report target. If I
>find time in the next week or so, I can try to get the PR in, else it
>really is just making a variable with a default and using it so that it
>can be passed in.
>
>Mike
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alex Harui
>Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018
it really is just making a
variable with a default and using it so that it can be passed in.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 1:07 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: FlexUnit - FlexUnit4AirCIListener targets player 10.0.0
I'm pretty sure
I'm pretty sure Apache Flex and Apache Royale (FlexJS) are using FlexUnit
without player 10. You can take a look at how that is set up in the
flex-sdk and royale-asjs/flex-asjs repos.
HTH,
-Alex
On 4/2/18, 8:07 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
>Hi Charles,
>
>Can you make pull request on GitHub wit
Hi Charles,
Can you make pull request on GitHub with all the changes in FlexUnit?
I can review it and maybe merge.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 01:33 doucettec wrote:
> 5 years later, I have the same problem.
> I am trying to use AIR SDK 21 with Flash version 21.
> We also try to run so
5 years later, I have the same problem.
I am trying to use AIR SDK 21 with Flash version 21.
We also try to run some Flex Unit tests.
Since this has a hard-coded reference to version 10.0.0, I either have to
find that version of playerglobal.swc and install it to my current FLEX SDK,
or I have to c
Yes. If you do clean your flexunit project, be sure to manually but
hamcrest SWC into the libs folder. After that it built correctly. Not sure
how this affects people who get it from the repo and try to build it.
‹peter
On 3/28/16, 11:47 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I think a lot of us are relying
I think a lot of us are relying on the fact we have hamcrest cached in the
right places.
-Alex
On 3/28/16, 8:19 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>Anyone having trouble building Flexunit? I'm getting this failure:
>
>
>download-zip:
>
> [get] Getting:
>https://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/ha
Does anyone mind if I get the unit tests to start running as part of
the checkintests target?
On 10 December 2014 at 16:18, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On 10/12/14 14:21, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> [flexunit] Using the following settings for compilation:
>> [flexunit] FLEX_HOME: [c:\Jenkins\worksp
Chris,
FlexUnit was an independent open source project with a bunch of contributors,
so when I said, 'we', I mean the people that developed and maintained FlexUnit.
Here is a quick summary of the issue:
* Flash Builder ships with a couple of jars that include its FlexUnit support
* In those jar
Michael,
I've just committed my changes and applied it to one test class. You can
take a look into that.
I'm filtering data inside loader based on the tests name:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flex-tlf.git;a=commit;h=6155a8ab
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.co
>"checkfirstBaselineOffset" and "checkColumnWidthOnGapChangeTest"
>I will create -> https://paste.apache.org/7Qka
This is pretty close to what I was suggesting in my original comment.
Mike
I would look at your code again. I don't think it's doing what you think it's
doing. A few things including that slice returns a shallow copy. You make a
copy and pass the original up.
However, you don't need a rule at all. Just do this work in the loader.
Load your data but ensure you only pas
One solution which came up to my mind is create for every test's methods data
loader.
So for example if we have two test methods which has some configuration:
"checkfirstBaselineOffset" and "checkColumnWidthOnGapChangeTest"
I will create -> https://paste.apache.org/7Qka
Piotr
-
Apache Fl
Hi Michael,
I did my own custom data loader and it's working fine. I will describe you
everything on a simpler example. Maybe I don't understand something.
1) I've created my Test class
https://paste.apache.org/juCo
My "TestConfigurationLoader" class loading data from xml into my data
provider
PROBLEM:
[Test(dataProvider=dp)]
public function checkColumnWidthOnGapChangeTest(dpData:Object):void
{
}
>If I add my data provider to the test above it will launch 100 times, but only
>two cases from this xml file is for this test.
This is just not how you are supposed to use this feature. It's
On 10/12/14 14:21, Erik de Bruin wrote:
[flexunit] Using the following settings for compilation:
[flexunit] FLEX_HOME: [c:\Jenkins\workspace\flex-sdk_test]
[flexunit] player: [flash]
Maybe that SDK hasn't been build with the new bits ?
Tom
Doh! First build the SDK, dude ;-)
All is well now, the tests run cleanly on the CI server.
EdB
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> And, like it's software development or something, stuff is not working
> on the CI machine. This is my ant 'stack trace':
>
> test-run:
>
And, like it's software development or something, stuff is not working
on the CI machine. This is my ant 'stack trace':
test-run:
[echo] Unit tests for
'c:\Jenkins\workspace\flex-sdk_test\frameworks\projects\apache'
[flexunit] Validating task attributes ...
