Re: On double dubbo starters

Thanks for your clarification. I've confirmed with Mark in the previous email. -Ian. On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I think Mark means you could publish dubbo starter(also same for dubbo > in another discussion) with ‘old’ group and

Re: On double dubbo starters

er thread: > we could publish something to maven central repository as usual until > transition is done. > > > > KimmKing(kimmk...@163.com) > == In me the tiger sniffs the rose. == > > > From: Ian Luo > Date: 2018-03-08 21:40 > To: dev > Subject: Re: On doub

Re: Re: On double dubbo starters

I think mentor means in another thread: we could publish something to maven central repository as usual until transition is done. KimmKing(kimmk...@163.com) == In me the tiger sniffs the rose. == From: Ian Luo Date: 2018-03-08 21:40 To: dev Subject: Re: On double dubbo starters > O

Re: On double dubbo starters

Sure, then we will not publish anything to maven repository until transition is done. Adrian, I guess this decision shouldn’t stop your further development work since you could depend on the snapshot build anyway. We will try our best to work with Mark and other apache mentors to boost the

Re: On double dubbo starters

On 07/03/18 11:41, Ian Luo wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Pls. check my comments below. Thanks for the additional information. Until the code transitions to the ASF (which I hope is fairly soon), and especially if the community needs a release, then you are able to publish releases as you have done

Re: On double dubbo starters

Hi Mark, Pls. check my comments below. Thanks, -Ian. > On 7 Mar 2018, at 6:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 07/03/18 09:49, Ian Luo wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> First of all, my apology for the confusion. The project under dubbo [1] >> group is the official project we plan

Re: On double dubbo starters

Hi Adrian, Apology again for the confusion. I agree with what you have mentioned before in gitter: i think you can work on the one that your are depending on now, til you think the integration job is stable enough, all problems related with dubbo cleared. Then we can change to the announced

Re: On double dubbo starters

On 07/03/18 09:49, Ian Luo wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > First of all, my apology for the confusion. The project under dubbo [1] group > is the official project we plan to maintain in long term for Spring Boot > support. I encourage you try it first and share your feedback if there’s any. > > In

Re: On double dubbo starters

ed for existing users and potential users. > > > > kimmk...@163.com > > > From: Ian Luo > Date: 2018-03-07 17:49 > To: dev > Subject: Re: On double dubbo starters > Hi Adrian, > > First of all, my apology for the confusion. The project under dubbo [1

Re: Re: On double dubbo starters

hi，Ian， It's a good idea to combine the two projects in a few days for transition. I think it's appropriated for existing users and potential users. kimmk...@163.com From: Ian Luo Date: 2018-03-07 17:49 To: dev Subject: Re: On double dubbo starters Hi Adrian, First of all, my

Re: On double dubbo starters

Hi Adrian, First of all, my apology for the confusion. The project under dubbo [1] group is the official project we plan to maintain in long term for Spring Boot support. I encourage you try it first and share your feedback if there’s any. In order to not block Adrian’s work, I suggest to