Hi Upayavira,
I like the idea of reusing HTTPUnit as much as possible - here's a
slightly different proposal which could allow multiple simultaneous
unit tests.
...
CocoonUnit
public class MyXMLTestCase extends XMLTestCase {
public MyXMLTestCase(String name) {
super(name);
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bertrand,
Thanks for this response. I like it, and it seems to remove almost all
of the things I dislike about this approach.
So, my comments:
1) The idea of passing an ID with the webRequest is brilliant. It gets
around a major disadvantage. I would send the ID as a request header
rather
Volker Schmitt wrote:
found the reason for this WARN:
WARN(2003-11-05) 09:13.24:667 [core.manager]
(/wa/ProductSearch/Global) Se
rvlet.Engine.Transports : 11387/ExcaliburComponentManager: Attempted to
release
a
org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.ComponentsSelector
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 08:17 Europe/Zurich, Upayavira a écrit :
...3) The remaining thing I dislike is the need to have some code in
the sitemap to accept the requests from CocoonUnit)
Thinking wildly about point 3, maybe I could write a unit test servlet
and set it up in web.xml to answer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19638.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10277.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FirstFridayNovember2003
I would like to work on getting the Patch list down a bit,
especially some of the older ones.
The first one that i will tackle is:
23796 [PATCH] docs pages containing source are sometimes too wide
This has been taken to Forrest, so
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 09:59 Europe/Zurich, David Crossley a écrit :
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FirstFridayNovember2003...
Wouldn't it be better to assign the bug to yourself in bugzilla,
instead of having to maintain a separate list?
I just did it for 24294, I'm going to add
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24326.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 07.11.2003 04:39, Tony Collen wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-06
23:47 ---
reopening for setting bug status correctly
Thanx Joerg, I was on the fence of either WONTFIX or INVALID ;)
I understand WONTFIX so, that we acknowledge a bug, but we WON'T FIX
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24326.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 07.11.2003 10:05, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FirstFridayNovember2003...
Wouldn't it be better to assign the bug to yourself in bugzilla, instead
of having to maintain a separate list?
I just did it for 24294, I'm going to add it to the scratchpad
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 10:16 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
But please: If anyone assigns a bug to him/herself, can he/her please
add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CCs. Otherwise the list won't be
informed that the bug is fixed.
good point, +1
-Bertrand
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19638.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 10:14 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
...Something similar was with the other bug changed (no offense,
Bertrand): the bug itself was in XSLTC, so we depended on this one.
But we can not set our bug to WONTFIX, because we had to update the
XSLTC library
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- cocoon.sendStatus(status)
- cocoon.sendStatus(status, message)
- cocoon.response.setStatus(status)
- cocoon.response.setStatus(status,message)
+4 from me
+1
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Volker found recently a hugh performance problem in the
current DefaultComponentFactory in Excalibur.
You can find more information here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10677987271r=1w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10680213662r=1w=2
I propose to remove the
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 08:17 Europe/Zurich, Upayavira a écrit :
...3) The remaining thing I dislike is the need to have some code in
the sitemap to accept the requests from CocoonUnit)
Thinking wildly about point 3, maybe I could write a unit test
servlet and
I often find myself fielding questions on the user list about why the
CLI doesn't work.
Sometimes this is down to my own stupidity. Other times, however, it is
down to people changing things in Cocoon, and assuming that the servlet
is the only environment in which Cocoon runs. This isn't the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17370.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FirstFridayNovember2003...
Wouldn't it be better to assign the bug to yourself in bugzilla, instead
of having to maintain a separate list?
I just did it for 24294, I'm going to add it to the
David Crossley wrote:
But please: If anyone assigns a bug to him/herself, can he/her please
add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CCs. Otherwise the list won't be
informed that the bug is fixed.
Really? I thought that Bugzilla did default Cc for every action.
Afaik it does exactly that - I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 10:14 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
No problem - but we might want to set some (small and simple) rules for
these bug states, how we decide which one to use etc., see
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=HowWeUseBugzilla
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 11:11 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a
écrit :
David Crossley wrote:
But please: If anyone assigns a bug to him/herself, can he/her please
add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CCs. Otherwise the list won't be
informed that the bug is fixed.
