Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I want to extend an invitation out to all the OpenORB developers who
might be interested in helping out. Lots of great work out here!
I'm one of them, but I don't use Geronimo and I haven't looked at G's
architecture.
Some of these points have already been made in
On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:57 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 10/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HOWL project page says:
The Apache Geronimo project has plans to integrate JOTM, and has
integrated the HOWL logger with an interim transaction manager that
is being
used
Lars Kühne wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I want to extend an invitation out to all the OpenORB developers who
might be interested in helping out. Lots of great work out here!
I'm one of them, but I don't use Geronimo and I haven't looked at G's
architecture.
Some of these points have
WWW site: Add Apache Directory to list of related projects
--
Key: GERONIMO-1113
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1113
Project: Geronimo
Type: Wish
Reporter: Stefan Zoerner
Priority:
John Sisson wrote:
I think we should be supporting 1.4.2 (and 1.5) for a while, as many
large enterprise systems are slow (like a year or two behind) to move to
recent (1.5) versions of Java, for many reasons.
J2EE 1.4 requires Java 1.4 whereas Java EE 1.5 does Java 5 (the acronyms
used in
Sachin Patel wrote:
I cleaned out my local repo and verifed the same...
velocity-1.4-dev.jar to be exact.
I can't do it now, so I'd ask you to paste the error msg here. Sachin,
would you?
Jacek
One reason is that we may need something like this for harmony...
On Oct 26, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Andy Piper wrote:
At 04:26 PM 10/26/2005, Rick McGuire wrote:
The most critical need right now is to have a replacement to the
Sun ORB that would allow portability to other JVM
impelementations.
But be careful. What Jacek said applies to things *on* the Apache
Geronimo site (anything on our site is under teh Apache License
http://www.apache.org/licensing/).
However, anything that we point to - like some of the books in
progress - are under a different copyright and license, and
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into
the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the
incubator if we accept.
The code is here :
+1 from me
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it
into the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the
incubator if we accept.
As far as I remember, with the 1.3 CTS there was signature tests that
would allow testing J2EE 1.3 Compatible on a 1.4 VM. I have not
seen the equivalent J2EE 1.4 tests, but there may be (or perhaps
coming) a similar set of tests that allow a J2EE 1.4 compatibility
test to complete on a
I pulled down the code an it looks like a lot of IIOP stuff is
there, what is missing for a full ORB? I'm not sure how I can help
with this without the full orb code. If we had that, I could try
integrating it into OpenEJB, but I am completely lost.
Sure, there is not an orb there yet;
On Oct 26, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Can I ask why portability is critical? Most VM's (with one notable
exception) use the Sun ORB so depending on it doesn't seem such a big
deal to me, especially if its a necessary evil. I agree support
for J2SE
5.0 is essential, but its pretty
When I checked yesterday the jar didn't exist in neither cvs.apache.org
or ibibilio.
the /velocity/jars/ folder on ibibilo has a last modified date of
10/24. I'm guessing this was when it could have been removed perhaps?
Sachin
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Sachin Patel wrote:
I cleaned out
You can have a J2EE 1.4 compatible product which soley supports J2SE
1.5 as long as your implementation passes CTS.
The minimum requirement is J2SE 1.4.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
I think we should be supporting 1.4.2 (and 1.5) for a while, as many
large enterprise systems
yes, that jar and jdbm jar are missing.
On 10/27/05, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I checked yesterday the jar didn't exist in neither cvs.apache.org
or ibibilio.
the /velocity/jars/ folder on ibibilo has a last modified date of
10/24. I'm guessing this was when it could
I just want to be sure we have a reasonable chance of
reviewing what Matt (or others) is doing. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think this process has worked very well in the past.
