Hey all,
I am switching to my personal email for all CloudStack communication . I will
not be reachable at my work address any longer. From now on, you can reach me
at csui...@gmail.commailto:csui...@gmail.com.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp
Thanks for everything, Chip and thanks to Hugo for stepping up!
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:55 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Congratulations Hugo!
Hey all,
I’m unable to build on 4.4 and master with no changes made in either branch. It
appears that there are some files which don’t meet the license header
requirement. I don’t see one, but is there a profile for ignoring the check
license plugin? Alternatively, does anyone know what files
line?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:52 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm unable to build on 4.4 and master with no changes made in either branch.
It appears that there are some files which don't meet the license header
requirement. I don't see one
the offending file is in utils. Doesn't it give info above the BUIL
FAILURE line?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:52 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm unable to build on 4.4 and master with no changes made in either
branch. It appears that there are some files which don't
I have reverted the commits on 4.4 and master.
Sorry about that, everyone. I thought I recompiled after applying the patch but
I must have missed a step…
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Mar
Ah, yes. Now seeing this snippet I can explain the issue.
So, during orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot(work.getVolumeId(),
work.getPolicyId(), work.getSnapshotId(), account, work.isQuiesceVm());” if an
exception is thrown, it is caught and ignored by
VolumeServiceImpl.takeSnapshot(VolumeInfo):
I was thinking something along the same lines. The current API UI plugin
frameworks would allow for an optional plugin which can be added to any
deployment post-install. It could allow for configurable reporting so that
users can decide what information is acceptable to report. If we can get
I’d be a fan of using 4.4 as a learning process for the community and an
attempt to meet our proposed schedule. While I can appreciate the desire to get
features into 4.4, there appears to be a significant backlog on JIRA and we’ve
now had two consecutive versions (I’m not sure about 4.1) not
vmops.com -keyalg RSA -validity 3650 -dname
cn=Cloudstack
Alternatively, modify your sudoers file so your user isn't prompted for a
password when attempting to use sudo.
Hope this helps!
Ian
On 27 February 2014 19:49, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.comwrote:
I tried searching
Chris,
I tried pulling down the box this morning and playing around…a couple of notes:
1) For anyone trying this, make sure to ‘git checkout v0.4’. The changes on
master are breaking the Vagrantfile.
2) When I run ‘vagrant up xen’, I can see in VirtualBox that the machine is
booted and appears
?
Many thanks,
Chris
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Chris,
I tried pulling down the box this morning and playing around...a couple of
notes:
1) For anyone trying this, make sure to 'git checkout v0.4'. The changes on
master
I tried searching for this issue and see that it has come up several times, but
I cannot seem to find a resolution. When deploying devcloud on my Mac, I run in
to this exception:
INFO [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) Processing updateSSLKeyStore
INFO [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl]
, I don't
know how to make myself an administrator any more (or my privilege has been
revoked?). Anyone know how to do it?
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 10:18 AM
To: dev
Subject: Confluence
Can someone please grant me permissions to edit pages on Confluence?
My username is: csuich2
Thanks!
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
Thanks everyone! I’m excited to continue working with this community.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Feb 6, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
...@citrix.com
wrote:
+1. I think this is a good idea.
On 1/31/14 7:27 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I¹m curious if there is any interest in creating a ³SDK² for developing
plugins in CloudStack. Right now, to develop my plugin, I need a
development environment set up
I’m curious if there is any interest in creating a “SDK” for developing plugins
in CloudStack. Right now, to develop my plugin, I need a development
environment set up in order to have the maven artifacts required for compiling
against. This can end up being quite a bit of work to maintain if
, SolidFire, and
Marcus have storage plug-ins.
We could document this issue and the easy workaround of not using true and
false as a value and try to address it in 4.4.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:53 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Any final thoughts on this? Letting
, 2014, at 3:34 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
This is the approach we’ll have to take if we can’t fix this in 4.3. It
certainly works, but it isn’t ideal.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on the impact this might have to 4.3?
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su
as a value?
If so, do you feel it is an acceptable amount of risk for 4.3 now that we
have already begun spinning up RC builds?
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:40 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I think my only real concern with working around it in this manner
I have found an additional issue related to this. The allocators do properly
ignore any storage pool details whose value is true that is not actually a
storage pool. However, the list storage pools API does NOT. When creating the
StoragePoolResponse, it is still assumed that any storage pool
each time you
pull it out of the DB.
