[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903006#action_12903006
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5553:
jpa.jar didn't contain an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902990#action_12902990
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5553:
Pre-compilation or spe
)
Components: Aries
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
I stumbled upon a deadlock during server startup. Only seen it once. Was
running 'JAVA_OPTS=-verbosegc ./geronimo run --long', but doubt that makes a
significant differenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902820#action_12902820
]
Kevan Miller commented on YOKO-430:
---
Sub-project status does not prevent Yoko from b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901470#action_12901470
]
Kevan Miller commented on YOKO-430:
---
That page definitely needs to be fixed. Most
Strange. You deploy the same application/plans to 2.1.4 and they work, but they
fail on 2.2?
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:59 AM, eva wrote:
> I have configured openejb.xml, ejb.xml, geronimo-web.xml and web.xml too.
Did you check these xml files, also? Can you post them?
I recall a problem where so
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:17 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> This isn't enough information for me.
>
> What do you want to do with the information that, for instance, a karaf
> instance started but no geronimo bundles were started? You have no idea how
> to contact this karaf instance with this info
I'm hoping we'll have things lined up for 2.2.x release in mid-September.
branches/2.2 is currently 2.2.2-SNAPSHOT. As we were preparing for a minimal
2.2.1 release. Given where we are, I think we discard the thoughts of this
minimal update, and change branches/2.2 back to 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. This c
On Aug 20, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> 2) Should the source NOTICE file be kept as is or changed to match the
> generated NOTICE file? Keeping these the same is definitely a manual
> process, so there's a good chance there will be drift over time. I suspect
> there's also a good
On Aug 20, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> This version of the file appears to be generated automatically by the build
> (not sure what plugin does this). The descriptive name "Annotation 1.1" is
> taken directly from the project pom. Note that all of the Geronimo specs
> have thi
+1
Signatures/checksums, source, build, license/notice -- all look good.
One minor problem -- NOTICE file in the generated jar annotation file looks
like:
Annotation 1.1
Copyright 2003-2010 The Apache Software Foundation
...
This is different from the NOTICE file in the source. Not sure
Welcome!
For information about our mailing lists, see --
http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
To subscribe to the developer's mailing list, simply send an email to
dev-subscr...@geronimo.apache.org
--kevan
On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:35 AM, zhanglianjiedahao wrote:
> hi,
>I am very i
On Aug 17, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> For some reasons, we often need to know if there is a running server
> instance. By establishing a connection to a specific port such as 1099, we
> may get the status of server. However, the method doesn't work if default
> port number is changed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899626#action_12899626
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5534:
I take that back. I reverted revi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-5534.
Resolution: Fixed
Added support for AccessTimeout on StatefulContainer in OpenEJB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899398#action_12899398
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5534:
We should either stop configuring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899248#action_12899248
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5535:
Super. Thanks!
> jms-mdb
)
Affects Versions: 2.2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.2
The jms-mdb ear that's built in samples/branches/2.2 contains the following
files:
{code:title=jms-mdb-ear}
drwxr-xr-x 0 14-Aug-2010 06:44:08 META-INF/
-rw-r--r-- 124 14-Aug-201
issues)
Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.2
During server startup on current 2.2.2-SNAPSHOT builds, I'm seeing the
following warning:
2010-08-16 17:02:12,353 WARN [service] Property "AccessTimeout"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12898780#action_12898780
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5530:
Fixed(?) in revision 985785.
)
Components: transaction manager
Affects Versions: 2.1.7, 2.2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.7, 2.2.2
During deploy of the JMS sample, I'm seeing the following:
2010-08-14 18:38:08,310 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean
i
Thanks All. Sounds like we're in agreement. Will update our docs and begin
following the new procedure.
--kevan
On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> All,
> Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described
> here --
> https://cwiki.ap
+1
Source, signature/checksums, build, all look good. Note that the NOTICE file is
out-of-date:
=
== NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the Apach
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm not sure we have plausible versions for our tm components.
>
> trunk is at 3.1-SNAPSHOT has has (same as the released 3.0) improved recovery
> support which required an api change and also supports j2ca 1.6 which extends
> j2ca 1.5. I'm n
I don't have any answers. IIRC, this doesn't stop you from using eclipse. I
always build outside of my IDE, anyway...
There are newer versions of Eclipse. Current is Helios (3.6). Good chance that
at least some of your problems are fixed...
On Aug 11, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrot
All,
Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described
here --
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html#GeronimoProjectPolicies-AccesstoTCK
The policy describes a 72 hour waiting period when granting non-Geronimo
committers read-only access to
Hi Ivan,
You should be all set.
--kevan
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
> I found that some members of the same timezone with me are working on the
> Geronimo docs, and could anyone help to grant me the admin right for Geronimo
> confluence, so that I could trigger the async p
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public
> svn location.
>
> So I guess we should create a
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks
> over. There should be no problem with moving the fo
org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck/trunk or to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck/branches/3.0 to mimic
> the setup we have in geronimo-tck repo?
>
> If there are no major objections to this plan I'll start working on it
> tomorrow.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, Jul
On Apr 8, 2010, at 3:12 AM, xiam...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: xiaming
> Date: Thu Apr 8 07:12:38 2010
> New Revision: 931799
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931799&view=rev
> Log:
> DataCDInfo Sample: Fix openjpa log file absolute path issue in
> persistence.xml and remove redundan
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:26 PM, Delos wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> maven-plugin 1.1 is parent of maven-eclipsepde-plugin 1.1. We only have
> source code for maven-eclipsepde-plugin. You may find it under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-
Can you point to me to the source distribution for this release? I just found a
sources jar, which is not buildable. All of our releases should have a source
distribution and that's what we should be voting on.
--kevan
On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hope you're not su
On Aug 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Jia Mao wrote:
> Hi
>
> My user name is maojia508
> Could you please ask the admin of Geronimo doc to grant me *editor access to
> Geronimo doc*. Thank you!
You should be all set. Thanks!
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5189:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> Deployment message indicates that the deployment fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5454.
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks. Rick made the necessary updates, a
On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hello;
>
> FYI : I have sent ApacheNDA to secret...@a.o. 2 days ago to access Geronimo
> TCKs.
By the way, Gurkan, Note that the JCDI, Bean Validation, and a few more TCK
test harnesses were moved from our private TCK svn to public svn.
-
On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hello;
>
> FYI : I have sent ApacheNDA to secret...@a.o. 2 days ago to access Geronimo
> TCKs.
Great. Thanks Gurkan. FYI --
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html#GeronimoProjectPolicies-AccesstoTCK
Send a note t
On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:41 PM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
>
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Commands Testsuite :: Deployer
> [INFO]task-segment: [install]
> [INFO]
> -
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Delos wrote:
> Since tomcat 6.0.29 is under voting, shall we wait for 6.0.29 instead of
> 6.0.28?
Seems reasonable.
--kevan
On Jul 20, 2010, at 3:05 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
>> My main concern is that if we move the JCDI and Bean Validation
>> porting code to public svn location then we will effectively have two
>> mailing lists for discussing tck issues, two jir
On Jul 20, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Meant to send this to the list, not directly to Vamsi.
>
> On 7/20/2010 2:38 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>> I am getting an error with rat:check on Windows XP SP3, maven-2.2.1. Build
>> output given below.
> If you run rat:check after build
Looks good. Two comments:
1) some of the NOTICE files contain a mix of Unix and Windows line endings. I'm
assuming that this is because they were built on a Windows system. I don't see
anything that is wrong or would cause an error, but another reminder of
problems we're encountering with Windo
Please update the subject when posting the "results" of a vote. Makes it much
easier when scanning the mailing list... Thanks!
--kevan
On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Finally, I got three +1 from PMCs, thank you Rick, Donald, Ivan for reviewing
> this release.
>
> Next, I wi
A new version of Tomcat was recently released. Any volunteers to create a
corresponding externals release?
--kevan
Delos,
One favor, please? Could you use plain text rather than html in your mailing
list postings?
I did not build, since builds aren't working on Mac OS. I reviewed source,
generated binaries, and installed in Helios (but did not test extensively).
Source looked good. I didn't see any problems
Delos,
Same request about using plain text, rather than html in your mailing list
postings...
I did not build, since builds aren't working on Mac OS. I reviewed source,
generated binaries, and did not test.
Source looked good. I didn't see any problems.
Generated jar's have multiple license/no
On Jul 13, 2010, at 4:32 AM, viola lu wrote:
> Hi, Kevan:
>
> From openejb subversion
> log:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=962759, you already
> merge serveral fixes and some code from openejb trunk, all merge work is
> already finished ?coz now i built openejb 3.1.3 lat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12886893#action_12886893
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5444:
I totally agree, in general. How
: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0
If ActiveMQ is being started asynchronously (e.g. for a master-slave shared
file system configuration), JMS clients may be started prior to the
On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Delos wrote:
> As part of GEP, maven-eclipsepde-plugin helps to convert eclipse plugins to
> maven dependencies and add them into artifact dependency list. So without it,
> GEP can't be compiled successfully. The plugin is in version 1.0. But now,
> some new require
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5440:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1.6
(was: 2.1)
Ugh. Thanks Frederik
On Jun 2, 2010, at 5:44 AM, chi runhua wrote:
> G2.2 don't have the problem and I think we could just apply the changes we
> made to G2.2 for G2.1 doc space .