Really? I thought that Bugzilla did
David Crossley wrote:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FirstFridayNovember2003
I would like to work on getting the Patch list down a bit,
especially some of the older ones.
The first one that i will tackle is:
23796 [PATCH] docs pages containing source are sometimes too wide
This has been
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
David Crossley wrote:
But please: If anyone assigns a bug to him/herself, can he/her
please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CCs. Otherwise the list
won't be informed that the bug is fixed.
Really? I thought that Bugzilla did default Cc for every action.
Afaik it does
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 11:21 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 10:14 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a
écrit :
No problem - but we might want to set some (small and simple) rules
for these bug states, how we decide which one to use
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 11:20 Europe/Zurich, Upayavira a écrit :
...Can someone recommend a decent Windows IRC client? I'd at least
like to watch what's going on, even if I can't participate much.
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/rt-messaging/chatzilla/ should work on
windows? Never used it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
David Crossley wrote:
But please: If anyone assigns a bug to him/herself, can he/her
please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CCs. Otherwise the list
won't be informed that the bug is fixed.
Really? I thought that Bugzilla did default Cc for every
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24319.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Joerg Heinicke dijo:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
David Crossley wrote:
But please: If anyone assigns a bug to him/herself, can he/her
please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CCs. Otherwise the list
won't be informed that the bug is fixed.
Really? I thought that Bugzilla did
Upayavira wrote:
Can someone recommend a decent Windows IRC client? I'd at least like to
watch what's going on, even if I can't participate much.
Upayavira
Try XChat http://xchat.org/.
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei - Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica
P.le Volontari del Sangue, 2 - 27100 Pavia
Hi Cocoon developers,
the Lenya community is considering to use the Cron block
as the basis to improve the Lenya scheduler.
At the moment, there is no job persistence functionality
(ie, when Cocoon is restarted, the scheduled jobs get lost).
Is anyone besides me interested in implementing this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi:
Sometime ago we agreed to use XSLTC as the default XSLT transformer in
Cocoon. But then a bug in xsltc made us to switch back to xalan.
Now the bug is fixed in XSLTC so please vote if you agree to switch again
to XSLTC as the default XSLT tranformer in Cocoon.
Here is my vote:
+1
Best
I use Ksirc. It is part of KDE.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Hi Cocoon developers,
the Lenya community is considering to use the Cron block
as the basis to improve the Lenya scheduler.
At the moment, there is no job persistence functionality
(ie, when Cocoon is restarted, the scheduled jobs get lost).
Is anyone besides me interested
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21177.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24305.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23615.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The only thing that comes to mind is automated tests of both CLI and
servlet environments...at this point it is a lot of work to add, but I
doubt that any rules like make sure you re-test the CLI would work.
Indeed - perhaps if we had something
Can someone recommend a decent Windows IRC client? I'd at least like to
watch what's going on, even if I can't participate much.
Try XChat http://xchat.org/.
Another popular one is mIRC: http://www.mirc.org/
Andreas
Andrew Savory wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The only thing that comes to mind is automated tests of both CLI and
servlet environments...at this point it is a lot of work to add, but I
doubt that any rules like make sure you re-test the CLI would work.
Indeed -
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The only thing that comes to mind is automated tests of both CLI and
servlet environments...at this point it is a lot of work to add, but I
doubt that any rules like make sure you re-test the CLI would work.
Re-reading this I realize that it might
Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Can someone recommend a decent Windows IRC client? I'd at least like to
watch what's going on, even if I can't participate much.
Try XChat http://xchat.org/.
Another popular one is mIRC: http://www.mirc.org/
Andreas
I've gone for the Mozilla one, which
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22682.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23614.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21536.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21536.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
snip/
Please, go to channel #cocoon we are discussing about that there right now.
Boohoo... I'm at a customer site and cannot participate...
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Sylvain Wallez
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
snip/
Please, go to channel #cocoon we are discussing about that
there right
now.
Boohoo... I'm at a customer site and cannot participate...
same problem here, no SSH, no IRC ... :-(
--
Reinhard
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 12:53 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
From: Sylvain Wallez
...
