Le 6 juin 05, à 10:28, Steven Noels a écrit :
...That said, we need to discuss access policies to the Daisy instance
on our Cocoon zone. It's only logical committers are granted User
access immediately. What about non-committer documentation
contributors?..
I suggest having a vote here
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 juin 05, à 10:28, Steven Noels a écrit :
...That said, we need to discuss access policies to the Daisy
instance on our Cocoon zone. It's only logical committers are granted
User access immediately. What about non-committer documentation
contributors?..
I
Hello,
Yes please, for example, I'd like to add the revised Eclipse
instructions I wrote up over here:
http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/LoadInEclipse
These instructions are complementary to Helma's getting started
instructions, and I want to add screenshots etc. I don't suppose I can
add these
Hi,
This feels like a stupid question, but what about comments? Do people
adding comments to daisy also need to sign the CLA???!
Mark
On 6 Jun 2005, at 10:27, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 juin 05, à 10:28, Steven Noels a écrit :
...That said, we need to discuss
Mark Leicester wrote:
Hi,
This feels like a stupid question, but what about comments? Do people
adding comments to daisy also need to sign the CLA???!
To my mind that would be overkill. After all, we've got stacks of stuff
on the wiki that isn't covered by a CLA. Comments would fall under
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 juin 05, à 10:28, Steven Noels a écrit :
...That said, we need to discuss access policies to the Daisy
instance on our Cocoon zone. It's only logical committers are granted
User access immediately. What about non-committer documentation
On 06 Jun 2005, at 12:39, Ross Gardler wrote:
In the above model a user is someone who self registered, can write
but not publish. A committer has the role doc-team and can publish.
I could configure the following setup:
* configure the site so that new document versions are saved in the
Le 6 juin 05, à 13:21, Steven Noels a écrit :
...I could configure the following setup:
* configure the site so that new document versions are saved in the
draft state
* guests are guest: no access rights except viewing and adding comments
* create a role document contributors which can edit
Steven Noels wrote:
On 06 Jun 2005, at 12:39, Ross Gardler wrote:
In the above model a user is someone who self registered, can write
but not publish. A committer has the role doc-team and can publish.
I could configure the following setup:
* configure the site so that new document
Mark Leicester wrote:
Hi,
This feels like a stupid question, but what about comments? Do people
adding comments to daisy also need to sign the CLA???!
Of course not! They just need to self-register, which gives them the
guest role.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez
On 06 Jun 2005, at 13:55, Ross Gardler wrote:
Really? That could be a real problem for getting folks to contribute
to the docs. It implies that, even to make a spelling correction, they
would need to submit a CLA.
We can be lenient about this: we don't require CLA signoff for casual
Le 6 juin 05, à 14:06, Steven Noels a écrit :
...I think obtaining a CLA from proper document committers should be
enough for the mean time. Let's see where we get from here...
+1
Are you planning to have Daisy send changes emails like the wiki does?
It would be good to keep track of
Steven Noels wrote:
On 06 Jun 2005, at 12:39, Ross Gardler wrote:
In the above model a user is someone who self registered, can write
but not publish. A committer has the role doc-team and can publish.
I could configure the following setup:
* configure the site so that new document
On 06 Jun 2005, at 14:41, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 juin 05, à 14:06, Steven Noels a écrit :
...I think obtaining a CLA from proper document committers should be
enough for the mean time. Let's see where we get from here...
+1
Are you planning to have Daisy send changes emails like
On 06 Jun 2005, at 14:32, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
We can consider that a CLA is needed for document committers as they
control official (i.e. published) docs,
+1
whereas document contributors are considered like people
contributing wiki pages and bugzilla patches, and implicitely accept
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 juin 05, à 14:06, Steven Noels a écrit :
...I think obtaining a CLA from proper document committers should be
enough for the mean time. Let's see where we get from here...
+1
Are you planning to have Daisy send changes emails like the wiki does?
It would be
Steven Noels wrote:
On 06 Jun 2005, at 14:32, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
We can consider that a CLA is needed for document committers as
they control official (i.e. published) docs,
+1
whereas document contributors are considered like people
contributing wiki pages and bugzilla patches, and
On 06 Jun 2005, at 16:25, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Regarding the modification, this can be a additional checkbox with a
validator requiring it to be checked, i.e. a user cannot register
without having clicked I accept.
OK. I tested this locally and will add this later to the live instance.
18 matches
Mail list logo
