This vote passed with three binding +1 and no -1 votes.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> cziege...@apache.org
>
>
ateful for all of your tolerance.
Meanwhile, there's this release I started ?2? weeks ago for the remote
shell component. Do two more of you PMC members want to give it a plus 1,
or do you want me to remove the tag and back out the version in the pom?
Regards,
benson margulies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15741954#comment-15741954
]
Benson Margulies commented on FELIX-5415:
-
No, you wind up with two serv
A look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/FELIX/versions
suggests that some folks have forgotten to mark some recent releases
as released, such as the 1.0.0 of gogo, unless the UI is fooling me.
The remote shell release still needs two votes.
I would be grateful if a PMC member would do this, since I can't edit
the download page until its over there to download.
; Regards,
>
> Clement
>
>> On 30 Nov 2016, at 11:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/30/2016 09:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 2016-11-25 21:59 GMT+01:00 B
Any chance of a few more voters? I'm in the middle of a job change; it
would be nice to finish this off during my week in between.
Hmm. I am inclined to write a JIRA to clean that up later; for the
typical trivial use case of the 'lite' package, I don't think it's a
big risk. We'll see if we get any votes.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> On Sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5353.
-
Resolution: Invalid
> ConfigurationAdmin does not log or diagnose invalid contents
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5413.
-
Resolution: Invalid
> incorrect log messages about port in felix h
Hi,
We solved 3 issues in this release:
** Bug
* [FELIX-5422] - httplite should accept more date formats.
* [FELIX-5423] - httplite does not urldecode parameter values
* [FELIX-5427] - httplite javadoc fails java8 javadoc lint
There are still some outstanding issues:
https://issues.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5427.
-
Resolution: Fixed
1771382.
> httplite javadoc fails java8 javadoc l
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5427:
---
Summary: httplite javadoc fails java8 javadoc lint
Key: FELIX-5427
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5427
Project: Felix
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies closed FELIX-5073.
---
> Option to create dependency-reduced-pom exi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies closed FELIX-5070.
---
> Simple syntax for specifying embedded dependencies has bro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies closed FELIX-5069.
---
> Spurious split package messages when embedding dependenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies updated FELIX-5422:
Fix Version/s: httplite-0.1.5
> httplite should accept more date form
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5069.
-
Resolution: Invalid
> Spurious split package messages when embedding dependenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5423.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: httplite-0.1.5
1771365
> httplite does
Hi,
We solved 1 issues in this release:
** Improvement
* [FELIX-5418] - Remote shell to support 1.0.0 of gogo instead of 0.6.2...
There are still some outstanding issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/component/12312457/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies updated FELIX-5418:
Fix Version/s: shell.remote-1.2.0
> Remote shell to support 1.0.0 of gogo instead of 0.
I'm about to start some release votes. I've got a new GPG key, could a
PMC member please add this to KEYS?
pub 4096R/45201BEB 2016-11-25
uid [ultimate] Benson Margulies (CODE SIGNING KEY)
sig 345201BEB 2016-11-25 Benson Margulies (CODE SIGNING KEY)
sub 4096R/ADAB37
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5423:
---
Summary: httplite does not urldecode parameter values
Key: FELIX-5423
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5423
Project: Felix
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5422.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in 1770706.
> httplite should accept more date form
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5422:
---
Summary: httplite should accept more date formats.
Key: FELIX-5422
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5422
Project: Felix
Issue Type
I committed the changes needed to work with gogo 1.0.0 (at least if
one avoids JLine). I bumped the version to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
Can I stage a release? Would someone else prefer to do so?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5418.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Benson Margulies
Commit 1770124: update pom so that
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5418:
---
Summary: Remote shell to support 1.0.0 of gogo instead of 0.6.2...
