[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29712) The same batch task works fine in 1.15.2 and 1.16.0-rc1, but fails in 1.16.0-rc2

2022-10-20 Thread macdoor615 (Jira)
macdoor615 created FLINK-29712: -- Summary: The same batch task works fine in 1.15.2 and 1.16.0-rc1, but fails in 1.16.0-rc2 Key: FLINK-29712 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29712

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Yuan Mei
Thanks, Qingsheng for the kicking-off efforts. 1. January 17th, 2023 as feature freeze data sounds reasonable to me. 2. We will input our plan to the wiki link. Thanks Best Yuan Ververica (Alibaba) On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:38 AM Xingbo Huang wrote: > Thanks Qingsheng, Leonard and Martijn

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread godfrey he
+1 to make 1.16.0 released as soon as possible, it's been more than two months since feature freeze, 1.17 already starts kicking off. We can fix the critical bugs in 1.16.1. Best, Godfrey Xintong Song 于2022年10月21日周五 09:57写道: > > BTW, missing 1.16.0 is probably not that bad. From my experience,

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Xingbo Huang
Thanks Qingsheng, Leonard and Martijn for starting the discussion and volunteering. The timeline proposal sounds reasonable :+1: Best, Xingbo Jark Wu 于2022年10月21日周五 00:17写道: > Thanks for kicking off the 1.17 release. > > Targeting feature freeze on 1/17 for 1.17 release sounds pretty good to

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29711) Topic notification not present in metadata after 60000 ms.

2022-10-20 Thread Durgesh Mishra (Jira)
Durgesh Mishra created FLINK-29711: -- Summary: Topic notification not present in metadata after 6 ms. Key: FLINK-29711 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29711 Project: Flink

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing the minimal supported version of Hadoop to 2.10.2

2022-10-20 Thread Xintong Song
I believe there are some reflection based approaches in the `flink-yarn` module, for supporting outdated APIs in early Hadoop versions. I haven't done a thorough check, and these are what I get. - AMRMClientAsyncReflector - ApplicationSubmissionContextReflector - ContainerRequestReflector -

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-263: Improve resolving schema compatibility

2022-10-20 Thread godfrey he
Hi Hangxiang, Dawid, I also prefer to add method into TypeSerializerSnapshot, which looks more natural. TypeSerializerSnapshot has `Version` concept, which also can be used for compatibility. ` TypeSerializerSnapshot { TypeSerializerSchemaCompatibility resolveSchemaCompatibility(

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Xintong Song
BTW, missing 1.16.0 is probably not that bad. From my experience, the x.y.0 releases are usually considered unstable and are mainly for trying out purposes. Most users do not upgrade to the new version in production until the x.y.1/2 releases, which are considered more stable. As this bug-fix is

Re: [Discuss]- Donate Iceberg Flink Connector

2022-10-20 Thread Jark Wu
Hi Abid and all, I added the Iceberg dev community for a wider discussion. I agree with Yuxia and have the same concern as Steven Wu. There were long discussions around the externalizing connector and many different opinions. If I remember correctly[1][2], at last, we would like to externalize

Re: [DISCUSS] REST API to suspend & resume checkpointing

2022-10-20 Thread Saurabh Kaul
Hi, thanks for the quick responses, I think a stop-with-checkpoint idea is overlapping well with the requirements. 1. Stop with native savepoint does solve any races and produces a predictable restoration point, but producing a self-contained snapshot and using CLAIM mode in re-running is not

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Danny Cranmer
We had a similar situation for Flink 1.15.1 where a non-regression "critical" bug was impacting a connector [1]. We decided to not block the release to address this issue. Based on this, I am inclined to agree with Martijn and move forward with the release. This bug is not marked as a "blocker"

[DISCUSS] Create a dedicated aws-base connector repository

2022-10-20 Thread Danny Cranmer
Hello all, Currently we have 2 AWS Flink connectors in the main Flink codebase (Kinesis Data Streams and Kinesis Data Firehose) and one new externalized connector in progress (DynamoDB). Currently all three of these use common AWS utilities from the flink-connector-aws-base module. Common code

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29710) Upgrade the minimal supported hadoop version to 2.10.2

2022-10-20 Thread Martijn Visser (Jira)
Martijn Visser created FLINK-29710: -- Summary: Upgrade the minimal supported hadoop version to 2.10.2 Key: FLINK-29710 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29710 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29709) Bump Pulsar to 2.10.2

2022-10-20 Thread Yufan Sheng (Jira)
Yufan Sheng created FLINK-29709: --- Summary: Bump Pulsar to 2.10.2 Key: FLINK-29709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29709 Project: Flink Issue Type: Technical Debt

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29708) Enrich Flink Kubernetes Operator CRD error field

