On 7 Nov 2003, at 13:52, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Thursday, Nov 6, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
I agree with comments in this other thread that let's not introduce nested components in <map:call/>. Instead, if needed, let's introduce <act type="flow"/>. Sometime later.
-1
Your -1 means: "replace later with never", right? Just to remove any possible point of confusion :)
yes. I am against the silly
<xxx> ... do something if true </xx> .. do something if false
syntax. doesn't matter what the logic that drives the "xxx" tag is or what "xxx" is remapped to.
-- Stefano.
