Re: Kubernetes cloud provider

es because nobody works on making it > external, we have to maintain IP and LB rules manually. > > > [1] > https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/access-application-cluster/create-external-load-balancer/ > [2] > https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/pkg/cloudprovider/providers

Re: Kubernetes cloud provider

ack-extras or something out of the kubernetes maintained code base > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > >> Hi all, it has been a while. >> >> Please see this: >> >> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/68199 >> &g

Kubernetes cloud provider

Hi all, it has been a while. Please see this: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/68199 I don't know if anyone is using it but if we don't reply the cloudstack controller in kubernetes might get removed from the upstream. -seb

[ANNOUNCE] Will Stevens as new Apache CloudStack VP

Morning Everyone, Yesterday at the ASF board meeting, the board passed the resolution making Will Stevens the new Vice President of the Apache CloudStack project. Join me in congratulating Will on this appointment, wish him luck and bring your unwavering support ! You may have noticed that

Re: Access to Docker Hub repo

done > On Apr 30, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on the Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04 packaging. Using Docker I want to > start building the packages for all distros. > > I'd like to publish the Docker images to Docker Hub: >

Re: Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC

Congrats Rafael, > On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > People, > > The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has > gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rafael and wish him > wisdom in his new task. > > ​on

Re: CaaS in CloudStack with Kubernetes

> > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> >> To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Friday, 22 April, 2016 17:02:22 >> Subject: CaaS in

Re: CaaS in CloudStack with Kubernetes

at has changed? > > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> >> To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org >&

CaaS in CloudStack with Kubernetes

Hi folks, I have been quite silent this past few weeks because aside from voting in a new VP (soon to be announced), I have been hard at work for my new endeavors with Skippbox. I am quite excited that today we could not wait and Skippbox together with Shapeblue announced a preview of a

Re: Travis Failing

Will, the way travis works is that it reads what is in .travis.yml at the root of our repo. If you check it, you will see that it uses scripts in /tools to make a fresh build of the simulator, start the simulator and run the tests. Everyone who has a fork will end up with Travis runs in their

Re: Travis build and tests

Rohit, Thank you, thank you so very very much for this ! -Sebastien > On 26 Mar 2016, at 17:49, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > While Travis builds are based on ACS-simulator and a green Travis build does > not represent that PR is “good enough”, it gives us a way to fail

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

void that. > @Ilya, 'cloud.com' is not getting transferred. > > Best, > Raja > Senior Manager, Product Development > Accelerite, > www.accelerite.com > > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 1:57 PM &

Re: Migrating CloudStack content from download.cloud.com

>>> >>> Citrix has been hosting "download.cloud.com" for quite some time now >>> and it holds the System Templates for all the releases and some tools. >>> Going forward, this content needs to be moved from >>> "download.cloud.com".So, we will be moving this content to

Re: github organisation cloudstack

Will, I think you are putting the carriage before the horse, sort of speak. I would suggest you make a dummy PR to cloudstack/cloudstack (just one, let’s not talk about migration or anything like that). then you can use this as a playground to see how you could improve our CI… The main idea

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Top posting because keeping track is going to be hard. Remi and I have talked several times with David about GitHub access and so far the answer has been no. There are several issues in my understanding: - apache on github is one single org, so if you get some write permission in the org

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Hi Chris, We have never met but i recognize your name from members only ASF threads. For the benefit of others on this list it is useful to mention that you are a member of the ASF board. The PMC has filed its quarterly report for march, as well as an interim report about a month ago. The

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:23 PM, sebgoa wrote: > >> “cloudstack” is a trademark of the ASF. > > > ​ok, good. I thought is was refused on the grounds of being to generic a > term.​ > >

Re: github organisation cloudstack

I am in favor of having a few volunteers start experimenting with it. Especially with/for CI I don’t think we have urgency to make any bold move right now. One thing we could do for sure, is to move everything that’s in CloudStak-Extras to cloudstack org. > On Mar 15, 2016, at 11:43 PM, Nux!

people.apache.org

Not sure if you got that —— Hi folks, As we said back in November, we have now moved the people.apache.org DNS entry to home.apache.org, the new home for your web stuff. If you forgot to move over your old content, or if you need to perform LDAP operations, you can still gain access to the old

Re: 4.9 Release Management

> On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > > Yes, I understand and agree with you. On the flip side, the lack of CI has > been a thorn in our side for a long time and the increased cadence only > adds to this problem, so I am trying to walk a thin line here. >

Re: PR validation using proposed CI.

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:58 PM, Bharat Kumar wrote: > > Hi ilya, > > We use cloudstack marvin framework to run tests. All of the tests were > written in the community, you can take a look at them > in the source (tests/integration) > Bharat, Ilya is aware of Marvin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the word active from project members on website

> On Feb 24, 2016, at 4:28 PM, Jan-Arve Nygård > wrote: > > 2016-02-24 15:50 GMT+01:00 Will Stevens : > >> I have not seen the script, so I am not sure how changing the title will >> modify the behavior, but if it will infact make the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1/4.8 (and call for new RM)

lease notes, docs, website updates etc. Haven’t done these myself > and until now someone always stepped in and helped :-) > > Thanks, > Remi > > > > On 06/02/16 19:29, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> On Feb 5, 201

Re: [DOC] 4.8.0 PR review needed

> On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Hi, > > Could it be possible to have review for following PR's for 4.8.0 release, > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/24 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/28 > PL, just go ahead

Important Pending Items

Morning folks, We have several crucial pending items, that we need to resolve before moving on: 1- We need an RM for master ( just saw some commits there that should be reverted or merged properly in other branches). 2- We need to automate writing release notes, pushing/tagging new docs when

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:08 AM, John Kinsella wrote: > > Did the announcements for 4.7/4.8 go out? I don’t see them on the mailing > lists or elsewhere? > I don’t think it went out, nor do I think there were RN for them or an update to the website >> On Dec 17, 2015, at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

Hi Folks, My proposal to freeze until we get CI was indeed due to seeing Rohit’s commit but was by no means a personal attack or judgment. We have lots of PR pending (as mentioned before by Remi) and we need people to help review and test. So thanks to Rohit. My only concerns were two fold:

Re: disable github notifications ?

The interesting thing is to look at our archive: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201601.mbox/thread And try to get in the shoes of a new comer or someone browsing for info. January starts with 50 jenkins failed build emails... I agree that GH discussion need to be

[RESULT] disable github notifications ?

Ok seems to be pretty good and quick ~consensus here, so we will leave it as is. I agree that filters can be set. and in the spirit of adopting github but staying a ASF project, we should archive all our PR discussions on the list. so let’s not do anything then. -sebastien > On Jan 27, 2016,

Re: disable github notifications ?

definitely, looking into it, the jenkins email are very noisy. > On Jan 27, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Nux! wrote: > > Actually it seems like we have a special mailing list (that nobody uses > probably) for git notifications - commits@ ... >

[PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

Folks, How about we freeze our repo entirely until we get proper CI in place. Seems to me all the hard work from Remi and co could be lost if we start committing again. Now Travis is not running, Jenkins fails all the time and nobody cares… So how about we figure out CI now ? and not do

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 9:25 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > > On 01/27/2016 09:18 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> Folks, >> >> How about we freeze our repo entirely until we get proper CI in place. >> >> Seems to me all

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

e better today. > we have failed miserably at making this happen centrally. we might have more luck with asking everyone to setup a cloudstack box of their preferred setup and asking them to run marvin tests, then report centrally. I don’t see why it would not be feasible. > On Wed, Jan 27, 20

Re: FYI: master branch is on 4.9.0 now

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 4:53 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi Remi, Ilya, I had the same question... do we have a release cadence ? > The cadence is that as long as we stick to our current process we can release *anytime* both minor and majors. So we are always only