2022-10-20 Thread Daren Wong (Jira)
Daren Wong created FLINK-29708: -- Summary: Enrich Flink Kubernetes Operator CRD error field Key: FLINK-29708 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29708 Project: Flink Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Externalized connector release details​

2022-10-20 Thread Steven Wu
Chesnay, thanks for the write-up. very helpful! Regarding the parent pom, I am wondering if it can be published to the `org.apache.flink` group? io.github.zentol.flink flink-connector-parent 1.0 On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:52 AM Chesnay Schepler wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Jark Wu
Thanks for kicking off the 1.17 release. Targeting feature freeze on 1/17 for 1.17 release sounds pretty good to me. +1 for the volunteers as release managers. Best, Jark Ververica (Alibaba) On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 18:09, Matthias Pohl wrote: > Thanks for starting the discussion about Flink

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Martijn Visser
Taking in this fix would require us to cancel RC2 and create another release candidate. We are already long-overdue on the Flink 1.16 release. Given that 1.15.3 is not yet released, it can't be a regression compared to the current situation of 1.15.2. The Flink Delta connector is not part of the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Chmielewski
Thank you all for response, however i think you may miss a bigger context regarding those 3 tickets. Those 3 tickets [29509, 29512, 29627] are part of a bigger thing. They are fixing 1.15 Sink V2 issue, where Task manager will not start after recovery for Sink topology with Global Committer. The

Re: [Discuss]- Donate Iceberg Flink Connector

2022-10-20 Thread Jing Ge
I agree with Steven Wu that those points are applicable to every externalized connector. So those were actually concerns about externalizing connector development and there were already some discussions and consensus has already been made to do it. Speaking of the 3x3 concern, I think the

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29707) Fix possible comparator violation for "flink list"

2022-10-20 Thread Ferenc Csaky (Jira)
Ferenc Csaky created FLINK-29707: Summary: Fix possible comparator violation for "flink list" Key: FLINK-29707 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29707 Project: Flink Issue

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29706) Remove japicmp dependency bumps

2022-10-20 Thread Chesnay Schepler (Jira)
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-29706: Summary: Remove japicmp dependency bumps Key: FLINK-29706 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29706 Project: Flink Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Xingbo Huang
Hi Krzysztof, When I was building rc2, I tried to search whether issues with `fix version` of 1.16.0 have not been closed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29627 was missed because the `fix version` was not marked. I agree with Martijn and Xintong that we won't block 1.16.0 on this.

Re: [Discuss]- Donate Iceberg Flink Connector

2022-10-20 Thread Steven Wu
Yuxia, those are valid points. But they are applicable to every connector (not just Iceberg). I also had a similar concern expressed in the discussion thread of "Externalized connector release details". My main concern is the multiplication factor of two upstream projects (Flink &

Re: [Discuss]- Donate Iceberg Flink Connector

2022-10-20 Thread yuxia
Hi, abmo, Abid! Thanks you guys for diriving it. As Iceberg is more and more pupular and is an important upstream/downstream system to Flink, I believe Flink community has paid much attention to Icberg and hope to be closer to Icberg community. No mather it's moved to Flink unbrella or not, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing the minimal supported version of Hadoop to 2.10.2

2022-10-20 Thread Yang Wang
Given that we do not bundle any hadoop classes in the Flink binary, do you mean simply bump the hadoop version in the parent pom? If it is, why do not we use the latest stable hadoop version 3.3.4? It seems that our cron build has verified that hadoop3 could work. Best, Yang David Morávek

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29705) Document the least access with RBAC setting for native K8s integration

2022-10-20 Thread Yang Wang (Jira)
Yang Wang created FLINK-29705: - Summary: Document the least access with RBAC setting for native K8s integration Key: FLINK-29705 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29705 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29704) E2E test for delegation token framework

2022-10-20 Thread Jira
Márton Balassi created FLINK-29704: -- Summary: E2E test for delegation token framework Key: FLINK-29704 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29704 Project: Flink Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TypeSerializerConfigSnapshot and savepoint support from Flink versions < 1.8.0

2022-10-20 Thread Chesnay Schepler
+1 Sounds like a good reason to drop these long-deprecated APIs. On 19/10/2022 15:13, Piotr Nowojski wrote: Hi devs, I would like to open a discussion to remove the long deprecated (@PublicEvolving) TypeSerializerConfigSnapshot class [1] and the related code. The motivation behind this move

Re: [DISCUSS] REST API to suspend & resume checkpointing

2022-10-20 Thread Piotr Nowojski
Hi Saurabh, Thanks for reaching out with the proposal. I have some mixed feelings about this for a couple of reasons: 1. It sounds like the core problem that you are describing is the race condition between shutting down the cluster and completion of new checkpoints. My first thought would be as