Key: FELIX-5418
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5418
Project: Felix
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5415:
---
Summary: HTTP leaves extra service registrations when configured
with config admin
Key: FELIX-5415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5415
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5413:
---
Summary: incorrect log messages about port in felix http
Key: FELIX-5413
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5413
Project: Felix
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5374.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: scr-2.1.0
1764148
fixes this by setting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies reassigned FELIX-5374:
---
Assignee: Benson Margulies
> Reduce severity of log message from SCR when there
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5374:
---
Summary: Reduce severity of log message from SCR when there is no
metatype
Key: FELIX-5374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5374
Project: Felix
OK, I'll do it posthumously.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, David Jencks
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prefer to open jira issues even for such simple changes as this so there’s
> a complete record in jira of everything that happened.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>> On Oct 10, 2016, at 9:17 AM, bimargul
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5353:
---
Summary: ConfigurationAdmin does not log or diagnose invalid
contents of files
Key: FELIX-5353
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5353
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15491558#comment-15491558
]
Benson Margulies commented on FELIX-5346:
-
Also note that bnd supp
And then you need 'new' for the Factory, or a static method? Somewhere, the
chain of abstraction has to stop. If you don't have any parameters that
modify the creation, 'new' is just as good as any sort of Factory or
Builder.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:21 PM, David Leangen wrote:
>
> Hi David B.,
Benson Margulies created FELIX-5197:
---
Summary: non-fatal circularities in SCR should be info, not error,
in log
Key: FELIX-5197
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5197
Project: Felix
ted enough stupid stuff here
as I've been learning my way around that I don't think of myself much
of a candidate member of a spec team; I can certainly represent my use
case.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>> On Dec 25, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
&g
single CA configuration? I’m in favor of both of these ideas making it into
> the specs in some form; felix DS already has some support for tree-shaped
> configurations using complex keys rather than complex values.
>
> I’d appreciate some more description of what your code does….
>
&
i, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> After some hints from folks on the Karaf list, I implemented a mutant
>> cousin of fileinstall. It only does config admin, and it's role in
>> life is to read yaml or json files, 'flatten' them, an
After some hints from folks on the Karaf list, I implemented a mutant
cousin of fileinstall. It only does config admin, and it's role in
life is to read yaml or json files, 'flatten' them, and push the
results into config admin. My plan is for the things that use it to
reconstruct the original obje
I believe that everyone in the felix-users confluence group now has
access to edit pages in my 'personal space'.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:50 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> I also see no way to edit your page, and I have n
imargul...@gmail.com into the Felix space. If not,
I'll open an Infra ticket.
meanwhile, can't you all at least put things into comments on the bottom?
(I can't see a way to give other people edit permission to my 'personal space').
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
On Dec 1, 2015 6:43 PM, "Richard S. Hall" wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 1, 2015, at 17:50, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> >
> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~bimargul...@gmail.com/Felix+and+Git
> >
> > ?
>
> Seems like a good start, althou
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~bimargul...@gmail.com/Felix+and+Git
?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 12/1/15 13:40 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>
>> Richard S. Hall wrote
>>>
>>> Well, the argument to the contrary is perhaps that is makes it more
>>> diff
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Hello Benson,
>
> There is, at least, substantial apathy about git on the part of the
> sub-communities that work on some of the sub-projects. In my view,
> this apathy, including perhaps a bit of antipathy, sunk the discussion
> of just c
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Benson Margulies wrote
>> Here's how I'd call the vote:
>>
>> This is a vote to move the reference source of the maven-bundle-plugin to
>> git.
>>
>> To be specific,
>>
>> -
hronic
> distraction I will wait a bit to see if someone else organizes the vote
> (thanks Carsten).
>
> david jencks
>
>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>
>> Benson Margulies wrote
>>> I would like to peel the bundle plugin. D
xisting history will be migrated using svn2git.
- the 'top' of the repo will correspond to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/tools/maven-bundle-plugin.
- The code will be removed and replaced with a readme.txt in svn on trunk.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Benson Margulies
I will write a VOTE thread with a description.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Benson Margulies wrote
>> I would like to peel the bundle plugin. Does any pmc member sympathize
>> sufficiently to start a vote to test consensus to do that?
>
> I do
transition. But the bulk of main project can safely continue to work in
> the meantime.
>
> That's the entire anti-climactic idea.
>
> - Ray
> On Dec 1, 2015 9:02 AM, "Carsten Ziegeler" wrote:
>
> > Benson Margulies wrote
> > > It sure seems as if t
It sure seems as if there are no PMC members fond enough of the git
idea to call a vote. I'm treating this as a dead topic for now.
