@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:14:25 +
I think enough folks have examined the source but it would be good to know
that it works in other countries
Sent from my LG G3, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original
, it is minor IMO even though that looks not pro (especially
from us).
Frédéric THOMAS
From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:19:15 +0100
Hold
Hi,
I also get a 3003 with FlexJS when running the binary.
The same URL works correctly when used in a browser.
http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/flex/flex-tool-api/1.0.0/flex-tool-api-1.0.0.jar
Here’s the log:
Installer version 3.2.0 (mac)
Using Locale: en_AU
] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
You're right. Let's count the votes and move on.
I was about to dedicate some time to test it but if you have already enough
votes, I'm fine with :-)
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:58:04
On 6/22/15, 8:35 AM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've still have the minor (?) issues:
Just to be clear, I ran the installer from the build done from the source
kit and had no issues in installing the Flex SDK itself, only FlexJS,
that's why I don't know it I have to
Hi,
I could be wrong, but I thought the Installer let you pick any version of
AIR to mix with any version of Apache Flex.
It does but it won’t currently default to the required one for the installer.
As I said in a recent reply, you can probably just set -target-player or
-swf-version.
On 6/21/15, 11:05 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Would have been a good thing to try before we cut the RC.
The previous RC didn’t compile so I (and I presume others) were unable to
test this.
Sounds like you are still unclear on how the release process is supposed
to work.
The README already says:
0. Make sure you have the right version of the Adobe AIR SDK. Apache
Flex Installer
3.1 uses Adobe AIR SDK 4.0. If you want to use an older version of the
AIR SDK,
you will have to change the namespace in the following files:
Hi,
You suggested change corrects one the issues. The other one is you can set
AIR_HOME to a 4.0 SDK, but if FLEX_HOME contains an air version other than 4.0
it will fail to compile. It will still fail to compile if you change the
namespace.
And since it is a minor change, we wouldn't need
I will be able to review this rc2 tonight (which is half a day away at this
time).
-Mark
Difficult to say it was quick but I guess it was for the uncompress tasks or
the tasks around of them.
--- Message initial ---
De : Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com
Envoyé : 22 juin 2015 19:22
A : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
On 6/22
Had an issue building from source using readme.
Step 2 worked:
2. In the ant_on_air directory, run:
ant [-DFLEX_HOME=/path/to/apache/flex/sdk]
[-DAIR_HOME=/path/to/air/sdk]
Step 3 failed here for me.
3. In the installer directory, run:
ant build
On 6/22/15, 1:03 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
You suggested change corrects one the issues. The other one is you can
set AIR_HOME to a 4.0 SDK, but if FLEX_HOME contains an air version other
than 4.0 it will fail to compile. It will still fail to compile if you
change
Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
From: e...@ixsoftware.nl
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Alex,
You're right. Let's count the votes and move on.
Contributions in the form of actual patches or even constructive comments
are always welcome and will certainly be part of the next release (which
Alex,
You're right. Let's count the votes and move on.
Contributions in the form of actual patches or even constructive comments
are always welcome and will certainly be part of the next release (which
everyone is free to create and put to a vote, btw). Just let's not let them
interfere with the
Alex,
I'm very sorry for the delay in my repsonse, but this time I get:
/Users/erik/Desktop/flex/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src/installer/src/InstallApacheFlex-app.xml:
error 305: Intial window content SWF version 28 exceeds namespace version
http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/4.0
when
On 6/21/15, 9:43 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
If you install some version of Apache Flex with AIR newer than 4.0 then
you will probably have this problem.
So you’re saying this will only work if you have a default Apache Flex
4.11 or below installed? If you have 4.12,
HI,
The Installer is just like any other AIR app. You need to adjust the xml
to whatever version of AIR you are using.
Except that doesn't work if you try to compile it with AIR 4.0 and your Flex
SDK has another version AIR.
Why do we have an AIR_HOME variable if in one place it using the
Hi,
I’m allso unable to compile from source. Tied various versions for AIR_HOME.
Setting to a a recent version of AIR give this:
error 305: Intial window content SWF version 27 exceeds namespace version
http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/4.0
Setting to the AIR 4.0 (the namespace mentioned
The -app.xml uses AIR 4.0.
AFAIK, SWCs do not have their SWF version carried over into the final SWF.
If you install some version of Apache Flex with AIR newer than 4.0 then
you will probably have this problem.
-Alex
On 6/21/15, 8:45 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m
Hi,
If you install some version of Apache Flex with AIR newer than 4.0 then you
will probably have this problem.
So you’re saying this will only work if you have a default Apache Flex 4.11 or
below installed? If you have 4.12, 4.13 or 4.14 default installs it won’t work?
You would also have
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
If you install some version of Apache Flex with AIR newer than 4.0 then
you will probably have this problem.
