a full set of
messages in the API.
At the end of the day, it will be faster, easier to manipulate and
unique. And we will have less code :)
This is what I probably will work on the next few days.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Yeah I think there is a lot of room for improvement as you say especially
for these special cases. I was wondering is this on your laptop or on the
big 8 way server?
On my laptop.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
where we are
consumming time.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
, then it would be great !
In any case, it's an interesting discussion!
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
in several respect if they are both the
same exception class hierarchy root.
They are.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
concerning OSGi migration.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
to separate the read/write interfaces for the
Schema. There is no need to do so atm, I don't see the added value. Also
it won't solve the problem I have.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
just talking about shared
dependencies here.
I presumed the SM implementation had deps on server components
No, none. All the SchemaManager is standalone atm.
This was an absolute need in order to get the client API to be able to
use the Schema.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
instead of implementing this.
Side note : this again prove that a community is way better than
individuals. Sharing ideas openly is the best way to avoid mistakes.
Thanks for the feedback Alex !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
. Another pro for sol. 2.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
, and no atomicity...
This is what bugs me : why should we apply a strategy for DN and the
opposite one for subentries...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On 7/31/10 11:11 AM, Ersin Er wrote:
As far as I remember the spec does not allow this.
I would be interested in having any reference that confirm this. I don't
want to waste time to implement those operations, if it's not supported ...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
?
Of course ! Follow the commits ...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
This is 23 236 less slocs !
I also expect the performance to be slightly better...
We will see ...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
of course !)
(I should check we add this ERR_X number in front of messages...)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
, it will probably cost one day to fix all those guys.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
:
- the bin won't contain anything related to serial (no rxtx jar, no
serial code)
- the src package will contain the code of the serial project
I'm fine with that if nobody object.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
something else than MINA, or our users
might want to do so. This was one part of the contract we wanted to
establish with the Sun/OpenDS guys when we started working o the API,
and I think it's still relevant.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
the
reorganization.
Can you do that in a branch please ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
around those
guys more, or adding more features in it.
We can define a schedule for that we can all agreed on, and get it done
quickly, don't you think so ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
it might be a good time to review
packages for the sake of turning modules into OSGi bundles in shared.
Absolutely.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
License, so I think
that's ok.
It should be. However, a mail to ask him the permission would be fair
(also adding his name in the source, as usual).
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
when schema manager is available
To be double checked.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---
On 2010-10-27 04:24:41, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14
possible and setting up a server gets easier too from a user's pov)
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea :
- if the configBean does the Bean - real object conversion, then the
configBean will have to be aware of the real object. In any case, there is a
tight
possible and setting up a server gets easier too from a user's pov)
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea :
- if the configBean does the Bean - real object conversion, then the
configBean will have to be aware of the real object. In any case, there is a
tight
possible and setting up a server gets easier too from a user's pov)
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea :
- if the configBean does the Bean - real object conversion, then the
configBean will have to be aware of the real object. In any case, there is a
tight
possible and setting up a server gets easier too from a user's pov)
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea :
- if the configBean does the Bean - real object conversion, then the
configBean will have to be aware of the real object. In any case, there is a
tight
possible and setting up a server gets easier too from a user's pov)
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea :
- if the configBean does the Bean - real object conversion, then the
configBean will have to be aware of the real object. In any case, there is a
tight
possible and setting up a server gets easier too from a user's pov)
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea :
- if the configBean does the Bean - real object conversion, then the
configBean will have to be aware of the real object. In any case, there is a
tight
parameters necessary to create an index), and let the Store creates the
correct index directly, instead of calling this convertAndInit method.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
type).
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
is out.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
is not declared as final, and has no constructor, then
it can be extended...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
would be to keep a timestamp when we receive the
first TLV, and if the end of the PDU is not received in a reasonable
delay, then we discard the full PDU.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
something better than a purely static name...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
keep it aside atm, it's not urgent, but we can't release a 1.0
before we have had this discussion anyway.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
there
are some Interceptor by-passes to avoid such checks.
True. No need to check the entry when it's manipulated by the server.
Thanks for the heads up !
Kind Regards,
Stefan
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
#3 is easy
and won't imply a huge refactoring, as the mechanisms used to update the
entries is already implemented.
That's it, just wanted to update you guys.
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
entries, and this is why we now use this structure.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
is the failure
recovery : we don't have any mechanism to restart the processing in the
middle of it. This is not an issue with #2.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
option #3 and make the server update the entries immediately. Option #1
is a one way road with no escape...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
modifications that are not urgent not necessary.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
and what is not, and we
will have a better view.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
going on stage, because she wasn't. She replied
Stress comes with talent :)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
and have deps on
implementation classes instead of being isolated.
That's fine with me. Package decoupling and such things have to be done
before any release, 100% agreed.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
as a blocker for a 1.0, I don't know.
