[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2650:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M2)
(was: 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2723:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0-M2)
2.0-beta1
The j2ee-builder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2723:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0-beta1)
2.0-M2
Fix
thoughts?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
What are the specifics around claiming certification? My
understanding is that to claim an assembly as certified that
specific configuration is tested and made available. Apart from
that we can ship any permutation but cannot claim those
of
activity on the list.
New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2
JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member.
Really neat stuff.
- Community
* New committers
None
* PMC additions
None
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
What are the specifics around claiming certification? My
understanding is that to claim an assembly as certified that
specific configuration is tested and made available. Apart from
that we can ship
as an alternative
dealing directly with the deployment plans.
-sachin
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
should be tested at least once. If we get
time,
we could do more :)
-- dims
On 1/8/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was thinking about M2 this weekend and was considering
many
with the
correct version.
* * *
Anyways, just a thought... meta-modules might help reduce some
dependency configuration by centralizing dependency groupings.
Any thoughts?
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 to remove it.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se
5 now...
Anyone know?
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
certainly simplify the user experience as
well as reduce the number of assemblies. Any CXF / Axis guys have
thoughts on this?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
possible permutation? Why
don't we bless a specific configuration and then concentrate the
TCK effort on that specific assembly?
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks nice Paul...just got back from a trip but I'll pay with it more
later :)
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
). There is lots to do, so whose working on what?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to handle this? Anyone interested in a specific configuration
and want to step up to TCK testing?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Here's my +1
-David
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nags are fine...I consider myself nagged.
On Jan 3, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
Hi Matt,
sorry to begin the year with a nag note but this patch is still
pending commit.
On 12/12/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we have most of the issues straightened out
Hi all,
We are scheduled to provide a board report by the 17th. Please be
thinking about the items that will can report on. I'll send out
another note later this week.
Oh, and Happy New Year :)
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tomorrow of the next day.
Happy New Year,
And here we go... :)
-dain
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok with the vote proceeding as is...+1
--kevan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is, and how to spin off builds with a few clicks.
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/version
--kevan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks good +1
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks good +1
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks good +1
Looks good +1
I meant things like DayTrader, XBean, DevTools, or broken out modules
like Tx mgr which we've been talking about for some time. I guess it
was a little ambiguous...basically everything except the big G
On Dec 22, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 12/22/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL
you
need to have the rev Otherwise you might pick up new changes
made and not actually get the same result artifacts when building.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:09:37
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote
smoothly :)
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
holiday :)
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 22, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I don't get it... why do we need an adopt a spec program? I'm not
really sure what it is... but it doesn't really sound good. :-\
--jason
It was a suggestion on how to parcel them out...kind of like adopt a
highway program :)
Matt
for Geronimo, and
would like to see any examples if they already exist.
Thanks much,
Tim McConnell
David Blevins wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 10:44 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
January
26th - Release Milestone 2
Add EJB 3.0 in its current form (need
that gets spit out of the
release.
We should deal with the module versions separately from the
assemblies. I'll hop back on this next week...I'm taking a few days
of R R.
Cheers
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
propose we release this branch as final.
Here's my +1
-David
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blevins
Hernan Cunico
Jacek Laskowski
Jason Dillon
Jeff Genender
Joe Bohn
Kevan Milller
Matt Hogstrom
Paul McMahan
Prasad Kashyap
Rick McGuire
Sachin Patel
Vamsavardhana Reddy
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
like to wait for David's response. I'm assuming
that this series of votes is to notify folks that a branch is ready
to begin a release cycle. I'm +1 for that. Just wanted to make sure
I knew what I was voting for :)
Let's wait for David to clarify.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
by the larger community.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
spin up the binaries after we vote? Since we vote on binaries
I expect this is notice that the process is starting. Can you
clarify please?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
It was something Roy said recently on Incubator general that
enlightened.
On Dec 7, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
FYI, traditionally, all release votes are for the source code
BOF.
Thanks for the quick response.
On Dec 21, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I put a proposal in for Java EE 5 development and community update
or something like that. If it goes through, anyone's welcome to speak
at it.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 12/21/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED
David
could follow it for these specs as a test case.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and allow more people to be involved.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
that code for that exact release can always be found
at a later time.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:10:46
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
On Dec 21, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Guillaume
recent developments relating to Java EE 5.0.
Please take a second to review it for accuracy.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+Java+EE
+5.0+Report+Card
Thanks
-Dave-
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
greeting is. One of our greatest strengths is our
diversity and ability to appreciate each others differences as the
glue that brings us together and makes us a strong whole. We're
wrapping up the old and pressing on to the new. Let the adventure
continue :)
Cheers
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL
You made my day :) But in the tradition of Festivus I didn't want
to ... u ... commercialize it. So in a way I paid it the air
time it is due :-0
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
For now I offer you a Merry Christmas, Happy Quanza, Happy
(unless all you PMC
members vote quicker :)
If a respin is is necessary this vote will be suspended and a new one
will start.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is one reason I lowered the log levels :)
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:21 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN to ERROR
(rev
488143)?
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All
All,
I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread
for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process
Thanks.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it was
added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it.
Anyway, it needs to be fixed.
All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to
STDOUT, but I
anita,
If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get
information in the log.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the
release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote
:197)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.access$500
(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:41)
at
...
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita,
If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server
Thanks for finding this Kevan.
I reposted the source, there are no modules.
Updated source is in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M1/
Thanks for finding this.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Dec 18, 2006
, these are a few of my favorite things. Actually, this is a lot
of process but to Jason's concern (which I agree with) we need to
lock this down.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical sense. We
could of course thump the rule book and make Matt redo 8+ hours of
work and have days worth of revoting followed up by a couple weeks
worth of cumulative man hours on policy discussions... or we could
just say close enough and focus on 2.0-M2.
