Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Bill Dudney
Attachments: GERONIMO-2344.bdudney.patch
Console classpath problems prevent the class from being found.
Here are the error messages;
10:12:39,240 WARN
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2344?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2344:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2344.bdudney.patch
Tomcat Console can't find TomcatManagerImpl class during display of ServerLogs
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2344?page=comments#action_12429755
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2344:
---
BTW you need to apply the patch from configs/console-tomcat.
To test the patch
1) log into the console
2
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Bill Dudney
to reproduce launch and go to the console, select DB Info, only the static info
shows up and the log has simply 'java.sql.SQLException'.
--
This message
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2346?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2346:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2346.bdudney.patch
The query for the gbean uses the old groupId of 'geronimo' instead of
'org.apache.geronimo.configs'.
The patch
Hi All,
As I've been going through all the dependency problems related to
getting a datasource deployed I've been reviewing 1.1.x vs 1.2 for
the db wizard related code in the console. They are significantly
different and the 1.1.x appears to be much better.
What is our plan to move this
: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Bill Dudney
to see the bug click on JMS Resources then For ActiveMQ - exception in the log
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid id: geronimo/ge-activemq-rar//rar
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.Artifact.create(Artifact.java:49
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2347?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2347:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2347.bdudney.patch
apply at root, to test,
1) launch console
2) Choose JMS Providers
3) For ActiveMQ
4) Go through all the steps
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2326?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2326:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.1)
To test the patch
1) after applying it rebuild the car plugin
2) rebuild all the configs
3) reassbmble
Also
Hi David,
On Aug 21, 2006, at 1:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 20, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry its taken me so long to get this posted. I had a bunch of
travel related headaches thur and fri of last week...
I've adopted http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi David,
On Aug 21, 2006, at 1:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 20, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry its taken me so long to get this posted. I had a bunch of
travel related headaches thur and fri of last week...
I've adopted http
Problem is that the 1.5 jdk does not include the sun orb so compile
fails, but not till late in the build
+1 from me
-bd-
On Aug 20, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
I keep running into problems switching my local jdk (ala setjdk)
from 1.4 to 1.5 and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2326?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2326:
--
Attachment: 2326-deploy-datasource.patch
So this gets us very close to working but I'm still having trouble (I susspec
its class loader related). Once
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2326?page=comments#action_12429301
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2326:
---
I'm not sure this shoudl reference 1.1.1 anymore. Wasn't that part fixed?
unable to deploy a database pool
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2327?page=comments#action_12429303
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2327:
---
This JIRA is a partial fix for 2326 - but there are still problems doing a
Datasource deployment. The rest
] wrote:
inline...
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
i've been using the m2 build for several days now and I've
noticed
that while it works well there are several details that are
still
not nailed down. Particularly I've
Hi Jason,
Before going too deeply in to the JUnit space what do you think of
using TestNG. I've used it on a couple of applications and found it
very nice to work with. Its yet another reason to move to JDK 5
though so I'm not sure about timing (although you can use it with JDK
1.4 I've
switch over
to TNG fully (if or when that is), all we need to do (optionally)
is drop the extends from TestCase and everything else should be fine.
--jason
On Aug 19, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Jason,
Before going too deeply in to the JUnit space what do you think of
using
+1
On Aug 18, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
PROPOSAL:
1. Each spec will no longer be split up into trunk+branches+tags.
There will instead be one trunk+branches+tags for all specs laid
out as follows:
specs/trunk/pom.xml
specs/trunk/artifactId
Hi All,
i've been using the m2 build for several days now and I've noticed
that while it works well there are several details that are still not
nailed down. Particularly I've been hitting lots of dependency issues
around deployment. So what I've started doing is slogging through
each of
issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Bill Dudney
deploy-new is unable to deploy anything with the m2 build because of missing
dependencies
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2325?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2325:
--
Attachment: 2325-console.patch
apply the patch from geronimo
unable to deploy from console with m2 build
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2325?page=comments#action_12428272
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2325:
---
to test the patch -
1) start the server
2) log into the console
3) deploy new
4) choose any deployable jar file
Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Bill Dudney
Trying to deploy a jdbc datasource leads to a blank screen and the following
stack trace in the log.
The issue appears to be that URLPatternSpec does not like the URL generated by
DatabasePoolPortlet from the info found in the DatabaseInfo.ALL_DATABASES
Hi Joe,
Could you try to deploy via the console. I'm not having any luck with
that (about to post a JIRA about it) would be nice to know if anyone
else is able to deploy via the console.
