Hi,
> This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix
> that ?
That commit wasn’t the issue it was the one after that. I’ve pushed a fix and
things should be back to normal.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix
> that ?
Odd that change is working fine locally and I can’t see how that would break
the build i.e. adding new target that isn’t used.
I’ll look into it.
Thanks,
Justin
This is one of the commit which causes build fail. What's the plan to fix
that ?
2017-12-30 7:26 GMT+01:00 <jmcl...@apache.org>:
> Repository: flex-sdk
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/develop eeb68fcc4 -> 35214ffd3
>
>
> testing if we can make a release build targe
On 12/27/16, 10:51 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote:
>Nice stuff, Chris.
>
>
>
>All the bugs in the framework seem to be about failing to override the
>clone() method in Event. If I understand correctly, this is mainly to
>preserve state in case an event is re-dispatched. Is
ahead and fix these bugs?
From: Christofer Dutz<mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 9:50 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)
Ok … stats are online:
Compiler: https://build
Thanks Chris for the effort on making this! :)
2016-12-27 20:50 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Ok … stats are online:
>
> Compiler: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/2461
> Typedefs: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20905
> Framework:
Ok … stats are online:
Compiler: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/2461
Typedefs: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20905
Framework: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20942
Happy reading,
Chris
Am 27.12.16, 09:02 schrieb "Alex Harui"
On 12/26/16, 11:50 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I suspect that a big chunk of the duplicate code is related to the Basic
>and HTML projects. As I understand it, HTML was forked from Basic to try a
>different architecture approach, but a big portion of the code is still
>the
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-
> available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
>
>
Thanks Chris. :) That's what I was intrested how much code duplication we
have. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57572.html
Sent
Looking forward to the results.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html
Sent from the Apache
Thank you. Looking forward to the results.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57566.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57566.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
amework?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57452.html
Sent from the Apac
run anlysis also for ActionScript part
of framework?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57452.ht
Hi Chris,
Do you think that would be possible run anlysis also for ActionScript part
of framework?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing
e.org/analysis/overview?id=2461
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Am 16.12.16, 11:48 schrieb "Christofer Dutz"
>><christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> even if not officially communicated (We’re still
ristofer Dutz"
>><christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> even if not officially communicated (We’re still beta-testing),
>>Gavin
>> recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be able
>>to
>> run the So
1
>
> Chris
>
> Am 16.12.16, 11:48 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>
> Hi,
>
> even if not officially communicated (We’re still beta-testing), Gavin
> recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be ab
lly communicated (We’re still beta-testing), Gavin
recently setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be able to run
the SonarQube analysis on the normal Jenkins build machine.
I am happy to announce that we now have publicly available SonarQube stats:
Feel fre
Hi,
even if not officially communicated (We’re still beta-testing), Gavin recently
setup a new SonarQube server and configured things to be able to run the
SonarQube analysis on the normal Jenkins build machine.
I am happy to announce that we now have publicly available SonarQube stats:
Feel
the links refers to FlexJS but I'd like to build the
>standard SDK to be able to test modifications.
>Before I'll waste to much time:
>Is the build process for the standard Flex SDK and FlexJS the same?
>
>Thanks,
>Olaf
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in c
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54622.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54621.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing
Wow, thanks for help Alex.
It encourages me to start with this stuff over the weekend.
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54615.html
Sen
Wow, thanks for help Alex.
It encourages me to start with this stuff over the weekend.
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Committing-to-the-dev-branch-without-testing-tp54606p54615.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list
On 8/25/16, 10:19 PM, "Krüger, Olaf" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>> I would much prefer that we figure out why you can't build the SDK and
>>update the wiki and other docs.
>Honestly the only reason is that I'm 'afraid' of the effort that's needed
>to build the SDK by myself.
>But
Thanks,
Olaf
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2016 07:08
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Committing to the dev branch without testing
On 8/25/16, 11:17 AM, "OK" <p...@olafkrueger.net> wrote:
>Hi,
>
if I just commit my changes to the development branch
without testing. I will test my changes as soon as they make it to the
nightly build. (I assume the nightly build is based on the dev branch,
right?)
The FontAwesome update is just a simple task, but a typo maybe could break
the build... so I
On 7/3/16, 11:09 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>I could imagine that it could be possible to write tests in selenium
>webdriver as this can automate flash and JavaScript applications. But
>that would be more down the path of frontend tes
I could imagine that it could be possible to write tests in selenium webdriver
as this can automate flash and JavaScript applications. But that would be more
down the path of frontend testing and not unit testing.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche
What about Jasmine? Unfortunately I have very little experience with unit
testing…
On Jul 3, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/3/16, 2:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Besides the “manualtests” folder, t
On 7/3/16, 2:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Besides the “manualtests” folder, there’s not really much testing that I
>can see. Is there an easy way to create unit tests that work on both the
>Flash side and the JS side of things?