That might be too risky of a change, though, for 4.3 at this point.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:24 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I have found an additional issue related to this. The allocators do
properly ignore any storage
:
I think your idea would be acceptable risk for 4.3. The upgrade logic
would have to perform this true-to-storage_tag conversion, too, though.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:00 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I think the quickest, easiest change would be to keep using
Sateesh,
It appears that your recent commit broke the deploydb mvn profile. When running
the profile this morning, I encountered the error below. I believe it comes
from this line of Upgrade421to430.java:
updatePstmt = conn.prepareStatement(UPDATE `cloud`.`service_offering` SET
ram_size=?
Can you apply this to the 4.3 branch as well, please?
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Jan 15, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Should be fixed:
commit
I created a fresh, clean install earlier today and everything worked up until
trying to deploy a VM. When the virtual router attempts to start, it quickly
shuts down after spewing out:
‘[…] Stopping web server: apache2apache2: Could not reliably determine the
server’s fully qualified domain
with it...the agents' states of my VMs don't ever
seem to get into the Up state.
Maybe you're having similar trouble and it's impacting your virtual router?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I created a fresh, clean install earlier today and everything worked
I can try to provide a direction to look in, but take this with a grain of salt…
I believe that the XenServer best practice for ‘restoring’ a VM volume is
creating a NEW volume from the snapshot and then attaching that volume to the
VM INSTEAD of reverting the volume back to it’s previous
Mike - thanks for pointing Victor to our video.
Victor - I’m not sure that everyone on the dev list wants to see this whole
conversation, so feel free to contact David (cc’d) and I off list and we can
talk more in depth.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
It appears that, no matter what, the createSnapshot API will ALWAYS return a
success. If you drill down from:
VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot() to
VolumeServiceImpl.takeSnapshot(), you’ll notice that ANY exception that is
thrown inside of SnapshotManager.takeSnapshot() is
For what it is worth, a very similar issue is occurring for deleting snapshots.
However, that issue is only with the UI.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:08 AM, SuichII
I updated to the latest System VM templates from
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm-master/ and the CloudStack
jars in /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ appear to be from Nov. 1. Should the System
VM build be pulling newer jars than that?
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
Hm. I may just be missing it, but I don’t see a section on implementing
VMSnapshotStrategy…
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Dec 22, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
Any chance this is a vhd-util issue? This is the generic error I generally see
when vhd-util isn’t in place or can’t be executed.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Dec 9, 2013, at 6:58 PM,
message is
displayed instead of the text I provided.
Talk to you later
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:28 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Alena Edison (or others),
Is there a reason that ServerApiException has a getDescription() method
Bumping this. Can someone take a look at it, please?
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Alena Edison (or others),
Is there a reason that ServerApiException has a getDescription() method rather
than using getMessage() like all other exceptions? This causes problems in
places where you’d like to treat all exceptions generically and be able to
simply call getMessage(), but
change behind its back will cause problem and it does not provide official
API to manipulate at volume level for a VM snapshot.
This is a bug
Kelven
On 11/6/13, 5:58 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Bumping this. I believe we need the imput of a VMWare expert
, depending on if we can or can't get a VMware person to chime in
on this issue, we may have to disallow disks from being detached from
VMware VMs with snapshots in 4.3.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:44 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Correct.
#6 FAILS with VMWare
We currently don’t allow volumes to be attached to VMs with snapshots and
allowing volumes to be detached causes quite a bug:
1) Attach a data disk to a VM
2) Snapshot the VM
3) Detach the data disk
4) Attempt to restore the VM from the snapshot — FAILS since the data disk is
no longer there,
Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:05 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
We currently don’t allow volumes to be attached to VMs with snapshots and
allowing volumes to be detached causes quite a bug:
1) Attach a data
, as well?
Is Xen OK with 6?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:26 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
FWIW, after looking into this more with Xen, when the VM is restored in
step 4, it simply no longer has the volume attached, so this appears to
really be a VMWare issue. Any
I would like to be able to leverage the existing apidoc tools to generate
apidoc for my plugin’s exposed APIs. However, gen_toc.py expects all APIs to
fall into one of the hard coded ‘known_categories’. Since my APIs don’t fall
into one of the existing categories, gen_toc.py fails with the
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Nov 4, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:19:12PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote:
I would like to be able to leverage the existing apidoc tools to generate
apidoc for my plugin’s exposed APIs. However
It looks like some changes made in 858ce766659101eb731c83c806892dd5d9baa976
prohibit any managed storage pool other than ISCSI from starting a VM. It looks
like you’ assuming that if the storage pool is managed then we should use
getIscsiSR() to get the xen SR, which isn’t the case.
