Re: Apache Geode + Narayana JTA = Global Transactions with Last-Resource Optimization

Awesome! -Dan On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Christian Tzolov wrote: > Recent experience of setting up Geode as a last-resource inside WebSphere > JTA, has motivated me to find a simpler way to integrate with JTA. > > The https://github.com/tzolov/narayana-jta-geode-support provides > utilitie

Re: Review Request 60570: GEODE-3153 Client receives duplicate events during rolling upgrade

> On July 3, 2017, 4:02 p.m., Dan Smith wrote: > > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java > > Lines 129 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60570/diff/3/?file=1767956#file1767956line129> &

Re: Question regarding node failure scenario

How are you performing the updates? Is N1 directly making updates or are they coming from some other source? What is the subscription-redundancy of your client that has registered continuous queries? -Dan On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Roi Apelker wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following scenari

Re: Review Request 60570: GEODE-3153 Client receives duplicate events during rolling upgrade

views.apache.org/r/60570/#comment254261> Is this not just targetVersion.equals(GFE_90) ? - Dan Smith On June 30, 2017, 11:17 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

WFH Today (7/3)

I'll be working from home today. -Dan

Re: Review Request 60570: GEODE-3153 Client receives duplicate events during rolling upgrade

hat version the membershipID bytes were serialized with. We're just deserializing them with the version of the TARGET and hoping that this will preserve information if the membershipID was serialized with 1.0, and not fail if the membershipID was serialized with 1.2. - Dan Smith On Jun

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #879

Looks like this build hung in PersistentPartitionedRegionDUnitTest. Here are the last lines in https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-nightly/879/artifact/geode-core/build/distributedTest/distributedTest-progress.txt : 2017-06-27 09:13:00.547 + Completed test org.apache.geode.internal.cache.parti

Re: [DISCUSS] Discussions of API changes missing or lost in noise

> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14266 > > > > > > Anthony > > > >> On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> > >> Hi devs, > >> > >> This is similar to the discussion John started about keeping trac

Re: [DISCUSS] Using Pull Requests over Review Board

+1 to just using PRs. I think the benefits to new people to the project make it worth it to switch. New people will see PRs from committers when they are creating their PRs, which will help provide good examples. It's one less system to sign up on as a contributor so it's easier for new people to

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #857

This CommandOverHttpDUnitTest seems to be failing pretty consistently in jenkins. Is anyone looking into this failure? -Dan On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See > > -

Re: Requesting permission to edit the wiki

Hi Ken, Karma bestowed! -Dan On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Kenneth Howe wrote: > Could I get karma to edit the wiki? > > Thanks, > Ken >

[DISCUSS] Discussions of API changes missing or lost in noise

Hi devs, This is similar to the discussion John started about keeping track of changes to geode. I'm seeing some changes happening to the public API that I feel like maybe should have a more visible discussion. For example GEODE-2892 (Region.sizeOnServer) or GEODE-3005 (new API for partitioning).

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2975) Attributes are not validated in lucene xml configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2975. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Dan Smith > Attributes are not validated in lucene xml configurat

What to do with the geode-spark-connector

Our geode-spark-connector needs some work. It's currently building against geode 1.0.0-incubating, because it has it's own separate build process. It's also somewhat out of date, we're building against spark 1.3. Is anyone actually using the spark connector? I think we need to get the spark connec

[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-2975) Attributes are not validated in lucene xml configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021949#comment-16021949 ] Dan Smith commented on GEODE-2975: -- I did a quick experiment. It looks like we woul

Re: Requesting Permisions

Hi David, I added you; you should have permission now. Thanks! -Dan On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:10 AM, David Anuta wrote: > Hi my name is David Anuta. My Geode username is DivineEnder. I would like > permission to contribute to the Geode project by assigning myself to an > issue. > > -- > David

Re: Problems in the gradle idea generated project

I don't think you actually need to use the gradle idea plugin - I think that's less up to date than the intellij's support for gradle. Just import the project as a gradle project in intellij. -Dan On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > If I use the idea plugin to generate an Intell

Re: Use InternalCache instead of GemFireCacheImpl

+googol - you're awesome Kirk, thanks for taking this on! -Dan On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > I just merged in a big refactoring which changes classes that were using > GemFireCacheImpl to using InternalCache. > > InternalCache is an interface representing the internal view

