Re: [batchee] future?

gt;>> >>>>>> Am 18.11.2022 um 09:50 schrieb Francois Papon < >>>>>> francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have insights about how BatchEE is used today and how the >>>>>> jbatch specification is support by others. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for freeze. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> François >>>>>> On 18/11/2022 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We discussed some time ago to drop batchee as an active subproject, >>>>>> wonder where we are now on this? >>>>>> Do we freeze it and document we don't maintain it anymore? >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Louis >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Louis >>> >> -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow, Java Champion

Re: Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

t;https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/appli

Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

The "Geronimo" project is getting long in the tooth and has very few maintainers. It's been teetering on the edge of what could be considered active ever since I've been involved (I believe more than 5 years now.) The project has seen many parts of its portfolio go unmaintained or deprecated.

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

hes against SVN repos. It would be great if >> > > > we could have them in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible. >> > > > >> > > > Thoughts? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -David >> > > > >> >

Re: Apache Geronimo Mail (provider) 2.1 - 1.0.0

MO-6839 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6839>] >- Upgrade to Activation Spec 2.0 - 1.0.0-M1 > > > [ ] +1 approve this release > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > Here is my +1 Binding vote. > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

> > TCK. >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Gruß >>>>>> > > > > Richard >>>>>> > > > > Von: Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2022 11:53:37 >>>>>> > > > > An: dev@geronimo

Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE

+1 On Mon., Jun. 6, 2022, 06:43 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi, > > Think it makes sense since most of contributors of the original projects > abandonned Microprofile due to the policy they apply to the project AFAIK > and there is not much interest there anymore AFAIK. > > Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1

+1 (binding) On Sun., May 15, 2022, 5:58 a.m. Jean-Louis MONTEIRO, wrote: > +1 > > Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I > can tell > > Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > >> Hi >> >> If we are confident to match javax/jakarta

Re: [VOTE] Release Mail 2.0.0-M1

+1 (binding) On Sun., May 15, 2022, 5:57 a.m. Jean-Louis MONTEIRO, wrote: > +1 > > But I agree with Romain, don't think there is remaining work on this one > for now. So wondering why we need a milestone. > We ran the unit tests and we ran all the platform TCK for Mail and > everything is

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.21 release

o approve this release: >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Regards >> JB >> > -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow, Java Champion

Re: Batchee coming release 1.0.1

gt; 1. drop of cxf 2 client support (think it is way overdue) > > 2. adding basic spring-boot batchee UI integration > > > > I'd like to release it, any objection? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/tree/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.1 > > > > My key can be found at > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS > > > > please VOTE > > [+1] all fine, ship it > > [+0] don't care > > [-1] stop, because ${reason} > > > > The VOTE is open for 72h. > > > > > -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow, Java Champion

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

+1 Ray On Fri., Oct. 8, 2021, 11:17 a.m. Cesar Hernandez, wrote: > +1, thank you! > > El vie, 8 oct 2021 a las 7:32, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO () > escribió: > >> +1 >> >> And yes I'll do provider and mail at the same time after. Wanted to get >> the spec first and separately. >> >> Le ven. 8 oct.

Re: [VOTE] - Move Svn to Gitbox

+1 Ray On Sat., May 15, 2021, 2:25 a.m. , wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start a vote about moving some projects from svn to gitbox: > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ > > -

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

; > > > >> > > > >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects: > > > >> > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to > > > move. > > > >> > > > >> regards, > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> François > > > >> fpa...@apache.org > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > D-74081 Heilbronn > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar) > mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ > -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BatchEE 1.0.0

ontent/repositories/orgapachebatchee-1007/ >> >> The source zip can be found here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebatchee-1007/org/apache/batchee/batchee/1.0.0/ >> sha1 is da2990a42caaa639a50df03de3eaec4f6548a8bc >> >> Please VOTE >> >> [+1] ship it! >> [+0] don't care >> [-1] stop, there's a ${showstopper} >> >> The VOTE is open for 72h >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

+1 Ray On Tue., Apr. 13, 2021, 3:47 a.m. Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > +1, thks a lot JB > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github >

Re: [arthur] Launching openjpa/derby support?

c for a moment so if anyone wants to >> continue the experimentations just jump in. >> >> The small side notes I can gives are: >> >> 1. we can do a dbcp2-knight and a commons-logging-knight (for now they >> are in openjpa one - it is commented as such), these ones should be easy >> since already coded, just not packaged properly >> 2. the immediate fix for deby will likely sit either >> in org.apache.geronimo.arthur.knight.derby.DerbyExtension or a substitution >> in the same module >> 3. if easier we can use another database (h2 does not work and will >> likely not work in embedded mode so hsqldb can be saner - at least I don't >> know for this one) >> >> If you are motivated to proove openjpa runs in native mode and finish >> this branch, don't hesitate to answer this thread, I'd also be happy to >> discuss more on slack or by mail details if it helps. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> > -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow