Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - testing if we can make a release build target without running the tests

2017-12-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix > that ? That commit wasn’t the issue it was the one after that. I’ve pushed a fix and things should be back to normal. Thanks, Justin

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - testing if we can make a release build target without running the tests

2017-12-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix > that ? Odd that change is working fine locally and I can’t see how that would break the build i.e. adding new target that isn’t used. I’ll look into it. Thanks, Justin

Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - testing if we can make a release build target without running the tests

2017-12-30 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix that ? 2017-12-30 7:26 GMT+01:00 <jmcl...@apache.org>: > Repository: flex-sdk > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/develop eeb68fcc4 -> 35214ffd3 > > > testing if we can make a release build targe

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-27 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/27/16, 10:51 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: >Nice stuff, Chris. > > > >All the bugs in the framework seem to be about failing to override the >clone() method in Event. If I understand correctly, this is mainly to >preserve state in case an event is re-dispatched. Is

RE: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-27 Thread Yishay Weiss
ahead and fix these bugs? From: Christofer Dutz<mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 9:50 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing) Ok … stats are online: Compiler: https://build

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Chris for the effort on making this! :) 2016-12-27 20:50 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz : > Ok … stats are online: > > Compiler: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/2461 > Typedefs: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20905 > Framework:

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-27 Thread Christofer Dutz
Ok … stats are online: Compiler: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/2461 Typedefs: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20905 Framework: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20942 Happy reading, Chris Am 27.12.16, 09:02 schrieb "Alex Harui"

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-27 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/26/16, 11:50 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >I suspect that a big chunk of the duplicate code is related to the Basic >and HTML projects. As I understand it, HTML was forked from Basic to try a >different architecture approach, but a big portion of the code is still >the

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-26 Thread Josh Tynjala
View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube- > available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > >

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-26 Thread piotrz
Thanks Chris. :) That's what I was intrested how much code duplication we have. :) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57572.html Sent

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-26 Thread Christofer Dutz
Looking forward to the results. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html Sent from the Apache

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-26 Thread piotrz
Thank you. Looking forward to the results. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-26 Thread Christofer Dutz
Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57566.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-26 Thread piotrz
/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57566.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-19 Thread Christofer Dutz
amework? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57452.html Sent from the Apac

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-19 Thread Christofer Dutz
run anlysis also for ActionScript part of framework? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57452.ht

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-19 Thread piotrz
Hi Chris, Do you think that would be possible run anlysis also for ActionScript part of framework? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-19 Thread Christofer Dutz
e.org/analysis/overview?id=2461 >> >> Chris >> >> Am 16.12.16, 11:48 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" >><christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: >> >> Hi, >> >> even if not officially communicated (We’re still

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-16 Thread Alex Harui
ristofer Dutz" >><christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: >> >> Hi, >> >> even if not officially communicated (We’re still beta-testing), >>Gavin >> recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be able >>to >> run the So

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
1 > > Chris > > Am 16.12.16, 11:48 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > > Hi, > > even if not officially communicated (We’re still beta-testing), Gavin > recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be ab

Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-16 Thread Christofer Dutz
lly communicated (We’re still beta-testing), Gavin recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be able to run the SonarQube analysis on the normal Jenkins build machine. I am happy to announce that we now have publicly available SonarQube stats: Feel fre

[FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)

2016-12-16 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, even if not officially communicated (We’re still beta-testing), Gavin recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be able to run the SonarQube analysis on the normal Jenkins build machine. I am happy to announce that we now have publicly available SonarQube stats: Feel

Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-26 Thread Alex Harui
the links refers to FlexJS but I'd like to build the >standard SDK to be able to test modifications. >Before I'll waste to much time: >Is the build process for the standard Flex SDK and FlexJS the same? > >Thanks, >Olaf > > > > > >-- >View this message in c

Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-26 Thread OK
Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54622.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: AW: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-26 Thread OK
: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54621.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AW: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-26 Thread Christofer Dutz
Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing Wow, thanks for help Alex. It encourages me to start with this stuff over the weekend. Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54615.html Sen

Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-25 Thread OK
Wow, thanks for help Alex. It encourages me to start with this stuff over the weekend. Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54615.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list

Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 8/25/16, 10:19 PM, "Krüger, Olaf" wrote: >Hi Alex, >> I would much prefer that we figure out why you can't build the SDK and >>update the wiki and other docs. >Honestly the only reason is that I'm 'afraid' of the effort that's needed >to build the SDK by myself. >But

AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-25 Thread Krüger , Olaf
Thanks, Olaf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2016 07:08 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Committing to the dev branch without testing On 8/25/16, 11:17 AM, "OK" <p...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: >Hi, >

Committing to the dev branch without testing

2016-08-25 Thread OK
if I just commit my changes to the development branch without testing. I will test my changes as soon as they make it to the nightly build. (I assume the nightly build is based on the dev branch, right?) The FontAwesome update is just a simple task, but a typo maybe could break the build... so I

Re: AW: [FlexJS]unit testing

2016-07-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 7/3/16, 11:09 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >I could imagine that it could be possible to write tests in selenium >webdriver as this can automate flash and JavaScript applications. But >that would be more down the path of frontend tes

AW: [FlexJS]unit testing

2016-07-03 Thread Christofer Dutz
I could imagine that it could be possible to write tests in selenium webdriver as this can automate flash and JavaScript applications. But that would be more down the path of frontend testing and not unit testing. Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. Ursprüngliche

Re: [FlexJS]unit testing

2016-07-03 Thread Harbs
What about Jasmine? Unfortunately I have very little experience with unit testing… On Jul 3, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > On 7/3/16, 2:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Besides the “manualtests” folder, t

Re: [FlexJS]unit testing

2016-07-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 7/3/16, 2:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Besides the “manualtests” folder, there’s not really much testing that I >can see. Is there an easy way to create unit tests that work on both the >Flash side and the JS side of things? In mustella/

[FlexJS]unit testing

2016-07-03 Thread Harbs
Besides the “manualtests” folder, there’s not really much testing that I can see. Is there an easy way to create unit tests that work on both the Flash side and the JS side of things?

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
> first time! > Thanks for that and for providing this cool node module!!! > That is great to hear. That is exactly the idea. Installing via the Apache Flex Installer seems like a cumbersome way to introduce newcomers to FlexJS. And managing projects using npm seems to be the in thing in the

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread OK
f there are no disadvantages with creating this html file) Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread OK
lexJS for the first time! Thanks for that and for providing this cool node module!!! Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51048.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread Josh Tynjala
if we can get this working. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Om > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this > > > > > simp

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
e a better > first > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS. > > +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file) > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
working. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Om > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > > > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this > > > > > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a > > better > > > > > first > > > > > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS. > > > > > > > > > > +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
kash Muppirala wrote > > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this > > > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a better > > > first > > > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS. > > > > >

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-06 Thread Josh Tynjala
nerate this > > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a better > > first > > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS. > > > > +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file) > > > > Thanks, > > Olaf > > &g

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ap.js? > I've tried to include it in a html file and call the start() function > ( "onLoad=start()" >) but nothing happens. > Not sure how to test this at this point. Once we resolve the discussion in that other thread, we should be able to make progress on this use case. Th

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-05 Thread OK
ative\USStat esMap\src\USStatesMap.as:133 Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant: SVGRect. var boundingRect:SVGRect = this.pathToAnimate.getBBox(); ^ -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Josh Tynjala
Judging by the package.json warning, it looks like you are installing it locally instead of globally. When you install locally, npm thinks that you're trying to add it as a dependency for a specific project, so it looks for a package.json file in the current directory. Executables won't be added

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
I looked it up. To clear cache you have to run "npm cache clear". I had to use sudo for all commands, and now it works! Way to go Om! -Alex On 1/4/16, 10:07 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: >I did not get any errors, but I did use sudo to do it. I confirmed by >trying asjsc again

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Matthias, Welcome to the community! I'm not sure we have anybody currently testing FlexJS with Linux. It would be great if you have the time to help out not only with finding problems but also proposing fixes for them. I don't have any experience with Linux so any help is much appreciated

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
Didn't notice that, but yes, it should be "Downloading Apache Flex Falcon Compiler" Also, for me on Mac in Terminal, the cursor position when asking for "y" or "n" in the license acceptance was in a funky place. I think it may be because the Terminal window was scrolling the output or was an