So you’re saying this will only work if you have a default Apache Flex
4.11 or below installed? If you
BTW, I think you can add -swf-version=23 and/or -target-player=12.0
-Alex
On 6/21/15, 7:51 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Alex,
I'm very sorry for the delay in my repsonse, but this time I get:
/Users/erik/Desktop/flex/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src/installer/src
On 6/21/15, 10:21 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Why do we have an AIR_HOME variable if in one place it using the air
version contained in FLEX_HOME?
Because we don’t want to mingle the AIR SDK files with the files from the
Apache Flex repo. And it should allow you to easily
Hi,
With the previous both FlexJS and 4.14.1 SDK failed to install for me, has that
been fixed or is it the same with this RC / just my problem?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
It sounded like we’d burn credits if we sign an RC and
then have to sign a subsequent RC if the first RC doesn’t get approved by
our PMC.
As far as I’m aware there’s a test process which costs nothing, and it also
costs if we (Apache as a whole) don’t use it.
So I think we finish up
This is the discussion thread.
Changes in this RC include:
-moved a bunch of files out of the installer folder up to the top-level so
that the file structure of the source package better matches the repo.
This reduces the chances that the repo build will work but the source
package build will
Ah yes, I should have been more clear. This issue should be fixed as well
by the official hash for this RC: 779907321df67042d80349d2a458b2db482deb35
-Alex
On 6/18/15, 11:55 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
With the previous both FlexJS and 4.14.1 SDK failed to install for
On 6/19/15, 12:16 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
It sounded like we’d burn credits if we sign an RC and
then have to sign a subsequent RC if the first RC doesn’t get approved
by
our PMC.
As far as I’m aware there’s a test process which costs nothing, and it
also
HI,
Heres the info from infra:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available
Thanks,
Justin
HI,
Which AIR/FP versions are offered is independent of the release. That is
managed in a data file on flex.a.o.
Understand but users would expect a new release to support the recently
releases FP 18/AIR 18 would they not?
What did you mean in your other post about signing the app? It is
Hi,
Yes, because someone asked about it a while ago separate from this
release. Please don’t mix work that folks besides the RM can do with what
needs to be done to finish the release.
Yep it’s not a release blocker and it is separate from the release.
Last time Om, Greg and myself all
On 6/18/15, 5:21 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
HI,
Which AIR/FP versions are offered is independent of the release. That
is
managed in a data file on flex.a.o.
Understand but users would expect a new release to support the recently
releases FP 18/AIR 18 would they not?
Yes,
On 6/18/15, 6:41 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
If someone wants to take on signing the binary, that’s fine with me.
If you want to make the next RC and then give me the binaries before
putting them up I’ll give it a go, unless someone else wants to? I am
getting on a
On 6/18/15, 1:50 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Anyone else seeing this or have I done something wrong?
I reported this about an hour ago.
Well, so much for the less-RC process. I’ll roll out another RC in about
9 hours.
-Alex
On 6/18/15, 2:12 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
HI,
Well, so much for the less-RC process. I’ll roll out another RC in
about
9 hours.
You might want to allow more time for any other feedback and hopefully
reduce the need for further RCs.
How much longer should we wait?
HI,
Well, so much for the less-RC process. I’ll roll out another RC in about
9 hours.
You might want to allow more time for any other feedback and hopefully reduce
the need for further RCs.
BTW the binary in the source was found via rat perhaps the release process
needs to be updated?
Hi,
How much longer should we wait? Anybody else planning to test RC1?
I would assume other people are.. I’ve still not reviewed the release in detail
or even got to running the installer yet. It’s been under 24 hours so there may
even be people who don’t even know we have a release to vote
On 6/18/15, 2:31 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
How much longer should we wait? Anybody else planning to test RC1?
I would assume other people are.. I’ve still not reviewed the release in
detail or even got to running the installer yet. It’s been under 24 hours
so
Hi,
I’ll probably still cut an RC2 tonight because I had to make enough
changes to where some files live and the build script that packages them
that people might be wasting time reviewing the RC1 packages.
That may be some other issues that need looking into before making a RC2 (see
my vote
On 6/18/15, 4:48 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I’ll probably still cut an RC2 tonight because I had to make enough
changes to where some files live and the build script that packages them
that people might be wasting time reviewing the RC1 packages.
That may be some
Hi,
Are the contents of build.number correct?
#Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation.
#Sat, 28 Sep 2013 18:23:00 +1000
build.number=0
Ignoring the incorrect dates, should the build.number be 0?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
The LICENSE and NOTICE are in the binary .dmg are exactly the same as the ones
in the source release. I thought it was discussed and agreed that these should
be different?
Thanks,
Justin
build.number=0
Ignoring the incorrect dates, should the build.number be 0?
?
