[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994222#comment-12994222
]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot commented on DIRAPI-40:
--
More specifically, the use of
Hi Dev,
These last days, I've been reviewing Authentication in Studio using the LDAP
API.
I'm happy to say that all the Authentication methods that were supported in
Studio with JNDI are also working (not yet with the same options, though) with
the LDAP API integrated in Studio.
This includes:
On lundi 14 février 2011 at 09:05, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
One more question.
Should we push this into Shared-1.0.0-M1 or wait for the next iteration?
I didn't look at last night the commits.
Looks like Shared-1.0.0-M1 has already been prepared, héhé...
It will be in
Hi,
This is a vote for the first milestone release on our way to a Shared
and LDAP API 1.0. Lot of cleanup and decoupling has already be done.
Also bug fixes and improvements have been done. Please see the release
notes below.
The SVN tag:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot p...@marcelot.net
wrote:
Hi Dev,
These last days, I've been reviewing Authentication in Studio using the LDAP
API.
I'm happy to say that all the Authentication methods that were supported in
Studio with JNDI are also working (not yet
On 2/14/11 11:05 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelotp...@marcelot.net
wrote:
Hi Dev,
These last days, I've been reviewing Authentication in Studio using the LDAP
API.
I'm happy to say that all the Authentication methods that were supported in
On 2/14/11 10:22 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi,
Hi Stefan,
This is a vote for the first milestone release on our way to a Shared
and LDAP API 1.0. Lot of cleanup and decoupling has already be done.
Also bug fixes and improvements have been done. Please see the release
notes below.
The SVN
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/14/11 10:22 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi,
Hi Stefan,
This is a vote for the first milestone release on our way to a Shared
and LDAP API 1.0. Lot of cleanup and decoupling has already be done.
Also bug
Review Package Names
Key: DIRSHARED-97
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-97
Project: Directory Shared
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Stefan Seelmann
Fix For: 1.0.0-RC1
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994271#comment-12994271
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSHARED-97:
On 2/14/11 10:22 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M1 and JUnit Add-ons 0.1
I have checked the bins and the src. I was able to build the jars from
the src. Licenses and Notices are ok from my POV.
Good job...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M1 and JUnit Add-ons 0.1
I checked the source and binary distribution packages.
The sources package looks good and built successfully via Maven.
I was able to connect to ApacheDS via the libraries included in the binary
distribution package and small hand-written
Thanks Pierre for catching all these. Was late and rushed last night.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:23 AM, pamarce...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pamarcelot
Date: Mon Feb 14 09:23:09 2011
New Revision: 1070415
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1070415view=rev
Log:
Fixed
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2/14/11 11:05 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelotp...@marcelot.net
wrote:
Hi Dev,
These last days, I've been reviewing Authentication in Studio using the
LDAP
Thanks for big work, Stefan!
The NOTICE file in the distribution packages says:
Additional copyright notices and license terms applicable are
present in the distribution/src/main/release/licenses or
licenses directory.
This is not right, I can't find any licences under the mentioned path.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the first milestone release on our way to a Shared
and LDAP API 1.0. Lot of cleanup and decoupling has already be done.
Also bug fixes and improvements have been done. Please see the release
Hi,
we already have a EMPTY_DN static field in Dn, I also have added
ROOT_DSE. They are the same thing, except that their semantic is different.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On lundi 14 février 2011 at 17:29, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2/14/11 11:05 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Pierre-Arnaud
Marcelotp...@marcelot.net wrote:
One more question.
On 2/14/11 6:44 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
On lundi 14 février 2011 at 17:29, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/14/11 11:05 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Pierre-Arnaud
Hi guys,
this is not the first time this question hits the mailing list, but I
don't think we have stated something definitive in this area.
Is having a constructor throwing a checked exception a code smell ?
Something like :
public Dn(String) throws LdapInvalidDnException
is
Hi Emmanuel,
I think it makes perfectly sense in the particular case of a DN.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On lundi 14 février 2011 at 18:51, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
this is not the first time this question hits the mailing list, but I
don't think we have stated something definitive
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
How about naming this branch 1.0 and that way we don't have to keep changing
the name with every RC or milestone release we have?
+1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot p...@marcelot.net
wrote:
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M1 and JUnit Add-ons 0.1
I checked the source and binary distribution packages.
The sources package looks good and built successfully via Maven.
I was able to connect to ApacheDS via
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Felix Knecht fel...@apache.org wrote:
The NOTICE file in the distribution packages says:
Additional copyright notices and license terms applicable are
present in the distribution/src/main/release/licenses or
licenses directory.
This is not right, I can't find
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the first milestone release on our way to a Shared
and LDAP API 1.0. Lot of cleanup and decoupling has already be
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.orgwrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the first milestone release on
Hi Steven,
I moved the samples some days ago, here is the one that should work with 1.5.7:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/documentation/samples/trunk/embedded-sample/
The trunk sample
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/documentation/samples/trunk/embedded-sample-trunk/
doesn't
Hi guys,
today, I continued to document the Dn class. I did it on the confluence
wiki, as I have a tool to export a confluence docuemnt to a docBook
format, which is way more convenient than typing text in XML...
Here is the current doco about Dn :
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
today, I continued to document the Dn class. I did it on the confluence
wiki, as I have a tool to export a confluence docuemnt to a docBook format,
which is way more convenient than typing text in XML...
On 2/15/11 12:41 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
today, I continued to document the Dn class. I did it on the confluence
wiki, as I have a tool to export a confluence docuemnt to a docBook format,
which is way
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.orgwrote:
Today I had the idea to add the samples to the /trunks aggregator so
that changes in the main code are reflected in the samples. Of course
more samples are needed.
That's a good idea. We should definitely do that to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994596#comment-12994596
]
Alex Karasulu commented on DIRSHARED-91:
Update:
o the
32 matches
Mail list logo
