20 :/
mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 26 feb. 2014 10:19 schreef Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl:
Daan,
You have the dubious honor to be the first victim of the findbugs check :-)
Can you check your commit b0c6d4734724358df97b6fa4d8c5beb0f447745e?
Cheers,
Hugo
On
Hi Sailaja,
Thanks for replay,
I am always running Management server under root.
Do I need to delete stale systemvm.iso and try it?
Regards,
Tejas
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi,
This seems similar to the bug @
H,
I made contact with Armijn Hemel (Tjaldur Software Governance Solutions) who
scans software for the purpose of making sure no unwanted licenses are in
products. I am going to ask him to look at a Jenkins 4.3 build and talk about
the results. He does this for a living so money may be
Thank you very much. I will follow up on this with Parth.
Saurav
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
Thank you, Dave.
Saurav, I¹ve assigned the bug to you.
-Alena.
On 2/25/14, 10:15 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
As for the
+1 for 4.4 feature freeze on 3/28.
On 26/02/14 10:01 am, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 26 February 2014 04:46
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature
+1
2014-02-26 20:01 GMT+08:00 Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
:
+1 for 4.4 feature freeze on 3/28.
On 26/02/14 10:01 am, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Hello Murali,
I have started working on the changes required to control publishing of
events on the event bus based on the event category config parameter. While
working on the changes I could come across the following approach
a.) Changed the routing key and binding key format to the following
-1 for postponing the feature freeze. It will amount to more features
in the release. I'd rather shorten the cycle and do more releases then
to pack more bugs in a single go.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Guo Star ghxand...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2014-02-26 20:01 GMT+08:00 Abhinandan Prateek
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/304/changes
Firstly, thanks to all those who took part in the discussion on the 4.4 FF
date. I think we should have a discussion on altering the release/development
schedule.
That said, what is the process to submit a feature proposal?
Regards,
Alex Hitchins
VP Software Engineering
D: +44 1892 523 587
+1 to Daan.
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
-1 for postponing the feature freeze. It will amount to more features
in the release. I'd rather shorten the cycle and do more releases then
to pack more bugs in a single
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Folks since the liability of Release manager has been called out explicitly
for the release I want to call out that I cannot take personal liability for
a release and I am not sure why would anyone else
Any volunteers to pull together a first draft of the report?
-- Forwarded message --
From: ASF Board bo...@apache.org
Date: Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:15 AM
Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Mar 2014
To: Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
This email was sent by
-1 on postponing the feature freeze. We are having this discussion after every
release, however we agreed to do a 4 month cycle so let's stick to it.
If there are important features that are currently being developed but might
not make this cut-off date we should discuss that separately, but as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18516/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta, Parth Jagirdar, and Sebastien
+1 well put.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Folks since the liability of Release manager has been called out explicitly
for the release I want to call out
Actually, if it’s a Significant Feature, I like seeing a spec put together to
be referenced by the [PROPOSAL] thread. Take a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design and in particular
the Design Document Template.
John
On Feb 26, 2014, at 7:34 AM, Mike Tutkowski
Good point, John.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:00 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Actually, if it's a Significant Feature, I like seeing a spec put together
to be referenced by the [PROPOSAL] thread. Take a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design and in
I will check out that link and put together any required documentation.
Thanks for the info and pointers.
On 26 Feb 2014, at 16:03, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Good point, John.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:00 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Actually, if
Sounds good - I figured that's what you were going to say, but just wanted
to confirm. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
We are still exploring but the initial goal is get 4.3 straight
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski
We are still exploring but the initial goal is get 4.3 straight
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Daan!
By the way, are you having him perform this in-depth analysis on 4.3 or is
this going to be done first on master?
On Wed, Feb
+1 this is reasonable.
On 26/02/14 8:14 pm, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Folks since the liability of Release manager has been called out
explicitly for the release I want to call out that
Just pushed a fix for that to master.
On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
So how do you now Œprovide¹ the jdbc connector on a Mac?
mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator
Š
SQL exception in trying initDB:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/#review35542
---
Antonio, in general looks good to me. There are some minor fixes
I am seeing the issue on 4.3 branch, can someone help me how can that be
made to work ??
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote:
We are already pretty much locked in as all our database scripts are MySQL
specific. If we want to be neutral we should fix that.
Before we go to another vote - apidocs build is failing with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/jlk/code/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py, line 195, in
module
category = choose_category(fn)
File /home/jlk/code/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py, line 175, in
I am running into the following error when I run deployDataCenter.py
-i devcloud.cfg.
I get the same error when I run against Rohit's devcloud2 and my
devcloud environments.
I have tried stepping through the code in the eclipse debugger, but
that hasn't helped my to identify the issue.
I have
H Kishan,
I implemented point 1, even though I had some doubts at what you
meant. If you have a minute please look at the last commit in
acl-item-cidrs again. I will work on the migration code as time falls
free.
thanks,
Daan
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Daan Hoogland
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sonal Ojha sonal.o...@sungard.com wrote:
I am attaching the patch with the email kindly let me know your comments.
Sonal,
Attachments are stripped by the listserv. You might have to include the text.
Folks,
ASF has been accepted has a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code
2014.
If you are interested and have the time to be a mentor for a CloudStack project
please see below to register as a mentor.
Also enter your project idea in JIRA and tag it with 'gsoc2014'
Currently Mike
On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:31 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Before we go to another vote - apidocs build is failing with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/jlk/code/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py, line 195, in
module
category = choose_category(fn)
File
Hi Alena,
I answer to your comments inline:
2014-02-26 19:08 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/
Antonio, in general looks good to me. There are some minor fixes that
Antonio, please see my 2 comments inline.
-Alena.
On 2/26/14, 1:17 PM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
antonio.for...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alena,
I answer to your comments inline:
2014-02-26 19:08 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com:
This is an automatically generated
Mike I share your opinion most of us have been pretty much on 4.3 until now,
and pushing out the release seems reasonable. As I called out in earlier mail
the feature proposal date was not called out for 4.4 and as such giving little
extra room seems reasonable.
Animesh
-Original
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
I am still not convinced or comfortable with release manager's liability for
release content. It seems
we are going with practical approach but since legality has been called out
the legal instrument
Antonio,
I still don’t quite see why false result returned from one of the workers,
should silently stop other workers if those workers are a) independent b) have
their own way of processing the failures in asynchronous manner later as you
stated.
You also say didn't want each worker to have
Animesh,
Can you cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3?
4c83f80c809674cb8ff9561d546a6ade25d983f8
CLOUDSTACK-6174: Provide separate option for Windows Server 2012 R2 as
an OS type when registering template.
94257c0fc85c7178e6ca3146662de08feee2c290
Hi, I installed the CloudStack-setup-management package, after I installed the
database and have made the necessary settings, but I can not access
http://localhost:8080/client.
Any solution?
thanks
Yeah, if we have a 4.3 workaround for this, that would be great. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Sonal Ojha sonal.o...@sungard.com wrote:
I am seeing the issue on 4.3 branch, can someone help me how can that be
made to work ??
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers
Just wondering if it would be easier to just make the management server
into a virtual appliance then recoding everything to run on Windows (not to
mention all the patches every month). The enterprises that I come in
contact with don't seem to have an issue with vCD. I don't know how the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18552/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18552/
---
(Updated Feb. 27, 2014, 12:56 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
I’ve merged one of the commits, will get the other two in this evening
On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Yeah, if we have a 4.3 workaround for this, that would be great. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 AM,
Awesome! Thanks, John!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:12 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
I've merged one of the commits, will get the other two in this evening
On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Yeah,
Hi Alena,
2014-02-26 23:19 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com:
Antonio,
I still don't quite see why false result returned from one of the
workers, should silently stop other workers if those workers are a)
independent b) have their own way of processing the failures
I’ve cherry-picked these into 4.3-forward…will ask RM in a separate email to
pick them into 4.3.
John
On Feb 26, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Awesome! Thanks, John!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:12 PM, John Kinsella
Dearest RM - would like the following commits from 4.3-forward picked into 4.3.
To the best of my knowledge they comply with ASF third-party licensing policy
for build scripts [1].
24dcf2948c2d4cdd98fcda0f766d82f40eee8be1
2c3cd90b5604cde8123968b15ef6c53bad43b5e2
I share it too. Many developers in the community went out of their way to get a
cleaner RC and thereby impacting their feature development efforts. We
shouldn't be penalizing them with this 2 week's feature freeze schedule
Thanks,
RamG
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Can you paste logs file here ?
Thanks,
Yitao
2014-02-27 8:02 GMT+08:00 María Noelia Gil marianoelia@um.es:
Hi, I installed the CloudStack-setup-management package, after I installed
the database and have made the necessary settings, but I can not access
Great, John - thanks again!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:10 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
I've cherry-picked these into 4.3-forward...will ask RM in a separate email
to pick them into 4.3.