In mustella/
Besides the “manualtests” folder, there’s not really much testing that I can
see. Is there an easy way to create unit tests that work on both the Flash side
and the JS side of things?
> first time!
> Thanks for that and for providing this cool node module!!!
>
That is great to hear. That is exactly the idea. Installing via the
Apache Flex Installer seems like a cumbersome way to introduce newcomers to
FlexJS. And managing projects using npm seems to be the in thing in the
f there are no disadvantages with creating this html file)
Thanks,
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lexJS for the
first time!
Thanks for that and for providing this cool node module!!!
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51048.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
if we can get this working.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote
> > > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this
> > > > > simp
e a better
> first
> > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS.
>
> +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file)
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
working.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Om
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote
> > > > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this
> > > > > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a
> > better
> > > > > first
> > > > > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Olaf
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html
> > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> > > Nabble.com.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
kash Muppirala wrote
> > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this
> > > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a better
> > > first
> > > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS.
> > >
> >
nerate this
> > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a better
> > first
> > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS.
> >
> > +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Olaf
> >
&g
ap.js?
> I've tried to include it in a html file and call the start() function
> ( "onLoad=start()" >) but nothing happens.
>
Not sure how to test this at this point. Once we resolve the discussion in
that other thread, we should be able to make progress on this use case.
Th
ative\USStat
esMap\src\USStatesMap.as:133
Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant: SVGRect.
var boundingRect:SVGRect =
this.pathToAnimate.getBBox();
^
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4
Judging by the package.json warning, it looks like you are installing it
locally instead of globally. When you install locally, npm thinks that
you're trying to add it as a dependency for a specific project, so it looks
for a package.json file in the current directory.
Executables won't be added
I looked it up. To clear cache you have to run "npm cache clear".
I had to use sudo for all commands, and now it works! Way to go Om!
-Alex
On 1/4/16, 10:07 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>I did not get any errors, but I did use sudo to do it. I confirmed by
>trying asjsc again
Hi Matthias,
Welcome to the community!
I'm not sure we have anybody currently testing FlexJS with Linux. It
would be great if you have the time to help out not only with finding
problems but also proposing fixes for them. I don't have any experience
with Linux so any help is much appreciated
Didn't notice that, but yes, it should be "Downloading Apache Flex Falcon
Compiler"
Also, for me on Mac in Terminal, the cursor position when asking for "y"
or "n" in the license acceptance was in a funky place. I think it may be
because the Terminal window was scrolling the output or was an
Hello All ,
i am new to the Group ... and i just checked out the Linux version .
the flexJS Stuff looks pretty awesome cool and neat you are gr8
are you testing on Linux ?? - or is the flexJS a Linux matter - no ??
Is there a TroubleShoot List/Rider where all the current Error´s
Thanks,
Om
>
>
> 2016-01-04 20:59 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>:
>
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > Welcome to the community!
> >
> > I'm not sure we have anybody currently testing FlexJS with Linux. It
> > would be great if you have th
Yes. That was the problem.
Next issue:
I tried installing this on a non-developement machine which apparently did not
have Java installed. When trying to run asjsc, I get a warning that “No Java
runtime preset”. Even after installing Java, I still get this error.
Do I need to re-install
One comment: "Downloading Apache Falcon" is not correct. Falcon is a separate
Apache project. It should be Apache Flex Falcon Compiler.
I tried installing and it does not look like it worked for me.
Here’s the output at the end of the install:
request@2.67.0
sure we have anybody currently testing FlexJS with Linux. It
> would be great if you have the time to help out not only with finding
> problems but also proposing fixes for them. I don't have any experience
> with Linux so any help is much appreciated.
>
> Please file bugs here: http:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Yes. That was the problem.
>
> Next issue:
>
> I tried installing this on a non-developement machine which apparently did
> not have Java installed. When trying to run asjsc, I get a warning that “No
> Java runtime preset”.
On Jan 4, 2016 11:30 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> One comment: "Downloading Apache Falcon" is not correct. Falcon is a
separate Apache project. It should be Apache Flex Falcon Compiler.
>
Good catch. I will fix that.
> I tried installing and it does not look like it worked
Whoops. I installed JRE rather than JDK.
Installing JDK now…
On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:40 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> Yes. That was the problem.
>>
>> Next issue:
>>
>> I tried installing this
OK. That did it.
I got the sample to compile.
Amazing work!
It would be cool if we could get the html file to be created as well.
On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Whoops. I installed JRE rather than JDK.
>
> Installing JDK now…
>
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:40
On Jan 4, 2016 10:02 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/4/16, 8:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >Oh right, forgot about that.
> >
> >npm uninstall flexjs -g
> >
> >Then clear cache
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Matthias Bode <m...@mat3d.com> wrote:
> Hello All ,
>
> i am new to the Group ... and i just checked out the Linux version .
> the flexJS Stuff looks pretty awesome cool and neat you are gr8
> are you testing on Linux ?? - or
Hi folks,
I now have the flexjs npm module working fine on Windows (Cygiwn) and Mac
OSX. Once again, here are the steps to test:
1. If you don't have Node and/or npm installed, first install it
- Windows: Use the Installer from https://nodejs.org. Ensure that
you select the 'npm
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> If you want to compile FlexJS framework apps that also have an HTML file,
> Om needs to expose the mxmlc compiler in js/bin too. asjsc is meant to be
> integrated into a larger workflow where you use the generated JS
Done! Added mxmlc support which correctly outputs the html files as well.
(There is a bug in the mxmlc script that I had to fix, I will open a new
thread about that)
Try this to get mxmlc to work with npm:
*npm uninstall flexjs -g*
*npm uninstall flexjs*
*npm cache clear*
npm install -g
Sounds exciting. For those of us who have already tried this, what are
the steps to uninstall so we know we are installing from a clean slate?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/4/16, 1:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Hi
Oh right, forgot about that.
npm uninstall flexjs -g
Then clear cache and install.
Thanks,
Om
On Jan 4, 2016 7:44 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> Sounds exciting. For those of us who have already tried this, what are
> the steps to uninstall so we know we are installing from a
I tried this just now. Worked fine; no errors and it built the USStatesMap
project. I also tried it out with the ChartExample and using an MXML file
as the main project file; that works too.
I think it has to generate or there has to be a companion tool to build
the HTML files before it can be
On 1/4/16, 8:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Oh right, forgot about that.
>
>npm uninstall flexjs -g
>
>Then clear cache and install.
Clear what cache and how? I just tried it and it didn't work for me.
I did not get any errors, but I did use sudo to do it. I confirmed by
trying asjsc again which could not be found.
‹peter
On 1/4/16, 1:02 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 1/4/16, 8:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>
If you use js/bin/mxmlc instead of js/bin/asjsc, it will generate an HTML
file. asjsc generates only JavaScript so that you can integrate it into
your own custom HTML.
- Josh
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
> I tried this just now. Worked fine; no errors and it
to answer questions, if I am having the impression the person
asking didn't try answering them for himself before asking ... but nevertheless
... here goes:
1. Yes you can use it, depending on your definition of functional testing ...
but is it ideal for this ... I'd say No
2. http
Justin Mclean
Can you please share Contact details we need telephonic conversation to get
more clarity on the same. Please reply ASAP.
Queries:
(1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing? Or just unit
testing?
(2)Will this work for Online Flex Based Applications?
(3
-Original Message-
From: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:31 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: AW: Regarding Apcahe FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool
And to add to that. Flexmojos produces normal surefire reports that look
exactly
Dear Flex Team,
I want to know following question about the FlexUnit test automation tool.
1. Does Flexunit automation tool can be used for functional testing ?
2.What are the feature is available in Flexunit tool ,does it involve drag and
drop feature for flex based application.
3.What
Automation Testing Tool
Datum: Di., Juni 9, 2015 23:17
Hi,
Just adding to Om’s answer.
(1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing? Or just unit
testing?
Why it designed for unit tests it can be used for functional, integration or
any other type of testing. There are however
Hi,
Just adding to Om’s answer.
(1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing? Or just unit
testing?
Why it designed for unit tests it can be used for functional, integration or
any other type of testing. There are however probably better tools for that.
(3)What
Hello Apache
I Need support on Apache FlexUnit Automation Testing Tool. As we are planning
to use it for one of our Flex based application. Before going forward I'm
seeking for clarification on below queries.
Queries:
(1)Does this tool provide support for all kind of testing
Alex, you said that you run the compiler with Eclipse args to test output
and be able to step through the code.
Can you give me a couple of your example run configs/args?
The best way for me to get back into the compiler and see what you are
doing with the flexjs emitter is to step through and
Thanks.
OT Erik had committed a Eclipse formatter XML file for the Eclipse
formatter, was that removed? I have been looking for it and can't find it.
Mike
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 5/26/15, 2:14 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com
On 5/26/15, 2:14 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex, you said that you run the compiler with Eclipse args to test output
and be able to step through the code.
Can you give me a couple of your example run configs/args?
Here are two of them. The first cross-compiles, the
Does anyone mind if I get the unit tests to start running as part of
the checkintests target?