Yes, I was surprised to get three links to the same list.
On Nov 26, 2015 9:00 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/26/2015 02:46 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 26 November 2015 at 13:09, Carsten Ziegeler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>
The release notes are identical?
On Nov 26, 2015 8:09 AM, "Carsten Ziegeler" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved some issues for this release:
>
> http.base 3.0.4 (4 issues)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12333777
>
> http.bridge 3.0.4 (4 issues)
> https://issues.apache.org/ji
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:14 AM, David Bosschaert
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Every time I do a release in the Felix community I am thinking:
> there's too many manual steps involved here, some of which seem to be
> unnecessary as they seem duplicative. I'm wondering whether all these
> steps are necessa
It's missing, because I apparently have failed twice to decode the CMS
doc as to how to create the extpaths.txt file that should stop it from
disappearing. As soon as I find out what I'm going wrong I'll put it
back into place.
downloads.cgi
> points to the dist area so for that it also has to contain the
> binaries?
>
> David
>
> On 13 November 2015 at 12:07, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> The only things in the dist area should be the source release zip,
>> it's detached signature file,
t;>
>> I guess that in the previous release (currently in the felix release repo),
>> the above files were not necessary.
>> I just would like that someone confirms this ?
>>
>> thanks;
>>
>> -> Pierre
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11
I'll send the announcement when I get word that someone has committed
the release package to the dist area.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Hi, the vote has passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding):
>
> Pierre De Rop
> David Bossch
11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Pierre De Rop wrote:
> Hello Benson,
>
> I was about to vote: +1
>
> regards;
> /Pierre
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> We are still one PMC vote short here.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7
We are still one PMC vote short here.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Thank You. Perhaps I will change that doc page to mention that a PMC
>> member might be requir
015 at 12:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> No can do with the signature. As a mere committer, I can't commit to
>> the dist area. Only PMC members can do that.
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>
>> mQ
PING! Please? I really want to fix this before I publish the bundle
plugin release.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I don't seem to have access to manage versions, and people have been
> marking JIRAs as fixed for 3.0.2 instead of 3.0.1. I am going to chea
keys
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
>
> On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 11:44, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 3 issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12333631&styleName=Text&projectId=12310100&Create=Cr
I am preparing, at least mentally, to do to [1] to the
maven-bundle-plugin -- to make it require Maven 3.x.
So, you might think that I need to change the major version number.
This, of course, would have the effect of de-syncing the versions from
bnd versions. Maybe this doesn't bother anyone.
On
Is there an Embed-Dependency analog?
On Nov 9, 2015 12:07 PM, "Konrad Windszus" wrote:
> The biggest difference is that currently the bnd-maven-plugin does not
> support instructions within pom files (
> https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues/952) but rather only in dedicated
> bnd files.
> There
Is this the one that is 'owned' by the bndlib people, or are there
more than one?
The 'bnd' mailing list told me that it had less capability than the
maven-bundle-plugin, so that would be a reason not to retire.
I'll take on the lifecycle, but I'll make it a plugin that requires
maven 3, first. T
This thread has again quiesced. I respectfully submit that it's time
for a PMC member to start a [VOTE] thread to see whether there is a
decision to proceed.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Greeting, Marcel,
>
> It's not my intention to try
Hi,
We solved 3 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12333631&styleName=Text&projectId=12310100&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C0a2bd62f03263e903089dc8019574717effb605c%7Clin
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org
I don't seem to have access to manage versions, and people have been
marking JIRAs as fixed for 3.0.2 instead of 3.0.1. I am going to cheat
to send out a vote, but I will fix up JIRA as soon as I have access.
http://felix.apache.org/components/bundle-plugin-archives/bundle-plugin-LATEST/
is the result of my labors so far.
I am willing. I'll tee it up this weekend.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> is it planned to make a release of maven-bundle-plugin 3.0.2 soon?
>
> i think the fix for FELIX-5062 is quite important.
>
> stefan
ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4818
> [2]
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/dependencymanager/release/build.gradle
> [3]
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/dependencymanager/release/README.release?view=log
>
>
> cheers;
> /Pierre
>
> On Mon, No
uite a few processes that we
> currently have which is why I don’t think we should “just switch” and then
> try to pick up the broken pieces.
