Re: Review Request 53813: GEODE-2114 Revise user and password options to gfsh connect

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53813/#review156081 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 16, 2016, 4:29

Re: Review Request 53746: GEODE-2105 Remove docs about log collection utility

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53746/#review155862 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 14, 2016, 11:02

Re: Review Request 53737: GEODE-2101 Improve WAN topology terminology in docs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53737/#review155846 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 14, 2016, 8:16

Re: Review Request 53737: GEODE-2101 Improve WAN topology terminology in docs

/multisite_topologies.html.md.erb (line 45) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53737/#comment225920> Sentence fragment. Perhaps "This is likewise true for any other initiating site." - Joey McAllister On Nov. 14, 2016, 6:12 p.m., Ka

Re: Review Request 53661: GEODE-2094 Update admin/dev REST API documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53661/#review155729 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 11, 2016, 5:37

Re: Review Request 53637: GEODE-2090 Update off-heap statistics documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53637/#review155523 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 10, 2016, 12:46

Re: Review Request 53581: GEODE-2070 Improve documentation of region management

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53581/#review155353 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 8, 2016, 6:53

Re: Review Request 53444: GEODE-2068 Improve documentation on serial/parallel gateway senders

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53444/#review154844 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 4, 2016, 12:11

Re: Review Request 53434: GEODE-2060 Update docs for security-related poperties

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53434/#review154751 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 3, 2016, 4:24

Re: Review Request 53414: GEODE-2065 Document defragmentationsInProgress statistic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53414/#review154661 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 2, 2016, 11:52

Re: Review Request 53360: GEODE-2050 Remove doc of statistics no longer present

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53360/#review154484 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Nov. 1, 2016, 11:55

Re: Review Request 53331: GEODE-2047 Document change to enable-network-partition-detection

s://reviews.apache.org/r/53331/#comment223873> "this property must be set to true if" - Joey McAllister On Oct. 31, 2016, 11:57 p.m., Karen Miller wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically gene

Re: Review Request 53311: GEODE-2045 Improve docs of region shortcuts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53311/#review154324 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Oct. 31, 2016, 7:28

Re: GEODE-2036 and documentation practices and procedures

3. +1 to Anthony and Dan's recommendation not to use a catch-all JIRA. I think the idea was an attempt to fit within existing guidelines. If there's no requirement to use a JIRA here, let's not do it. On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:26 AM Dave Barnes wrote: > 3. If there's no

Re: Review Request 53190: [GEODE-2037] Update documentation links

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53190/#review153886 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Oct. 26, 2016, 3:12

Re: GEODE-2036 and documentation practices and procedures

Thanks for kicking this off, Karen! 1. +1 - I like the idea of making documentation part of the requirements for issues that need it. Is it better in these cases to use the primary ticket or to create a new subticket associated with the primary one? 2. +1 - I agree that reviews should be on a

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation

+1 On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:42 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > Unless somebody objects strongly to my #2 and #3 proposals I'm going > > to kick of this thread on private@. > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Donation of Geode documentation

Hi Anil, The search functionality on the old version of the docs was a third-party feature held over from GemFire documentation. We'll need to research options that are Apache friendly. Joey On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:23 PM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > I don't see any

Re: Review Request 53107: GEODE-2023: Add Lucene documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53107/#review153718 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Oct. 21, 2016, 10:56

Re: Review Request 53072: GEODE-2019 Add automated rebalance documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53072/#review153477 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Oct. 20, 2016, 9:22

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

bout geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release? > > -Dan > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community time > > to offer feedback he

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

@Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community time to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the website with the docs included. Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

Only a very enthusiastic +1. :) On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, let’s > start hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > > Anthony > > > On Oct 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Swapnil

Re: [GitHub] incubator-geode issue #259: Feature/geode 1952 2

Hi Swapnil, Yes, I'm working on that right now and will resubmit. Joey On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:40 PM sbawaska wrote: > Github user sbawaska commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/259 > > Hi @joeymcallister The CI failed

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

+1 for moving to a feature branch. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:32 AM Mark Bretl wrote: > +1 for feature branch as well. > > --Mark > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > +1 for moving it to a feature branch. > > > > -Dan > > > > On Wed,

Re: Limiting scope for Geode 1.0

*geode-site, rather On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:37 PM Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> wrote: > The docs build process creates HTML output that we can drop into > geode-website. +William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> and I were able to > make this work locally. I'