I also
StartCommand.
Can you tell me, are you using NFS? What is your managed storage type?
Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:32 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
It looks like some changes made in 858ce766659101eb731c83c806892dd5d9baa976
prohibit any managed
...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Sep 30, 2013, at 8:37 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
See responses inline.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su
, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I just wanted to add a little clarification from a plugin perspective.
Having commands.properties as a whitelist just adds another place that
plugins have to register with CloudStack. For plugins
that is something that answered your question.
If not you can email me directly with your spring config and I can
help, or we can setup a GTM.
Darren
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:04 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Darren,
I’m switching my plugin over to use the new
On first glance it looks great! I’ll look at it first thing in the morning
since it is getting late here in EST.
Thanks!
Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 24, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Darren
It appears that the deployment of systemvms was broken by commit
e33ae74067d5d7ff165098028c0bd6897f14bbd2, specifically, the change
Adding the commit author.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:39 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
It appears that the deployment of systemvms was broken
It looks like the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all. I
should have been more clear in my review - there are logic changes that needed
to be carried from my changes into yours, not simply a rebase. I will work on
those changes and try to get a patch up shortly.
--
Chris
And it looks like some of your changes may have not merged correctly. I’m
getting compile errors like:
The method close() is undefined for the type Transaction
This shouldn’t have come from our merge.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud
, 2013 at 1:05 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
And it looks like some of your changes may have not merged correctly. I’m
getting compile errors like:
The method close() is undefined for the type Transaction
This shouldn’t have come from our merge.
--
Chris Suich
looking at a clean version
of master?
Darren
On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
Er, sorry. That was poorly worded on my part. Some classes, like
SnapshotTest.java and all the storage providers, did not get updated
references to your
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
I fixed all the compilation errors in engine/storage/integration-test.
I don't know how to run those test though, so I can't validate the
changes.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Yep. I’m running
Yes - I sent out an email about it earlier. I’ll bump the thread.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Jessica Wang jessica.w...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
My management server
Bumping this as system vms still can’t be deployed on master.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:43 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
Adding the commit
, at 5:56 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
My understanding is that it is still a work in progress to get those test
back running. Is this correct, Edison?
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix
to do? As it stands right now, what is on master, I'm not
aware of any issues.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:22 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Darren,
Would you be able to look into copy the logic back into your refactoring today
or tomorrow
.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:30 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Take a look at revision 3 of my changes here:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/diff/3/#index_header
The changes I made were due to discussion in the reviews. It should be
simpler, cleaner and more
John,
Will you be able to take a look at this revision soon? It is a small change to
address your comments so it should not take very long.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix,
Congrats, Animesh!
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats Animesh. Your contributions to 4.2 were tremendous... Looking
forward
:28 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
John,
I'm glad to hear you think these changes look better. It sounds like everything
else you mentioned is fairly minor, so I have no problems making some changes.
However, I have made a couple comments
Oh, I noticed this and created a fix, which I thought I already had submitted
since it was a part of the storage refactoring a couple weeks back. I'll post
the patch for review now.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix,
, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Marcus Sorensen
shadow...@gmail.commailto:shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, let me test it.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:56 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Oh, I noticed this and created a fix, which I thought I already had submitted
, 2013 at 1:45 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Hm, interesting.
Since nothing else in the if/else if series there depends on the src
being a
template, I'd imagine it would be safe to just have the check be:
} else if (srcData.getObjectType
with it, though it looks ok on first
glance.
regards,
Daan
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:33 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Just bumping this. It should be a fairly simple review.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
:
This sounds like a great idea.
From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Revert to VM disk Snapshot
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:53:35 +
+1.
On 9/30/13 2:31 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
The storage subsystem API
Just bumping this. It should be a fairly simple review.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 10, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Chris Suich
need to enforce the whole process for everybody.
Darren
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:05 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Whether the hypervisor snapshot happens depends on whether the
'quiesce' option is specified with the snapshot request. If a user
doesn't care
– Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 10, 2013, at 1:40 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Views are meant to be read only. So +1 for removing setters.
On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:59 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
*JoinVOs are used to store entries
volume (which is
analogous to the SR).
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:29 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Multivendor snapshotting:
The case with two storage providers is a bit trickier and is one that we
are still working on. I believe there are a couple options
, please
notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system.
Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the
communications sent to and from its email network.
On 9/10/13 10:02 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
http
Just bumping this since there haven't been any responses.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I'm ready and prepared to do the work,
but I don't want to move on if people have concerns with this approach or can
think of a better solution.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
master of what is
allowed (a whitelist). But by default, I think the file should be
empty and default to what is defined by the API annotation.