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Matthias Bode
Hello All , i am new to the Group ... and i just checked out the Linux version . the flexJS Stuff looks pretty awesome cool and neat you are gr8 are you testing on Linux ?? - or is the flexJS a Linux matter - no ?? Is there a TroubleShoot List/Rider where all the current Error´s

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Thanks, Om > > > 2016-01-04 20:59 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > > > Hi Matthias, > > > > Welcome to the community! > > > > I'm not sure we have anybody currently testing FlexJS with Linux. It > > would be great if you have th

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Harbs
Yes. That was the problem. Next issue: I tried installing this on a non-developement machine which apparently did not have Java installed. When trying to run asjsc, I get a warning that “No Java runtime preset”. Even after installing Java, I still get this error. Do I need to re-install

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Harbs
One comment: "Downloading Apache Falcon" is not correct. Falcon is a separate Apache project. It should be Apache Flex Falcon Compiler. I tried installing and it does not look like it worked for me. Here’s the output at the end of the install: request@2.67.0

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Carlos Rovira
sure we have anybody currently testing FlexJS with Linux. It > would be great if you have the time to help out not only with finding > problems but also proposing fixes for them. I don't have any experience > with Linux so any help is much appreciated. > > Please file bugs here: http:

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Harbs wrote: > Yes. That was the problem. > > Next issue: > > I tried installing this on a non-developement machine which apparently did > not have Java installed. When trying to run asjsc, I get a warning that “No > Java runtime preset”.

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Jan 4, 2016 11:30 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > > One comment: "Downloading Apache Falcon" is not correct. Falcon is a separate Apache project. It should be Apache Flex Falcon Compiler. > Good catch. I will fix that. > I tried installing and it does not look like it worked

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Harbs
Whoops. I installed JRE rather than JDK. Installing JDK now… On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:40 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Harbs wrote: > >> Yes. That was the problem. >> >> Next issue: >> >> I tried installing this

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Harbs
OK. That did it. I got the sample to compile. Amazing work! It would be cool if we could get the html file to be created as well. On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Harbs wrote: > Whoops. I installed JRE rather than JDK. > > Installing JDK now… > > On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:40

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Jan 4, 2016 10:02 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 1/4/16, 8:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > >Oh right, forgot about that. > > > >npm uninstall flexjs -g > > > >Then clear cache

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Matthias Bode <m...@mat3d.com> wrote: > Hello All , > > i am new to the Group ... and i just checked out the Linux version . > the flexJS Stuff looks pretty awesome cool and neat you are gr8 > are you testing on Linux ?? - or

[FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Hi folks, I now have the flexjs npm module working fine on Windows (Cygiwn) and Mac OSX. Once again, here are the steps to test: 1. If you don't have Node and/or npm installed, first install it - Windows: Use the Installer from https://nodejs.org. Ensure that you select the 'npm

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > If you want to compile FlexJS framework apps that also have an HTML file, > Om needs to expose the mxmlc compiler in js/bin too. asjsc is meant to be > integrated into a larger workflow where you use the generated JS

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Done! Added mxmlc support which correctly outputs the html files as well. (There is a bug in the mxmlc script that I had to fix, I will open a new thread about that) Try this to get mxmlc to work with npm: *npm uninstall flexjs -g* *npm uninstall flexjs* *npm cache clear* npm install -g

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
Sounds exciting. For those of us who have already tried this, what are the steps to uninstall so we know we are installing from a clean slate? Thanks, -Alex On 1/4/16, 1:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Hi

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Oh right, forgot about that. npm uninstall flexjs -g Then clear cache and install. Thanks, Om On Jan 4, 2016 7:44 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Sounds exciting. For those of us who have already tried this, what are > the steps to uninstall so we know we are installing from a

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Peter Ent
I tried this just now. Worked fine; no errors and it built the USStatesMap project. I also tried it out with the ChartExample and using an MXML file as the main project file; that works too. I think it has to generate or there has to be a companion tool to build the HTML files before it can be

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/4/16, 8:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Oh right, forgot about that. > >npm uninstall flexjs -g > >Then clear cache and install. Clear what cache and how? I just tried it and it didn't work for me.

