Hi All,Apache con asia will be held from Au 14-17 in Colombo, Sri Lanka and the call for papers is on.http://www.asia.apachecon.com/This will be a good oppurtunity to reach out to the growing asian user community as the close proximity will attract more people from india, china ..etc which has a
thanks Dain,-rajithOn 6/29/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link to the paper people are talking about out is here:http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/clustering.html-dainOn Jun 29, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Greg, Hopefully this is early enough for someone to look at.
.
From:
Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 2:28 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build failed
Hi Guys, The build failed with the following errors. Any ideas??Btw I was on revision 396023 when I did svn up.---Build Errors
Hi Guys, The build failed with the following errors. Any ideas??Btw I was on revision 396023 when I did svn up.---Build Errors-test:compile: [javac] Compiling 13 source files to /opt/workspace/geronimo/modules/security/target/test-classes
Nice idea !! , especially considering all the things we are putting inside Geronimo and the list keeps growing.
If there is a way to do a build withonly what you want in a less painful way then it's great !!!
Thanks,
Rajith
On 2/13/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would folks
Hi,
Can somebody please clarify as to the extent of Spring support we have within Geronimo.
I did read David Jencks comments on the JIRA issue,but couldn't grasp the overall context of the sping involvment within G.
SoI really appreciate a bit more background and more specific information on the
standalone, may thats whatu did, pls correct me if I am wrong)
Regards,
Rajith.
On 2/2/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Hi, Can somebody please clarify as to the extent of Spring support we
have within Geronimo. I did read David Jencks
Bruce,
I agree that my excuse for not writing unit tests is lame :)
With mock objects we should be able to cover a reasonable amount of code for atleast the trivial test cases. Ex. A MockPOP3Connection that returnsa predetermined response that we can compare in an assert statement.
But as u
.
On 1/27/06, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote: On 1/4/06, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341?page=all Thanks Bruce,
Looking forward for your comments !!! My apologies for taking so long ot get this committed - I've
I would think both my patch and Ricks patches would have no impact on each other as I have not touched anything beyond POP3.
However my code could benifit from Ricks work on some of the authentication mechanisms :)
But still, Rick if u tried out my stuff, I would love to hear from you.!!!
But my
I am in for helping Hernan and anybody else in organizing the wiki and providing content.
Regards,
Rajith.
On 1/21/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am certainly IN. I want to help getting confluence up and running in the ASF. I also would like tohelp in the overall web site reorg. I
[x] Confluence
From an end-user point of view I think it's more organized and easy to navigate.
From a contributers point of view I think there is already a good skeleton in place for anybody interested to fill in the gaps.
Regards,
Rajith
Wiki might be a better idea for now so most people can contribute.
However if it's under svn then non-comiiters can only contribute via patches.
Another possiblity is to have it under the confluence thing that Hernan is working on.
Also with wiki there want be issue about the format (wether
Hey Hernan,
If u can publish a few tips on basic formatting with confluence that will help.
Maybe an email or a doc itself within confluence will do.
Regards,
Rajith.
On 1/18/06, lichtner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So where is this document now? I am not very familiar with the web sitethere seems
of applying it to the SFSBs where, we hope for 100% affinity,
should be 0.Jules Jules Jules Gosnell wrote: Rajith Attapattu wrote: More question if you don't mind.
2.) Assuming sombody wants to do session replication (All Active) instead of (one Active and n backups) is there provision within
Hi,
Some of these questions came up after reading the thread on totem. However I started the new thread so that searching is easy and also want distract the intense discussions on totem with out-of-topic questions.
Jules Gosnel wrote
This is not something that is really considered a
Hi,
Can somebody familliar with AC provide me some answers to the following questions.
1. Why is the AC api tied to JMS?? I guess a simillar question was raised within the totem thread.
I was expecting a more abstract API independent of any platform and then the implementation to be some sort
Can u guys talk more about locking mechanisms pros and cons wrt in memory replication and storaged backed replication.
Also what if a node goes down while thelock is aquirred?? I assume there is a time out.
When it comes to partition (either network/power failure or vistual)or healing (same new
/06, lichtner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Can u guys talk more about locking mechanisms pros and cons wrt in memory
replication and storaged backed replication.I don't know what you have in mind here by 'storage-backed'. Also what if a node goes down while
+1 for Hernans idea on organizing the content.
How are we going to do that?? move the content from confluence over here or provide a link to confluence.
Besides are we going to maintain the same structure as we have now in the confluence site?
Regards,
Rajith.
On 1/17/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL
Thanks a lot for the info !!!
Regards,
Rajith
On 1/17/06, lichtner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By reading selected parts of this book you can get a background on variousissues that you have asked about:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/birman96building.htmlOn Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Rajith Attapattu wrote
This is a very educating thread, maybe Jules can incoporate some of the ideas into your document on clustering.
I do have a few questions on Guglielmo's points onsession replication. (Not an expert so pls bear with my questions)
1. The user should configure a minimum-degree-of-replication R. This
I see one short criticalcommingon Geronimo at the moment is we haven't defined what can and what we have todo in terms of clustering.
I am glad you started the thread on JMS clustering, so some of the questions will be addressed
There is no documentation out there what has been done or needs to
a lot for you/james/matt and all the people who have kept this discussion going. It was very helpful and u guys have answered so many concerns and questions regarding the topic.
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
On 1/6/06, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote: Jules, I think you
Attapattu.
On 1/5/06, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-From: Jules Gosnell [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:55 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
; dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo
???
If so then I can simply extend and do the POP3 stuff with it. But I am willing to help to since it's just not nice to sit back and let Rick do the dirty work.
