Hi:
The results of the votation:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10748904244r=1w=2
is:
A- [ +2] Cocoon will don't throw any exception when this happen.
B- [ -4] Log the event at INFO level.
C- [ +6] Log the event at DEBUG level.
Also Nicola comment:
snip
*IMPORTANT*
IIRC this
Joerg, did you forget to commit TraxTransformer after your
DeliTransformer changes?
Deli block now compiles ok, please cross-check.
(I'm no Avalon guru) (yet;-).
-Bertrand
bdelacretaz2004/02/07 00:59:57
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
o 25285 - Processing pipelines from within flowscript and get various
results objects
What about cocoon.processPipelineTo()? I thought it already exists.
But anyway, it is an enhancement.
This is covered by PipelineUtil and it has been suggested to even
deprecate
On 07.02.2004 12:26, Guido Casper wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
o 25285 - Processing pipelines from within flowscript and get various
results objects
What about cocoon.processPipelineTo()? I thought it already exists.
But anyway, it is an enhancement.
This is covered by PipelineUtil and it has
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26750.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Luca Morandini wrote:
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
OK, I narrowed down the problem. The XSPGenerator object is not
re-created when the page is requested the second time. So, the
XSPModuleHelper isn't re-initialized. Because its input modules
were released at the end of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 06.02.2004 23:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/i18n
AbstractBundleFactory.java
This one is not used. Even the XMLResourceBundleFactory extends
DefaultServiceSelector and implements the BundleFactory interface
directly. The same
Hi guys,
I took some time to test what we have... Found several showstoppers:
1) Exception during startup from portal block - pluto - castor. See
all startup messages [1]. To reproduce, plug out from the network.
Exception message is:
java.net.UnknownHostException: java.sun.com
2) JPEG Hello
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
starts nowjust a joke :)
The code freeze starts tomorrow morning and ends with the release on
thursday (hopefully).
Do I need a vote to apply a bug fix now that the code freeze has
(presumably) started? See the ModuleHelper not correctly setup
thread:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:04 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
starts nowjust a joke :)
The code freeze starts tomorrow morning and ends with the release on
thursday (hopefully).
Do I need a vote to apply a bug fix now that the code freeze has
(presumably)
On 07.02.2004 15:04, Geoff Howard wrote:
The code freeze starts tomorrow morning and ends with the release on
thursday (hopefully).
Do I need a vote to apply a bug fix now that the code freeze has
(presumably) started?
Isn't it that's what the code freeze is about?
See the ModuleHelper not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:12 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
...Maybe you can add an anteater test too ;)
+1, me loves anteater tests ;-)
-Bertrand
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:01 Europe/Zurich, Vadim Gritsenko a écrit :
I took some time to test what we have... Found several showstoppers:...
See also the next release bug
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25321
we have entered some new stuff including a scary cache
Geoff Howard wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
starts nowjust a joke :)
The code freeze starts tomorrow morning and ends with the release on
thursday (hopefully).
Do I need a vote to apply a bug fix now that the code freeze has
(presumably) started? See the ModuleHelper not correctly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Hi guys,
I took some time to test what we have... Found several showstoppers:
...
5) Cacheable XSP is *painfully* slow! It takes 2 seconds per request!!!
Click on http://localhost:/samples/xsp/java/cacheable?pageKey=one;,
then on
Geoff Howard wrote:
I don't have time right now, but it would be good if this was officially
entered in bugzilla so the record is there, and so it doesn't get lost.
I've added it as bug bug #26754. Thanks for your reply :)
Regards,
---
Luca Morandini
[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:15 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
5) Cacheable XSP is *painfully* slow! It takes 2 seconds per
request!!!...
Um, isn't that because the xsp intentionally sleeps for 2 seconds so
you can observe the effect of the caching? It says it is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26756.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26750.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Just for the archives:
1) Exception during startup from portal block - pluto - castor. See
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751
2) JPEG Hello World exception (as seen also by Bertrand).
3) Ditto for PNG
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748
Fixed by
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:15 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
5) Cacheable XSP is *painfully* slow! It takes 2 seconds per
request!!!...