Review Request 59251: LuceneClientSecurityDUnitTest was not testing anything

/r/59251/diff/1/ Testing --- Thanks, Dan Smith

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-11) Lucene Integration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-11. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 This feature will be marked as non experimental in geode 1.2

[jira] [Closed] (GEODE-150) Implementing user defined aggregate functions in OQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith closed GEODE-150. --- > Implementing user defined aggregate functions in

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-150) Implementing user defined aggregate functions in OQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-150. - Resolution: Duplicate > Implementing user defined aggregate functions in

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-2246) Invalid class cast in function execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-2246: Assignee: (was: Michael Dodge) > Invalid class cast in function execut

Re: Review Request 59181: write a dunit test to prove soundex analyzer is easy to apply

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59181/#review174670 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dan Smith On May 11, 2017, 4:15 p.m

Re: JIRA assignment privileges.

Hi Prasad, I've given you permissions, so you should have access now. Just reply to the list if you have any issues. Thanks for contributing! -Dan On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Prasad Indulkar wrote: > Hi , > > I am working on GEODE-2866 . Please assign me permissions on JIRA so that I > can

Re: ASF Board Report for Geode - Initial Reminder for May 2017

+1 - Thanks for taking this on Anthony! -Dan On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > Here’s a rough draft, please review and comment: > > (@Mark, I noticed that issues@geode has 0 emails. Is that a > configuration issue?) > > ## Description: > - Apache Geode provides a databa

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2889) Generic session module should touch sessions rather than recreate the native session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2889. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Dan Smith Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > Generic session mod

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2901) Add more tests of http session replication module

Dan Smith created GEODE-2901: Summary: Add more tests of http session replication module Key: GEODE-2901 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2901 Project: Geode Issue Type

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-1728) SessionCachingFilter can create multiple sessions when requests are forwarded

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-1728. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > SessionCachingFilter can create multiple sessions w

Re: Review Request 59040: when advisor cannot found target nodes for bucket id, should double check if the member is offline

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59040/#review174195 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dan Smith On May 7, 2017, 5:47 p.m

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2889) Generic session module should touch sessions rather than recreate the native session

Dan Smith created GEODE-2889: Summary: Generic session module should touch sessions rather than recreate the native session Key: GEODE-2889 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2889 Project

Re: Development Help!

Hi Aashita, The mailing lists are self service, please send an email to user-subscr...@geode.apache.org. http://geode.apache.org/community/#mailing-lists -Dan On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Aashita Sharma < aashitasha...@yahoo.co.in.invalid> wrote: > Hello, > Request you to help me subscribe

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

> > I wouldn't tackle that at this layer. I would suggest adding a layer > between the message and TCP that creates channels that are opaque to the > message layer above. The message layer wouldn't know if it was talking to > multiple sockets to the client or single socket with multiple channels. >

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

+1 to what Anthony has laid out! I think this is a better way to handle value encodings, and it's also better to be putting message specific details like event id with those messages. I do wonder whether this proposal actually needs metadata headers at all? What will eventually go in there? -Dan

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

api. >>> >>> As for the EventId, we will look into this and update the document >>> accordingly. >>> >>> --Udo >>> >>> >>> On 5/2/17 13:42, Dan Smith wrote: >>> >>>> I guess the value of building other me

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-2553) After deleting and recreating my Lucene index and region, my Lucene query hung.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-2553: Assignee: Barry Oglesby > After deleting and recreating my Lucene index and region, my Luc

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2235) test is missing @Test: PrCqUsingPoolDUnitTest.testCqOnAccessorServerWithUpdatesResultingInDestroyedCQEvents

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2235. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > test is missing @T

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-2230) LuceneIndex.waitUntilFlushed should not have to wait for the queue to be completely empty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-2230: Assignee: Barry Oglesby > LuceneIndex.waitUntilFlushed should not have to wait for the queue to

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-2211) OQL query shows partial results when data is inserted through REST POST api.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith updated GEODE-2211: - Component/s: (was: querying) > OQL query shows partial results when data is inserted through R

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-1926) The function peekAhead function puts the queue key into peekedIDs even though it was not in the batch to be dispatched

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-1926: Assignee: nabarun > The function peekAhead function puts the queue key into peekedIDs even tho

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-1842) Execution of query from GFSH or Pulse may kill a Server with StackOverflowError