Re: Accelerite's acquisition of CloudPlatform - the Accelerite viewpoint

Thanks for the note Samir, Indeed welcome to the CloudStack community. It is great to hear your thoughts and high level views of what you are going to do with CloudPlatform and how you plan to engage with CloudStack. Let us know how we can help. -Sebastien > On Jan 26, 2016, at 10:04 AM,

Quick note about $dayjob

Hi folks, As some of you might have guessed I am changing $dayjob. This is an exciting time for me, but it also means that I will become less involved with CloudStack. ( I said *less* involved, did not say I was going to disappear). I have informed the PMC and offered to stop my VP role ahead

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Boris Roman Schrijver

Well done Boris, looking forward for more contributions from you > On Jan 19, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache

Re: BVT Results Google Page -

> On Jan 14, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Please take a look - ACS Master BVT Dashboard - > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17i_Bd78SrKoLnu0cFpwXbC0R-YKBTqs9sOw15hQLP3o/pubhtml > > I am still trying to find a way to upload the test results

Re: cloudstack devs at fosdem?

yes,I will be there > On Jan 12, 2016, at 11:20 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > Hi List, > > Anyone planing to visit fosdem this year? It would be great to meet there. > > Best regards, > Laszlo > > -- > > EOF

Re: LTS release or not

About LTS. Here are some of the Mesos releases: +## Releases ## + + * Apache Mesos 0.23.1 (2015-09-21) + * Apache Mesos 0.22.2 (2015-09-23) + * Apache Mesos 0.21.2 (2015-09-24) + * Apache Mesos 0.25.0 (2015-10-09) + * Apache Mesos 0.26.0 (2015-12-10) quite frequent. Anyone cares to check their

Thoughts on Citrix announcement yesterday

Hi everyone (cross-posting), Yesterday Citrix announced that it sold its CloudPlatform business to Accelerite from Persistent Systems [1] As you know CloudPlatform is Citrix’s commercial distribution of Apache CloudStack. I wanted to share a few thoughts on what this means for CloudStack. One

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

, 2016 at 6:17 PM, ilya <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 to moving to github. >>> >>> On 1/3/16 3:25 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>>> Bringing this one discuss thread to the top of the ML to get stronger >>> co

Re: Pull Requests we should include in 4.7.1 / 4.8.0

> On Jan 10, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > Are all of the documentation issues fixed? there are no open PR on the docs repos. > > Does the documentation reflect the 4.7.1/4.8 release? > Are there any new issues that need to be created to update

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > > On 11-01-16 10:56, sebgoa wrote: >> >> On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sebastien >>> &g

Re: LTS release or not

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Nux! wrote: > > Daan, > > Ok, that sounds good, but at this point it's really up to the people writing > actual code. > Wido has already voted against it and SBP guys don't seem too keen on it > either. > Exactly, we can say we want an LTS,

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

and still maintain strong provenance of commits to keep the high quality and provenance standards of ASF code. If we get consensus we can request to the board to be part of the “trial” and move to Github. > On Dec 21, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

> On Jan 3, 2016, at 4:28 PM, humbed...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On 2016-01-03 12:25, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Bringing this one discuss thread to the top of the ML to get stronger >> consensus. >> >> We need it if we

Re: DoNot host Copyrighted stuff on home.apache.org/

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 1:34 AM, Srikanteswararao talluri > wrote: > > Hello All, > > Please do not host any copyrighted material like windows templates on your > apache home directory. There are concerns from Apache Infra team on These are not concerns, it is just plainly

Re: 4.7 release notes

@pdion89 ok merged. haven’t check the docs yet though. > On Dec 21, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > @seb, here is the PR for the RN of 4.7.0, > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/27 > > @Rohit, Thanks for the clue, I will update the RN

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

gstack. > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> BTW >> >> Anyone can ask for a new git repo which will be mirrored on github at: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