[flexunit] Generating default val
Ah, and before I forget: I have added a new job to the build VM that
runs all tests on every commit or once daily (like the other jobs).
EdB
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on the Promise class, I very much wanted to be able to
> use FlexUnit to te
On 10/13/14, 1:17 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>We probably should add similar announcements to the rest of the Flex
>forums. If someone comes up with wording, I’ll be happy to post them.
Well, the Adobe Flex forum is still active, folks who are using Adobe
versions of Flex are welcome to post there, and
We probably should add similar announcements to the rest of the Flex forums. If
someone comes up with wording, I’ll be happy to post them.
On Oct 13, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Okay. Done.
>
> On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/13/14, 12:42 PM, "Harbs"
Okay. Done.
On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/14, 12:42 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> Probably not...
>>
>> It might be worthwhile posting a forum post (or announcement) that the
>> code was donated to Apache. I can add an announcement if we want.
> Sounds good to me,
On 10/13/14, 12:42 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Probably not...
>
>It might be worthwhile posting a forum post (or announcement) that the
>code was donated to Apache. I can add an announcement if we want.
Sounds good to me, please do it!
-Alex
Probably not...
It might be worthwhile posting a forum post (or announcement) that the code was
donated to Apache. I can add an announcement if we want.
On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/14, 11:19 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I’m a moderator on the forums and used t
On 10/13/14, 11:19 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m a moderator on the forums and used to have rights to modify the
>forums, but they pulled the admin rights for moderators who are not Adobe
>employees after someone messed something up with the forums.
>
>Alex, being an employee, you can probably get ad
I’m a moderator on the forums and used to have rights to modify the forums, but
they pulled the admin rights for moderators who are not Adobe employees after
someone messed something up with the forums.
Alex, being an employee, you can probably get admin rights. Adjusting the forum
is pretty ea
It didn’t look like anyone has posted there in 5 months, or am I not
looking at the data correctly? Maybe folks have already figured out to
ask for help elsewhere.
Are you proposing that Adobe should modify the web page at the link you
posted to make it more clear that FlexUnit is now at Apache?
>Does anyone have an idea of which Flex SDK was used for the examples?
It was probably the original 4.0 SDK
Does anyone have an idea of which Flex SDK was used for the examples?
Chris
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Chris Martin wrote:
> Thanks Michael, will do! :D
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Mihai Chira
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> On 23 Aug 2014 04:54, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>>
Thanks Michael, will do! :D
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Mihai Chira wrote:
> +1
> On 23 Aug 2014 04:54, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 8/22/14 8:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >> Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through
> > >>
+1
On 23 Aug 2014 04:54, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> +1
>
> On 8/22/14 8:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through
> >>the
> >> UI differences too. Before I get too far into this, I wanted to run it
> >> past the team. Is i
>Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through the UI
>differences too. Before I get too far into this, I wanted to run it past the
>team. Is it cool if I go ahead and update the tutorials to also include the
>variations in FB 4.7 versus FB 4.6?
I don't have time to w
+1
On 8/22/14 8:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through
>>the
>> UI differences too. Before I get too far into this, I wanted to run it
>> past the team. Is it cool if I go ahead and update the tutorials to
>>also
>> includ
Hi,
> Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through the
> UI differences too. Before I get too far into this, I wanted to run it
> past the team. Is it cool if I go ahead and update the tutorials to also
> include the variations in FB 4.7 versus FB 4.6?
No issues here +
I ended up creating one test method by sequence I wanted to test and it works
well.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:35:17 +0100
&
et, method, args, argsFunction));
runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(target,
ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, timeout));
runner.addAssertHandler(assertHandler, null);
return runner;
}
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject:
Well, it seems the answer is to create more SequenceRunner :P
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:23:10 +0100
>
> I meant,
> It looks l
I meant,
It looks like it uses the first addAssertHandler in both cases.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:18:27 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the Sequen
>
> I wasn't expecting us to push out the door a new release one week after
> the last :-)
>
Well, the first one was a 'parity' release, mostly. I think it would be a
big plus if we could do another release so soon after this one, as it shows
the bits are in active development!
Great job.
EdB
>Ok ... glad to help.
>But I have to admit that I have never done an Apache release before.
>So a little coaching from you guys would be great :)
Side note, I would like to get one bug fix in before we release too. After this
release, I think we should update Mockolate and Hamcrest version comp
That's great news, Chris. Do you want to be the release manager for 4.3?
On 4/26/14 1:45 PM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> Ok ... so I got further than I expected today ... Actually I'm finished
>>:-)
>
>Nice work
> Ok ... so I got further than I expected today ... Actually I'm finished :-)
Nice work
Cool :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases
> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 15:54:11 +
>
> Ok ... so I got further than I expected today ... Actually I'm finished :-)
>
>
>
> What I changed:
>By the way: I read in this post [1] that FlexUnit 4.2 will support Code
>Coverage with Apparat. When will this be available?
People are needed to work on it
Jason Gardner did some great work on this [1], but it would require work to get
it into Apache. This is still the goal for anyone who can
Hi,
Thanks for fining that - just out of interest what platform were you on?
Justin
Our website won't be updated until they get the cms buildbot fixed.
https://twitter.com/infrabot/status/456554060217204736
-Nick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:38 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I just sent out a tweet from the official @ApacheFlex twitter account:
> https://twitter.com/ApacheFlex
Download page with versions:
https://github.com/drewbourne/mockolate/downloads
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 4:56 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: FlexUnit 4.2.0 release
Hi,
Checked all of the links
Hi,
Checked all of the links but looks like one is broken:
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/mockolate-0.9.5.zip
Anyone know an alternative link?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Also looking for feedback on this new page :
> http://flex.staging.apache.org/download-flexunit.html
Two of the download links are broken (missing the SDK version number) I'll fix.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> I'm not clear what Justin's plans are for the asdoc. It looked like it
> was actually in the source package. Maybe it can just be copied to dist.
Currently the docs are in the distribution but I don't see why they can't be in
two places.
Thanks,
Justin
I read it relatively quickly, but didn't see anything obvious.
I did see the 'r' after FlexUnit. Is it really a registered trademark? I
hope the mark was part of the donationŠ
-Alex
On 4/14/14 1:53 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>Also looking for feedback on this new page :
>http://flex.s
Also looking for feedback on this new page :
http://flex.staging.apache.org/download-flexunit.html
If somebody could check for grammar, spelling, etc. The dist downloads
still don't work 100% of the time yet, so you don't have to report those,
but everything else should be good. I'll write the
I'm not clear what Justin's plans are for the asdoc. It looked like it
was actually in the source package. Maybe it can just be copied to dist.
-Alex
On 4/14/14 1:12 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>Did we end up adding the FlexUnit asdocs on dist? I know it wasn't built
>with the
Alex,
Did we end up adding the FlexUnit asdocs on dist? I know it wasn't built
with the RC4 build, but we should distribute it.
-Nick
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/13/14 5:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> Although I am not sure if they will al
On 4/13/14 5:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Although I am not sure if they will allow us to do a PR as it is not a
>> major version n. You could definitely ask.
>
>I think the first Apache release counts as a major version, I'll ask.
Didn't we do PR for 4.8 and/or 4.9?
-Alex
I'll get the website readied for it tomorrow, and I'll watch the dist to
see when a majority of the sites have the bits. Anybody want to send me a
quote or something I can include in the Blog post?
-Nick
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Although I am not sure i
Hi,
> Although I am not sure if they will allow us to do a PR as it is not a
> major version n. You could definitely ask.
I think the first Apache release counts as a major version, I'll ask.
Justin
On Apr 13, 2014 3:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The votes passed and I've placed 4.2.0 into the release area, it will
take 24 hours to propagate and then we can announce it to the world.
>
> The web site and blog needs an update - Nick do you need a hand with that?
>
> Also as this is
credi 2 avril 2014 01:53
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: FlexUnit Tutorials
I can't take credit for the verbiage -- that came from the folks at
DigitalPrimates.
The version on the main site is not up to date. Some pushes were snuck into
the main site when the 3rd party community pag
I can't take credit for the verbiage -- that came from the folks at
DigitalPrimates.
The version on the main site is not up to date. Some pushes were snuck
into the main site when the 3rd party community pages went online. The
Intro, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd unit have been converted to the CMS, but the
g and headers have disappeared.
- would be nice to have a word on using FlexUnit in IDEA.
Otherwise, that's awesome tutorial!