Um, isn't that because the xsp intentionally sleeps for 2 seconds so
you can observe the effect
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Found WARN [1] in the core.log with java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.exolab.jms.jndi.InitialContextFactory. Is it something which should
not be happening? Geoff? ;-)
Vadim
[1] Stacktrace:
WARN(2004-02-07) 09:28.38:724 [core] (Unknown-URI)
Unknown-thread/JMSConnectionImpl:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:15 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
5) Cacheable XSP is *painfully* slow! It takes 2 seconds per
request!!!...
Um, isn't that because the xsp intentionally sleeps for 2 seconds so
you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Did this have to do with the jms/jndi lookup failure you were finding?
Haven't looked into it yet.
Geoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
joerg 2004/02/07 07:20:09
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/pagination
Paginator.java
On 07.02.2004 16:24, Geoff Howard wrote:
Did this have to do with the jms/jndi lookup failure you were finding?
Haven't looked into it yet.
No, nothing. I also don't have this issue.
Joerg
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26750.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
We are doing the full move with 2.2.
For 2.1.x we should prefer compatibility over clean code, so we should
only change Composable to Serviceable if we can assure that no user is
affected by the change.
Carsten
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 07.02.2004 16:24, Geoff Howard wrote:
Did this have to do with the jms/jndi lookup failure you were finding?
Haven't looked into it yet.
No, nothing. I also don't have this issue.
oh, sorry - it was Vadim. Weird that you don't have the same warning
though. Do you
On 07.02.2004 16:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We are doing the full move with 2.2.
For 2.1.x we should prefer compatibility over clean code, so we should
only change Composable to Serviceable if we can assure that no user is
affected by the change.
Ok, assure is only very difficult as almost
On 07.02.2004 16:58, Geoff Howard wrote:
Did this have to do with the jms/jndi lookup failure you were
finding? Haven't looked into it yet.
No, nothing. I also don't have this issue.
oh, sorry - it was Vadim. Weird that you don't have the same warning
though. Do you have all blocks enabled?
Luca Morandini wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
I don't have time right now, but it would be good if this was officially
entered in bugzilla so the record is there, and so it doesn't get lost.
I've added it as bug bug #26754. Thanks for your reply :)
fixed now in cvs - will be in 2.1.4 release.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 7 Feb 2004, at 08:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG
On 07.02.2004 17:38, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-07
It just happens, what shall I say? Cocoon works after this stack
trace, but both
the connection and the stack trace are not normal.
It might be xerces trying to dereference the DTD
Geoff Howard wrote:
Luca Morandini wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
I don't have time right now, but it would be good if this was officially
entered in bugzilla so the record is there, and so it doesn't get lost.
I've added it as bug bug #26754. Thanks for your reply :)
fixed now in cvs - will be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
is there a interface for the service manager avaiable which definies
that a method of a pooled component will be called right before I get it
from the pool?
I want to get a new Datasource each time I get the component from the
pool. How to do that?
Thank you.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753
Persistent store or cache corruption?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-07 18:34 ---
Afaik, this is a known Jisp bug which should be fixed according to Scott with
Jisp 3.0. We could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cziegeler2004/02/07 10:31:16
Modified:src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities catalog
src/blocks/portal/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/pluto/om
PortletDefinitionRegistryImpl.java
Added: src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Hi,
Found WARN [1] in the core.log with java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.exolab.jms.jndi.InitialContextFactory. Is it something which should
not be happening? Geoff? ;-)
Sorry, it's been too long since I've looked at this, and had forgotten:
we don't bundle the
Geoff Howard wrote:
1.1
cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities/web-app_2_3.dtd
Index: web-app_2_3.dtd
===
!--
Copyright (c) 2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
901 San Antonio Road,
Palo Alto, California
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Alfredas Chmieliauskas (junior) wrote:
Hi, everyone!
I just wanted to share my sentiment and express my gratitude to all Cocoon
developers for a wonderful piece of technology!
The first site (w/ content management system) I built on Cocoon has (as of
today) been
91 matches
Mail list logo