On 10 December 2014 at 16:18, Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com wrote:
On 10/12/14 14:21, Erik de Bruin wrote:
[flexunit] Using the following settings for compilation:
[flexunit] FLEX_HOME:
Mike,
That’s great that you can help out. Every little bit helps.
On 5/14/15, 3:49 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote:
I will just ask this here but, how do you have your setup for testing the
javascript compiler fixing?
Say I find a bug, I know the problem is say
I will just ask this here but, how do you have your setup for testing the
javascript compiler fixing?
Say I find a bug, I know the problem is say in an emitter, right now I am
building from the nightly. Is there a streamlined way that I don't have to
build the compiler but say run the main class
automated testing. I’ve really bad about that though.
Or post code and the error that might be the culprit.
That’s also an option, especially if you just want some hints on how to
fix it yourself.
Remember, I am trying to remember all the apache protocol and stuff, so
have patients with my
in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-14-testing-is-easy-tp43472p44225.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(forwarding to dev)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mihai Chira mihai.ch...@gmail.com
Date: 18 December 2014 at 11:17
Subject: Re: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy!
To: us...@flex.apache.org
FYI Yesterday I compiled TrafficLIVE (pretty big application; many
sub-projects) against
-Original Message-
From: Neil Madsen [mailto:li...@cranialinteractive.com]
Sent: December-15-14 8:44 PM
To: 'dev@flex.apache.org'
Cc: 'Justin Mclean'
Subject: RE: [4.14] testing is easy!
So what it looks like is happening is the XML file
(apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml) that has
Subject: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy!
For those who want to help out with testing Apache Flex 4.14. Respond to
dev@flex.apache.org.
Thanks,
Om
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl
Date: Dec 14, 2014 5:18 AM
Subject: [4.14] testing is easy!
To: dev
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 10:46 PM
To: us...@flex.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: [4.14] testing is easy!
For those who want to help out with testing Apache Flex 4.14. Respond to
dev@flex.apache.org.
Thanks,
Om
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl
On 17/12/14 10:35, Devesh Mishra(NABFS00) wrote:
What I am supposed to do in order to test Apache Flex 4.14 ? Kindly let me know.
I install it, and then at least build, deploy to testing and debug our
main applications.
Where there are formal unit tests, run those against the new SDK.
Tom
] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is
easy!
Neil,
Awesome! Thanks for following through.
So, all that is needed are changes to the installer config file(s) in the
SDK?
Have you been able to log into Git in order to commit your change(s)?
EdB
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Neil Madsen
So, all that is needed are changes to the installer config file(s) in
the SDK?
Yes, the only changes for the flex-sdk are in the
'apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml' file. All other changes are in the
installer code.
OK. I must have misunderstood something earlier in the thread(s). A
some extra
logic added to the installer.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Sent: December-17-14 9:38 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: li...@cranialinteractive.com
Subject: Re: [INSTALLER] Update to options -- was RE: [4.14] testing is
easy!
So, all
-- was RE: [4.14] testing is
easy!
So, all that is needed are changes to the installer config file(s)
in
the SDK?
Yes, the only changes for the flex-sdk are in the
'apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml' file. All other changes are in
the installer code.
OK. I must have misunderstood something
Just tried to install it, and after three attempts I still get The
Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files does not match
the reference value. The file is invalid, installation is aborted.
Aborting Installation
The first two times I checked the log it was evident that the sdk had
not
Ok, now that worked (it's quite flaky though), but (three times now)
failed to open OSMF after downloading it (I can confirm the file is
there):
...
Downloading OSMF2_0.swc?format=raw from:
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs
Validating download:
When I turn on verbose traces, it tells me this:
check-sum:
Validating download: C:\FlexSDK4.14/frameworks/libs/osmf.swc
progress 266698 266698
put-in-cache:
[copy] Copying 1 file to C:\Users\evolverine\Downloads\Flex
Download
That’s correct, turn off download cache for now.
Thanks for finding that. I’ve updated the installer.xml so it shouldn’t
require turning off the download cache. Please test again with cache on
after the next RC build.
FWIW, I think we have to use format=raw otherwise you get HTML, not the
raw
Message-
From: Neil Madsen [mailto:li...@cranialinteractive.com]
Sent: December-15-14 8:44 PM
To: 'dev@flex.apache.org'
Cc: 'Justin Mclean'
Subject: RE: [4.14] testing is easy!
So what it looks like is happening is the XML file
(apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml) that has the license info etc
The 'nightly' RC binaries can be found here:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/
Thanks,
EdB
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com wrote:
Could you post the URL of the binary release files ?
Thanks for information OM, Will test it with my applications
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo