For Linux support, me and one of this mailing list figured how to run it,
my self I was able to run it in Ubuntu and it explained here how it is done
:
http://saleh360.blogspot.com/2013/04/up-and-running-with-apache-flex-on.html?m=1
On May 10, 2013 11:44 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran ant from in the textlayout, spark, mx, mobilecomponents, and
mobiletheme folders and they all ran to completion. What errors are you
getting?
Run ant at frameworks get:
lean-external:
[echo] cleaning ${TLF_HOME}
BUILD FAILED
I'll go the long way round ;-)
EdB
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Nick is right, but I don't understand why you are getting these files to
show up in rat. Are those 3 targets the equivalent of ant release?
Otherwise, it isn't a fair test as the release
I do some bug work on those major / critical ones later.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:59 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Making an new Apache Flex release
Hi,
Develop and trunk are drifting further apart
Never one to shy away from a daunting task, I've taken on the 'missing
headers' issue...
I can run 'ant release' successfully (after fixing the JavaCC URL) and
get a nice 'rat.report'. I've fixed the headers in the
'experimental/bundles' property files that ant reports.
Running 'ant release'
If I run:
ant main
ant source-package
ant rat-check
I get a rat.report with 5 unapproved licenses:
/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/temp/frameworks/javascript/fabridge/samples/EmptySwf.swf
I think we have a list of Excluded files so the RAT report ignores files
that can't or shouldn't have the license header in them. According to my
IDE, those files are listed on lines 1668:1701 in the build.xml (ANT
builder). We don't add the license header to binaries such as SWF,
because,
Nick is right, but I don't understand why you are getting these files to
show up in rat. Are those 3 targets the equivalent of ant release?
Otherwise, it isn't a fair test as the release target might otherwise
delete those files (since they are binaries and shouldn't be in a source
package).
I
On 5/5/13 8:58 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
Develop and trunk are drifting further apart and we have a fair number of bug
fixes, support for newer version of AIR and FP, some new experimental
components, so probably about time we started thinking about a release. The
Hi,
I was wondering when you were going to come up for air. You and Mark have
been on a great run.
More to come - lots of little date, time and number and formatting issues still
to look at. :-)
I thought this was working except for running just the TLF folder?
It's more broken that that -
On 5/5/13 10:11 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering when you were going to come up for air. You and Mark have
been on a great run.
More to come - lots of little date, time and number and formatting issues
still to look at. :-)
I thought this was
11 matches
Mail list logo
