Re: [RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:50:23 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Gilles wrote: Hi. Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks, waiting for additional implementations. Then, please, cancel the

Re: commons-io git commit: Remove redundant type arguments.

Gary Gregory schrieb am Mi., 21. Sep. 2016 um 18:57 Uhr: > My git config --global core.autocrlf is already true... could the file in > Git have been stored with Windows EOLs? > Don't know. Looks like Kristian has fixed it via .gitattributes. > > Gary > > > > On Wed,

Re: commons-io git commit: Remove redundant type arguments.

Adding .gitattributes just ensures any future changes will be correct. If there are committed files with incorrect line endings in the repo they will not be automatically be fixed. I fixed the remaining incorrect files in 9e2b2c09732ca596331f7ca34ba4e0f03d70093d. Kristian 2016-09-22 8:30

Re: commons-io git commit: Remove redundant type arguments.

Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > Adding .gitattributes just ensures any future changes will be correct. If > there are committed files with incorrect line endings in the repo they > will not be automatically be fixed. I fixed the remaining incorrect files > in 9e2b2c09732ca596331f7ca34ba4e0f03d70093d.

Re: [RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0

Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks, > waiting for additional implementations. Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-) Cheers, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:59:20 + (UTC), Emmanuel Bourg (JIRA) wrote: Emmanuel Bourg created RNG-18: - Summary: LICENSE.txt cleanup Key: RNG-18 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-18 Project:

[RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0

Hi. Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks, waiting for additional implementations. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-16 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-17 If you intend to try and implement them, please assign the issue to yourself. Patches for

Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:27 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 22/09/2016 à 13:24, Gilles a écrit : The fact is that we don't distribute the original code (in C) but a Java port (that has undergone several transformations). That's still a derivative from the original code. Sure, but my point

Re: commons-rng git commit: RNG-18

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:41:01 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 22/09/2016 à 13:17, Gilles a écrit : Reference to Commons Math or to the original code? The former, I don't think so, the latter is the subject of a post which I've just sent. To the original code. I saw the commit before your

Re: commons-rng git commit: RNG-18

Le 22/09/2016 à 13:17, Gilles a écrit : > Reference to Commons Math or to the original code? > The former, I don't think so, the latter is the subject of a > post which I've just sent. To the original code. I saw the commit before your post. We may also want to document the other

Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:16:43 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 22/09/2016 à 12:52, Gilles a écrit : Since Apache releases source code, is it enough to have the license text in the Java source file? Or should should a copy of the same license text also appear in "LICENCE.txt"? I'm not sure,

Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])

Le 22/09/2016 à 13:24, Gilles a écrit : > The fact is that we don't distribute the original code (in C) > but a Java port (that has undergone several transformations). That's still a derivative from the original code. > It is confusing to read at times that "Apache only releases sources" and >

Re: [RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Gilles wrote: Hi. Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks, waiting for additional implementations. Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-) I'll do (the deadline was over anyways). Gilles Cheers,

[CANCEL][VOTE][RC2] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

Hello. Vote cancelled as additional implementations could be shortly added: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-16 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-17 RC3 will give another chance to those who did not vote for RC2. :-) Those who did, please don't forget to vote again (sorry

Re: [RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0

Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Gilles wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks, >>> waiting for additional implementations. >> >> Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-) > > I'll

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC3

Bump. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC3) > > This should fix earlier Java 6 / Maven 3.0 build issues with RC2 and > adds a BUILDING.txt > > (Tested with Centos 6, Oracle JDK 6

RE: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])

> -Original Message- > From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 04:41 > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...]) > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:27 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le