Re: Unable to download DevCloud image file

Hi Lohit, DevCloud isn't maintained or used anymore, the apache folder was removed long back. You can try mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx or Simulator based development (https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#simulator-based-development) instead. Regards.

Re: [REVIVE][DISCUSS] Closing issues & PR after a certain time

I like the general idea but at the same time want to weight in that we also do the right thing in handle issues and PRs. Sometimes there are genuine issues and PRs, however, we make no progress on them for one reason or another. As of last week, I've triaged all the outstanding Github issues

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0

, the vote for CloudStack 4.18.2.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Daan Hoogland Nux (Lucian) Rohit Yadav +1 (non binding) Bryan Lima Jithin Raju 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC2

+1 (binding) I've built and uploaded the 4.18.2.0 RC2 packages here for people's convenience - http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.18.2.0-rc2/ * Tested upgrade from 4.18.1.1 to 4.18.2.0 RC packages -ok * Rebuilt systemvms (ssvm and cpvm) - ok * Restart network - ok * New VM

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

/109#issuecomment-2058519817 The only note for future release manager is to avoid publishing the artifacts before voting is closed, or to delete an already published release. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 13:15 To: dev Subject: Re

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the future though. 1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue

[DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

All, The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform registry website. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109 The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual resync button on the provider isn't fixing the

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

Rohit, It is possible to install CAPC on a CS 4.16 ? Le jeu. 11 avr. 2024 à 12:03, Rohit Yadav a écrit : > Hi Benoit, > > The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what > you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a different version >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

Thanks Kiran and all for the excellent release work. There has been some issue with publishing the v0.5.0 on the Terraform registry, for this I've logged a support ticket with the TF Registry. In the meanwhile, users can use the following to install the provider locally using artifacts from

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

Hi Benoit, The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a different version of the data iso: http://download.cloudstack.org/cks/ Alternatively, you can also have a look at the CAPC project:

Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva

Welcome aboard Slavka! Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 6:16:00 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva Congratulations Slavka!

New Committer: Kiran Chavala

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Kiran Chavala (kiranchavala) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Kiran has been a long time CloudStack contributor and has created over a hundred issues on Github. Being a committer

[ADVISORY] Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1

Apache CloudStack security releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1 address the CVEs listed below. Affected users are recommended to upgrade their CloudStack installations. 1. CVE-2024-29006: x-forwarded-for HTTP header parsed by default Severity: moderate Description: By default the CloudStack

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

+1 (binding) Tested vm deployment using 0.5.0-pre. Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2:55:40 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0 Hi ALL

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer

Congratulations Rene! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 2:30:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer Congratulations Rene! On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 9:12 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > devs

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0

# Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0 Release Apache CloudStack, proven as one of the most scalable, free and open source cloud computing operating system for large scale private, public, and hybrid clouds, today announced the availability of the latest release of Apache CloudMonkey v6.4.0, the

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. And I'll publish the Github release as latest. Regards, Rohit Yadav On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifacts up for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

All, Reminder - cmk 6.4.0 RC1 is up for testing and voting. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 4:08:29 PM To: dev ; users Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1 Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador

in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / VP. Best Regards, Rohit Yadav

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 Commit: df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 GitHub pre-release

Re: [DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Since we haven't heard of any issue/feature requests and the ones in the current milestone are all done. I'll start a vote on this today. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/milestone/5 Thanks and regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

/regressions at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 18:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

Re: Re-Introduction

Welcome back Sina! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Re-Introduction Welcome back Sina! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Sina Kashipazha Date: Sunday, 17 March 2024 at 18:10 To:

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

All, Kiran is release manager for the next Terraform provider release (v0.5.0) but isn't a committer to have commit privileges to the upstream repo (something PMC can help into?). To assist him, I've created a pre-RC (alpha) build for testing purposes and we encourage users to test and report

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

API disruptive changes - but that warning can be given in other ways (in > documentation , a compatibility matrix, etc) *If* it ever happened, we would > be using the first number for bothand > > > > Kind Regards > Giles > > > > > -Original Message

