[VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs (was: Documenting the FOM)

] Subject: RE: Documenting the FOM From: Geoff Howard Reinhard Poetz wrote: From: Giacomo Pati Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation? AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM description to the Control Flow

RE: Documenting the FOM

From: Geoff Howard Reinhard Poetz wrote: From: Giacomo Pati Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation? AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM description to the Control Flow documentation. I think we can remove the IDL docs.

Re: Documenting the FOM

Reinhard Poetz wrote: From: Giacomo Pati Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation? AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM description to the Control Flow documentation. I think we can remove the IDL docs. WDOT? I wouldn't object. At the very

Documenting the FOM

Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation? -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com