>
> Greetings, Marcel
>
> On 31 October 2015 at 22:01:01 , Oliver Lietz (apa...@oliverlietz.de)
> wrote:
>
> On Friday 30 October 2015 06
irect from /foo to /components/foo/
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/$
RewriteRule components/(.*) /$1/ [R]
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I set up the pom for the maven-bundle-plugin to use the
> maven-scm-publish-plugin to push th
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Am 30.10.15 um 01:48 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>> Is this a consensus to proceed yet? It's been a few days since the
>> last contribution.
>>
> We clearly have different opinions, they range from "why
I set up the pom for the maven-bundle-plugin to use the
maven-scm-publish-plugin to push the generated doc to svn. However,
it's not visible yet, because there's some trickery needed to combine
the CMS content with this content.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10688
describes how this
Is this a consensus to proceed yet? It's been a few days since the
last contribution.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> I’m +0 on making a switch because it’s also a lot of work and I don’t think
>> the benef
#x27;re welcome' until I've done some work, and I don't
perceive a consensus to get started quite just yet :-)
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>> On Oct 27, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14976860#comment-14976860
]
Benson Margulies commented on FELIX-5069:
-
https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/is
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Am 27.10.15 um 14:52 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
>> wrote:
>>> Am 27.10.15 um 14:28 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>>>> As a volunteer of record, I
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Am 27.10.15 um 14:28 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>> As a volunteer of record, I have a preference at this point for
>> flipping the entire repo. It's not zero work; all the elements
>> have to be edited, and rele
As a volunteer of record, I have a preference at this point for
flipping the entire repo. It's not zero work; all the elements
have to be edited, and release plugin config adjusted, for the maven
plugins. But that's very straightforward. Once we get this much done,
we can then start to move things
oken?
>> Right now I don't see much of a benefit to this, but as I'm not part of
>> any
>> decision makers here,
>> take this just as a little hint :-)
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>>
>> 2015-10-27 11:12 GMT+01:00 Benson Marg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14976195#comment-14976195
]
Benson Margulies commented on FELIX-5069:
-
There is no test dependency invo
My recommendation at this point in the discussion is to convert the
repo _en bloc_, then split out very independent things (if any), and
only then contemplate add-ons.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies reassigned FELIX-5069:
---
Assignee: Benson Margulies
> Spurious split package messages when embedd
>>> We are currently moving each subproject to the release by subproject model
>>> gradually.
>>> Theoretically we can then move each subproject to git independently. I am
>>> not sure though how to move the change history over in that case.
>>> In any case the Aries
n to start with.
>
> FWIW, I’m hoping to move DS onto a gradle based build soon.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>> On Oct 24, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Greeting, Marcel,
>>
>> It's not my intention to try to talk anyone into
At Felix, I'd like to add publication of a maven-generated site to the
existing CMS content, following the trail of what's done at Maven.
I see that the main site for Felix is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/felix/content,
that's
http://felix.apache.org
I created
https
ust a
preference. If the acceptable compromise is to have less repos than
releasable items (possibly as few as one repo), I'd personally rather
do that than not move to git at all.
regards,
benson
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> On 24 October 2015 at 11:36:
I almost exclusively use it, but I’m +0 on making a switch because it’s
> also a lot of work and I don’t think the benefits are huge. If it works,
> don’t fix it. :)
>
> +1
>
> I don't care, but I agree the benefits aren't super compelling other than
> buzzword
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5070.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: maven-bundle-plugin-3.0.2
r1710372 adds a unit
rojects and
> I’d like them to be in 1 repo.
>
> Do you know how infra feels about gradual migration? Are they fine with it
> or do they prefer all-at-once?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:36 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> The
Still no luck. I even logged out and into jira.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Am 24.10.15 um 14:14 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>> I can close them, but I can't assign them to myself.
>>
> Should work now
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
>
I can close them, but I can't assign them to myself.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-5073.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: maven-bundle-plugin-3.0.2
r1710332 | bimargulies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies resolved FELIX-4970.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: gogo.runtime-0.16.4
Fixed in r1710336.
>
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
