Bumping this. Any thoughts?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup is
> essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully
> baked and we don't support it".
> Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0?
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point,
> > it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more
> > complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the
> > try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier for
> > people to get jVSD and play with it.
> > -Dan