Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 07:53, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>
>
> > On May 5, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 17:44, Ralph Goers a
> > écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On May 5, 2021, at 6:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph
Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 02:24, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>
> Le 2021-05-05 20:31, Oliver Heger a écrit :
>
> > What about the sandbox? IIUC, every committer can start a new
> > component there. If then a community forms around this component, it
> > can move to proper (which would then require a
Le 2021-05-06 13:06, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
It is not nice to decide for others what they may need.
It is not nice to suggest I shouldn't voice my opinions.
It would have been courteous to acknowledge the answers to
your argument against having a dedicated component
I've little
What about the Commons Sandox? Would that be a good place to start?
Gary
On Thu, May 6, 2021, 09:37 Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 14:48, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> >
> > Le 2021-05-06 13:06, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> >
> > > It is not nice to decide for others what they may
Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 14:48, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>
> Le 2021-05-06 13:06, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> > It is not nice to decide for others what they may need.
>
> It is not nice to suggest I shouldn't voice my opinions.
Your argued opinion is welcome.
In the text which you cut, you
> On May 6, 2021, at 3:04 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>
>> It looks like you didn’t read the page.
>
> I did, of course. And my interpretation differs.
>
>> For clarity I am copying it here
>>
>> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless
>>
>> otherwise
> > [...]
> >>
> >> So a procedural vote requires a majority.
> >
> > There is a small majority (irrespective of the binding vs non-binding
> > categories).
>
> In votes ONLY PMC member votes are counted. Other votes are
> advisory. PMC members should take those votes into account
> when voting.
> On May 6, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> What about the Commons Sandox? Would that be a good place to start?
>
Emmanuel just sort of proposed doing away with it. As he put it, anyone can
create a
GitHub repo so why does it need to be under the apache user. He hasn’t
Am 05.05.21 um 21:54 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger
a écrit :
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit :
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component
That's
Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 20:29, Oliver Heger
a écrit :
>
>
>
> Am 05.05.21 um 21:54 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
> > Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger
> > a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
> >>> Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit
> >>> :
>
It is true that there much less friction these days to get a repository
going with GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, but, for now, the Commons Sandbox
is still available. If we want to do away with the sandbox, then let's
talk about that separately.
Gary
On Thu, May 6, 2021, 11:26 Ralph Goers
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:13, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It is true that there much less friction these days to get a repository
> going with GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, but, for now, the Commons Sandbox
> is still available. If we want to do away with the sandbox, then let's
> talk about that
12 matches
Mail list logo