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 2 avril 2014 00:54
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet
Hi Nick, it's also on flex.a.o (because I published to add third-party section).
http://flex.apache.org/flexunit/tutorial/
-Message d'origine-
De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2014 23:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : FlexUnit Tutorials
Hey E
>BTW, a key motivating factor in creating a set of FlexUnit tests is to try to
>conform to that government standard you told me about. Do you have a 5
>sentence summary of what a test suite needs to cover? Is it measured purely
>by code coverage or do you have to have boundary tests, negative
On 3/24/14 9:22 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>BTW, was one of the enhancements automated test generation? Maybe from
>>metadata on the class?
>
>There was a bigger project on that, yes, although we didn't get
>particularly far before the Apache switch so most of it was put on hold.
>Also,
>BTW, was one of the enhancements automated test generation? Maybe from
>metadata on the class?
There was a bigger project on that, yes, although we didn't get particularly
far before the Apache switch so most of it was put on hold. Also, Flash Builder
would create stubs for you based on the c
On 3/23/14 9:57 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>I put together a presentation years ago on FlexUnit for contributors that
>explained the architecture. I will find it and get that posted somewhere.
>
>Additionally, if anyone is interested, I would be happy to do a session
>sometime on the inte
Hi Michael.
I would be happy to participate in such session.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexUnit-was-Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36204p36210.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Developme
Sorry for being so noisy today, here is FlexUnit 4 for Contributors.
http://www.slideshare.net/michael.labriola/flexunit-4-for-contributors
It's a little older (written at the release of FlexUnit 4.0) but still relevant
and is a good, and comparatively brief, way to understand how the major piec
Anyway to just replace the repo with a text file that points them to a new URL?
Moved.txt or such...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 12:00 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: FlexUnit GitHub
Goin
>Hi Mike do you if anything has been done to solve the external dependencies
>issue so it could be donated to FlexUnit?
Nothing has been done.
Hi Mike do you if anything has been done to solve the external dependencies
issue so it could be donated to FlexUnit?
On 9 October 2013 15:22, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
> >If the patch is small, they should just submit the patch in a JIRA and an
> ICLA is not required.
>
> It will eventually co
Maybe we can ask Infra to point flexunit.org to
flex.apache.org/flexunit? That way we at least have a framework to
place the FlexUnit information in.
EdB
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/29/14 9:38 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
> wrote:
>
>>>My bad for not actually lo
On 1/29/14 9:38 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>My bad for not actually looking at the site. I just tried though and it
>>isn't responding. What do you mean by "domain staying intact?" Are you
>>saying we should just map flexunit.org to a brand new site on Apache
>>hardware and not take a
>My bad for not actually looking at the site. I just tried though and it isn't
>responding. What do you mean by "domain staying intact?" Are you saying we
>should just map flexunit.org to a brand new site on Apache hardware and not
>take any of the old content?
Probably. And if there is some
My bad for not actually looking at the site. I just tried though and it
isn't responding. What do you mean by "domain staying intact?" Are you
saying we should just map flexunit.org to a brand new site on Apache
hardware and not take any of the old content?
-Alex
On 1/29/14 9:28 AM, "Michael A
>So, were the files on flexunit.org in the original FlexUnit donation? If not,
>what is the licensing on the site content? You may need to do another
>donation.
They likely weren't but I will look back at the language I wrote in the grant.
No problem if I need to do another.
As far as the si
So, were the files on flexunit.org in the original FlexUnit donation? If
not, what is the licensing on the site content? You may need to do
another donation.
-Alex
On 1/29/14 8:04 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>BTW, Infra did say they can host flexunit.org, but they did not answer
>>my qu
>BTW, Infra did say they can host flexunit.org, but they did not answer my
>question about what form the files need to be. It won't be any fun if we have
>to convert it to mdtext.
So agree.
Mike
BTW, Infra did say they can host flexunit.org, but they did not answer my
question about what form the files need to be. It won't be any fun if we
have to convert it to mdtext.
-Alex
On 1/29/14 7:13 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>If anyone is looking for a way to help, the FlexUnit wiki pag
>If the patch is small, they should just submit the patch in a JIRA and an ICLA
>is not required.
It will eventually come in via jira but there are other hurdles to pass first.
It is using work from others, likely binaries and a ton of other issues that
all need to be resolved before the patch
If the patch is small, they should just submit the patch in a JIRA and an ICLA
is not required.