So Rick if you can tell me when I can chip in then we can finish it quickly and then I can finish with the POP3 as well.
Regards,
Rajith
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341?page=all
Thanks Bruce,
Looking forward for your comments !!!Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
On 1/3/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 3, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote
Can somebody help me with the following questions and concerns?
Jules and Jeff had a few comments and my questions are based on that.
Thanks,
Rajith.
-Original Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 2:20 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Once the discussion is done can one of you guys put an update on the
list for the less fortunate souls like me who couldn't attend
ApacheCon??
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Jules Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:35 PM
To: dev
.
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Jules Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:51 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Geronimo] Clustering
Rajith,
I'll have a crack at these and then if Jeff wants to add anything
POP3 Implementation
---
Key: GERONIMO-1341
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Components: mail
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
Priority: Minor
I have completed
Complete POP3 implementation
Key: GERONIMO-1343
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1343
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: mail
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
Priority: Minor
How is the IMAP implementation going?? I guess Bilal is working on it.
I have some free time next week and I can help after cleaning up the
POP3 stuff.
Let me know.
Regards,
Rajith
without doing another read()(or else it will
block).
That way you know it's the end of response and proceed with the rest of
the logic.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Bilal Bhatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 11:47 AM
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341?page=comments#action_12360246
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on GERONIMO-1341:
All the above issues are still outstanding.
Item 1 is of high priority. Working on it currently.
Items 3,4,5
I feel this debate is like do you like Coke or Pepsi?
People will be more biased about the web container they use most of the
time (forget about merits/demerits of each app)
I think it's kind of useless to be arguing about this since both tomcat
and jetty is available. So ppl will always choose
+1
Jeff Genender wrote:
But at the end of the day...what
counts is we offer both and that is most important.
That's the most important thing.
Greg Wilkins wrote:
So long as all our efforts are acknowledge and no disrespect is shown,
we
should be able to do this without hurt feelings.
I am almost done with the POP3 support and currently testing it. Will
upload a patch soon.
Sorry for the delay.
Rajith.
-Original Message-
From: Bilal Bhatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:20 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Who wants to write
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ X ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
My vote may not count, but I like Tomcat :)
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Genender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08
/index.html
http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/JavaMail-1.3-changes.txt
It's quite a bit to read :)
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:36 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
continue with the clustering conversation.
Thanks,
Rajith
-Original Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:29 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Geronimo] Clustering
Jeff,
We maybe able to leverage
can fill me in that would be great.
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Bilal Bhatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:25 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports? [status
mixed up :)
I thought the configuration module for the underlying JavaMail
implementation was exposed as a portlet through the console.
But as Bruce mentioned I guess for now we are concentrating more on
getting the JavaMail implementation.
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message
mention that, the intention is to move the JavaMail
implementation to a sub project in the future. So maybe it's a good idea
to make it Geronimo independent.
Anyways a separation of concerns is always a plus point.
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto
figure out if I am looking in the wrong place?
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:52 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports? [status]
Rajith
minutes 6 seconds
Server shutdown begun
Server shutdown completed
Thanks,
Rajith Attapattu.
cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied
dependency:
geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:28 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error when doing maven
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 8:25 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?
On 12/3/05, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess we can later move it to it's own sub-project so other Apache
users can use it as a standalone library
James crossed my mind to, but it's a server implementation for POP3,
IMAP ect.
James is actually a mail server, but what we need is mail client. I
really wish James had a client project as sub project or something.
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and then summarize (reading the whole
thing will kill you :) ) it, then I can code the Message thingy.
Any volunteers ???
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:10 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE
I am willing to help. But I may not have the time to do the research and
go through all the specs in detail (Unfortunately I can only do stuff at
home at night and during weekends)
So if Bruce can help me with some pointers and simple documentation I
can start looking in to POP3. (sorry not very
Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:31 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?
I am willing to help. But I may not have the time to do the research and
go through all the specs in detail
I will wait for the breakdown from Bruce and let you guys know on what
areas I can help.
Looking forward to see the list from Bruce.
Rajith.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:52 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject:
, 2005 7:11 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?
On 12/3/05, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we really need to write it ourselves??
The following link includes a few open source implementations of email
clients. If we can reuse them
I guess we can later move it to it's own sub-project so other Apache
users can use it as a standalone library. Just so that they don't go
through the same trouble we are experiencing.
-Original Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 7
integration with WADI...and we look
forward to getting that.
We are interested in the HA JNDI...so lets definitely get some
discussion going on that.
Jeff
With Kind Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
From: Panda, Akshaya Kumar (Cognizant)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Found an article from OpenEJB
http://cvs.codehaus.org/viewrep/~raw,r=1.1/wadi/wadi/modules/openejb/ROA
DMAP.txt
but any comments thoughts are most welcome
Rajith
-Original Message-
From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:40 AM
To: dev
without a major impact on the code base.
What are your thoughts on this??? Everybody please help with ideas :)
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Genender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:13 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re
the integration or any other intermediate tasks that needs to
be done before WADI can be integrated.
I guess we will have some discussion on what areas we will work on when the
plan is announced??
Jeff can you pls comment on this?
With Kind Regards,
Rajith Attapattu
, I don't know much about it but there's been a fair bit
of mail about it on the dev list in the last week or two and it looks
pretty promising.
Aaron
On 11/24/05, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am very interested in the Clustering and remote deployment and
management
. We are cleaning up a few items and will
integrate it in shortly. If you are interested in helping out on this,
have a look at wadi.codehaus.org for now. Shortly we hope to have this
over here ;-)
Jeff
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am very interested in the Clustering and remote
61 matches
Mail list logo