Boohoo... I'm at a customer site and cannot participate...
same problem here, no SSH, no IRC ... :-(
Just a reminder for people on IRC: make sure decisions and important
discussions take place on
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23585.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24399.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The only thing that comes to mind is automated tests of both CLI and
servlet environments...at this point it is a lot of work to add, but I
doubt that any rules like make sure you re-test the CLI
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Gump. It already works.
What we need is to make core Cocoon *not* need the servlet jar, as I had
tried in he past but gt fed up with discussions.
Take the servlet jar out, see what the dependencies are, make sure that
the core doesn't need servlet.jar, and you
Andrew Savory wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The only thing that comes to mind is automated tests of both CLI and
servlet environments...at this point it is a lot of work to add, but I
doubt that any rules like make sure you re-test the CLI would work.
Indeed -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cannot set MIME type for ResourceReader
...
I just changed the impl for 2.2:
- MIME type declared on the reader instance
- MIME type declared for the reader component
- Ask the Reader for a MIME type. A *.doc reader could peek into the file
and return either
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Thursday, Nov 6, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
I agree with comments in this other thread that let's not introduce
nested components in map:call/. Instead, if needed, let's introduce
act type=flow/. Sometime later.
-1
Your -1 means: replace
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Does it make sense to have same in 2.1?
We agreed, that these changes should only be in 2.2, but if someone needs
it in 2.1 as well we can add it there, too.
And more general question -- I see some commits flowing into 2.1 branch,
should those changes be also
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong HTTP Content Length for Reader when show-time
...
It is not possible to fix this problem as once the content
length is written it
can't be changed later on. So if e.g. the content comes from the
cache, the
cache sets the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * resource. A codensmapping/code parameter can be specified to point to a file containing lines to map prefixes
+ * to namespaces like this:
+ * /p
+ * p
+ * prefix=namespace-uribr/
+ * prefix2=namespace-uri-2
+ * /p
Just a quick one -- why configuration is
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sometime ago we agreed to use XSLTC as the default XSLT transformer in
Cocoon. But then a bug in xsltc made us to switch back to xalan.
Now the bug is fixed in XSLTC so please vote if you agree to switch again
to XSLTC as the default XSLT tranformer in Cocoon.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22377.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
What's the status here, do we want to change it?
Carsten
-Original Message-
From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BUG] CachingPointProcessingPipeline is Configurable and
Parameterizable
Le Vendredi, 7 nov 2003, à 15:18 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a
écrit :
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sometime ago we agreed to use XSLTC as the default XSLT transformer in
Cocoon. But then a bug in xsltc made us to switch back to xalan.
Now the bug is fixed in XSLTC so please vote if you agree to
If I'm not mistaken and our website is up to date [1], we still should
be able to compile Cocoon on jdk 1.3. Please keep it in mind.
Vadim
[1] http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/installing/requirements.html
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sometime ago we agreed to use XSLTC as the default XSLT transformer in
Cocoon. But then a bug in xsltc made us to switch back to xalan.
Now the bug is fixed in XSLTC so please vote if you agree to switch again
to XSLTC as the default XSLT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23714.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Vadim Gritsenko
If I'm not mistaken and our website is up to date [1], we
still should
be able to compile Cocoon on jdk 1.3. Please keep it in mind.
Yes, and this is very important. In many companies it will take years!
until they'll upgrade.
--
Reinhard
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
(and if you're not there don't worry, it is only (nice and friendly)
chatter and quick coordination questions ATM ;-)
that's not true, since we voted that we would _not_ vote on IRC ;-D
seriously: you're perfectly right, Bertrand
/Steven
--
Steven Noels
Upayavira wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
Then add a test run target to the ant buildfine and make sure Gump
runs it daily.
That's the thing. Write a test target...
What shape would a CLI test target take?
IMHO the first easy thing to do is to rely on Forrest, that uses Cocoon
in a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14314.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 7 Nov 2003, at 13:52, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Thursday, Nov 6, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
I agree with comments in this other thread that let's not introduce
nested components in map:call/. Instead, if needed, let's
introduce act
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15220.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23328.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15220.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14314.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