It deserves some discussion...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
with 100 million entries, trust me, we will have
other issues than just dealing with the migration of its database :)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
, except if it's marginal but mandatory (to
fix a bug), then I'd rather vote a major version.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
, as available() returns false
until the entry is fetched, we still fetch the entry twice...
Btw, see my second mail for the reason why we have to handle this a the
cursor level, not on the SearchHandler level.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
something like :
cursor.addEntryFilter( SEARCH_FILTER );
so we don't control the filter's position. Modifying this would not be
complicated, but it would be more complicated than simply inverting the
2 interceptors :)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
find it smart...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
roadmap later next week.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
and the new configuration
system. There are some documentation to be written in this area, and
it's hard to do so on a moving target. Also for studio 2.0-M1, which
include a plugin to manage ADS 2.0 config, having a stable release of
ADS would be a great thing.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel
on the problem we will face anyway
before facing them :)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
back something u delete but
cannot remember the name.
Yeah, but it's never updated, unless someone does a check on all the
commits, a painful task :/
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
that it will be the same in the future, and even
me, I'm quite sure I'll forgot to add the branches I delete :)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
it a look and tell me if it's ok before starting to write
many decorators that might be spurious.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
morning, create a branch, and finish what we are doing in the
branch (the cost of branching, reverting, and merging should be around 2
hours for one person.)
Let's see what tomorrow brings, and then we decide what to do.
Thanks for the heads up, Alex
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
the tests.
May be it's compiling, but tests are now failing, while I got the code
compiling *and* tests passing.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
switch to version 8 first ?
I updated to version 8. The release of version 9 of the Apache POM
seems to take some more time, some new Jiras were opened [2].
So I'm going to prepare a release for org.apache.directory.project:project:19.
Great ! Thanks a lot !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel
to implement their
own classes to handle the controls we don't provide, unless we add them
in the code base.
Is this what we want to do ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
of core and core-api. There are many of
them.
hmmm, not sure.
We need a list here.
Let's start !
PS : And remember : no trunk breakage, no big refactoring without
previous discussion on the ML, branching could be the way to go.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
do I address this problem?
Can you svn up and give it a try ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Can someone take care of the templates we have for the Directory (and
MINA) confluence spaces ? We just need to save them somewhere, just in case.
Thanks !
Original Message
From: - Fri Feb 4 07:10:18 2011
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: GmailId12def49c6e0a1aba
the
food was in such a quantity that it diluted the alcohol...
Baseline, with the sun we had, it was an *exzellent* week-end, much
needed ! I also slept a lot, something I forgot was possible :)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
specified are using the latest versions.
[INFO]
[WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified:
[WARNING] com.agilejava.docbkx:docbkx-maven-plugin ...
(unknown)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
for clients with 1.4.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
is not *that* bad. i'm just wondering if
the problem we have with the concurrent test tooling (which requires
Java6) can't be workarounded by requiring the code to be compiled using
Java 5 and run with Java 6.
If not, then, well, let's go for Java 6
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
perception of the way we should handle those
license/notice thingy. I may be wrong...
Hope it helps...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
about the right place for tests,
so I took the path of least resistance. But, basically, you are 100%
right : we may have to define a MockSchemaManager.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
is frankly difficult to understand, and also confusing
(getDnToAncestor ? getAncestorDn ? Which one does what ?).
dn.getDescendant() is easier to understand, even if not perfect.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
(and here, xxxdescendant() is problematic, because it's not
easy to type without doing a mistake. I'd rather use 'child', if we
don't mind about the Rdn relation)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On 2/17/11 12:03 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
we have had some convo about the Dn methods
On 2/17/11 12:43 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 2/17/11 12:03 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.orgwrote:
On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote
On 2/17/11 12:43 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 2/17/11 12:03 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.orgwrote:
On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote
those names.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
are
doing that in the open, and even if we don't agree on everything, at
then end the result will be the same : we will reach consensus, and we
will get something better than any decision made by one single person.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
of them, I'll apply the agreed on modification in code.
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
the
modifications you don't like, until we reach a consensus.
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
also have to deal with the different serializer we have, the static
ones we use in the server, which must take a SM as a parameter.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
that there is some contention on the container instance, which
is simply strange.
More to come after lunch.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
rational, it's not a Felix bug, it's not even a JVM bug,
it's a bad bug in *our* code.
Next step : why is this container null ???
/me digging...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
to become interesting !
Definitively to be investigated, and hopefully Stefan has already
started to dig in this direction with his Hashbase implementation.
Fun project too.
Sure is !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
along the class it
works on is a big problem.
One other option would be to use a static method in the class to do the
serialization/deserialization, and make the constructors private.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
? If you have a preference we can cater to
that.
Not a big deal, trying to connect the two mails you sent, was thinking
you wanted to get M2 out now.
Sorry for the short answers, I'm a bit busy dealing with real life atm.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On 3/2/11 4:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Just a wild thought. Really isn't the codec doing serialization too?
No. The codec processes Messages, not base elements as DNs, RDNs or AVAs.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
1 - 100 of 2498 matches
Mail list logo
