Cocoon 2.1 will stay around for a while so same here!
Jeroen
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz escribió:
Agree with Ralph, there's no need to close anything, if people want
to fix bugs on older versions that's one of the beauties of open
source: no one forces you to upgrade, as long
On Nov 17, 2007 9:49 AM, Ralph Goers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...If someone finds a bug and wants to fix it and do a release of 2.1.x
they should be free to do so
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
...After 2.1.11 I would like to close 2.1.x branch completely
Agree with Ralph, there's no
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
If I get enough positive feedback about the current state I'm happy to
prepare a release of 2.1.11 in December.
the lenya community would appreciate that a lot! i'm collecting some
cocoon-specific user feedback on our lists atm. there have been no
problem reports
Hi Cocoon devs
Am 15.11.2007 um 15:41 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
We have no real plans or another 2.1.x release, although we talked
briefly about it over the last year several times. I think it makes
sense to do a 2.1.11 release as a maintenance release, especially if
Lenya wants to use this
Bertrand Delacretaz escribió:
Agree with Ralph, there's no need to close anything, if people want
to fix bugs on older versions that's one of the beauties of open
source: no one forces you to upgrade, as long as you're ready to fix
what you're using if needed.
+1
Best Regards,
Antonio
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz escribió:
Agree with Ralph, there's no need to close anything, if people want
to fix bugs on older versions that's one of the beauties of open
source: no one forces you to upgrade, as long as you're ready to fix
what you're using if needed.
+1
Bertrand Delacretaz pisze:
On Nov 17, 2007 9:49 AM, Ralph Goers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...If someone finds a bug and wants to fix it and do a release of 2.1.x
they should be free to do so
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Agree with Ralph, there's no need to close anything, if people want
If you fix a bug in 2.1 it should obviously go to trunk. 2.1.11 has not
been released so if you know of a bug that applies to 2.1.x that is
fixed in trunk, IMO it should also be applied to 2.1.x. I would
recommend that this policy be followed until 2.2.0 is released. Past
that I would suggest
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 09:41 -0500, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
If I get enough positive feedback about the current state I'm happy to
prepare a release of 2.1.11 in December.
WDYT?
Carsten
+1
Cheers, Alfred.
On 19.11.2007 17:54 Uhr, Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
If I get enough positive feedback about the current state I'm happy to
prepare a release of 2.1.11 in December.
+1 I'd like to have a final 2.1 release as well.
Joerg
Fine by me. I finally have the fix for XMLFileModule that I will be
checking in and it would be nice to get that in a release.
Ralph
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We have no real plans or another 2.1.x release, although we talked
briefly about it over the last year several times. I think it
If someone finds a bug and wants to fix it and do a release of 2.1.x
they should be free to do so. Once 2.2 is released and has all the
parts working I doubt anyone will though.
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Thanks for offer Carsten, I will help with testing (based only on samples,
though).
On Nov 15, 2007 9:41 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I think it makes
sense to do a 2.1.11 release as a maintenance release, especially if
Lenya wants to use this version. However, the only problem I see right
now is the question of the qualitify. Which means, how many people
Juergen Ragaller wrote:
Hi Cocoon devs
The Lenya community is preparing for a lenya 2.0 release.
A considerable part of our testing was done against the 2.1.x trunk of
cocoon as the 2.1.x cocoon trunk has been very stable for quite some time.
We just talked about declaring either a 2.1.10
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Florian, I completely forgot about this. Since your report looks to be
perfect (screenshots, sample
files etc.) it should be really appreciated by fixing it.
I won't make any promises but since it also affects 2.2 and there is about a
month left to
planned(?)
Carsten Ziegeler pisze:
Juergen Ragaller wrote:
Hi Cocoon devs
The Lenya community is preparing for a lenya 2.0 release.
A considerable part of our testing was done against the 2.1.x trunk of
cocoon as the 2.1.x cocoon trunk has been very stable for quite some time.
We just talked about
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
If Lenya is using it successfully, and if our automated tests pass (I
can run them on Linux and MacOSX when the time comes) I'd be ok with
making a release. There have been some small changes since 2.1.10, and
little is happening in the 2.1 branch, so it might be
Dev at weitling pisze:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
If Lenya is using it successfully, and if our automated tests pass (I
can run them on Linux and MacOSX when the time comes) I'd be ok with
making a release. There have been some small changes since 2.1.10, and
little is happening in the 2.1
Hi Cocoon devs
The Lenya community is preparing for a lenya 2.0 release.
A considerable part of our testing was done against the 2.1.x trunk of
cocoon as the 2.1.x cocoon trunk has been very stable for quite some
time.
We just talked about declaring either a 2.1.10 or SVN-Version 595020
19 matches
Mail list logo