Re: [PROPOSE] upgrade paths for 4.19 and 20

I think it would be most likely that we work towards releasing 4.19.1 before 4.20.0. Then, it would be sensible to have 4.19.0 -> 4.19.1 -> 4.20.0 upgrade path. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 14:50 To: dev Subject: [PROPOSE]

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

, and have a clearly defined vote, I'd change the vote to > something like "Drop semantic versioning and continue from 20". And include > your explanation about moving to > . . > > I would be ok to +1 that ^^^ > > -paul > > -Original Message- > From: Rohit

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

As I understand Daan's vote proposal and from the previous discussion thread, the current scheme that results in a release like 4.20.x.y would simply become 20.a.b, wherein "a" is for maintenance release (counter, starting with 0) and "b" is only used for security releases (counter, starting

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

Thanks for stepping up and sharing your plan. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 5:36:55 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider +1, on the

Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh)

Congratulations Vishesh! Regards. From: Daman Arora Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 8:59:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh) Congrats Vishesh! On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 10:29 a.m. Ruben Bosch wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

+1 Regards. From: m...@swen.io Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 18:29 To: 'dev' Subject: AW: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 +1 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daan Hoogland Gesendet: Montag, 19. Februar 2024 13:50 An: dev Cc: users

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

(+ users) All, Generally speaking, any versioning/styling change can be perceived as a big or concerning change by users (those existing or new ones trying/adopting). So, we must get our message across properly and correctly. I'm not for or against cosmetics change in versioning, but I'm

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.19.1.0

Thanks for volunteering Suresh. Agree as Daan has mentioned, community would benefit to have the 4.18.2.0 first with some gap to then have 4.19.1.0. The 4.19.1 RC by May end or early June LGTM. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] web site publishing procedure

Thanks Daan, LGTM - though, if website isn't going to get too many activity and updates (except for couple of blogs a month), we may simplify publishing from main in future. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 17:39 To: dev Cc:

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

ough. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 13:00 To: Rohit Yadav Cc: dev Subject: Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3 Hi Rohit, Thanks. I will revert the changes then. If the users think 512MB will lead to large memory consumption, they can -

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

I would advise we should move to 512 MiB. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 4:14:06 PM To: Rohit Yadav ; dev Subject: Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3 Hi Rohit, I tested the VRs of a VPC (with 2 tiers

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

Rs seem good. For > stability, I have updated the PR to change the memory size of the > default > offering of virtual routers from 256 MiB to 384 MiB. > > The current default memory size of system vms (CPVM, SSVM) is 512 MiB, > so > they will not be impacted. > Hope it has les

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

Hi Wei, all, Thanks for the thread, I've no objections to either of the options, but option2 is preferred as Debian 11 security will EOL mid of this year. So, if not in 4.20, eventually we'll need to migrate systemvmtemplate base OS to Debian 12 at some point in future. The bigger implication

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0

improvements - First week of February: accept only blocker and critical bug fixes, aiming to stabilize the branch. - Second week of February: start cutting RCs, vote and finish release work. What do you think? Best regards, João Jandre. On 12/9/23 17:22, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 > > Given, 4.

Re: new website is life

Fantastic! Great to see the new website finally go live after a decade, congratulations everybody! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 13:52 To: dev ; users Subject: new website is life People, we brought the new website.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 LTS Release

Congratulations everyone! Great work Abhishek and everyone involved in the release work. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 17:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 LTS Release The

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0

Thanks Abhishek and everyone involved in the effort. And congratulations everyone ! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 5:48:54 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 Hi all,

Re: [VOTE] go life with new website(design)

+1 (binding) Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 18:02 To: dev Subject: [VOTE] go life with new website(design) LS, I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions before,but I would like to start a lazy consent

Re: Introduction and Greetings

Welcome Abhisar! Regards. From: Suresh Anaparti Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 19:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Introduction and Greetings Welcome Abhisar! Regards, Suresh From: Abhisar Sinha Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 6:12

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4

+1 (binding) Tested 4.19.0.0 RC4 packages with EL8 (Alma Linux) + KVM using mbx. Tested the following: Registered new template Registered ssh public key Created isolated network in VM deploy form Deployed VM as root admin Allow egress rules for isolated network Created PF and FW rules, was able

[DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Anybody have any feature/improvements requests and bugs to report for the next cmk release? (RM/release timeline yet to be discussed/determined). Please add them here - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues Regards.

