Re: ApacheCon Community track

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: All, Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab. We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like some

Re: FW: Request to use Apache Lucene/Solr in association with the next Lucene/Solr Revolution

Hi Megan: Thanks for the well documented request. As an all-volunteer organization it will likely take us several days to get you a meaningful response; but I wanted to at least acknowledge the request. I appreciate the respect you folks are showing towards the ASF marks. --David On Thu, Feb

Re: FW: Request to use Apache Lucene/Solr in association with the next Lucene/Solr Revolution

Copying Megan this time. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi Megan: Thanks for the well documented request. As an all-volunteer organization it will likely take us several days to get you a meaningful response; but I wanted to at least acknowledge

Re: ApacheCon community panel

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: It might be more interesting to skip Cordova altogether. The industry is full of ferment about CD. If everyone checks their rhetoric at the door, there could be an interesting conversation about how to mesh the

Re: ApacheCon community panel

AM, David Nalley wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: It might be more interesting to skip Cordova altogether. The industry is full of ferment about CD. If everyone checks their rhetoric at the door, there could be an interesting conversation

Re: ApacheIndia?

It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted. --David On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: Are we aware of this event: http://apacheindia.org/ -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: ApacheIndia?

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:03 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 30 April 2014 04:19, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted. Meaning they got a denial, or simply no response ? In the latter case I can understand they cannot

Re: ApacheCon keynotes

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 21/05/2014 jan iversen wrote: It would also be nice to hear a keynote about who are we today, we all know our own projects, but currently ASF consist of soo many projects that I think most of us lost track.

Re: Understanding the commit-then-review workflow

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Eric Schultz eschu...@prplfoundation.org wrote: All, I'm trying to understand to the Apache Foundation model of voting in the commit-then-review system. If a project is running on a CTR system and someone says they dislike a piece of a previous commit, what

Re: ApacheCon Austin keynotes

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Agreed: How we got here is nice; where we are going (and where we *should* be going) is better :) Yes!

Re: Apache Extras PoC

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Great David, Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top downloads, etc) be restricted to Apache Extras related projects ? I'll let others comment on the adds portion of the prototype. Frankly, I

Re: Mailing lists, sites, ...

-essential areas. David Nalley and I, as part of our budget planning, are working on identifying what is considered core and what is not. This will help address the confusion and therefore make it easier for project communities to decide whether they can use external services. What we

Re: Mailinglists - a tool from the 90s?

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, over at the Apache Commons Project, we have a long discussion about our mailing lists. Are they to noisy? Should they be splitted up into sublists? Should individual components go TLP? IMHO Ben McCann summed

Re: Managing zyz.apache.org (was RE: WELCOME to dev@community.apache.org)

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:24 AM, jay vyas jayunit100.apa...@gmail.com wrote: IS the ASF okay with simply doing a one time commit to SVN, of a single HTML page which forwards to gh-pages? I am pretty sure there is a brand requirement that the project's web site is at $foo.a.o -

Re: Volunteering in schools

As for timing, it's now. But if you only have time to show up at the BOF and share your experience that will be appreciated. Ahh - My takeaway from the email was that the ask was for organizing a BoF. What is it that you need help with? --David

Re: [ALL] Badges for github README.md

None that I am aware of. A number of projects are using Travis, showing the results of that doesn't seem to be obviously problematic. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: Hi, is anybody aware of any (legal) problems if projects use services like Travis

Re: GitHub Pages

SSL Specifically - apache.org sites are in https-everywhere. Those sites can't provide SSL. None of the current TLP web sites are being served from Apache hardware though - it's all VMs in 2-3 different cloud providers. --David On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Kienenberger

Re: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help ASF communities grow?

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any community member no matter what they do. It is all

Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016

It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made. --David On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:

Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016

there is confusion over who owns the decision. Happy for it to be ComDev if you are happy from infra perspective. Ross Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us javascript:;] Sent: Thursday

Re: GitHub Pages

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote: All, Has any thought been put into leveraging GitHub pages for project documentation, static site hosting? A lot of www.apache.org is simple static content, as are project pages. Since a lot of projects are now using git,

Re: GitLab?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM, anto...@gmx.de wrote: Could the ASF not simply run a GitHub Enterprise server ? No, but for varying reasons. We've discussed GH Enterprise server, and one of the licensing points is that you can't expose GH Enterprise Server publicly. Even in our discussions

Re: GitLab?

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: Opening a new thread... Git without Github is like sex without a partner, sufficient but not very satisfactory. Github option has been explored in the past, and due to various reasons, it was not possible to achieve.

Re: ComDev VM

The Solaris zone has been deprecated (but still works), but please don't use that. (Not that you could use docker with it anyway) INFRA-8771 is tracking the new VM for use by ComDev, though I suspect there are actually several comdev VMs (projects-new for instance runs on a new VM) --David On

Re: Apache Extras, Google Code and Sourceforge

://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html Ross -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:09 AM To: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) Cc: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Apache Extras, Google Code and Sourceforge So dropping the SF

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed that the new reporter output now contains LDAP in a way that makes it sound

Re: Moving Apache Extras

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: Thanks Daniel, Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense. By delegating read/write access to the new repos do you mean the ComDev owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the

Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > This whole process is nonsense In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except for all of the others) > > What is important is what economic value does the code produce. If we look at > it

Re: Getting planetapache back

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > Why Puppet? The Jenkins stuff is done via Ansible. > Multiple automatisation tools? > The Jenkins stuff that was done in Ansible was done by a volunteer, who chose to use Ansible because it was something he knew,

Re: Working Ecosystems at ASF

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi Bertrand > > Am .01.2017, 15:03 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz > : > >> Hi Raphael, >> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Raphael Bircher >> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Hackathon today?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Rich Bowen wrote on 11/18/16 11:47 AM: >> Do we have a place to track tasks/tickets for ComDev? The doc was >> intended for brainstorming, but I don't think we really want to use it >> as a long-term todo list. > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Setting up an official ASF swag store

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose setting up an official ASF swag store. I recently > came across RedBubble [1] who produce stuff through geographically > distributed agents so the post costs remain reasonable world-wide. > Have

Re: ALC, and who can speak on behalf of Apache

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:15 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > I've made two posts on this list in the past couple of days regarding > the rising ACL effort and my concerns about it. > > I *desperately* want this kind of grass-roots enthusiast community > effort. I do NOT want to kill it. But I've learned

Re: ASF at Devnexus in Atlanta

This is a 2 hour drive from my house, so provided ComDev doesn't mind a non-ComDev-er participating, I'm happy to show up. --David On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:05 AM Bob Paulin wrote: > > I'd be willing to help with this as well. I'll be speaking there so > just let me know how I can be of help.

Re: What license are the ICLA and CCLA available under?

Our website footers proclaim content contained there are licensed under ALv2 On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:02 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > FWIW, I asked this question years ago, and never got a clear answer. I > think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is > that they do not