Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.33

+1 Thanks Daniel ! Le 09/05/2024 à 01:36, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Hi all, Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.33! Release Notes: https://freemarker.apache.org/builds/2.3.33-voting/_html/versions_2_3_33.html Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long time, always

Re: 2.3.33 pre-vote testing

use config.setTemplateLoader(new freemarker.ext.jakarta.servlet.WebappTemplateLoader(...)) though). On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:03 AM Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, It seems we found an issue that could be related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-218 It's at bottom of https

Re: 2.3.33 pre-vote testing

Hi, It seems we found an issue that could be related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-218 It's at bottom of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935 TIA Jacques Le 12/03/2024 à 11:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Daniel, We have started testing with https

Re: 2.3.33 pre-vote testing

Hi Daniel, We have started testing with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12934. For now we only crossed things to change in OFBiz that makes sense. We will let you informed in case we cross real issues. Thanks Jacques Le 12/03/2024 à 01:18, Daniel Dekany a écrit : By the way...

Re: Dropping support for vintage Servlet and JSP versions with next release?

Le 21/12/2023 à 19:02, Daniel Dekany a écrit : I propose increasing the lowest supported Serlvet/JSP versions to 3.0/2.2, starting with the next release (FreeMarker 2.3.33). From Tomcat perspective, that's Tomcat 7 (2011-01-14, EOL since 2021-03-31). This will simplify the source code and the

Re: Long-Awaited FreeMarker 3 Preview Available

Thanks Jonathan for all the details. I'll have a deeper look... Jacques Le 12/11/2023 à 22:03, Jonathan Revusky a écrit : On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 8:02 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Hi Jonathan, Salut, Jacques. What about existing projects using the

Re: Long-Awaited FreeMarker 3 Preview Available

Hi Jonathan, What about existing projects using the Apache version ? I mean the move from 2.3 version to 2.4. Like: 1. Would it be an easy move? 2. What does it brings? 3. What are the pros and cons of each version? 4. etc. I guess that's not easy questions to answer to (4 being somehow a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.32

Le 06/01/2023 à 20:29, Daniel Dekany a écrit : The artifacts to be voted upon are located here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/freemarker/engine/2.3.32/source/ where the source release artifacts are: - Normal (non-gae) variant: apache-freemarker-2.3.32-src.tar.gz - "gae" variant:

Re: [GitHub] [freemarker-docgen] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #2: Bump minimist from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6 in /freemarker-docgen-core

Thanks for the info Daniel, I'll close the PR with a reference to this convo. Le 21/05/2022 à 10:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : It wasn't merged as the file it tries to fix is actually generated. It's package.json that should be updated, but minimist is only a transitive dependency there, and I

Re: [GitHub] [freemarker-docgen] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #2: Bump minimist from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6 in /freemarker-docgen-core

Hi, Is there a reason why this PR has not been pushed? TIA Jacques Le 13/04/2022 à 07:15, GitBox a écrit : dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/freemarker-docgen/pull/2 Bumps [minimist](https://github.com/substack/minimist) from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6.

Re: November board report draft

+1 Jacques Le 10/11/2021 à 11:38, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Here it is - pretty standard stuff mostly: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Board+report+draft+-+November+2021 Any comments? This will be submitted today.

Re: August board report draft

Thanks Daniel, Looks good to me, +1 to submit Jacques Le 11/08/2021 à 08:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Hi, This below is what I plan to submit today. The usual template, without any additions this time. Any additions from someone?

Re: May board repot draft (due today)

Sounds good to me too, thanks Daniel! Le 12/05/2021 à 09:33, Woonsan Ko a écrit : Looks good to me, too! Thank you very much! Woonsan On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 4:26 PM Jacopo Cappellato wrote: it looks good to me, thank you! Jacopo On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 8:09 AM Daniel Dekany wrote:

Re: Suggestion: Discourse Forum for Freemarker?

Le 18/03/2021 à 21:55, Christoph Rüger a écrit : On 2021/03/07 06:48:56, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks and sorry for the late reply. Not sure personally if I like the Slack idea here. Since Slack chat is by nature supposed to be more real-time I imagine it makes sense if you have a larger

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.31

+1 (binding) Tested in OFBiz trunk HEAD, UI and console OK. I even spotted an old small issue in log that did not show before :) Jacques Le 13/02/2021 à 12:31, Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : +1 (non-binding) Tested with freemarker-generator Thanks in advance, Siegfried Goeschl On

Re: Board report draft for November 11

+1 Jacques Le 11/11/2020 à 14:21, Woonsan Ko a écrit : Hi Daniel, Looks good! Thank you so much! Kind regards, Woonsan On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:50 PM Daniel Dekany wrote: Hi, At least if you are in the PMC, please check below draft, and recommend anything that comes into mind:

Re: August 2020 Board report draft

+1 Jacques Le 11/08/2020 à 19:25, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Please find the board report draft here (will be submitted tomorrow), and comment if anything is missing or incorrect: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Board+report+draft+-+August+2020 Thanks!