BTW Anyone can ask for a new git repo which will be mirrored on github at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/create/8 Not sure if the link will work, but it’s available through issues. > On Dec 19, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com&

Re: Protocol to add scripts to a newer version of ACS

> On Dec 21, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > Unfortunately the mirror to Github is broken. Pushed 4.7 branch hours ago but > it doesn’t show up. Can only create PR if it arrives. > > confirmed, the mirror is also delayed for the website. > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

> On 19 Dec 2015, at 16:28, Rene Moser wrote: > > Hi Seb > >> On 12/19/2015 10:12 AM, sebgoa wrote: >> >> Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would >> like to re-open this discussion. >> >> Now that we have stabilized master and release

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

Just a quick note here, We are getting in the holidays season, and we have not yet discussed all implications of our new workflow and ability to release much faster. - Upgrade is a big thing for us, so let’s make sure we keep getting it right. - We need to have a discussion about which branch

Re: PR's and the 2 LGTM Story

Top posting on this one to reinforce a few things: Master is now our release branch Merge on master by the RMs *only* PR still need 2 LGTM Do note, that any committer is free to create any other branch and work there or work on their own fork. The goal is not to slow down development but

Re: BVT report for week of 12/14

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the BVT report for this week - > - XS Basic - 97.0% (4.6 RC passrate 96.9%) > - XS Adv - 79.5% (4.6 RC passrate 93.4%)// went down from 92.7% to 79.5% Hi Raja, with very few commits

Re: Lists admin, please unsubscribe/remove andrewlore...@gmx.com

That’s weird, I am not seeing any bounced messages. @David, might be able to do it Otherwise @Nux can you file a JIRA with Infra ? thanks > On Dec 8, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Nux! wrote: > > Hi, > > Whoever is list admin, please remove andrewlore...@gmx.com from the user/dev >

Re: Package Repositories

> On Dec 1, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >>> As I mentioned in my initial message, the public ShapeBlue repositories >> [1] are noredist builds of release baselines with no

4.6 announcement

The 4.6.0 announcement is out, please take 5 minutes to promote on social media: - NASDAQ GlobeNewswire http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/12/01/791835/0/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-announces-Apache-CloudStack-v4-6.html - ASF "Foundation" blog http://s.apache.org/VfP - @TheASF

Re: 4.6 release

at 6:13 AM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> > wrote: > >> These should be in the RN for 4.6.0, we can add it asap indeed. >> >> >> >> >> On 23/11/15 12:07, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> &g

Re: 4.6 release

e it, or we should gracefully >>> "obsolete" it from the RPM packaging. >>> >>> I had to manually "rpm -e --nodeps cloudstack-awsapi" to avoid conflicts, >>> but otherwise the upgrade went fine. >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the

Re: 4.6 release

> On Nov 21, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Talking about 4.6 > > There seems to be an issue when people upgrade from 4.5.2 and the awsapi > package is missing. > Ping on this. Before me make the 4.6 release ann

Re: 4.6 release

Talking about 4.6 There seems to be an issue when people upgrade from 4.5.2 and the awsapi package is missing. Can someone (ping @pdion) upgrade the release notes to mention the fact that awsapi is removed and add a step in the upgrade process ? > On Nov 20, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Wido den

Re: cloudstack UI

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:24 AM, Abhinandan Prateek > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am considering some improvements to cloudstack UI. Like delinking the > quick view with the details page. Such that the details page can contain > listView. > > Another change

Re: Hello 4.6.0, now what?!