Darren
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:45 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Maybe we could consider switching from a whitelist
three, I don't have much vested interest in this.
Darren
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Well, it seems OK, but I think we should keep on discussing our options. One
concern I have with the global config approach is that it adds manual
and how that is problematic, as
well.
With Storage Tagging, there is no indication of what storage provider
supports the Compute or Disk Offering in question and, as such, we don't
know what fields to show to or hide from users.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su
Interesting. I'm not sure how I missed this thread... I'll try to chime in
where I can, then. However, everything going on in here sounds like work for
post-4.3, but if we are adding revert volume snapshot to 4.3, we will need a
solution to that before then. It seems like the idea I've got for
at 1:13 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I think I'll look into a version of (2). The difference being that I think
using an int is too large of a range and provides unnecessary granularity.
If two strategies or providers both have snapshot strategies, they are both
care of by our controller's operating system, Data ONTAP, and we simply
use APIs to communicate with it.
Darren
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:10 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I can comment on the second half.
Through storage operations, storage providers can create
, at 4:57 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Who is going to decide whether the hypervisor snapshot should actually
happen or not? Or how?
Darren
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:38 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
Maybe we could consider switching from a whitelist to a blacklist, then. A
whitelist is certainly easier in terms of a one-step configuration, but a
blacklist would allow for much easier plugin development, installation and
removal. Perhaps we could find write a script that generates the
Hi Fabrice,
RHEV is not currently supported. At this time, CloudStack supports VMWare, KVM,
XenServer and XenCloud.
-Chris
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 7, 2013, at 4:11 AM, Fabrice Brazier
I'm a fan of option 2 - this gives us the most flexibility (as you stated). The
option is given to completely override the way VM snapshots work AND storage
providers are given to opportunity to work within the default VM snapshot
workflow.
I believe this option should satisfy your concern,
Thanks for the notes, Edison.
Chip - Edison hit all the important points, but I'm not sure what the proper
etiquette is here. I'd be more than happy to add some tests, but after looking
through the code, I can't find any tests to model after. While I don't mind
coming up with a model for
/api_3.0.6/user/associateLun.html
API set the LUN mask on the filer for that LUN. Then the ISCSI initiator
on the bare metal host / vm can login to the LUN.
On 9/23/13 10:32 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:44:51PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote
*JoinVOs are used to store entries from MySQL views, which are not editable. I
think removing setters from the *JoinVOs may help avoid some potential
confusion as setters seem to imply that the fields are editable, which they
really aren't.
I started looking around and it looks like most
: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring
Sure - I could see that working. Anyone have thoughts whether an enum
could be used instead of an integer? That way we can
PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/04/2013 11:58 AM, SuichII, Christopher wrote:
Darren,
I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the
xml is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two
strategies or providers
:42 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply.
After talking with Edison, I think what we could do is allow the strategies
to either specify a priority or 'type' and then order them by that when they
are loaded. For example, we could have an enum
interface and let storage providers implement it if they can.
Darren
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:41 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Well, yes, in part. By scalable I mean that if CloudStack is expected to be
able to manage such a large number of vms, it should be able
The storage subsystem API currently has an interface for takeSnapshot() and an
associated externally facing API for takeSnapshot. There is also a method on
the primary data store interface for revertSnapshot(). However, this method is
unused. We would like this storage subsystem interface
The storage subsystem currently uses a number of hypervisor APIs for
transferring files between data stores (both primary and secondary). However,
while implementing the storage subsystem API as a storage provider, we have
discovered that there is a need for a generic copy method that can copy
CloudStack currently snapshots vm disks by taking hypervisor snapshots.
However, when implementing the storage subsystem API interface takeSnapshot(),
the VM associated with the requested volume is not quiesced since a hypervisor
snapshot is not necessarily taken. When creating a storage level
a properly quiesced snapshot on the data disk - just a point-in-time
snapshot.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Is VM Quiescing sufficient to ensure consistency of the snapshot?
On 9/30/13 2:43 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su
.
The actual scalability of the snapshot process itself is limited by
available disk and network bandwidth.
Also certain hypervisors have various quirks which stand in the way of an
efficient solution.
On 9/27/13 10:27 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
I'd like to start
Brian - The new style looks great, but I'd like to repeat someone else's
question: Are we getting rid of the icons on the nav bar? As a plugin dev, it
would be really nice to keep our company logo by our UI plugin.
Shiva Sebastien - What impact would this angular.js project have on UI
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