-Alex
From: Michael A. Labriola [labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 6:41 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: FlexUnit - code
>I guess the first thing to sort out would be who actually wrote the code in
>that pull request (it's unclear to me) and have they all signed an ICLA?
They have not yet. That was actually the origin of my previous comment on
wondering if I can take the github repo and site offline and start redi
Hi,
I guess the first thing to sort out would be who actually wrote the code in
that pull request (it's unclear to me) and have they all signed an ICLA?
Anyone know?
Thanks,
Justin
>"He may be also able to provide a more recent version of Mockolate."
This is good. FlexUnit may not be built against the latest right now as I
believe there were some method signature changes, so it's possible upgrading to
the latest will cause some minor library changes. I am also going to com
"He may be also able to provide a more recent version of Mockolate."
Wow, awesome!
These should definitely go in the release notes when we have a chance.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Hamcrest look
Hi,
> Hamcrest looks like BSD, Mockolate looks like MIT.
I spoke to Drew (developer of said libraries) and he confirmed:
"Hamcrest-AS3 is BSD, same as Hamcrest for Java. Mockolate is MIT license. "
He may be also able to provide a more recent version of Mockolate.
Thanks,
Justin
Thanks Alex. Checked it aswell and added those license to flexunit's repo.
Cyrill
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Labriola probably will know for sure, but it looks like it is bsd
>
> http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexunit/wiki/License/
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/14/13 7:53 AM, "Al
Labriola probably will know for sure, but it looks like it is bsd
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexunit/wiki/License/
-Alex
On 9/14/13 7:53 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hamcrest looks like BSD, Mockolate looks like MIT. If you google the
>first line of the license it finds the same text. I didn'
Hamcrest looks like BSD, Mockolate looks like MIT. If you google the
first line of the license it finds the same text. I didn't compare every
line, so please double-check.
The FlexUnitLIb.swc will need examining to find the classes within and
hopefully the author of those classes.
I'll try to f
Thanks Erik...
Now there are 3 libraries left:
hamcrest -
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/mockolate-0.9.5.zip(License
-
https://github.com/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/blob/master/hamcrest/LICENSE)
mockolate -
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/hamcrest
The first two are OK, the third may need something extra, according to [1]
EdB
1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just updated README file, which lists now all thirdparty libraries with its
> licenses. There are a few Apache
On 9/3/13 1:17 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
wrote:
>>I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference
>>with those who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their
>>patches would have likely already been integrated.
>
>None have agreements. I can post a comme
>FWIW, Adobe did not need to contact any of its prior patch providers because
>the terms and conditions of providing the patch gave Adobe ownership and
>therefore the right to donate.
We did have an agreement, in fact the Adobe one since FlexUnit .9 was under the
Adobe banner. This had to be si
>I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference with
>those who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their patches would
>have likely already been integrated.
None have agreements. I can post a comment on each github issue asking them to
approve the integration
FWIW, Adobe did not need to contact any of its prior patch providers
because the terms and conditions of providing the patch gave Adobe
ownership and therefore the right to donate.
Was there any similar agreement for FlexUnit?
-Alex
On 9/3/13 8:50 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>Hi
>
>There are sti
>Are any of the mocking frameworks being donated to apache then? The save work
>great, it's just documentation and getting the stack working together >that I
>feel could be improved.
I do not believe so. You can contact the authors about donations if others are
interested as well. It is not my
Save = swcs. Stupid autocorrect
On 2 Sep 2013 19:51, "Avi Kessner" wrote:
> Are any of the mocking frameworks being donated to apache then? The save
> work great, it's just documentation and getting the stack working together
> that I feel could be improved.
> On 2 Sep 2013 17:45, "Michael A. L
Are any of the mocking frameworks being donated to apache then? The save
work great, it's just documentation and getting the stack working together
that I feel could be improved.
On 2 Sep 2013 17:45, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
> >Does flexUnit plan on making a mocking framework built in? The
>
>Does flexUnit plan on making a mocking framework built in? The documentation
>on Mockolate and other frameworks seems to have just died mid >devleopment,
>and the code doesn't match the docs or the forums anymore. :( brought to you
>by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47
FlexUnit belongs
From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: 30 August 2013 14:24
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: FlexUnit
>It was 6 now it's 7 still failing :-(
Okay, the only thing that makes sense though is a mismatch. Possible there are
two JDKs on the box, one that i
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