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Nice email, Remi! > > The most important point that everyone has to be aware of: > > Master is release branch for 4.7 > > Master has now become the 4.7.0 release

Re: website API doc

it’s all on the website now. that’s the last bit that is not automated. We need to build the html and push that directly. > On Nov 16, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Hi all, Seb, > > I want to update API doc of our website to publish 4.6 API. do we use >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Congratulations to all, this could be our strongest release to date. Sorry I could not vote, I have been traveling. > On Nov 13, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > thanks all, great. let's improve even further, after we had a great party > to celebrate our

Still no direct commit on master

Folks just a quick note, While 4.6.0 is out (almost) we should not direct commit on master. Master is now our release branch fir 4.7. Let's be patient a bit more to finish the 4.6 items remi mentioned and we will have a clear process for 4.7. -Sebastien

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Thanks Raja, Attachments get striped on this mailing list, so I can’t see wha you seem to have attached. Also it would be most helpful if you could comment on the errors that you report. Do you consider them as blockers, are they related to open issues, shall we discard them ? > On Nov 6,

Re: Git with Eclipse

Ron, I don’t know how to use Github with eclipse, I use the command line for everything. But the documentation should be good: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin#contributing-to-the-documentation Basically you need an account on GitHub. You fork

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

Not surprisingly I like Travis, because it outsources the “tests” and that we can fix them by editing .travis.yml, which can be done by someone without access to the Jenkins servers/slaves. At the very least I agree with Miguel which should keep the mvn build, and possible rat etc…

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

ing. > So ... revert at your will. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Not surprisingly I like Travis, because it outsources the “tests” and that >> we can fix them by editing .travis.yml, which can be done by s

Re: [PROPOSAL] remove travis pull request checks from github

> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>

Re: Pull request on Admin docs failure

Hi Ron, Yes you need an account on github.com > On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > I am new to this and trying to create a pull request in Eclipse and get the > message: > "Unexpected error: API rate limit exceeded for 24.37.79.202." > > It

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to GitHub

core of your work. > >> > > > > Agree. I love Github and it works great, but make it THE primary source > > for the source code and go away from ASF? Well, I'm not sure. > > > > True, Git is distributed and that's cool, but I think we should make > > sure that as a project we aren't depended on Github. > > > > Wido > > > >> If we need to use the labels, and others github behaviors, why not > >> create a new ASF service provided by GitLab open source project ? > >> > >> Milamber > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> -Sebastien > -- --- Sebastien Goasguen Open Source Cloud Evangelist, Cloudstack http://sites.google.com/site/runseb/

[DISCUSS] Move to GitHub

Folks, We have been using GitHub for PR now for a while, it seems to work despite the fact that we still have to get used to the workflow. We lack some privileges on the mirror to be able to use labels etc. I would also be in favor of using Issues and why not the Wiki. Basically I personally

Re: UI translation for 4.6

> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%): >> >> French (France) 100% >> Portuguese

Re: Time to create 4.6 branch ?

Wei might have a point, however: 1-We still have blockers, and one is unassigned, the others are on Wilder’s plate. So there is still work to get done on the blockers and work to help Wilder. 2-If you don’t work on blockers you can start testing master as if it was RC and getting ready to

CCC EU

Hi folks, CCC Dublin 2015 is over and we had a blast. Thanks to our sponsors who helped make this happen: Citrix, Cloud Foundry foundation, Nuage Networks, Shapeblue, Cloudian, Solidfire, ikoula, LPI-Japan, PC Extreme and Cloud Ops. A few take aways: 1-We had 150 people at the event, which is

UI translation for 4.6

Milamber reminded me that before releasing 4.6 we should include the latest translated strings for the UI. If you care about translation, you might be interested to work on it in the coming days. Here is where we stand: Portuguese (Brazil) 100% French (France) 100%

new features in 4.6 ?