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Xintong Song
Hi Krzysztof, FLINK-29627 is merged after rc2 being created, that's why it doesn't appear in the change list. See the commit history of rc2 [1]. It's unfortunate this fix didn't make the 1.16.0 release (if rc2 is approved). However, I agree with Martijn that we should not further block 1.16.0 on

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29703) Fail to call unix_timestamp in runtime in Hive dialect

2022-10-20 Thread luoyuxia (Jira)
luoyuxia created FLINK-29703: Summary: Fail to call unix_timestamp in runtime in Hive dialect Key: FLINK-29703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29703 Project: Flink Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Chmielewski
Thanks Martijn, just to clarify from my end, All three tickets, [1] [2] [3] are fixed and merged to 1.16 branch already. I just noticed that one of them [3] is not on included in the change list. Hence my email. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29509 [2]

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Matthias Pohl
Thanks for starting the discussion about Flink 1.17. I would be interested in helping out around the release as well. Best, Matthias On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:07 PM Xintong Song wrote: > Thanks for kicking this off. > > +1 for the proposed timeline. > > Also +1 for Qingsheng, Leonard and

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Xintong Song
Thanks for kicking this off. +1 for the proposed timeline. Also +1 for Qingsheng, Leonard and Martijn as the release managers. Thanks for volunteering. Best, Xintong On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:59 PM Martijn Visser wrote: > Hi Qingsheng, > > I'm definitely interested in participating as a

Re: [DISCUSS] REST API to suspend & resume checkpointing

2022-10-20 Thread Jing Ge
Hi Saurabh, In general, it is always good to add new features. I am not really sure if I understood your requirement. I guess it will be too long for you to resume the job with a created savepoint in the new stand-by Flink cluster. But if it would be acceptable to you, you should not have the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Krzysztof, Given that this issue already exists in previous Flink versions, I don't think it's a blocker for 1.16. We should get it fixed (all of the tickets) so it will be addressed in a new Flink 1.15 version, in Flink 1.16.1 and of course Flink 1.17. Best regards, Martijn On Thu, Oct 20,

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Krzysztof Chmielewski
Hi, I would like to ask about [1] ticket with PR [2]. It was merged to 1.16 release branch today but I do not see it on the change list. It is closely related to [3] and [4] that are on the change list. However to fully fix Sink architecture issue we need all 3 tickets [1], [3] and [4] [1]

[VOTE] Release 1.16.0, release candidate #2

2022-10-20 Thread Xingbo Huang
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.16.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TypeSerializerConfigSnapshot and savepoint support from Flink versions < 1.8.0

2022-10-20 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
+1, I think that is a sensible think to do. I don't think this will affect many users as those versions are already quite old. As a side note, there is a different effort around serializers that might introduce another incompatibility (in the API). I wonder if we could squash it together

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-263: Improve resolving schema compatibility

2022-10-20 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
That's the final status we will arrive at. IIUC, we cannot just remove the original method but just mark it as deprecated so two methods have to exist together in the short term. Users may also need to migrate their own external serializers which is a long run. I'd like to

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29702) Add merge tree reader and writer micro benchmarks

2022-10-20 Thread Shammon (Jira)
Shammon created FLINK-29702: --- Summary: Add merge tree reader and writer micro benchmarks Key: FLINK-29702 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29702 Project: Flink Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29701) Refactor flink-table-store-benchmark and create micro benchmarks module

2022-10-20 Thread Shammon (Jira)
Shammon created FLINK-29701: --- Summary: Refactor flink-table-store-benchmark and create micro benchmarks module Key: FLINK-29701 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29701 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29700) Serializer to BinaryInMemorySortBuffer is wrong

2022-10-20 Thread Jingsong Lee (Jira)
Jingsong Lee created FLINK-29700: Summary: Serializer to BinaryInMemorySortBuffer is wrong Key: FLINK-29700 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29700 Project: Flink Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Qingsheng, I'm definitely interested in participating as a release manager again. Best regards, Martijn On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:47 AM Qingsheng Ren wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As we are approaching the official release of Flink 1.16, it’s a good time > to kick off some discussions and

[DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.17

2022-10-20 Thread Qingsheng Ren
Hi everyone, As we are approaching the official release of Flink 1.16, it’s a good time to kick off some discussions and march toward 1.17. - Release managers Leonard Xu and I would like to volunteer as release managers for 1.17, and it would be great to have someone else working together on

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-29699) Debezium format parsing supports converting strings and numbers with Z at the end to timestamp

2022-10-20 Thread waywtdcc (Jira)
waywtdcc created FLINK-29699: Summary: Debezium format parsing supports converting strings and numbers with Z at the end to timestamp Key: FLINK-29699 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29699