Re: CentOS 7 is reaching EOL

Like we've done for EL6, starting some CloudStack release we'll need to consider the following for EL7: - drop the EL7 packging support (this can be either from the next major release this year) - change default smoketests against the next (EL8) as the new default - fix our CI/CD to assume/use

Re: [VOTE] drop first version number and continue with semantic versioning

Agree with Daniel, I would prefer to discuss this further too. I think we're moving too fast with the voting. Regards. From: Guto Veronezi Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 20:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] drop first version number

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC3

Thanks Abhishek and all involved for your hard work - it's not uncommon to create multiple RCs for a major .0 release - hope to get there with the next one. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 18:55 To: users ;

Re: new website design

+1 overall, but there are a few things I would consider blockers: 1. the blog page doesn't look same as on current blog (prod). https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/blog (staging blog) versus https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/ (current blog/prod.) If we can fix the blog listing and the

Re: Setup Linstor Plugin for ACS

Hi, I got my rough notes here; https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/7844bfa8cbc9586408ce3596c71caa50 And there is a guide here - https://linbit.com/drbd-user-guide/linstor-guide-1_0-en Regards.

Re: [PROPOSE] Upgrade JDK from 11 to 17

Thanks Vishesh. Good initiative. I think moving the codebase to build against JDK17 could be more work, than making cloudstack pkgs/builds work with JRE17. Given the next Debian release (12) only supports JRE17, the first step (maybe within scope of 4.20) could be to ensure that CloudStack can

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release

Thanks Abhishek, looking forward to RC1. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 6:14:43 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release Hi all, I would like to announce the

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

Hi Ronald, If it helps, there are some CloudStack dev learning guide around how to create a plugin and manage dependencies: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook Looking forward to see your new object storage plugin (if you decide to contribute upstream). Regards.

Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov

Congratulations and well done Vladi ! Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 15:27 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov Well done, Vladi! :) On 2023-12-12 09:52, Daan Hoogland wrote: > community, >

Re: Question about ObjectStoreDriver for implementing Ceph driver

Hi Wido, I think when the minio object storage plugin was written we didn’t have the limitations or foresight on how to structure the code, I would agree in refactoring the interface enough to allow what you’re trying to achieve. Typically to a plugin you don’t want to pass database objects

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

discussions: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343 Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 14:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

ards. From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 22:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum +1 Regards, Pearl Dsilva From: Rohit Y

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0

+1 Given, 4.18 branch is benefitting from maintenance work already, I wouldn't mind if you want to push it earlier to even say end of Jan, and target release in Feb 2024. Regards. From: João Jandre Paraquetti Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 23:32 To:

Re: 4.20 plans

Hi João, Glad to hear about your interests and I will fully support your effort to release manage the next major release 4.20. In fact you can also help us with 4.18.2.0 maintenance release which will be relatively low-effort release and in doing so you can learn the logistics of release

Re: 4.20 plans

Wrt regular maintenance work, I think we can discuss the following for next year releases (4.20/4.21): * Support python 3.10, including Marvin, VR scripts (**that's still on python2 that we must upgrade) and smoketests and other misc scripts * Java 17 or 21 LTS (we'll need to look at

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum

: Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum Personally I'm against that, as it will dilute the community and once the mailing lists will get inactive they'll stay that way. Also github/discussions is a proprietary platform at Microsoft's whim, I think this goes against

[VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

All, Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as users forum [1], I put the following proposal for a vote: 1. Adopt and use Github Discussions as user forums. 2. The Github Discussions feature is tied with the us...@cloudstack.apache.org mailing list (PR:

[DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum

All, It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated with mailing lists:

Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar

Congratulations Abhishek, well deserved! Regards. From: Daman Arora Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 17:46 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar Many congrats Abhishek! On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, 9:25 p.m. Wei ZHOU

Re: [DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

Thanks all, since there have been no objections I've got a new repository created here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-csbench Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 15:13 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav Subject

Re: Can't upload ova file format

Hi, OVA templates aren't supported for KVM. You could convert the ova/vmdk to qcow2/img to be able to use it with KVM. Regards. From: Technology Rss Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 11:25 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject:

[DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

All, I want to kickstart a discussion of developing a new tool - csbench, that can help with generating resource load and measuring the performance and efficiency of Apache CloudStack APIs. Much like cmk, this tool can be written in Go and can be useful for anybody to benchmark CloudStack

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Mockito & phasing out powermock

Good work Vishesh! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 20:23 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Mockito & phasing out powermock Great work Vishesh, thanks! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.1.0

Congratulations everyone on the new release, and thanks Wei and everyone involved in the release and voting process. Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 20:36 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wei ZHOU Subject: Re:

Re: GSOC 2023 Results

Well done Ayush, thank you for your contribution! Looking forward to still seeing you around in the community even after the GSoC. Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 19:40 To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

4.18.1.0 *passes* with 5 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Rohit Yadav Nux (Lucian) Boris Stoyanov Nicolas Vazquez Wei Zhou +1 (non binding) Harikrishna Patnala 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

+1 binding, have manually tested the new changes since RC2 in an adv zone KVM env with nfs and local storage. Regards. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 2:05:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

Thanks Wei. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 13:49 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2) Hi all, Thanks a lot for your testing, Rohit, Hari, Lucian, Nicolas and Bobby.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Upgraded a multi-zone (edge and core) KVM env with NFS, local storage > and Linstor storage from 4.18.0.0 to 4.18.1.0. Post upgrade tested VM > deployment as root admin and normal user account. > > I hit the issue of procedures not found as I

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Upgraded a multi-zone (edge and core) KVM env with NFS, local storage and Linstor storage from 4.18.0.0 to 4.18.1.0. Post upgrade tested VM deployment as root admin and normal user account. I hit the issue of procedures not found as I had moved my DB from one host to another and

Re: Reminder on triaging role to access and use Github better

Hi Daan, Sorry missed this email - yes we can put this somewhere on the project wiki/website if required or on Github's README. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 12:05 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Cc: us

Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

Thanks Ivet, the new iterated design looks impressive especially some of the new graphical elements. +1 to moving forward with the proposed design. Let's collect any further feedback and ideas from the community and if there are no objections go ahead with updating the preview/staging site

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.18.1.0

Thanks Wei. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 14:27 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.18.1.0 Hi all, This vote has to be closed, as we found a critical issue that the direct-download

Re: Unable to add host error ACS

Hi again, You may try to re-add the host and tail the /var/log/cloudstack/agent/* (usually there is a setup.log) to watchout for errors. Is this a test/virtualised environment? You may want to run kvm-ok and ensure that /dev/kvm exists and works. It's possible the KVM host doesn't have

Re: Unable to add host error ACS

ue Regards. From: Technology Mail Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2023 13:33 To: Rohit Yadav ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to add host error ACS Now I am using 4.18, Ubuntu 20.04 server. KVM server cloud and libvirt agent service not start

Re: new PMC member: Daniel Salvador

Congratulations and welcome Daniel! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 16:26 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new PMC member: Daniel Salvador Welcome, Daniel! Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Ruben Bosch CLDIN > On

Re: new committer: Sina Kashipazha

Congratulations and welcome Sina! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 16:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Sina Kashipazha Welcome Sina! Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Ruben Bosch CLDIN > On 25

Re: new committer: John Bampton

Congratulations and welcome John! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 16:22 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: John Bampton Welcome John! Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Ruben Bosch CLDIN > On 25 Aug

Re: [Consultation] Remove DB HA feature (db.ha.enabled)