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Peter Ent
I did not get any errors, but I did use sudo to do it. I confirmed by trying asjsc again which could not be found. ‹peter On 1/4/16, 1:02 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >On 1/4/16, 8:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" >

Re: [FlexJS] Need your help testing the flexjs npm module

2016-01-04 Thread Josh Tynjala
If you use js/bin/mxmlc instead of js/bin/asjsc, it will generate an HTML file. asjsc generates only JavaScript so that you can integrate it into your own custom HTML. - Josh On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Peter Ent wrote: > I tried this just now. Worked fine; no errors and it

AW: Query on FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
to answer questions, if I am having the impression the person asking didn't try answering them for himself before asking ... but nevertheless ... here goes: 1. Yes you can use it, depending on your definition of functional testing ... but is it ideal for this ... I'd say No 2. http

RE: Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-11 Thread Amritpal Singh
Justin Mclean Can you please share Contact details we need telephonic conversation to get more clarity on the same. Please reply ASAP. Queries: (1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing? Or just unit testing? (2)Will this work for Online Flex Based Applications? (3

RE: Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-11 Thread Amritpal Singh
-Original Message- From: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:31 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: AW: Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool And to add to that. Flexmojos produces normal surefire reports that look exactly

Query on FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-11 Thread Rajveer Singh - ERS, HCL Tech
Dear Flex Team, I want to know following question about the FlexUnit test automation tool. 1. Does Flexunit automation tool can be used for functional testing ? 2.What are the feature is available in Flexunit tool ,does it involve drag and drop feature for flex based application. 3.What

AW: Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-10 Thread Christofer Dutz
Automation Testing Tool Datum: Di., Juni 9, 2015 23:17 Hi, Just adding to Om’s answer. (1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing? Or just unit testing? Why it designed for unit tests it can be used for functional, integration or any other type of testing. There are however

Re: Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Just adding to Om’s answer. (1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing? Or just unit testing? Why it designed for unit tests it can be used for functional, integration or any other type of testing. There are however probably better tools for that. (3)What

Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool

2015-06-05 Thread Amritpal Singh
Hello Apache I Need support on Apache FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool. As we are planning to use it for one of our Flex based application. Before going forward I'm seeking for clarification on below queries. Queries: (1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing

[FalconJX] Testing the compiler with FlexJS targets

2015-05-26 Thread Michael Schmalle
Alex, you said that you run the compiler with Eclipse args to test output and be able to step through the code. Can you give me a couple of your example run configs/args? The best way for me to get back into the compiler and see what you are doing with the flexjs emitter is to step through and

Re: [FalconJX] Testing the compiler with FlexJS targets

2015-05-26 Thread Michael Schmalle
Thanks. OT Erik had committed a Eclipse formatter XML file for the Eclipse formatter, was that removed? I have been looking for it and can't find it. Mike On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 5/26/15, 2:14 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com

Re: [FalconJX] Testing the compiler with FlexJS targets

2015-05-26 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/26/15, 2:14 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: Alex, you said that you run the compiler with Eclipse args to test output and be able to step through the code. Can you give me a couple of your example run configs/args? Here are two of them. The first cross-compiles, the

Re: FlexUnit testing now built into the Flex SDK

2015-05-22 Thread Mihai Chira
Does anyone mind if I get the unit tests to start running as part of the checkintests target? On 10 December 2014 at 16:18, Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com wrote: On 10/12/14 14:21, Erik de Bruin wrote: [flexunit] Using the following settings for compilation: [flexunit] FLEX_HOME:

Re: [FlexJS] Testing current API and bugs

2015-05-14 Thread Alex Harui
Mike, That’s great that you can help out. Every little bit helps. On 5/14/15, 3:49 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: I will just ask this here but, how do you have your setup for testing the javascript compiler fixing? Say I find a bug, I know the problem is say

Re: [FlexJS] Testing current API and bugs

2015-05-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
I will just ask this here but, how do you have your setup for testing the javascript compiler fixing? Say I find a bug, I know the problem is say in an emitter, right now I am building from the nightly. Is there a streamlined way that I don't have to build the compiler but say run the main class

Re: [FlexJS] Testing current API and bugs

2015-05-14 Thread Alex Harui
automated testing. I’ve really bad about that though. Or post code and the error that might be the culprit. That’s also an option, especially if you just want some hints on how to fix it yourself. Remember, I am trying to remember all the apache protocol and stuff, so have patients with my

RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2015-01-08 Thread JanFW
in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-14-testing-is-easy-tp43472p44225.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Fwd: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-18 Thread Mihai Chira
(forwarding to dev) -- Forwarded message -- From: Mihai Chira mihai.ch...@gmail.com Date: 18 December 2014 at 11:17 Subject: Re: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy! To: us...@flex.apache.org FYI Yesterday I compiled TrafficLIVE (pretty big application; many sub-projects) against

Re: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Erik de Bruin
-Original Message- From: Neil Madsen [mailto:li...@cranialinteractive.com] Sent: December-15-14 8:44 PM To: 'dev@flex.apache.org' Cc: 'Justin Mclean' Subject: RE: [4.14] testing is easy! So what it looks like is happening is the XML file (apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml) that has

RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Devesh Mishra(NABFS00)
Subject: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy! For those who want to help out with testing Apache Flex 4.14. Respond to dev@flex.apache.org. Thanks, Om -- Forwarded message -- From: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Date: Dec 14, 2014 5:18 AM Subject: [4.14] testing is easy! To: dev

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Erik de Bruin
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 10:46 PM To: us...@flex.apache.org Subject: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy! For those who want to help out with testing Apache Flex 4.14. Respond to dev@flex.apache.org. Thanks, Om -- Forwarded message -- From: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Tom Chiverton
On 17/12/14 10:35, Devesh Mishra(NABFS00) wrote: What I am supposed to do in order to test Apache Flex 4.14 ? Kindly let me know. I install it, and then at least build, deploy to testing and debug our main applications. Where there are formal unit tests, run those against the new SDK. Tom

RE: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Neil Madsen
] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy! Neil, Awesome! Thanks for following through. So, all that is needed are changes to the installer config file(s) in the SDK? Have you been able to log into Git in order to commit your change(s)? EdB On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Neil Madsen

Re: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Erik de Bruin
So, all that is needed are changes to the installer config file(s) in the SDK? Yes, the only changes for the flex-sdk are in the 'apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml' file. All other changes are in the installer code. OK. I must have misunderstood something earlier in the thread(s). A

RE: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Neil Madsen
some extra logic added to the installer. Neil -Original Message- From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Sent: December-17-14 9:38 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Cc: li...@cranialinteractive.com Subject: Re: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy! So, all

Re: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-17 Thread Erik de Bruin
-- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy! So, all that is needed are changes to the installer config file(s) in the SDK? Yes, the only changes for the flex-sdk are in the 'apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml' file. All other changes are in the installer code. OK. I must have misunderstood something

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-16 Thread Mihai Chira
Just tried to install it, and after three attempts I still get The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files does not match the reference value. The file is invalid, installation is aborted. Aborting Installation The first two times I checked the log it was evident that the sdk had not

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-16 Thread Mihai Chira
Ok, now that worked (it's quite flaky though), but (three times now) failed to open OSMF after downloading it (I can confirm the file is there): ... Downloading OSMF2_0.swc?format=raw from: http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs Validating download:

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-16 Thread Mihai Chira
When I turn on verbose traces, it tells me this: check-sum: Validating download: C:\FlexSDK4.14/frameworks/libs/osmf.swc progress 266698 266698 put-in-cache: [copy] Copying 1 file to C:\Users\evolverine\Downloads\Flex Download

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-16 Thread Alex Harui
That’s correct, turn off download cache for now. Thanks for finding that. I’ve updated the installer.xml so it shouldn’t require turning off the download cache. Please test again with cache on after the next RC build. FWIW, I think we have to use format=raw otherwise you get HTML, not the raw

[INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-16 Thread Neil Madsen
Message- From: Neil Madsen [mailto:li...@cranialinteractive.com] Sent: December-15-14 8:44 PM To: 'dev@flex.apache.org' Cc: 'Justin Mclean' Subject: RE: [4.14] testing is easy! So what it looks like is happening is the XML file (apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml) that has the license info etc

Re: [4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-15 Thread Erik de Bruin
The 'nightly' RC binaries can be found here: http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ Thanks, EdB On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com wrote: Could you post the URL of the binary release files ?

[4.14] testing is easy!

2014-12-15 Thread Seth.
Thanks for information OM, Will test it with my applications

  1   2   3   >