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith updated GEODE-1842: - Component/s: (was: querying) > Execution of query from GFSH or Pulse may kill a Server w

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-1736) Lucene GFSH commands are showing up as off-line commands

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-1736. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Dan Smith Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 This was fixed in

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #823

Looks like maybe it timed out in ConnectToLocatorSSLDUnitTest.testConnectToLocatorWithLegacyClusterSSL? https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-nightly/823/artifact/geode-core/build/distributedTest/ 2017-05-02 09:56:36.408 + Completed test org.apache.geode.management.ConnectToLocatorSSLDUnitTest

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-1325) Convert Tomcat{6,7}SessionsJUnitTest to IntegrationTest category

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-1325. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 This was fixed in

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-1325) Convert Tomcat{6,7}SessionsJUnitTest to IntegrationTest category

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-1325: Assignee: Dan Smith > Convert Tomcat{6,7}SessionsJUnitTest to IntegrationTest categ

Re: Requesting Commenting Access to Geode Confluence wiki for Binary Protocol Proposal

Hi Matt, I've added you - you should have access to comment now. -Dan On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Matt Kalinowski wrote: > Hello, > > I was invited to review the proposal for the new binary client-server > protocol ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/New+ > Client+Server+

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

I guess the value of building other messages on top of the function service mostly comes into play when we start talking about smarter clients that can do single hop. At that point it's really nice to have have a layer that lets us send a message to a single primary, or all of the members that host

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

e an API that > application developers could use to do pretty much anything they wanted to > do on the server. Having a Region object with methods like get and put on > it could just be a little syntatic sugar on top of that.*" > > It can be argued that having a standard client

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

I think the current proposal seems to be gloming some things together that probably belong in different layers. The message header currently is specified to have things like correlation id, isPartial message, and also metdatadata about whether the key or the value is JSON. Fragmenting messages (is

Re: [gemfire-dev] New Client-Server Protocol Proposal

I think any new client driver or server we develop might want to incorporate function execution at lower level than region operations like get and put, etc. We could then easily build operations like GET, PUT, PUTALL, etc. on top of that by making them functions. The original client protocol isn't

Re: Remove keys from a PartitionedRegion

That seems like it should do things fairly quickly. Are you executing the function from a client? Did you find that using a function was actually faster than just calling removeAll from the client? I think removeAll from the client should send your keys in a single message, similar to your function

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #822

I've usually seen this happen when one test logs a bunch of stuff, and jenkins runs out memory trying to process that log. I don't think we should reorganize repos because of jenkins issues - even if the # of tests were an issue we could just create multiple jobs. I'm not quite sure I see the valu

Re: ASF review board down?

Works for me now. -Dan On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > I'm unable to submit any review board reviews on > https://reviews.apache.org/. > I was able to submit a review an hour or so ago, but now I get this cryptic > message: > > "fatal: git cat-file: could not get object inf

Review Request 58752: GEODE-236: Removed deprecated CacheEvent methods

72ce6c63c1b3673d2cbccf57f4b507fe168f810a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58752/diff/1/ Testing --- Thanks, Dan Smith

Re: Finer grained security

I agree that async event queues seem like a different case than wan or disk. In that case you are not using anything that creating a region doesn't do. Shouldn't creating a region be DATA:MANAGE:DISK? Requiring DATA privileges for a region without disk and CLUSTER privileges for a region with disk

Re: Simple Java Client

What transport are you planning on using? REST, or the current binary protocol? Or is this just a wrapper around the existing java client APIs? If this about creating a new API, I agree with what John is saying that we need reduce the number of APIs we have to do the same thing in java. It seems e

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2808) Deadlock in tomcat session module during session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2808. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > Deadlock in tomcat session module during sess

[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-2808) Deadlock in tomcat session module during session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15979167#comment-15979167 ] Dan Smith commented on GEODE-2808: -- We hit a related deadlock with liferay portal du

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2808) Deadlock in tomcat session module during session expiration

Dan Smith created GEODE-2808: Summary: Deadlock in tomcat session module during session expiration Key: GEODE-2808 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2808 Project: Geode Issue

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-2808) Deadlock in tomcat session module during session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-2808: Assignee: Dan Smith > Deadlock in tomcat session module during session expirat

Re: Review Request 58550: AEQ regions being created before the user regions

1 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58550/#comment245624> Remove commented out code. - Dan Smith On April 20, 2017, 2:03 a.m., nabarun nag wrote: > > --- > This i

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-728) Rename Execution.withArgs to Execution.setArguments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-728. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 I merged the changes from [~dalyssakim] for this issue. I

Re: Request For Geode Wiki Admin Karma

Hi Mark, I just made you a space admin on the wiki! -Dan On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Mark Bretl wrote: > Ping. > > --Mark > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to follow Kirk's request with one of my own for Admin Karma > > on the Geode Wi

Re: Edit Permissions for Confluence

I just added you, hopefully you should be able to edit now. -Dan On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Galen M O'Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > I don't seem to have edit permissions for the Apache Confluence wiki. Would > someone with the proper permissions be willing to give me the proper > permissions

Re: [gemfire-dev] More detailed Geode Modularization proposal

I remember one of the issues we hit with OSGI is that geode-core needs to be able to instantiate internal classes of other modules in order to deserialize them. Is that something that is going to be an issue with jboss modules? All of the documentation on classloaders for jboss modules is blank in

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2679) Lucene asynchronous disk writes for aeq can lead to data mismatch after compacting

Hi Mike, disk-synchronous=true is the default for geode regions. disk-synchronous=false means that geode will buffer up writes in a queue and flush them to disk asynchronously. Neither setting actually flushes the os buffers. Thats gemfire.syncWrites. -Dan On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Micha

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-688) CI failure: AsyncEventListenerDUnitTest.testParallelAsyncEventQueueHA_Scenario2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-688. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > CI fail

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-1775) CI failure: ParallelWANPropagationClientServerDUnitTest.testParallelPropagationWithClientServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith updated GEODE-1775: - Component/s: (was: tests) > CI fail

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-1775) CI failure: ParallelWANPropagationClientServerDUnitTest.testParallelPropagationWithClientServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-1775: Assignee: Dan Smith (was: Kirk Lund) > CI fail

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2672) LuceneManagementDUnitTest.testMBeanAndProxiesCreated fails intermittently with ConditionTimeoutException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2672. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Dan Smith > LuceneManagementDUnitTest.testMBeanAndProxiesCrea

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-2672) LuceneManagementDUnitTest.testMBeanAndProxiesCreated fails intermittently with ConditionTimeoutException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith updated GEODE-2672: - Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > LuceneManagementDUnitTest.testMBeanAndProxiesCreated fails intermittently >

Re: Review Request 57715: let bucket region to distribute before notify gateway for putAll and removeAll

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57715/#review169241 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dan Smith On March 17, 2017, 12:53 a.m

Re: [jira] [Commented] (GEODE-2674) Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried event

> feature/GEODE-2674 > > > > Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: > > > > https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/427.patch > > > > To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch > > with (at least)

[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-2672) LuceneManagementDUnitTest.testMBeanAndProxiesCreated fails intermittently with ConditionTimeoutException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15928659#comment-15928659 ] Dan Smith commented on GEODE-2672: -- Looks like this test has a 5 second timeout. Th

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2674) Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried event

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2674. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 This is fixed for lucene by my previous commit. However

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2675) AsyncEventListener may see a retried event come out of order

Dan Smith created GEODE-2675: Summary: AsyncEventListener may see a retried event come out of order Key: GEODE-2675 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2675 Project: Geode Issue

Re: [jira] [Created] (GEODE-2674) Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried event

+1-631-835-4771 > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Dan Smith (JIRA) > wrote: > > > Dan Smith created GEODE-2674: > > > > > > Summary: Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to > > retried event &g

Re: [gemfire-dev] Geode Modularization Proposal

Nice! Also looking forward to seeing some more details. I like the goals you've laid out, but I do have some reservations about the classloader isolation goal. In my experience containers that do classloader isolation tend to cause ton of headaches for users - I'm looking at you, OSGI. -Dan On T

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-2674) Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried event

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-2674: Assignee: Dan Smith > Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried ev

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2674) Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried event

Dan Smith created GEODE-2674: Summary: Lucene index is out of sync with data region due to retried event Key: GEODE-2674 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2674 Project: Geode

[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-2654) Backups can capture different members from different points in time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15925271#comment-15925271 ] Dan Smith commented on GEODE-2654: -- Darrel asked me to clarify the suggestion a

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-2654) Backups can capture different members from different points in time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith updated GEODE-2654: - Description: Geode backups should behave the same as recovering from disk after killing all of the

Re: A force push happened to geode-native develop!?!

