FYI here's my +1 w.r.t. the move. Best of luck
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > If it helps: the package is not a big deal for javax -> jakarta concerned > bundles but can be for the one already migrated. A note is that the OSGi > compliance should probable be kept inside tomee project since several > consumers are OSGi ones but nothing crazy or not already done @tomee AFAIK. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le jeu. 7 juil. 2022 à 10:19, Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> to summarize the current discussion: >> >> From the discussion, it looks like, that there are no real objections / >> blockers for a move? >> >> However, a move of the packages / project might confuse users and >> automated tools (like dependency update check tooling). We would need >> to communicate / announce it accordingly, but haven't discussed this >> aspect much atm? >> >> It seems, that an open task is to complete the move from svn to git for >> the repositories where it isn't already done. Guess, this should happen >> first... >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> >> Am Dienstag, dem 14.06.2022 um 22:09 -0700 schrieb David Jencks: >> > I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure >> > which already are. >> > >> > I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) >> > Aries. On the other hand they might have copied the implementation. >> > It might be confusing if the governing project and/or package names >> > change. I don’t know if there are other uses, or how to find out. >> > >> > It might possibly be simpler, after we get each subproject into >> > appropriate git repos, to make people who want to work on these >> > implementations geronimo committers. >> > >> > David Jencks >> > >> > > On Jun 14, 2022, at 9:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so >> > > don't start back from svn ;)) >> > > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >> > > >> > > >> > > Le mar. 14 juin 2022 à 18:29, David Blevins < >> > > david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> > > > Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing >> > > > moving this code over to TomEE? >> > > > >> > > > - >> > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ >> > > > - >> > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/ >> > > > - >> > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec/ >> > > > - >> > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/ >> > > > >> > > > These are on the critical path for TomEE, being updated in >> > > > Jakarta EE 10. We're not working on Jakarta EE 10 yet, but we'll >> > > > hopefully be doing that by early next year. >> > > > >> > > > It's a bit painful to send people over from the TomEE project to >> > > > here and submit patches against SVN repos. It would be great if >> > > > we could have them in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible. >> > > > >> > > > Thoughts? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -David >> > > > >> > > > > On Jun 6, 2022, at 1:59 AM, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > >> > > > > I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of >> > > > the Apache Geronimo Microprofile implementation: >> > > > > >> > > > > https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ >> > > > > >> > > > > As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the >> > > > maintenance of the implementation to be up-to-date with the >> > > > Microprofile specification. >> > > > > >> > > > > The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the >> > > > active EE server seems to be Apache TomEE. >> > > > > >> > > > > May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile >> > > > implementation to the Apache TomEE umbrella. >> > > > > >> > > > > WDYT? >> > > > > >> > > > > regards, >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > -- >> > > > > François >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) OSGi Fellow, Java Champion
