DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27467.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 11 oct. 04, à 12:24, Torsten Curdt a écrit :
...But wouldn't it be cool to just write:
fixes-bug:1234
message
..not having to care about the status.xml
anymore?..
it would for sure ;-)
The problem is that not necessarily stastus changes are done in one
commit, there
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
...
But to be sure, someone should look at the code and verify.
I'm sorry to say that my time constraints have grown even more
strict, as my wife's vet ambulatory opening date is getting nearer
The problem is that not necessarily stastus changes are done in one
commit, there is a different granularity in the two. This is the reason
why some projects that were using commit message extraction systems are
now also using a status file.
where is the problem?
do one commit without the magic
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Torsten Curdt wrote:
The problem is that not necessarily stastus changes are done in one
commit, there is a different granularity in the two. This is the
reason why some projects that were using commit message extraction
systems are now also using a status file.
where is the problem?
do one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: upayavira
Date: Tue Oct 12 04:08:27 2004
New Revision: 54666
Modified:
...
Log:
Broken link reporting now includes referring pages (requested by Forrest)
Woh! :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta
Il giorno 12/ott/04, alle 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
set correct commons-validator-1.1.3.jar path (did the guy who's on
stage now mess up? ;-)
You bet! But the error slipped by because I had to disable jars
validation because of another library that had broken it just a few
minutes
Adam Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We could in theory have a couple 100 different SWF's many of
which are slight variations on each other. We'd generate the
Laszlo source for them from Cocoon, customized for each user
as needed and then send the resultant compiled SWF over to the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 14:20
---
Porting Igor's patch to 2.2 will break some stuff (e.g. the Forms
stuff because
of different behaviour in JS dynamic typing) but I can't fix
everything ATM.
Should I simply do it and somebody cleans up or should I wait
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 14:20
---
Porting Igor's patch to 2.2 will break some stuff (e.g. the Forms
stuff because
of different behaviour in JS dynamic typing) but I can't fix
everything ATM.
Should I simply do it and somebody
Le 12 oct. 04, à 16:35, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
...Yes, Igor had the idea to change the package names in
rhino-continuations to something else. This way we could have both
impls in 2.2. After 2.2 has stabilized we can backport both flowscript
impls to 2.1.x.
Would be great, in this way people
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: upayavira
Date: Tue Oct 12 04:08:27 2004
New Revision: 54666
Modified:
...
Log:
Broken link reporting now includes referring pages (requested by
Forrest)
Woh! :-)
Yeah, but I realise that it doesn't yet work fully... It will only
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ugo Cei dijo:
2. [+1] Keep it on the assumption that we will use it for something else.
Please cast your votes or at least tell me what you think.
I guess this library can be used in the other CForms validators + create
new ones Some time ago I wrote a mail about that:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Ugo Cei dijo:
2. [+1] Keep it on the assumption that we will use it for something else.
Please cast your votes or at least tell me what you think.
I guess this library can be used in the other CForms validators + create
new ones Some time ago I wrote a mail about that:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I committed the pre-alpha cforms xml editor (Swan).
It has some pipelines commented out to not expose
some security holes, so just uncomment those on a
private server to try it out. There are lots of
bugs, and visual mis-design for anybody interested
to jump in and help fix :)
I committed it in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31229.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31676.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31676.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31676.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
30 matches
Mail list logo