-David
Matt Hogstrom
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/
javamail-1.0
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/1.2.0-beta
Here's my +1!
-dain
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
by: org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE: Can not create Util delegate:
org.apache.yoko.rmi.impl.UtilImpl: vmcid: 0x0 minor code: 0x0
completed: No
at javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.clinit(Util.java:47)
... 52 more
Regards
Krish
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2665?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2665.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closed at Rakesh's request.
CLONE -Invalid module path or references in plan should result in failed
deployment or warning
I'm updating and getting ready to cut the 2.0-M1 release. Caveat
Emptor.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
responding to this one as I've seen an increase in attack mode
and I'm not going back there.
Thanks
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
prolly Sunday sometime.
This is just a heads up on what's coming and thanks to the folks that
have been pulling everything together. Wow...two releases in one
month...we're definitely moving in the right direction.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/specs/tags
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/javamail-1.0
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/1.2.0-beta
Here's my +1!
-dain
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this. Thanks for the reminder.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 15, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
2) Performance data against other app servers ;-)
Sounds like a performance target isn't good enuf :(D
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a community that incorporates multiple disciplines
required to create complex runtime and toolable infrastructure.
===
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
*** New swill ***
Welcome to the Apache Geronimo Project!
Our goal
with the released tranql-1.4 and
nearly all of the org.apache.openejb.deployment.entity.cmp.cmr.*
test fail.
Going to see if I can't find a good revision...
-David
On Dec 13, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All TranQL artifacts have now been released. The final tally is:
TranQL
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Gianny...doing it now.
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:19 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 13/12/2006, at 9:13 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have released TranQL artifacts:
tranql-parent 1.0
tranql-connector 1.3
tranql-connector-derby-* 1.2
I still have to release TranQL 1.4. Gianny indicated he
All TranQL artifacts have now been released. The final tally is:
TranQL 1.4
TranQL-Connector 1.3
TranQL-Connector-ra 1.3
TranQL-Connector-Derby-* 1.2
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on what your plans are in this area?
-David
__
__
Have a burning question?
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who
know.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this week :)
-dain
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
add this file to branches/2.0-M1 and trunk too
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the cap on your tooth paste ?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this happen.
--kevan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at this horrible hour :)
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the configuration.
+ *
+ * @param configName Name of the configuration
+ * @return true if the configuration contains any custom gbean
attributes
+ */
+boolean hasGBeanAttributes(Artifact configName);
}
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Looks like we'll need to address this...anyone friends with folks
from Selenium?
On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Greg,
I updated the branches/2.0-M1 to use 6.1.0r0. I'm getting the
following error when running the tests
+/execution
+/executions
+/plugin
+/plugins
+/build
/profile
/profiles
/project
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
will continue to get larger and larger and all tests will
pay the penalty.
Could we include the selenium stuff only in modules that require it?
I'm picking on Selenium now so no offense as its the shiny penny. I
understand that being granular can be just as efficient as uber.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2661?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2661:
Fix Version/s: Wish List
(was: 2.0)
Rakesh...this would be awesome. The comments are specifically missing as the
content
). For geronimo, yoko is now our corba spec provider.
Rather than releasing these 3 specs which we aren't using, testing,
etc. I'd prefer to remove them. Anybody see a problem with this? If
not, I'll remove them shortly...
--kevan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
back but the patch still hasn't been gone in. Could you please go
ahead and commit it?
Regards
Piyush Agarwal
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the branch I'll be checking e-
mail beforehand too.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have released TranQL artifacts:
tranql-parent 1.0
tranql-connector 1.3
tranql-connector-derby-* 1.2
I still have to release TranQL 1.4. Gianny indicated he was going to
look at the prefetch code so I'll defer to him if we should release
that now or wait.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have updated all TranQL artifacts except the CMP generation code in
branches/1.2. This is just a heads up.
I'll update trunk tonight.
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with -gbean suffixes to be consistent.
Then we cut a release of it that both 1.2beta and 2.0m1 can use
Thoughts?
-David
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411?page=comments#action_12458006
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2411:
-
Does this apply to trunk as well ?
Add NOTICE and LICENSE files to CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2111?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2111:
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M1
(was: 1.2)
Change Default WebContainer behaviour to disable AccessLogging
products... period.
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
apply to Geronimo 2.0. My thiking is that people will continue
to work on trunk (2.0) while the M1 release is cleaned and made
ready. I'll do the packaging and people can happily continue to hack
away at trunk.
Any major items missing?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-releasing unchanged specifications.
I suppose there's a hybrid option where we release separate
versions, now, and move to a single version policy (2.0?) for our
next release.
--kevan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at this point
I simply don't care.
Before we continue this discussion, how about we first determine if
anyone cares?
If you care about how the specs use one version for all specs or
one version for each spec, please respond to this email.
-dain
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for each spec, please respond to this email.
-dain
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is branch...make a tar ball or
two to vote on, modify stuff, cut another one, etc. Doing this
straight out of trunk would work if everything was perfect but if
people didn't like the content we'd have to do it again. how would
that affect Maven?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
You do not need a branch for this. You can easily make a release
like this using `mvn release:*` off of trunk, and it will update
the poms, label and then update to the next version for development
to make sure.
Anyway, I'll take a look on Monday and try to sort out what
happened... Just curious, did you apply Daytrader-28?
Not yet...was verifying the other patches...I'll get to it once I get
all modes working.
Thanks...
Chris
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
501 - 600 of 2122 matches
Mail list logo