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Hi,
The source release (.tar.gz) has a unexpected binary file inside it, so looks
like there will need to be another RC. But I’ll do a full review before voting
and see if there is anything else we need to fix as well.
Here’s the file:
ant_on_air/tests/OSMF2_0.swc
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
The LICENSE and NOTICE are in the binary .dmg are exactly the same as the
ones in the source release. I thought it was discussed and agreed that these
should be different?
Ah sorry they are different it's just that the extra license info is above the
APACHE FLEX SUBCOMPONENTS” line.
Hi,
I’m also seeing a compile error, that seems to be related to placement of the
NOTICE file?
[get] To:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexSDKInstaller/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src/installer/deps/as3crypto/LICENSE.txt
[java] no such file
Anyone else seeing this or have I done something wrong?
I reported this about an hour ago.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Hi,
Just trying to run the approve script. I get a failure while building. The
'packageair' step is looking for NOTICE in the 'installer' subdirectory,
where it isn't. It seems to be in the root.
Also I noticed that running the approve script that it doesn't check the
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME variable
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Alex Harui
Hi,
I've just tried last nightly build of installer (Build #380) and on the
license agreements I see:
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/a1bcfrLefuRiHbJB-Obszar.png
Once I change language I see:
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/qJZ5xeUiPfgyTChe-Obszar.png
So we have an issue here. Additionally I
: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Hi,
Once I change language I see:
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/qJZ5xeUiPfgyTChe-Obszar.png
Yes and even worse if you now continue from this point it makes an SDK that
doesn't work.
I've raised this issue on the list recently but other PMC
-15 1:40 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Hi,
Once I change language I see:
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/qJZ5xeUiPfgyTChe-Obszar.png
Yes and even worse if you now continue from this point it makes an SDK
that
doesn't work.
I've raised
. If I have
a list I can fix up the error when changing languages on the license screen.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: piotrz [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-05-15 12:58 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Hi,
I've just
Hi,
Once I change language I see:
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/qJZ5xeUiPfgyTChe-Obszar.png
Yes and even worse if you now continue from this point it makes an SDK that
doesn't work.
I've raised this issue on the list recently but other PMC members didn't think
it would occur enough to
On 2/5/15, 12:39 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Once I change language I see:
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/qJZ5xeUiPfgyTChe-Obszar.png
Yes and even worse if you now continue from this point it makes an SDK
that doesn't work.
I've raised this issue on the list
fix up the error when changing languages on the license screen.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: piotrz [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-05-15 12:58 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Hi,
I've just tried last nightly
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: February-05-15 9:23 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org; Neil Madsen
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Hi Neil,
It sounds like there may still be confusion about how the checkbox set is
determined
the
correct items are being displayed and then push this version for testing.
Neil
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Thanks Piotr. I see what's happening.
Can someone please give a list of all required/optional check boxes to be
displayed
; Neil Madsen
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Hi Neil,
It sounds like there may still be confusion about how the checkbox set is
determined. For recent releases like Flex SDK 4.13 and 4.14, and for FlexJS
releases, the 'final' list of items
Do we want want to put a halt to this release to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34251?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Does this mean we can blame you on all the errors with your name on it
:P?
Indeed. I'm sacrificing my reputation as
On 04/02/15 16:24, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
Do we want want to put a halt to this release to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34251?
Well, I'm not going to use Jira as a discussion platform, but no would
be my view.
Software updates must be delivered over secure channels.
Why would we need to halt the release process? The 'less-RC' release
process [1] has 3 phases, and we're currently still at the start of
the first phase. I've made the LAST CALL, but clearly stated that I'll
only cut the release branch when there's consensus on the ready-ness
of the bits.
EdB
1:
hahaha :)
Mark,
That's why we haven't had any other volunteers for this job. :D Erik is
taking it great. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
Does this mean we can blame you on all the errors with your name on it :P?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 11:19 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2
Sorry Eric
Does this mean we can blame you on all the errors with your name on it :P?
Indeed. I'm sacrificing my reputation as the
'never-ever-wrote-buggy-software-code-whisperer' for the greater good.
People always feel better if they have someone else to blame :-P
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan
Wow, what an overwhelming response... I'll have to disappoint the
other volunteers, but I'm taking this one ;-)
Let's get this show on the road!
EdB
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Hi,
If no one else volunteers, I'm prepared to manage this release as
Sorry Eric, I wish I could do it but I'm not skilled enough :(
Not really any skills required, just a masochistic desire to have your
account name show up in the stack trace :-P
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Sorry Eric, I wish I could do it but I'm not skilled enough :(
Thx for the great work
Dany
Op 3-feb.-2015, om 17:05 heeft Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl het
volgende geschreven:
Wow, what an overwhelming response... I'll have to disappoint the
other volunteers, but I'm taking this one
Hi,
If no one else volunteers, I'm prepared to manage this release as well.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
70 matches
Mail list logo