Basically it appears that the DeploymentFactoryImpl (from geronimo-
deploy-jsr88) is not being started
Canoo is quite good;
http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/WebTestHome.html
It uses Ant to execute its tests and AFAIK there is not maven plugin
to invoke it but should be straight forward to do with maven.
Its license appears to (this non-lawyer at least) be compatible.
Also the Struts
8, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Yep, I hit a console deploy problem with the j2ee jetty image ...
so I think it's a real issue (although I didn't look at the
details of the exception).
Joe
Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Joe,
Could you try to deploy via the console. I'm not having any luck
)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Bill Dudney
the m2 build makes a server that is not able to deploy from the console
The DeploymentFactoryImpl is never started. In the 1.1.1 package (built with
m1) the DFI is started by the hot-deploy car, which is commented out
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2302?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2302:
--
Attachment: 2302-console-deploy.patch
The assembly does not end up with an empty directory called 'deploy' that is
probably required for the hot
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2302?page=comments#action_12426773
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2302:
---
Anita - is there a jira to track that patch?
Perhaps we could attach it here if not. If there is a JIRA could
Hi Prasad,
The cargo plugins [1] might be another place to check to start and
stop the server.
I've used them before for tomcat and its good stuff for running
integration tests.
And what can I do to help?
TTFN,
-bd-
[1] http://cargo.codehaus.org
On Aug 4, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Prasad
Cool thing is someone else has already done it Cargo currently
supports G 1.1.
:-)
-bd-
On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think that in general it would be good to have cargo support :-)
--jason
On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Prasad,
The cargo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2281?page=comments#action_12426303
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2281:
---
Verifyed fixed
Thanks Jason
Deploy tool does not work (built from new m2 build
: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Bill Dudney
A fresh build of geronimo from trunk (with m2) does not have a working deployer.
Tested only with the tomcat install but its likely a bug in all.
To recreate;
build with m2 (follow
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2281?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2281:
--
Attachment: 2281-online-deployer.patch
apply from the root, one simple change in 'configs/online-deployer/pom.xml'
Deploy tool does not work (built
Hi Jason,
Thanks again for all the hard work!
Build works fine, I get an assembly that I can install and run.
However there is a problem deploying.
I filed;
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2281
and attached a patch to fix it.
The console will not deploy anything either,
Does the m2 assembly work yet? I'm searching through the archives and
I could have sworn I saw a bit on how to get an assembly with m2 but
now I can't find it.
If some one would summarize how I'd be glad to document it on the wiki.
Thanks!
-bd-
://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty-j2ee/1.2-SNAPSHOT/
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/3/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the m2 assembly work yet? I'm searching through the archives and
I could have sworn I saw a bit on how to get
on a repo -
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty-j2ee/1.2-SNAPSHOT/
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/3/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the m2 assembly work yet? I'm searching through the
archives and
I could have sworn I saw a bit on how
Dillon wrote:
Well... if you were following the instructions in the wiki to build
with m2 you should have been using this branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/svkmerge/
m2migration/
Soon to be merged to trunk
--jason
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi
),
codehaus-snapshots (http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org),
mergere (http://repo.mergere.com/maven2)
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
must have gotten ahead of myself, I have the m2migration branch
checked out too
I guess I saw bootstrap in the trunk and figured the merge
, Bill Dudney wrote:
Ok so back on the m2 branch I get failures for the corba spec jar.
We had talked about this a while back and had changed the groupId
for the geronimo-spec-corba pom (currently geronimo-spec, but the
geronimo pom is expecting it to be org.apache.geronimo.specs
Hi Jeff,I think dropping the m:co is fine as long as there is a way to get to the source code. I did not see openejb src released with the jar's here;http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/openejb/openejb-core/2.0/but if I recall correctly its a snap to get m2 to push src jars as well. Maybe we could get
and into the project soon.
agreed
TTFN,
-bd-
Cheers
Prasad.
On 7/5/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Prasad,
I would like to see the itests for openejb running from m2. David
mentioned
that you might have already done a bunch of work on that front.
Could you
update me on the status
] On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:Yep. This is it.So what you could do is take a m1 binary and run the mvninstall:install-file command to install it into your m2 local repo.The exact syntax of that command is in the error message that you have pasted.CheersPrasadOn 7/6/06, Bill Dudney
Hi Prasad,I would like to see the itests for openejb running from m2. David mentioned that you might have already done a bunch of work on that front. Could you update me on the status of that? I'm happy to jump in where ever to help make them functional again.Thanks! Bill DudneyMyFaces -
Corba Spec pom has inconsistent groupId
---
Key: GERONIMO-2159
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2159
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Bill Dudney
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2159?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2159:
--
Attachment: pom.patch
Corba Spec pom has inconsistent groupId
---
Key: GERONIMO-2159
URL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2159?page=comments#action_12418672
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-2159:
---
If this patch is applied there are several places in the rest of the tree that
refer to the inconsistent groupId. I'll
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2159?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2159:
--
Attachment: openejb.patch
This patch should be applied at the root of the openejb tree.
https://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2
is the code
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2159?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2159:
--
Attachment: geronimo.patch
Hi Alan,
Thanks for picking this up. This final patch (geronimo.patch) should be applied
at the root of the Geronimo tree
Hi All,Great news on the call in, thanks Matt for making that happen!I will be a bit late but I'll be there.TTFN, Bill DudneyMyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.orgCayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.htmlOn Jun 29, 2006, at 7:08 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:There will be a BOF held at
Hi Anita,So where are we to get openejb from now?https://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2/If so I'd be glad to update the wiki page.TTFN, Bill DudneyMyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.orgCayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html On Jun 29, 2006, at 7:44 AM, anita kulshreshtha
Hi Greg,
Hopefully this is early enough for someone to look at.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Caching
It need lots more detail - I have some graphics too but don't have
time to write them up before meeting so I'll try to get that done
this afternoon and update the wiki
are ignored when the local working space is
updated.
just fyi, 'svn checkout' will update through an external but 'svn
checkin' will not. We use them on myfaces, they work well.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
Hi Jacek,Yep just edit the svn:externals property on geronimo and you are done :-)TTFN, Bill DudneyMyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.orgCayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html On Jun 29, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 6/29/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,If we do http;svn ci from within the openejb tree (i.e geronimo/openejb) won't workif we do https;an openejb committer can edit the code in the openejb tree (within the geronimo tree) and do an svn ci and it would commit.in any event 'svn ci' from the root of the geronimo tree would ignore
I like #1 unless we can convince the TC folks to push to an m2 repo
somewhere.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
All,
Jeff, Bill and I had done a lot of work
Hi Jules,
Too bad about the line, thanks for trying. Not sure how well this
would work but maybe someone could hop on IRC and take notes and
field questions?
Just a thought.
Looking forward to the summary on the list afterwards.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Geronimo v1.1
- Developer's Guide. Something opening the field to later talk
about how to do build custom build. What you guys think? should we
create a new entry under the v1.1 doc?
Cheers!
Hernan
Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I'm in the midst of trying to get the M2 build to work for me.
After
--- Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/27/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Current Geronimo Release Under Development * Trunk Developer GuideThoughts? Call it whatever you like, but do it as it took me quite a lot oftimeto figure out and haven't finished yet. I don't want anyone
+2ThanksAnita --- Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/27/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Current Geronimo Release Under Development * Trunk Developer GuideThoughts? Call it whatever you like, but do it as it took me quite a lot oftimeto figure out and haven't finished yet. I don't
Hi Prasad,
AFAIKT the m2-plugins depend on the modules/deploy but the modules
build depends on the m2-plugins so even though the cycle is not
called out it appears to exist.
Is anyone able to do a clean build from the top with m2?
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
;
Current Geronimo Release Under Development
* Trunk Developer Guide
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
FWIW
I am not able to get a clean build with either m1 or m2 either.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I agree that trunk should always be buildable... though
the one I
could reproduce today. The actual failure seems to change quite
often. The failures seem to come in spurts for a couple of weeks it
won't build, other times it will build for a week or so then stop
building.
Thanks!
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http
Hi Jules,
I'd be interested too.
4pm your time or later would work fine.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:21
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2046?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2046:
--
Attachment: geronimo-cache-2.patch
this patch adds JMS impl to the replicated server
I also did some refactoring so there are some svn commands
+1 on the move (non-binding). Quick question though, what is going to
happen to the session api that was added to trunk?
I ask because I'm about to submit a jira and patch that depends on
these api's.
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http
no caching implementation
-
Key: GERONIMO-2046
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2046
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: general
Reporter: Bill Dudney
Priority
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2046?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2046:
--
Attachment: geronimo-cache.patch
attaching the patch, it is intended to be applied at the root of the sandbox
(i.e. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=comments#action_12370815
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-1686:
---
Hi Greg,
Make sure you are using the 3rd patch (its about 13 K) instead of the other two
which are substantially larger
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-1686:
--
Attachment: servlet_fixes.patch
Hi Greg,
Thanks for testing the stuff out so quickly! I've put some comments into the
issues below;
To apply
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-1686:
--
Attachment: jee5_exp_servlet.patch
the jee5_exp_servlet.patch is the patch to use to add servlet 2.5 to the jee5
spec project.
this patch contains
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-1686:
--
Attachment: jee5_exp.patch
apply at the root of
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/jee5_exp
with 'patch -p0 ./jee5_exp.patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=comments#action_12369637
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-1686:
---
this is the patch for servlet api, i'll be providing the jsp one shortly
Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 api jars for JavaEE 5
Hi Jacek,
Those files are already in your repo
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trunk/modules/j2ee-schema/
src/j2ee_1_4schema/jsp_2_0.xsd
I just copied the old schemas/dtd's from the existing geronimo stuff.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Mar 9, 2006, at 7:09 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It
Hi Jacek,
Dooh! Sent this just before I saw your comments in the JIRA issue.
I'll comment on the missing stuff in the JIRA.
BTW: Thanks for looking at the patch so quickly!
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 9, 2006, at 7:20 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Those
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=comments#action_12369644
]
Bill Dudney commented on GERONIMO-1686:
---
Hi Jacek Jeff,
I'm happy to go back and change Revesion to Rev, I did Revision cause that is
what was in the other files
better that it come from a G committer.
Thoughts?
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 9, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Here is what it says in the DTD:
This document and the product to which it pertains are distributed
under licenses restricting their use, copying
is command line versioin 1.3.0
$ svn --version
svn, version 1.3.0 (r17949)
compiled Jan 2 2006, 08:56:49
HTH,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
On Mar 8, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Every time I run svn add as of recent I get... This never
Hi All,I'm wrapping up the servlet 2.5 spec work and I'm wondering where the put the javaee_5.xsd and the javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd schema docs? They are not part of the servlet spec but should probably be in the jar file for easy catalog type stuff.I think we need a
Hi Geir,
They are part of the schema in the spec pdf, no claimed copyright in
the schema definition.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 8, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
if the comments are part of someone else's copyrighted material,
and it's not under
- incubator.apache.org/wadi On Mar 8, 2006, at 12:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:On Mar 8, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:Hi All,I'm wrapping up the servlet 2.5 spec work and I'm wondering where the put the javaee_5.xsd and the javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd schema docs? They are not part of the servlet
So I will go ahead and type the comments (I'm more than half way
through it anyway) and then we can delete them if we need to.
OK?
Jeff or anyone else, who should I go to for official statement? [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org
-in-incubation-
t1234076.html
There are tons of resources to get you started on the cayenne website;
http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/
Feel free to join the mailing list before the move we'd love to have
you involved!
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 6, 2006, at 9:48 AM
Hi Shanky,iBatis maps jdbc calls into hashtables (its more sophisticated than that but essentially that is what is happening) the theory being that more than a few object models being mapped through hibernate/cayenne/jdo/toplink/ojb/castor/etc/etc/etc are simply data holders and don't have any
Hi All,
I think this must have gotten lost in the traffic over the weekend.
Anyone know if I should/have to retype all the documentation comments
in the XSD?
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
One other question
:02 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for the comments.
Dain: Yeah its not copying out of the pdf but simply typing,
hardly feels like original work though so even though I'm not
copying, it sure feels like it. :-)
I'll leave the comments out and post a patch after I get one more
pass
the definitive answer (or since we are
not lawyers as close to definitive as possible:) I'd love to hear it.
Thanks!
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
week).
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured that a good
place for the api
Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 api jars for JavaEE 5 work
--
Key: GERONIMO-1686
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Reporter: Bill Dudney
Priority: Minor
I'm
be submitting a patch early next week that has both of these api
projects.
Sorry for not entering a jira issue on it earlier
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 2, 2006, at 12:55 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
All,
I'm
I'd love to see another milestone release - not that my vote is
binding but I'm +1 :-)
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
On Dec 30, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Before arriving at the incubator, ActiveMQ was cutting
Hi All,
I could not find the jira on apache for active cluster so I posted a
jira here;
https://jira.logicblaze.com/jira/browse/ACL-7
I was not sure if that instance's posts make it to anyone any more so
I'm posting here.
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi
Hi All,
We (the Wadi team) are currently moving our code base to use AMQ 4.0
but we want to make sure to coordinate this move as closely as
possible with the Geronimo team. Is there a time-table yet for the
move of Geonimo to AMQ 4.0.
Thanks!
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
exclude implementation=java.lang.String**/TestSupport.java/exclude
/excludes
/configuration
/plugin
/plugins
/build
/project
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
I'd also prefer the choice too be left to the user
+1
-bd-
On Dec 8, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
This is obviously a hot topic and I hope that as a Geronimo PMC and
user community we are not forced to have to show preference of one
over the other. There is obviously some
101 - 198 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