There are still parts of our Wiki documentation that still have the Tuscany
logo. See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC30/clustering-a
Mark result in subject -- fulfilling my obsessive compulsive tendencies...
--kevan
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The vote to release 2.1.6 passes with xx +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
> Voting +1 were
>
> Rick McGuire
> Jay D. McHugh
> Kevan Miller
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12885611#action_12885611
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5426:
Has an ActiveMQ Jira been created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12884658#action_12884658
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5424:
Ashish, I assume you'l
I just noticed that we have two groups defined for Geronimo which would seem to
have overlapping usage: geronimo-contributors and geronimo-users.
I suspect that 'geronimo-users' preceded 'geronimo-contributors'. I see that
'geronimo-users' is used for some of our spaces.
IMO, we should only be
On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Lu Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to give some description to the javaee 6 samples on Geronimo
> wiki page. Currently my confluence ID(jessy) do not have write access
> to the "Apache Geronimo" confluence project,could anyone help to add
> me in?
>
> Request write
All,
FYI. If you'd like to attend Apache Con, but are having trouble justifying the
expense -- please see below. This is a great program...
--kevan
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There is only ONE WEEK to go before we stop accepting applications for
> financial assistan
On Jun 30, 2010, at 2:32 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Back in April 2007 I ran into this problem:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-221
>
> and just ran into it again in the tck.
>
> There's a char field in a jpa data object and somehow openjpa is mapping the
> char 'a' to the st
(Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
Connector-deployer shouldn't require Yoko. Here's the connector-deployer module
section from config.xml for a minimal server:
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns
On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:55 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> ResouceRefBuilder has to be able to create resource refs to ORB's. Dunno why
> we put a reference in to the whole plugin, it just needs the
> org.omg.CORBA.ORB.class which can be loaded dynamically.
>
> have the code... guess I need a jira.
I was looking at the config.xml for a minimal assembly. Noticed that we have a
corba references in the connector-deployer:
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee,http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.2";
x
+1
Sig, checksums, legal files, source, build, testsuite -- all look good.
--kevan
On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This
> version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade
> to the
On Jun 20, 2010, at 11:58 PM, c_das007 wrote:
>
> Thanks Kevan. You are right.
>
> Ya I know this issue is something related to JavaBridge configuration.
>
> I am not getting much help from internet regarding on JavaBridge
> configuration.
I was afraid of that...
At the risk of sounding like
On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the
>> release were
>>
>> Rick McGuire
>> Jarek Gawor
>> Kevan Woods
>> Donald Wood
>> Joe Bohn
>>
>> Thank you for the time spent
On Jun 19, 2010, at 1:59 AM, c_das007 wrote:
> When I run the same application inside JavaBridge of Apache Geroinimo. I am
> getting the similar error. I think similar kind of way I have to follow here
> also. Here its not working. Its throwing some exception related
> "php-cgi-x86-windows.exe".
+1
Source, license/notice, signatures/checksums, build -- all look good.
Thanks Rick!
--kevan
On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geroni
On Jun 18, 2010, at 8:01 AM, c_das007 wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please let me know how to resolve "Curl error" for PHP Java Bridge in Apache
> Geronimo server.
>
> I am not getting any solution for it. Its very urgent.
>
> If you have any ideas, then please share with me.
Hi,
Can you descr
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> fixed the geronimo-plugins.xml accordingly. Thanks Kevan for catching this.
>
> I also update my 2.1.5 release tips(at the page bottom):
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.5+Release+Tips
>
> Will get the process me
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:18 PM, chi runhua wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Right, stay with SE 5. But document that there might be some potential
> issue(e.g. webservice problems caused by SE 6 bundled saaj and jaxb) when
> working with SE 6.
>
> So far,
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
>>
>
> Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification rules?
Yes, but I don't think it really matters. I don't think w
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:01 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Vote passes with the following voting +1:
> Kevan Miller, Donald Woods, Ivan
> and also got +1 from:
> Ashish, Amit, ASHOK, Jay D., Forrest and me.
>
> There were no 0 or -1 votes. Will perform the release and announce it.
On Jun 16, 2010, at 6:44 PM, superk888 wrote:
>
> I did ran into this page but still, how am I supposed to configure the
> reference to my directory (the one I would like to make accessible to
> external users).
>
> Is configuring the working directory in the geronimo-web.xml file supposed
> t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879333#action_12879333
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5369:
Hmm. I wouldn't drop 1.5 sup
On Jun 16, 2010, at 3:45 AM, weberjn wrote:
>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> Is there also a binary package to try out? I guess this would make more
> eyeballs test the new server.
They are staged here --
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori
+1
Source, signatures, checksums, license/notice -- all look good.