Can you guys help me with a few new features in 4.6 or even the last year ? I lost track but want to mention some of them in tomorrow’s talk thanks -sebastien

Re: BVT report 10/5

Thanks Raja, couple additional comments in-line. > On Oct 5, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Changes in code base since last BVT report - 10/1 > - CLOUDSTACK-8848: ensure power state is up to date when handling > missing VMs in powerReport - >

Re: [VOTE] jenkins jobs removal

+1 for sure on all build-docs jobs > On Oct 2, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Boris Schrijver wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 on all. > > -- > > Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, > > Boris Schrijver > > PCextreme B.V. > > http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact > Tel direct: +31 6 33784542 >

Re: BVT report 10/1

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:47 PM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Sebastien, Remi and Raja… > > Michael and I just tested that one on 4.4.4, and it also happens there: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697 > Thanks for testing this as well as

Re: new colleagues

congrats Daan, +1 > On Oct 1, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Hello fellow stackers, > > This to let you know that I just entered the building of Leaseweb, in order > to be working there for the next couple of years. You know them via Whei > Zou, who will

Re: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Koushik Das wrote: > > Raja, > The earlier scale vm test couldn't run on simulator because of the validation > steps (IIRC it tries to connect to the real VM created during test). Since it > wasn't possible to run with simulator, the new

Re: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

st:/tmp/MarvinLogs/test_scale_vm_OPS7AD# cat results.txt > Test scale virtual machine ... === TestName: test_01_scale_vm | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > > -- > Ran 1 test in 23.455s > > OK > > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasgu

Re: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

ssment and Koushik report of this failure correctly. > -Original Message----- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:48 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py > >

Re: OVS Plugin documentation issues

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > Don't mind making the changes. > I have a lot of SVN experience and have the git repo for Apache OFBiz > configured but am still trying to figure out git. > What do I have to setup in Eclipse to access the

Re: OVS documentation

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > Can someone fix this? > Honestly Ron, the issue is that very few people are actually using the GRE isolation. One would need to test it with the latest cloudstack 4.5.2 and latest OVS to see if it

Re: CloudStack networking documentation

Pinging Paul Angus, who can surely answer these questions. We can then edit the docs. > On Sep 29, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/concepts.html#what-is-apache-cloudstack > > In the opening paragraph of

Re: BVT report 9/29

_09_13_45_5NC2QK. All >> logs will be available here >> >> === Marvin Init Logging Successful=== >> >> Marvin Init Successful >> === TestName: test_01_scale_vm | Status : SUCCESS === >> >> === TestName: test_02_scale_vm_without_hyperviso

Re: [Blocker] test duplicated in test_scale_vm.py

a criteria for priority of a bug - just my take. We should >> include BVT failures in the Blocker criteria (whether the fix is in the >> core functionality/test script). Otherwise, we will not hit 100% passrate >> on BVTs. >>> >>> You are right - only a subse

Re: VR refactoring, concerns and a way out ?

it’s easy to sit-down and wait for other people to work on > features/test/fixes. > > Cheers, > Wilder > > >> On 24 Sep 2015, at 14:33, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 2:00 PM, Ramanath Katru

Re: OVS documentation

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com> > wrote: > > On 30/09/2015 6:33 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com> >>> wrote: >>> >&g

Re: Cloustack 4.3.2 announced?

I fixed it, You don’t see 4.3.2 in the latest announcement section, just the latest blog entry. thanks > On Sep 29, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > HI Ron, > > I am looking into it. The announcement section is pulled from the blog. &

Re: Cloustack 4.3.2 announced?

HI Ron, I am looking into it. The announcement section is pulled from the blog. But it does not seem to be updated. The latest version is indeed 4.5.2 > On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > I am running 4.5.2 on Centos7. > Thanks to all who

Future of CloudStack panel

Hi everyone, We had a cancellation in the CCC panel on the future of cloudstack. Anyone interested to jump in ? Send me a private email if you want to take part, should be fun. -Sebastien

4.6 blockers

Just checking JIRA, we have 5 blockers for 4.6: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8920 - not assigned KVM agent cannot communicate with server on port 8250 The other 4 are assigned and being worked on. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915 - assigned to Wilder

Re: BVT report 9/29

Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors. First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our Travis run…:( If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross check with Travis, we could run them as well. @miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >