Forwarded from Incubator.
-Original Message-
From: RATHANASALAM RADHIKA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:12
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: joining the big team is a privilage
hi
this is radhika i like to join the project of j2ee which i can
James Strachan wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1)
OK
we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a committer votes all count style
FWIW we've had a PPMC in place for some time ;)
As James notes, you've
Forwarded ... please follow up.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Senthil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 18:32
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: open-source Geronimo project from Apache.
Hi,
I am S.Senthil Kumar from India and have around
-Original Message-From: milan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006
0:42To: general@incubator.apache.orgSubject: Apache
Geronimo
My name is Milan Shrestha .Am am an
IT Engineeer . I have about one year experience working in java.
I have heard the project proposed
Joshua Slive wrote:
So you not only have your build process tied to apache infrastructure
in a non-scalable way
Is this the issue with Maven not handling redirects, or something else?
but you are essentially doing a DoS attack against the
infrastructure every time you build. Great.
Is
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Personally, I believe that ActiveMQ ought to be a TLP.
Just to be clear, though, that's just a personal opinion
Which part of Personally, I believe wasn't clear? ;-)
What makes a project with multiple codebases an umbrella
is a gray area.
I've posted *my* first
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Our goal when starting the incubation process of ActiveMQ, OpenEJB,
ServiceMix, WADI, and XBean, was to consolidate the Geronimo
community.
Consolidating the community is a good thing. I've long wanted to see a
number of those projects at the ASF.
The vision was to
James Strachan wrote:
What other issues are there?
A number of infrastucture issues. Votes from the Incubator PMC and Geronimo
PMC. To do that responsibly, I'd say that we would want to see communities
having demonstrated that they understand how to practice as an ASF
community. Such things
Henri Yandell wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The APR spin-off from HTTP Server was probably the first federation
(although it wasn't called that). HTTP Server depends upon APR and
they have a large committer and PMCer overlap (but not total), but
from the Foundation/Board's
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I only see infrastructure issues in your list of concerns
that would prevent the graduation of ActiveMQ.
Look again, but also at comments from Dims, Henri and others.
You express an opinion that it should be a TLP but mention that it has a
long way to go before it's
David Blevins wrote:
Lots of good stuff, thanks. :-)
If you ask me what my opinion on OpenEJB's future or James' opinion
on ActiveMQ's future, we'll both probably tell you TLP is a good
goal eventually.
We've more or less been running as TLPs in relation to Geronimo for
the past two plus
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
On the community side, we're still a bit shy of Mentors on ActiveMQ
(James is the only one, and we are looking for at least 3 per project)
That's not actually a formal requirement though, correct?
Not at this time. We're still
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
'So close to graduation'? Whence comes that? I think that
proximity is still very much up in the air, particularly
given Noel's opinion that [...]
Keep in mind that is *my* opinion. The Incubator PMC as a whole may or may
not agree.
For a guy who is seriously
That's not actually a formal requirement though, correct?
Not at this time. We're still discussing what the SHOULD and MUST
will be, as I mentioned in the fuller context of what you quoted.
Hmmm ... or perhaps I hadn't made it as clear as I thought I had. I just
went back and found that
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
When AMQ entered the incubator as a sponsored project from Geronimo,
the current understanding of incubator rules was that AMQ would
simply use the Geronimo pmc since the Geronimo pmc is expected to be
the home for the project. Since then the incubator rules have been
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
This is not a vote, but simply a discussion about the graduation of
ActiveMQ from the Incubator.
And should have been on general@incubator.apache.org, not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whether or not to cross-post to a myriad of other lists is a separate
question of netiquette. And
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I agree it is important to have as much as possible on apache
hardware. It was my understanding until I read this thread
here, that infrastructure was fine with leaving JIRAs for
imported projects hosted remotely until the JIRA had a better
import tool.
Please keep in
Alan,
Others are commenting on the infrastructure issues still on the plate for
ActiveMQ. And, yes, migrating out of JIRA is a PITA. Jeff is proposing
that we end up running lots of JIRA instances because we have to pull in
several sets of JIRA imports from atlassian, codehaus, and elsewhere.
Sanjiva,
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The Incubator
PMC will sponsor the project.
--- Noel
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification.
If every JBI implementation has an integrated orchestration engine, then we
should factor
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants to
participate, including other ASF projects.
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal
policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one.
--- Noel
FYI. Do not cross-post replies.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list for discussion of the JavaMail(tm) API
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 14:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JavaMail and JAF available as Open
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I would like to propose a moratorium on any changes to our
infrastructure or our maven architecture until we have
passed the TCK.
On the technical front, you can change how you are doing development, now
that you are using Subversion. You can create a branch for the
Locking down CVS now ...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Alex Karasulu is working on it. I suspect that it will be
completed soon. Alex?
Small matter of something called a hurricane has Alex off-line at the
moment.
--- Noel
26 matches
Mail list logo