--kevan
On Jun 11, 2010, at 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a major problem with using the javamail code
> on EBCDIC-based platforms. The JIRA in question is
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Here's my +1. Build, source, signatures, checksums, license/notice files all
look good.
Some minor issues running the server:
ExceptionInInitializerError during shutdown of Jetty server
warnings during start of Tomcat Java EE server
Here's my +1
--kevan
On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuir
On Jun 10, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> +0.5
>
> M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
> be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> setting the ServerHostn
On Jun 9, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Now that I have the initial web profile assemblies created and hooked
> into our TCK harness, I'd like to circle back around on this.
>
> Personally, I like Option #1 - Upgrade and rename minimal assemblies to
> EBA based assemblies. This way, a
Looking good... Almost. :-(
The LICENSE files in the binary assemblies are missing the "ADDITIONAL SOURCE
LICENSES". I'm guessing that I didn't notice this, last time... IMO, that's a
must fix.
There are still a few WARN startup messages. That's minor.
I didn't see any other issues.
Here's m
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> Source, signatures, and build all look good to me. Spot checks of jar file
>> legal information looks good. Assemblies start. I didn't run any extensi
Source, signatures, and build all look good to me. Spot checks of jar file
legal information looks good. Assemblies start. I didn't run any extensive
tests, but didn't see any functional problems.
Major issues:
license/notice files in assemblies are different than the source license/notice
fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12875587#action_12875587
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5365:
Agreed that the problem is with
On Jun 4, 2010, at 2:18 AM, viola lu wrote:
> Hi,Guys:
> i enable ejb multipoint by editing
> var/config/config-substitutions.properties
> MultipointEnabled=true
> and initialize multipoint servers with syntax like below:
> MultipointServers=9.123.237.141,9.186.10.68
The following should work
On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Tannu Agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using geronimo Version 2.1.4. We are facing issue when we configure
> application specific log4j. We have two applications which get deployed on
> Geronimo. When we start the application separate log files gets created for
> bo
On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Ivan wrote:
> I checked the Tomcat's own NOTICE files, we do not distribute those
> components in the customized Tomcat release.
>
> Quoted from NOTICE file :
>
> The Windows Installer is built with the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System
> (NSIS), which is open sou
How were the LICENSE and NOTICE files built? They seem to be generic...
However, the original Tomcat license/notice files have multiple licenses and
notice information...
--kevan
On May 24, 2010, at 2:21 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.1
> a. Recently, Tomcat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12874020#action_12874020
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5357:
OK. These problems are caused b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12873976#action_12873976
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5357:
Thanks. Right. I didn't rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5357:
---
Attachment: amq54.patch
This builds. Server starts, but testsuite fails. Also seeing the
)
Components: ActiveMQ
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1
I'd like to be able to run ActiveMQ 5.4-SNAPSHOT can run in Geronimo 2.2.1. AMQ
5.4 contains some fixes that it would be nice to pick up.
Will use this Jira to track the associated ch
On May 31, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Tannu Agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using geronimo Version 2.1.4. We are facing issue when we configure
> application specific log4j. We have two applications which get deployed on
> Geronimo. When we start the application separate log files gets created for
> b
When I load our 2.1 or 2.2 Wiki information, I'm getting a Tuscany logo (e.g.
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation.html). Anybody else seeing
this? Anybody willing to fix?
--kevan
On May 28, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Kanchana Welagedara wrote:
> Hi Kevan
>
> I was trying to access thi link for my call for papers,Still the link didn't
> work.I could go upto http://blogs.apache.org/foundation/
> but further.
Hi Kanchana,
blogs.apache.org seems to be down. Here's the CFP:
On Apr
Anybody understand why these tests are failing? They run fine for me...
Here's the error from the log:
Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Commands Testsuite :: Deployer
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [genesis:va
On May 14, 2010, at 1:49 AM, genspr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: genspring
> Date: Fri May 14 05:49:37 2010
> New Revision: 944122
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=944122&view=rev
> Log:
> GERONIMO-5274 Deploy New/Install New Application portlet needs some love to
> help out newbies,
Geronimo Community,
Reminder of the Call For Participation for ApacheCon North America 2010:
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/call_for_participation_technical_talks
Submissions are due Friday, May 28 by midnight PDT.
--kevan
On May 19, 2010, at 8:15 AM, rickmcgu...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rickmcguire
> Date: Wed May 19 12:15:04 2010
> New Revision: 946147
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=946147&view=rev
> Log:
> update LICENSE/NOTICE files for latest dependency versions
>
> Modified:
>geronimo/serv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870592#action_12870592
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5337:
As long as it's configu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5338:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Affects Version/s: 3.0
3.0, as it's working on other ver
701 - 800 of 3111 matches
Mail list logo