Re: FreeMarker generator release preparations

Hi Daniel, I may help, though it seems you already done most of it. What help would you expect now? Thanks for all the good work! Jacques Le 26/07/2020 à 01:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : I said I will help in the Apache release process, so only focusing on that, so some points: - We are

Re: Use TemplateClassResolver.SAFER_RESOLVER by default

p_faq.html#faq_template_uploading_security, then a template author with some persistence and skill will manage to breach you anyway. On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 8:41 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Hi, After reading https://ackcent.com/blog/in-depth-freemarker-template-injection/ I wo

Use TemplateClassResolver.SAFER_RESOLVER by default

Hi, After reading https://ackcent.com/blog/in-depth-freemarker-template-injection/ I wonder why we have not TemplateClassResolver.SAFER_RESOLVER[1] used by default, like there is:     The api_builtin_enabled configuration setting must be set to true. Its default is false (at least as of

Re: Please review May board report draft

+1 Jacques Le 08/05/2020 à 20:13, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Here it is: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Board+report+draft+-+May+2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.30

+1 (binding) Works for me in UI and with integration tests Jacques Le 28/02/2020 à 23:53, David E Jones a écrit : Sorry for the delay, finally tested the binary release preview build with the main test suite I have available in Moqui. Looks good. +1 (binding) -David On Wed, Feb 26, 2020

Re: new committer: Siegfried Goeschl

Welcome Siegfried Jacques Le 07/01/2020 à 20:22, Woonsan Ko a écrit : Welcome aboard, Siegfried! Cheers, Woonsan On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:52 PM Daniel Dekany wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache FreeMarker has invited Siegfried Goeschl to become a committer, and we are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.29

+1 (binding) Using temporarily (more for my own reminder) Index: build.gradle === --- build.gradle(revision 1865342) +++ build.gradle(working copy) @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ repositories{ jcenter()

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.29

Hi Daniel, Doing so... Jacques Le 16/08/2019 à 09:37, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Thank you for the votes so far! With my vote we will have the required 3 PMC votes, so no problem there, but if anyone else intends to test the release, please indicate it. Like, if OFBiz test suite tests lot of

Re: Board report draft for May 2019

+1 Jacques Le 09/05/2019 à 12:26, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : Hi all, please review the draft of the report that is now due: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Board+report+draft+-+May+2019 If there are no objections I am going to submit it today. Thanks, Jacopo

Re: Opinions about the new ?truncate built-in?

://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#deploy-snapshot Saturday, March 2, 2019, 12:13:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Daniel, I tried to test this morning using OFBiz, but I have not much time and freemarker:2.3.29 is not available in Maven (we use Jcenter in our Gradle build, but I have a local

Re: Opinions about the new ?truncate built-in?

Thanks Woonsan, I'll do that :) Jacques Le 04/03/2019 à 06:20, Woonsan Ko a écrit : On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 6:15 AM Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Daniel, I tried to test this morning using OFBiz, but I have not much time and freemarker:2.3.29 is not available in Maven (we use Jcenter in our

Re: Opinions about the new ?truncate built-in?

Hi Daniel, I tried to test this morning using OFBiz, but I have not much time and freemarker:2.3.29 is not available in Maven (we use Jcenter in our Gradle build, but I have a local m2 repository too) https://maven-repository.com/artifact/org.freemarker/freemarker So I'll wait its release to

Re: Review Board Report draft for the last 3 months

Thanks Daniel Looks good to me Jacques Le 11/02/2019 à 08:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Dear PMC members, and all, Here's the draft of our PMC report, which I will submit at 2019-02-13: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Board+report+draft Please review it, and add to if

Re: [VOTE] Move Git repos from git-wip to gitbox

I agree, it's soon mandatory anyway +1 Jacques Le 18/12/2018 à 05:28, David E Jones a écrit : Seems odd to require a consensus vote if it is mandatory in a couple of months but sure, agreed. +1 -David On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:02 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: We should move the FreeMarker

Re: Review Board Report draft for the last 3 months

Sounds good to me, thanks Daniel and David Jacques Le 11/11/2018 à 08:42, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Saturday, November 10, 2018, 10:45:18 PM, David E Jones wrote: This looks good Daniel, thank you. The only thought I had while reading it was related to the Oath contribution, might be good to

Re: [DISCUSS] Estabilish the "FreeMarker Generator" product

+1 I second Woonsan Le 11/09/2018 à 14:41, Woonsan Ko a écrit : +1 The plan also seems good to me! Cheers, Woonsan On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:33 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: Dear PMC members, It would be good to hear the voice of more of you. Even if it's just "I agree", please respond, so we

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le 12/06/2018 à 21:43, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Tuesday, June 12, 2018, 7:48:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: [snip] OK thanks, indeed sudo curl -X POST http://localhost:8081/tasks/reload-ssl works :) All is ready and working manually. I will just check the /var/log/fmonlinetester/letsencrypt.log

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Error 405 Method Not Allowed HTTP ERROR 405 Problem accessing /tasks/reload-ssl. Reason:     Method Not Allowed Jacques Le 09/06/2018 à 14:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Yes, I'll take care of that Thanks for the reminder :) Jacques Le 09/06/2018 à 11:26, Daniel Dekany a écrit : You have

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le 19/05/2018 à 12:04, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Saturday, May 19, 2018, 11:53:04 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Ah, not a big deal, but should we not restrict read (640) on /opt/fmonlinetester/etc/freemarker-online.yml ? It contains the cert secret key... Sure, go ahead. Done, I have also

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le 19/05/2018 à 14:16, Daniel Dekany a écrit : I thinkhttps://svn.apache.org/repos/private/pmc/freemarker better fits for all private things For instance the cron job copy and all the rest. And simply refer to private things from the wiki For try.freemarker these security things doesn't

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

nd only the cron job and documenting things on the cwiki is missing (the copy-paste cron script mostly, I guess). Thursday, May 17, 2018, 7:47:20 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: Thursday, May 17, 2018, 3:05:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Le 17/05/2018 à 09:04, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 16/05/2018 à 22

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le 17/05/2018 à 09:04, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 16/05/2018 à 22:26, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : When I read the content in my local Git repo it's commented out. I guess I should manually change it on the VM and restart the app with Gradle? As it's a bit late already, I let you handle

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le 16/05/2018 à 22:26, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : When I read the content in my local Git repo it's commented out. I guess I should manually change it on the VM and restart the app with Gradle? As it's a bit late already, I let you handle this last part ;) OK I remember now that you documented

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le Roux a écrit : Le 16/05/2018 à 21:54, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 15/05/2018 à 21:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : It's going to be something like    certbot certonly --webroot -w /opt/fmonlinetester/var/letsencrypt-acme-challenge Almost, we just needed to add the domains (else it asks for one

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Le 15/05/2018 à 21:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : And, don't install httpd now suddenly... that part of the problem is solved, we don't need it. It's going to be something like Actually HTTPD is installed by default on all ASF VMs (no surprise, it's initially the HTTPD foundation after all ;)) I

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

It's OK now with Chris Lambertus's help I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16498 to continue Jacques Le 06/05/2018 à 09:10, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks Just tried, did not work, not sure why Le 05/05/2018 à 19:05, Daniel Dekany a écrit : I'm a sudoer, so I can add

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

Thanks Just tried, did not work, not sure why Le 05/05/2018 à 19:05, Daniel Dekany a écrit : I'm a sudoer, so I can add you. Try now! Saturday, May 5, 2018, 3:07:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Daniel, I did not, but actually as I'm not in the sudoers it does not help: otp-md5 499

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

I asked for sudo: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15775 Jacques Le 01/05/2018 à 14:50, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Daniel, Yes completely forgot about that. I just checked and I have access to the VM. Since we need to do it ourselves, I'll have a look, hopefully this week (very

Re: try.freemarker.apache.org instead of try.freemarker.org?

it? Monday, January 8, 2018, 11:04:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Daniel, That's a good news. I did not want to get further with try.freemarker.org waiting for this to happen. Once LetsEncrypt setting is done a redirection should be enough Jacques Le 08/01/2018 à 09:47, Daniel Dekany a écrit

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28 released

Excellent, thanks guys for your work! Jacques Le 05/04/2018 à 15:22, Woonsan Ko a écrit : Great news! Congrats! Woonsan On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: kudos!!! Jacopo On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Dekany

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

E' On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: Jacques, tomorrow I will send you the patch. Jacopo Il Sab 31 Mar 2018, 20:13 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> ha scritto: Le 31/03/2018 à 19:42, Daniel Dekany a écr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

exist. -David On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: Jacques, tomorrow I will send you the patch. Jacopo Il Sab 31 Mar 2018, 20:13 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> ha scritto: Le 31/03/2018 à 19:42, Daniel Dekany a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Le 31/03/2018 à 22:42, Daniel Dekany a écrit : We are talking about two different things. The material linked by Jacopo talks about the checksums used on dist.apache.org (like https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/freemarker/engine/2.3.28/source/), not about the Maven repositories. Also, as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Le 31/03/2018 à 19:42, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Saturday, March 31, 2018, 5:44:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: +1 (binding) Sha1 and MD5 on freemarker-2.3.28.jar OK. I think we should drop sha1 with md5 and provide sha256 at least. For now it's OK with sha1 as Jacopo's link at [1] says

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

+1 (binding) Sha1 and MD5 on freemarker-2.3.28.jar OK. I think we should drop sha1 with md5 and provide sha256 at least. For now it's OK with sha1 as Jacopo's link at [1] says. OFBiz trunk HEAD with freemarker-2.3.28 works well (for myself to remember: putting  pom+jar in my local maven repo