Re: Limiting scope for Geode 1.0

the site, so there might some effort to try to > get the docs actually hosted on the website? > > +1 for getting the docs in the source distro at least. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > +1 to includin

Re: Limiting scope for Geode 1.0

+1 to including docs On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:48 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 for including docs in the release > > Anthony > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > > This sounds like feature creep, but based on this thread: >

Re: Review Request 52518: GEODE-1963: Add lucene xsd to website

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52518/#review151350 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Oct. 4, 2016, 4:37

Re: jvsd

+1 Thanks, Dave! On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:37 AM Dave Barnes wrote: > Good observations, John. > A clarification: JVSD is Geode-only. The corresponding GemFire tool, VSD, > enjoys a more 'mainstream' status, at least for now, so it still appears in > the GF user guide. > >

Re: jvsd

> > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Kirk Lund <kirk.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Joey McAllister < > jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > If it

Re: jvsd

> > > > > > > Anthony > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > JVSD has appeared in the Geode user

Re: jvsd

Bumping this. Any thoughts? On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM Dave Barnes wrote: > To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup is > essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully > baked and we don't support it". > Would

Re: Geode Community > Events List

t; < > https://www.google.com/calendar/event?eid=bnM3ODdjYms2bm05aDJwYnJrYnBrb2Q2YnMgcGl2b3RhbC5pb191OGtndnVhaGprYm9oMWduZmh2NXRzMnY5Y0Bn=America/Los_Angeles > > > 10/19 - 9AM Pacific > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > &g

Re: Review Request 51764: GEODE-1880 DistributedSystem.java: typo repair in javadocs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51764/#review148357 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On Sept. 9, 2016, 6:30

Re: M3 is done, what's next?

+1 On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:52 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Sai Boorlagadda < > sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 for package renaming. > > > > Sai > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:42 AM, William Markito > >

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

+1 - Great idea On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:10 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > Yes we should definitely do this > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager > Mobile: 631-835-4771 > On Aug 10, 2016 9:01 PM, "William Markito" wrote: > > > As

Re: Review Request 50042: GEODE-1664: Update M3 LICENSE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50042/#review142291 --- Ship it! Looks good! - Joey McAllister On July 14, 2016, 6

Re: Donation of Geode Docs [was: Re: What will it take to release geode 1.0?]

Ok, great. Thanks, Jens! On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM Jens Deppe <jde...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Joey, > > We can configure CI to ignore changes to doc files so that they won't > trigger a build; so that shouldn't be a concern here. > > --Jens > > On Fri, Jun 24, 20

Re: Donation of Geode Docs [was: Re: What will it take to release geode 1.0?]

Hi all, Pivotal currently is working through the process of converting the existing Geode manual from DITA to the more open-source-friendly markdown. The value in this is that anyone will be able to contribute, rather than just folks who have access to DITA editors. Our automated conversion

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

+1 Looks great, Swapnil. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:16 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Here is take 2: http://i.imgur.com/gmsHomO.png > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, John Blum wrote: > > > @Swap- > > > > Perhaps we should

Re: New committer and PPMC Member: Nabarun Nag

Nice! Congrats, Naba! On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:07 PM Dan Smith wrote: > Please welcome the newest committer to the apache Geode project - Nabarun > Nag! > > We appreciate all the work he has already contributed thus far and are > looking forward to continued

Re: Please review / approve WAN Gateway blog at blogs.apache.org

Hi All, +Karen Miller noted that there appears to be some wayward text (in the form of a link) in the first paragraph of the Parallel, Contention-free Replication section of the blog post. Do we have edit permissions for that page? If so, please let me know how and I'll be

Re: Review Request 46458: GEODE-1263-7

> On April 20, 2016, 11:58 p.m., Joey McAllister wrote: > > The Droid Fonts seem to be the only listing under the Apache License in > > LICENSE. > > Is that correct? (I thought we listed all Apache License stuff in NOTICE.) > > And, > > if so, should we format

Re: Review Request 46458: GEODE-1263-7

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46458/#review129935 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On April 20, 2016, 11

Re: Review Request 45827: GEODE-902: Remove incorrect src header; update LICENSE and NOTICE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45827/#review127851 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On April 6, 2016, 6:07

Re: Review Request 45919: Updates to NOTICE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45919/#review127849 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On April 8, 2016, 12:21

Re: Review Request 45931: GEODE-914: Added specific NOTICE files for war projects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45931/#review127850 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joey McAllister On April 8, 2016, 3:26