John
On Feb 26, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
I don’t see not moving the freeze date as a penalty. If a feature doesn’t make
the current deadline, it moves to the next release, which is still a few months
away. For significant issues, it’s not uncommon for us to allow them in late.
What we have a stronger need for than shifting a date, by
+1 to move feature freeze date in this case as 4.3 closure has impact on the
next release cycle. There are 14 features targeted for 4.4 and all of them
are in open state as of now. There are only 2 weeks left to close on coding
and developers would rush to check in the code. This only
There is a new version of devcloud (version 0.4) ready for testing.
See here for more information:
https://github.com/snowch/devcloud/releases/tag/v0.4
It would be great if this release could be tested and any defects
raised on the github project.
The ultimate goal is that this project will
I agree on the RC process! Few thoughts from my end
- I see a rush of request to cherry pick 4.3 requests from
committers. This may be a burden for an RM. We can simplify it by RM responding
to the email with OK to commit or Not ok to commit email response. This
should free up some
Hi Alex,
The mysql dependency is on for only StaticStrategy.java as mentioned
by you. And this is not used anywhere in the code base as a compile time
dependency rather used as a run time dependency in db.properties. this will be
passed to mysql driver as part of mysql Database URL
Hi Damoder,
I don't think I follow. There's clearly compile dependency on mysql in
StaticStrategy.
To me, when I look at StaticStartegy, it makes sense to move that into separate
project in github and reference people to it if they want to use the specific
setup outlined in the DB HA wiki.
Perhaps we just need to reduce overlap. Most people work on 4.3 until
it's out the door, I think. Personally, I have a hard time straddling
the two during this phase.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Ram Ganesh ram.gan...@citrix.com wrote:
I agree on the RC process! Few thoughts from my end
StaticStrategy is overriding the Mysql¹s HA Strategy. So it is more a part
of the mysql jdbc driver providing a specific strategy that works as per
the documented HA procedure.
I think moving it to a separate github project that generates the
additional mysql connector jar should be ok (any
+1 for the 3/28 Feature Freeze.
If we try to close on the Feature Freeze sooner than when we are ready, we will
end up finding more blockers/criticals and end up spending more time on bug
fixing. This could potentially result in moving the RC?
So, bottom line - it is like we pay now or pay
Immediately if there are no specific licensing issues we should maintain
the status-quo.
The fact is that some other HA solutions will not work as all the schema
related scripts are mysql engine specific.
When we decide to move the mysql dependency out of cloudstack we should do
it for all such
Hi,
Can you please respond if you are actively involved or looking get involved in
testing 4.4 Release?
Thanks,
Raja
Hey John,
I'm just getting around now to trying to rebuild my CS environment using
the new changes in 4.3-forward.
When I run the following:
mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb
I receive the following error:
Running query: drop database if exists `cloud`
SQL exception in
I'm in!
Cheers,
Wilder
-Original Message-
From: Raja Pullela [mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:01 AM
To: CloudStack Dev (dev@cloudstack.apache.org)
Subject: Looking for test folks on the community!
Hi,
Can you please respond if you are actively
Hi,
thanks for replay,
Is there any workaround for this ?
OR
how can I update 4.0.2 to 4.1.0 ?
Regards,
Tejas
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi,
Error log seems to be same as the bug @
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1403 -
Please follow the instructions given at : [1] to upgrade from 4.0.x to 4.1.0:
[1]:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/docsite/html/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.0-to-4.1
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From:
Hi All,
I am setting up a 2-node cloudstack environment.
Management Server :10.44.189.125
Host Server : 10.44.65.143
I am able to see the system VMs in running state.
But not able ping to outside network from system VMs.
I am not able to ping to corporate DNS or Google DNS from system
Certainly :-)
On 27 feb. 2014, at 07:00, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you please respond if you are actively involved or looking get involved
in testing 4.4 Release?
Thanks,
Raja
Hey,
StaticStrategy is an optional component, so it should be perfectly OK to
include it at compile time in our source code. If i understand the apache rules
correctly we can keep it in the code base without problems as long as it is
optional. We should however move it to a separate project
Hi Guys,
Does anyone have any ideas about this?
My main concern is the KVM resource collector and I assume the other
hypervisor setups are receiving the wrong values.
The CSAgent periodically runs the following command:
[kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null)
80 matches
Mail list logo