If we end up with a reasonable set of Jira versions (1.0, 1.1, and 1.x
seem fine -- not for 1.0 wasn't a literal
I like the division. Generally I think you can rm-Rf samples but I'd probably
think twice about doing the same to system. (Of course I'm not that smart so
thinking twice doesn't guarantee a positive outcome :)
Matt
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
It looks fine to me. I've
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox +1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play with
and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into the
sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the incubator if
we accept.
The
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play with
and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into the
sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the incubator if
we accept.
The code is
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
On 10/27/05, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play with
and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into the
sandbox. I
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play with
and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into the
sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the incubator if
we accept.
The code is
At 01:51 PM 10/27/2005, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
One issue is that RMI needs to be able to write the value of a final
instance field (to de-serialize an object) and this is something that
cannot be done with reflection. So for this we are using
com.sun.Unsafe (which is the internal Sun API to
Somehow my spam filter removed your original e-mail
At 07:09 PM 10/26/2005, Rick McGuire wrote:
Actually, then don't. The IBM JVM certainly doesn't, and I don't
believe JRocket does either. And it is
JRockit uses the Sun ORB. The IBM VM is the notable exception I
referred to. That's why I
Here's the deal with the velocity jars.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1718
Now let me track the jdbm jars.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/05, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, that jar and jdbm jar are missing.On 10/27/05, Sachin Patel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I checked
[ X] Yes, bring into sandbox
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into
the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll
Just a quick update. The jdbm jar in the ibiblio repo is at version 0.12
(http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/jdbm/jars). We are trying to get v 0.20-dev .
Dain will get Jason to upload the req'd version in ibiblio.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/05, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the deal
Done.
I created a 1.x version.
-dain
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I just want to be sure we have a reasonable chance of reviewing
what Matt (or others) is doing. Maybe it's just me, but I don't
think this process has worked very well in the past.
If we end up with a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1028?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1028:
---
Summary: WebLogViewerPortlet does not honor the date in the search
(was: Correct some annoying problems with the WebLogViewerPortlet)
Description:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1068?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1068:
---
Attachment: weblog2.patch
This patch fixes a number of related problems when viewing the web logs for
Jetty or Tomcat:
- Can search more than the most
I have placed jdbm-.20-dev and jdbm-1.0 in my apache repo as a temporary
measure. Try now.
Jeff
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Just a quick update. The jdbm jar in the ibiblio repo is at version 0.12
(http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/jdbm/jars). We are trying to get v 0.20-dev .
Dain will get Jason to
pache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version
Geir,
I wanted to see how the copyright assignment you were chasing down with Epiq was
going. I'm updating DayTrader with Entry # 19 in a few places to get ready for 1.0.
Let me know how I can help.
Cheers,
Matt
There should be no problems. Go forward with using the logo.
There's no need to serialize.
geir
On Oct 27, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Geir,
I wanted to see how the copyright assignment you were chasing down
with Epiq was going. I'm updating DayTrader with Entry # 19 in a
Works like a champ!On 10/26/05, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevan, Slavic,Found and fixed the problem. Please try latest SVN again and let us know.thanks,dimsOn 10/26/05, Slavic Chernyak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I get the same exact problem, and doing this works.Running on XP Pro.
On 10/27/2005 5:39 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
There is no doubt in my mind that we should build a complete stand-
alone and quality ORB. Once we're up and running, we might even see
Sun chime in, and have them adopt this the same way we've seen with
many other Apache Java projects.
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
Regards,
Hiram
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play
with and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it
into the sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
[ ] No
Hi all,
I don't think you know this, but there is an impression within Apache
that the Geronimo committers are a bit too insular. I know we all
have good reasons why we have not been involved more in the
foundation, like working 18 hour days to get Geronimo finished and
certified, and
Unless someone has an objection, I shall convert this to M2 as I put it
into the sandbox.
Regards,
Alan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hernan Cunico wrote:
I have been working some articles in confluence which has better
formating and way much easier than Apache wiki.
It would be really cool if we can continue to submit documentation in
confluence and, eventually, turn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I wanted to see how the copyright assignment you were chasing down with
Epiq was going.
Is it an assignment or a licence ?
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer,
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 12:58 -0700, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Unless someone has an objection, I shall convert this to M2 as I put it
into the sandbox.
I can help you too.
Regards,
Alan
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org
People develop abstractions by
On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Hernan Cunico wrote:
I have been working some articles in confluence which has better
formating and way much easier than Apache wiki.
It would be really cool if we can continue to submit documentation in
confluence and, eventually,
An assignment, because unlike a code contribution where we have no
problem if someone retains the right to use or re-license elsewhere,
we want to be sure that the ASF has the sole rights to the project
logo. Otherwise we'd have no legal right to complain if Epiq
licensed the logo for
gbeans with xml-attribute/reference in j2ee plan need correct namespace
---
Key: GERONIMO-1114
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1114
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.0
[X] Yes, bring into sandbox
John
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think the way to move forward to make it easy for people to play with
and add to this software as we discuss this is to bring it into the
sandbox. I have a CCLA for it that I'll register with the incubator if
we accept.
The
The missing jdbm, velocity and axion jars are now on ibiblio.
Are we missing anything else?
-dain
On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I have placed jdbm-.20-dev and jdbm-1.0 in my apache repo as a
temporary measure. Try now.
Jeff
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Just a quick
Spinning a clean build now.. will let u know.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The missing jdbm, velocity and axion jars are now on ibiblio.
Are we missing anything else?
-dain
On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I have placed jdbm-.20-dev and jdbm-1.0 in my apache repo as a
temporary
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=comments#action_12356157
]
Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-:
Kresten, bits of this code doesn't compile. IOSemaphoreClosedException seems
to be missing, as are the CSIv2/IIOP CORBA
I know it's only been about 15 hours for this vote, but we have Alan
itching to get it in the sandbox, and +1 votes from
geir, matt, sachin, dims, jeff, bruce, david j, hiram, alan and john
and no complaints or even concerns voiced about putting in sandbox as
far as I can tell, so I think
Geir,
I have a conditional +1. Lets be sure it is compilable before it goes
in. We should wait to hear from Alan. Once he fully compiles it, then
you can have my +1 back ;-)
Jeff
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I know it's only been about 15 hours for this vote, but we have Alan
itching to
He already put it in I figure that's an oversight (the
noncompilation) that will get fixed Real Soon Now.
If it compiles was a requirement, we'd have to dump the Geronimo
tree out of SVN from time to time :)
geir
On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:11 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Geir,
I have a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-890?page=comments#action_12356164
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-890:
---
I believe alan has completely fixed this problem.
Backward compatibility to the old schema implemented: (includes fix for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1114?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1114:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Also includes fix for GERONIMO-890
Adding
modules/j2ee-schema/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/schema/ElementConverter.java
Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our regular
build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to move it out to
its own root called specs. I will also convert it to m2 while I'm at it?
What do you think?
Regards,
Alan
+1
I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
need a version as well,
e.g. artifactIdservlet-2.4/artifactId
versionIdrc4/versionId
I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs and
make an apache specs project that we all use.
BTW, am
+1
FYI.. there is a JIRA open for this:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744
John
David Jencks wrote:
+1
I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
need a version as well,
e.g. artifactIdservlet-2.4/artifactId
versionIdrc4/versionId
I think
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera reassigned GERONIMO-744:
-
Assign To: Alan Cabrera
Review specs and move them from rc versions to formal versions
On 10/27/2005 9:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
+1
I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
need a version as well,
e.g. artifactIdservlet-2.4/artifactId
versionIdrc4/versionId
Thinking the same thing.
I think we should talk to all the other apache projects
I think there's a lot of code copied from the jetty to the tomcat
module builder. Now that both are somewhere near the verge of
stability, I'd like to refactor the common parts into a common
superclass. Any objections?
thanks
david jencks
61 matches
Mail list logo
