Hello Rob,
can you please share brief how-to, so I can regenerate the report? :)
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 02:04, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Just an FYI, I hacked this together for the sake of reporting on solomax’s
> work:
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
>
>
>
> > On Jan 20, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Gary Gregory
>
Hi Gang,
I recently alter the code for both SimplexSolver and SimplexTableau to use
the OpenMapRealMatrix object rather than the Array2DRowRealMatrix. Most
large Linear Programming programming problems in fact have a very sparse
Simplex Tableau --- lots of zeros -- perhaps 90 percent of the
+1
Tested from the RC tag.
mvn clean package site OK
mvn apache-rat:check OK
I used a 1.5-SNAPSHOT to test with Apache Commons BCEL and it was OK.
Using:
Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
2018-10-24T14:41:47-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.0\bin\..
Java
Hello.
Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 18:02, Edna Dias Canedo
a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am investigating how Apache development teams use static analysis tools
> (in particular SonarQube). To this end, I kindly ask you to answer a small
> survey on this topic. The survey is available at:
>
>
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.4 was released, so I would like to release
Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.5.
Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.5 RC1 is available for review here:
Just an FYI, I hacked this together for the sake of reporting on solomax’s work:
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We might as well start with releasing fresh versions of our internal maven
> plugins, then commons-parent, then components... ;-) More work for
Sven,
Le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 à 08:26, GitBox a écrit :
>
> svenrathgeber opened a new pull request #19: GEOMETRY-38 adds test
> intersecting a cube with a line diagonally.
> URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/19
>
I think that Matt chose to to fix the issue using another PR...
Hello Gary,
I dont think we should do that, javadoc expects html not xhtml tags. Or has
this changed (in our tooling)?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5260368/which-tag-should-be-used-as-paragraph-separator-in-javadoc
And probably if you want to changes it Needs way more changes all over
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2019-01-25, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > By chance, I opened and read an automated mail from "GitBox" whose
> > subject line did not contain anything that would usually prompt a
> > reaction from me.[1]
>
> [Sidenote: I also find it
You can create a github PR template in the repository that has instructions
on what you expect for the PRs.
This would hopefully include things like:
is there a jira?
does the title have the jira in it?
have your run `foo` command to test and verify there are no errors etc:
asfgit closed pull request #21: GEOMETRY-38: PolyhedronsSet.firstIntersection
does not detect intersections on boundaries
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/21
This is an automated message from the Apache
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:17 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> On 2019-01-25, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > By chance, I opened and read an automated mail from "GitBox" whose
> > subject line did not contain anything that would usually prompt a
> > reaction from me.[1]
>
> [Sidenote: I also find it
On 2019-01-25, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> By chance, I opened and read an automated mail from "GitBox" whose
> subject line did not contain anything that would usually prompt a
> reaction from me.[1]
[Sidenote: I also find it annoying that the messages no longer contain
the name of the repository
Hi Gilles and all,
As projects are moving from Apache's svn/git to Apache GitBox, using GitHub
(GH) makes more and more sense for accepting code changes; IMO GH's UI is
better than looking at a patch file, especially with GH's "Conversation"
feature which let's you have discussion threads in the
Hi.
By chance, I opened and read an automated mail from "GitBox" whose subject
line did not contain anything that would usually prompt a reaction from me.[1]
In fact, it was a PR for Commons Math, and there are several others pending:
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pulls
Could someone
coveralls commented on issue #102: Flush ObjectOutputStream before calling
toByteArray on underlying ByteArrayOutputStream
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/102#issuecomment-457509542
[![Coverage
emopers opened a new pull request #102: Flush ObjectOutputStream before calling
toByteArray on underlying ByteArrayOutputStream
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/102
When an `ObjectOutputStream` instance wraps an underlying
`ByteArrayOutputStream` instance,
it is
17 matches
Mail list logo