2023-08-22 15:36, K B Shiv Kumar wrote: >>>>> We faced some issues when running Galera. We went back to master >>>>> slave. >>>>> Anyone using Galera in production for a long time? >>>>> Regards, >>>&g

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release

Thanks for the proposal Abhishek, sounds good to me. Looking forward to 4.19! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 22:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release Hi, Thanks

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.1.0 release

Thanks for the update Wei. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 19:42 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.1.0 release Thanks for the update, Wei. Good job so far! On 2023-08-21 12:48,

Re: [Consultation] Remove DB HA feature (db.ha.enabled)

t;> Happy to contribute a doc on how to achieve HA if we decide to remove >> this. >> >> Thanks >> >> On 2023-08-22 15:01, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> +1 it's a broken feature that at least doesn't work with MySQL 8.x, >>> I'm not sure if it worked with

Re: [Consultation] Remove DB HA feature (db.ha.enabled)

+1 it's a broken feature that at least doesn't work with MySQL 8.x, I'm not sure if it worked with prior versions of MySQL. However, we need to document some sort of suggested MySQL HA setup in our docs. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 18:54

[DISCUSS] Simplifying constructs and UX

All, Request for comments on following ideas, largely in the UI: 1. Does it make sense to simply the Default View as a Project which cannot be deleted and primary space for the Account. Essentially, the default view is the logged in account/user's project with no other collaborators 2.

[DISCUSS] Fixing npm version for building UI

All, Our UI building in packages/PRs uses npm v14, while the current LTS version is v18. However, since we use npm for only development and building the UI statically there are hopefully no concerns around security and support. I've been using both v14 and v16 to build UI across different

Re: CentOS9 going to kernel panic mode

multiple CPU offerings. I have used 4C4R, > 4C8R, 8C8R & 8C16R CPU & RAM offerings. > > Best Regards > > Stanley > > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 6:52 PM Rohit Yadav > wrote: > >> Hi Stanley, is it consistent even if you use a service offering with >&g

Re: CentOS9 going to kernel panic mode

Hi Stanley, is it consistent even if you use a service offering with large enough CPU and memory? Are you booting the VM in uefi or normal mode? Regards. From: Stanley Burkee Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 18:50 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ;

Re: [Proposal] Object Storage in CloudStack

Thanks for proposal the design doc Kishan, LGTM. Looking forward to experiment with the draft PR and iterations for further feedback. Regards. From: Kishan Kavala Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 14:13 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [Proposal] Object

Re: [proposal] Consistency of naming in Cloudstack

+1 As long as we're not changing API names which would break backward compatibility, I think having clear, intuitive and consistent names and terminology in CloudStack UI and documentation for resources is a good idea and will be greatly improve and polish CloudStack. Historically, the word VM

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Mockito & phasing out powermock

Your approach LGTM Vishes, and we need to ensure build stability and smoketests continue to pass as-is. It would be great if unit tests using powermock runner are refactored or supported/counted in the codecoverage. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

João, Technically, for lazy consensus a vote thread needs three +1 (binding) votes which are only counted towards a decision or approval [1]. Since there are no objections but concerns shared so far, the PR can be reviewed, tested and merged as any other PR as long as it meets the community

Re: ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19

d ones, this upgrade has already been tested. All that users must do when installing the new packages is answer 'yes' when questioned about upgrading the log4j config. Best regards, João Jandre (JoaoJandre) On 26/05/2023 06:19, Rohit Yadav wrote: > João, Daniel, Daan, All, > > I've revi

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Website build and modernisation

automation once the website is fully migrated. Please continue to review and test the staging site at https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/ and report/suggest at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/issues Thanks and regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday

Re: ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19

nt/build -v ~/.m2:/root/.m2 -e "USER_ID=$(id > > -u)" > > > -e "USER_GID=$(id -g)" -e "ACS_BUILD_OPTS=-Dnoredist" > > > scclouds/cloudstack-deb-builder:ubuntu2004-jdk11-python3 --git-remote > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack.gi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >