Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from
Google Code to SourceForge.
This will happen over the course of next week, save some freak accident
occurs, however, SourceForge is not Google Code, and as such, there are
a few things we need to consider:
- I
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains LDAP in a way
that makes it sound
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense.
By delegating read/write access to the new repos do you mean the ComDev
owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the
When the time comes please make the request through whatever channel is needed.
We won't remember requests coming in right now.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Roger Whitcombmailto:rogerandb...@rbwhitcomb.com
Sent: 7/9/2015 2:01 PM
To:
Assigning admin rights to PMCs is part of the transition isn't it? You didn't
actually answer my question, so maybe my assumption was incorrect. If this is
ongoing work then we need to be clear on what ComDev is signing up to here.
For PMC mails I was just thinking of a blanket mail to all PMCs
Did you forget Kevin's email address? Perhaps a separate forward...
// Niclas
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Apache Open Office by itself is a project within the Apache Software
Foundation.
The Apache Software Foundation has 501 c3
On 07/09/2015 12:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There
have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release
that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2.
How do we get the changes from trunk into the 410
Okay, that's fine. Thanks. I'm sure I can find stuff in the archives.
I just wasn't sure what the final reasoning was. NBD.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
That discussion has been had a
Definitely need admin rights to the new Pivot-Extras for the Pivot PMC.
Thanks,
~Roger Whitcomb
Apache Pivot PMC Chair
On Jul 9, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense.
By delegating
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains LDAP in a way
that makes it sound like LDAP is the project name. Is this
intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have LDAP in
there instead of PMC, and when I read the first report containing
that verbiage, I thought there was was
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains LDAP in a way
that makes it sound like LDAP is the project name. Is this
intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have LDAP in
there instead of PMC, and
It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There
have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release
that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2.
How do we get the changes from trunk into the 410 branch easily?
It seems we could use --
svn copy
That discussion has been had a number of times. We're not opening it again
since we are ready to pull the trigger on SF. The archives have the discussion
(sorry, not got the time to search them and find links right now).
-Original Message-
From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense.
By delegating read/write access to the new repos do you mean the ComDev owned
admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the relevant PMC
upon request. If that's the case then the ComDev PMC as a whole can own
It seems to me that moving to GitHub would be easier, since Google put
a Export to GitHub button on each project page, and I've used it and
it works well.
Perhaps I missed it, but was there a reason why SourceForge was chosen
over GitHub? (Just curious... since I have no personal stake in this
On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains LDAP in a way
that makes it sound like LDAP is the project name. Is this
intentional? It
16 matches
Mail list logo