: > +1 for blocking shared branches > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > It looks like there is a lot of support for preventing force pushes on > > these branches. I discussed this with Jake offline, he's also ok with > > having them blo

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2654) Backups can capture different members from different points in time

Dan Smith created GEODE-2654: Summary: Backups can capture different members from different points in time Key: GEODE-2654 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2654 Project: Geode

Re: A force push happened to geode-native develop!?!

ared branches. > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > > +1 For no force push > > > > --Mark > > > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Duling wrote: > > > > > +1. Don't turn to the dark side of the --force. > >

Re: "rat" task hangs on Windows

I've seen this happen before (on linux) if you have very large files in your workspace that rat is trying to analyze. Unfortunately, rat is not just looking at files tracked by git but any files that are in your checkout directory and aren't excluded in gradle/rat.gradle. So maybe check to see if

[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-2651) Function service should provide built-in mechanism for streaming back large function results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15922998#comment-15922998 ] Dan Smith commented on GEODE-2651: -- Geode does support streaming results u

Re: Split geode nightly build into two jobs

+1 -Dan On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > I'd like to propose splitting the Geode Nightly build into two jobs: > > 1) precheckin without flakyTest > 2) flakyTest by itself >

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-2595) Change LuceneService.createIndex to use a factory pattern

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith reassigned GEODE-2595: Assignee: Dan Smith > Change LuceneService.createIndex to use a factory patt

[jira] [Resolved] (GEODE-2595) Change LuceneService.createIndex to use a factory pattern

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Smith resolved GEODE-2595. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 > Change LuceneService.createIndex to use a fact

Re: Review Request 57483: GEODE-2643:Combine chunk and file region into a single region

/geode/cache/lucene/internal/filesystem/FileSystem.java Lines 62 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57483/#comment240825> toList is probably more efficient than toSet here, so it doesn't have to hash all of your strings. - Dan Smith On March 10, 2017, 12:26 a.m., Jason

Re: A force push happened to geode-native develop!?!

gt; >> +1 to blocking force pushes on shared branches. It also would seem > >> prudent to block 'git push —delete’ on shared branches if that isn’t > >> already blocked. > >> > >>> On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >>> &g

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

+1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it. -Dan On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > +1 to marking it experimental now > > Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking > changes to it if we need to. > > -- > Mike Stolz > Prin

Re: A force push happened to geode-native develop!?!

disagree on the blocking of force commits. Especially at his early stage > of source cleanup. > > -Jake > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM Dan Smith wrote: > > > Karen and I just spent a long time tracking down weird git history in her > > checkout to discover tha

A force push happened to geode-native develop!?!

Karen and I just spent a long time tracking down weird git history in her checkout to discover that someone did a force push of the geode-native develop. That's not cool, because it screws over anyone with a copy of the branch and we potentially lost history. I think we need to do two things. 1)

Re: Review Request 57206: let LuceneResultStruct to be Serializable, then customer does not have to defined their Serializable class to hold result

LuceneServiceImpl.registerDataSerializables. - Dan Smith On March 8, 2017, 5:49 a.m., xiaojian zhou wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Review Request 57206: let LuceneResultStruct to be Serializable, then customer does not have to defined their Serializable class to hold result

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Xiaojian Zhou wrote: > If so, we have to implement fromData() and toData() in > LuceneResultStructImpl.java for K and V. But we don't know their type yet. > > You don't need to know the type, you just call DataSerializer.writeObject. -Dan

Re: Review Request 57206: let LuceneResultStruct to be Serializable, then customer does not have to defined their Serializable class to hold result

DataSerializableFixedID or something like that, so that it can be serialized more efficiently and we can manage backwards compatibility? - Dan Smith On March 7, 2017, 10:03 p.m., xiaojian zhou wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically ge

Re: please add me to community

Hi Lior, Welcome! If you are looking for information, the How to Contribute page on the wiki is good place to start. We welcome all kinds of contributions. Code contributions don't require any special access, you can just file a

Re: Review Request 57345: GEODE-2579: ClassCastException cannot cast CompiledIn to CompiledJunction when querying with a junction containing an in clause

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57345/#review168034 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dan Smith On March 6, 2017, 7:38 p.m

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >